BCN Ranking collects real sales data from approximately 40% of Japanese retailers - this is not a worldwide market share or sales report. Previous BCN reports from Japan can be found here.
Photography can feel like an isolating activity, so it's exciting when opportunities come around to feel like part of a bigger community. Such is the case with The Last Camera Project (TLCP), a community art project. TLCP was conceived by Lucas Buick and Ryan Dorshorst, the founders of the original retro camera app, Hipstamatic. The project invites people to create a single image, culminating in a show at Art Basil Miami and a book.
TLCP puts a digital spin on the concept of sending around a single disposable film camera, with each person taking one frame. "The idea is simple," says Buick. "If I handed you a disposable camera and said, 'Take One Photo. Then Pass it along to someone else,' what would happen?" Of course, sending a physical camera around wouldn't work very well for many reasons. So Buick and Dorshorst created a camera app that allows participation anywhere in the world.
Screenshots: The Last Camera Project
The app has some guardrails that help recreate the disposable film camera experience. It's styled to look like a disposable camera (minus the simulated display, of course). Like a film camera, participants can't review or edit their photo before submitting it. You get one chance to "Take one photo that represents you, your moment, your story." Your photo will save metadata, including location, timestamp, frame number and personal details that you add.
When you download the app, you can enter an invite code or join the waitlist.
Screenshot: Dale Baskin
The project is invite-only, but you can download the app (if you have an iPhone, as it's iOS only) and join the waitlist if you don't have an invite. Once you take your photo, you can invite up to six people to join the project.
Buick says there are currently 4K people on the waitlist, 10K people inside the project and 1200 photos contributed so far from over 50 different countries. The app displays a timeline with the people whose numbers have been activated and whether they've taken a photo, so you can keep tabs on the progress.
All of the images taken will remain a secret until the big reveal at Art Basel Miami in December 2025. The photographs will also be compiled in a book of the project.
You can download the app and sign up for the waitlist via the App Store, or check out more details about the project at the TLCP website and on Instagram.
It's Friday, so it's time to round up recent firmware updates. This week brings an update from Nikon for the Z8, small improvements for some Panasonic cameras and a healthy list of changes from Canon. In fact, nearly every camera in its lineup has at least a small update, including the R5, R6 II, R8, R3 and R50. The upgrades range from minor (improved network security) to more significant (exposure simulation for flash shooting).
Below, you'll find some of the standout features included in the updates for each camera. There are additional smaller fixes for all, so for full details, be sure to head to the relevant page for each firmware version. Without further ado, let's get into it.
Nikon
Image: Nikon
Nikon Z8 Firmware Ver 3.01
Nikon's Ver 3.00 update for the Z8 was a dramatic one, unlocking a long list of new features. But it also caused two distinct issues for third-party lens users, rendering some lenses inoperable or limited in functionality. This update addresses at least part of that, though details are scant. The changelog simply states, "Fixed an issue that prevented the camera from operating properly with some lenses."
Nikon still has a warning at the top of the firmware download page that cautions against updating firmware with third-party lenses or mount adapters. Thus, it may not fix issues related to upgrading firmware on the Z8 with anything other than Nikon lenses. If you're updating to Ver 3.01, remove those third-party lenses to be safe.
Canon released firmware for a long list of cameras, but it has since pulled back updates for the EOS R1 and R5 II. However, there are still plenty of other upgrades for other devices in the company's lineup.
Canon EOS R5 Ver 2.2.0
While the R5 II may not have an update ready yet, the R5 does. It's now compatible with CFexpress cards up to 8TB, which is ideal for videographers who need lots of space. It introduces an auto-protect feature when you rate images, a useful tool for those who cull in camera. The update also allows users to check for and download firmware updates when the camera is connected to the internet. That should make keeping cameras up-to-date much easier and faster (no more excuses).
The R6 II Ver 1.6.0 update shares some of the items introduced on the R5, including internet-based firmware downloads, auto-protection for rated images and improved security features. It also promises improved AF tracking performance while zooming in still photo shooting with thee RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z , RF70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z and RF100-300mm F2.8 L IS USM. Additionally, Ver 1.6.0 allows users to enable exposure simulates when using flash, so that they can get an accurate preview of lighting.
Additionally, Canon has expanded its Cropping Guide firmware to the R6 II. However, if you want this feature, you'll need to send your camera to a Canon Service Center and it isn't a free standard firmware update. You can also buy the camera with it preloaded now.
The Canon EOS R8 Ver 1.5.0 added improved security features and internet-based firmware updates. Plus, the R8 will now allow for exposure simulation while using flash, like the R6 II.
Outside of the standard update, he R8 also now has access to the Cropping Guide feature. Again, you'll either need to pay to send in your camera so that it can be added, or buy a new model with it preloaded.
Canon EOS R3 Ver 1.9.0 adds improved security features, internet-based firmware updates and auto-protection for rated images. It also makes the R3 compatible with up to 8TB cards and enables exposure simulation with flash. Canon improved AF tracking with the same three lenses as the R6 II.
The one unique update for the R3 is related to transferring images with voice memos via FTP, something sports photographers and journalists may want to be aware of. Now, the voice memo will be sent first, followed by the image.
Ver 1.4.0 for the EOS R50 is a more subtle update that mostly fixes small issues. However, it does add VR lens support, including the RF-S3.9mm F3.5 STM Dual Fisheye and RF-S7.8mm F4 STM Dual lens. It also fains the convenience of internet firmware updates.
Finally, Panasonic has released small updates for a number of its cameras. The S9, S5II, S5IIX, G100D, G97 and ZS99 (known as the TZ99 in Europe). Panasonic promises improved operational stability for all models and enhanced security for all except the G97.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
What you need to know
Product photos: Sony
As you may have seen, Sony has just refreshed its full-frame compact, the RX1R, with the mark III coming almost a decade after the last. The new version is packed with Sony's latest technologies but also hews so closely to the original concept that a lot risks looking dated, too.
We've already looked at how the RX1R III stacks up against the cheaper, stabilized a7CR, but that doesn't tell the whole story. Sometimes compactness and the focusedness of purpose of a fixed-lens camera is enough to justify a premium over an interchangeable lens camera. But a list price of €4900, £4200 and, in particular, $5100, is quite a premium.
We take a closer look at what the RX1R III is, what it offers and where it sits relative to its predecessors and rivals.
At its core, the RX1R III is exactly the update you'd expect, if you were familiar with Sony's latest internals. It's built around the excellent 60.2MP sensor that, coincidentally, also underpins the more expensive Leica Q3 and Q3 43 models.
It uses the same 35mm F2 Zeiss-branded lens as all the other RX1 models, with the same stepper-motor-driven focus system.
Like Mark II it has a built-in electronic viewfinder but now fixed into the corner of the body, rather than a pop-up design. The need to keep the camera small has limited Sony to a 2.36M dot (1024 x 768px) EVF panel, which is a jarring spec on a camera this expensive.
Like previous RX1 cameras (and the first five iterations of Fujifilm's X100 series), there's no stabilization system. The body has been redesigned, with a sleeker front panel and dials recessed into the top plate, but the fundamentals of the camera are broadly unchanged.
Updated autofocus
Sony's AF system has been massively improved in the decade since the RX1R II's launch, in terms of both performance and operability, and we've become used to reliable subject recognition and very tenacious tracking. Like Sony's other high-end models, the RX1R III includes a dedicated processor for crunching the added complexity of these machine-learning-derived algorithms.
However, the RX1's focus group isn't the fastest mover, which risks blunting the camera's top-end performance. We'll update this article in the coming days, once we have got a sense for how much of its potential it's able to deliver.
It's something of a shock to realize the RX1R II's clunky "Center Lock-on AF" system was as recent as ten years ago, given the huge advances we've seen since.
Price and positioning
The original RX1 Photo: DPReview
The price tag on the RX1R III is somewhat eye-watering, if you compare it to anything other than Leica's Q3 twins, but this series has always been a halo product.
The original RX1 felt like Sony was making the statement "we understand photography" as much as putting out a product that was expected to shift units or make a profit. Even back at a much lower price point, we pondered whether it was trying to be a modern Leica (this is before the Q series showed us how much a real Leica full-frame compact would cost).
The first RX1 pre-dated the company's full-frame ILCs, and cost appreciably more than the higher resolution a7R when it was launched a year later. The RX1R II was priced much closer to the cost of the contemporary a7R II model, but they've always been priced at a premium.
That said, if you compare the RX1's UK launch prices to those of the Fujifilm X100 version available at the time, you'll see the first two RX1 models were 2.3x more expensive than the contemporary X100s, and the RX1R II and III are around 2.6x more expensive. Which, given you get a sensor around 2.4x larger, suggests they're not out-of-keeping with the rest of the market.
Price: US and beyond
The price in the US, though, is punchy, for reasons you may have heard about, in the news. Looking at the launch prices of previous Sony models over the past ten years, we found the UK launch price (incl. VAT) is around 20% higher than the US launch price, if you use the then prevailing exchange rate. This is, in part, because prices soften more readily in the UK market: the apparent premium is essentially an early-adopter tax that fades away after a few months.
However, that same calculation would lead you to expect a US launch price of around $4700, if you simply subtract 20% from the UK price and use the current exchange rate. This, and the 3.2x premium over the X100VI (vs 2.6x for the RX1R II over the X100T), helps explain why the US price in particular looks so high.
Higher-res sensor
Sony has made some critical changes, compared with previous models. The biggest of these is the move from a 42MP sensor to a 60.2MP one. It may be a chip that we've seen before, but it remains one of the best sensors, in terms of image quality, that we've ever encountered.
The first RX1R model was a variant of the RX1 with no low-pass (anti-aliasing) filter. The RX1R II had an innovative design that placed an LCD panel in the middle of the low-pass filter. AA filters work by refracting light differently, depending on its orientation. Engaging the LCD layer would polarize the light and determine whether the second layer of filter doubled or cancelled the effect of the first layer.
The RX1R III has no such cleverness, so you lose the ability to engage an AA filtering effect as you could on the Mark II. However, the higher resolution of the RX1R III's sensor means aliasing will only occur with higher frequency patterns, at frequencies even more likely to be inhibited by the lens, anyway.
Larger battery
The new camera also gains a larger battery, the 7.3Wh NP-FW50 battery, compared to its predecessor. This helps address one of the most sustained criticisms of the series, which was known for offering relatively short shooting durations from its compact 4.5Wh NP-BX1 battery.
The new battery is around twice the depth of the one used in previous models (18.5mm, rather than 9.2mm). Despite this, the new camera isn't appreciably deeper than the existing one, with the body itself measuring just 2.5mm more than its predecessor.
The new camera also has a USB-C socket and is compatible with the USB Power Delivery protocol, allowing it to both charge or be powered over the USB socket if you have a sufficiently powerful external charger or battery pack.
Vs Leica Q3
The most obvious direct competitor to the Sony RX1R III are Leica's Q3 cameras, the original Q3 with its 28mm F1.7 lens and the Q3 43 with its 43mm F2 lens. They let you choose whether you want a wider-angle lens or a normal perspective, rather than the RX1R III's 35mm that splits the difference. They also offer stabilization, which the Sony lacks.
Both cameras are based around the same sensor as the Sony but both have larger format 5.98M dot OLED viewfinders (with greater, 0.79x magnification) and tilting rear screens, where the RX1R III's is fixed. They're also both appreciably larger cameras than the Sony, as the diagram above shows. They are also substantially heavier, with the Q3 tipping the scales at 743g, with a battery and memory card: 49% heavier than the RX1R III.
In addition, they're also both more expensive cameras. If you want to see what premium pricing in this type of camera looks like, then feast your eyes and lock up your wallet when you see the $6735 and $7380 price tags dangling from the Leicas.
A rather more pragmatic alternative might be the a7CR and a suitable prime lens. That's a comparison we looked at in more depth, the other day.
EVF and screen
Two of the greatest points of contention, beyond its pricing, are the specifications of its viewfinder and its rear screen. Both have been dictated by Sony's focus on keeping the size of the camera down.
With the body already a fraction deeper, as a result of the adoption of a larger battery, the company has clearly decided that the additional bulk of an articulated screen would compromise its compactness. There have been several successful fixed-lens cameras with fixed screens (not least the first four X100 cameras), but there are times, particularly for waist-level shooting, when a tilting screen comes in handy. If that's the way you prefer to shoot, you'll need to opt for a larger camera.
Leaf shutter and hotshoe
The other factor worth remembering is that, like most fixed lens cameras, the RX1R III features an in-lens 'leaf' shutter. This gives essentially a global shutter effect, allowing flash sync across the whole shutter speed range, but with the disadvantage that its maximum shutter speed drops as you approach the camera's widest aperture setting. A 1/4000 sec maximum at F5.6 drops to 1/3200 sec by F4 and 1/2000 at F2. There's an e-shutter mode that allows shooting at up to 1/8000 at any aperture, but the 100ms (1/10 sec) readout rate means it's better for static subjects.
The camera has a hotshoe, useful both for mounting a flash but also featuring the multi-interface pins that let you connect mics and channel digital audio into the camera. Like the a7CR, the small body of the RX1R III sees video limited to 4K/30 (the sensor can deliver 8K resolution, though with a lot of rolling shutter). It has all the latest Sony video goodies including uploadable LUTs, S-Cinetone and 10-bit Log capture. The RX1R II, by comparison, topped-out at 8-bit 1080.
Summary
The Sony DSC-RX1R III is the update we weren't sure we'd ever see, and it's a pleasant surprise in many respects. The fixed-position viewfinder is more readily accessible than the pop-up unit in the Mark II, the 60.2MP BSI CMOS sensor has proven itself to be excellent and the new model addresses one of our biggest criticisms of the previous models: battery life. The adoption of a host of Sony's latest features and functions is promising, too.
However, the move to a fixed screen feels like a retrograde step and we're disappointed they couldn't find room for an AF joystick, given the complete redesign of the body.
The RX1 series has always been a halo product that commanded a premium for reasons of prestige as well as miniaturization, but its current pricing, particularly in the US, is brought into stark relief by the existence of the still-quite-small a7CR, elsewhere in Sony's own lineup.
If you like a fixed-lens camera and the compactness is a major benefit to you, then it's hard to think of a camera that promises so much image quality from such a small package. But there's a price, both metaphorical and financial, to be paid for that totability.
Harmon has released a truly new film stock in an era when many other companies are repackaging existing formulations. The latest offering from the company, which is best known for its black-and-white film products, builds on its Phoenix 200 color film.
Harman released Phoenix 200 in December 2023. It was Harman's first color film made entirely from scratch at its Mobberley, UK site. The film was considered an experimental stock with colors noticeably different from most color negative films. Phoenix 200 II is a brand-new formulation, and while it shares a name with the original, the sample images coming out look like a completely new stock.
Sample gallery
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.
Image samples provided by Harman.
Harman says that Phoenix 200 II is improved over the original Phoenix 200 in almost every way. "Each layer and component has been redesigned and reengineered: new dyes, couplers and layer construction," Harman said. "The result is noticeably finer grain, better color reproduction, controlled contrast, increased sharpness and a wider dynamic range."
Because of all the improvements, Harman says the film will be easier to shoot, saying that it's "less bold and unpredictable than the original." The original was known to be quite challenging to work with, in part because of its limited dynamic range and high contrast, so this is a welcome change. Harman also says it will be easier to scan, which will be beneficial for home developers and large labs alike.
Harman Phoenix II is available in 35mm (36 exposures) and 120 formats for $14 and $12, respectively.
That's not the only film Harman has announced this summer, either. In June, the company also released a 120 format version of its Red 125 film. It initially unveiled the redscale color negative film in February for 35mm, so while not a new film stock, it was a new format for those who like the red and orange tones of Harman's Red 125.
The registration for the 2026 CP+ Camera and Photo Imaging Show is now open, and the show's dates have been officially announced: February 26 - March 1, 2026. Previous coverage of the CP+ show can be found here:
Canon has introduced the Speedlite EL-1 V2, though the changes are extremely subtle. The latest flash shares nearly all specs with the original EL-1, with only two minor differences in flash power and battery life.
The EL-1 V2 offers a slightly lower guide number than the EL-1. The original model's guide number is 14.1m (46.3') at ISO 100 for the 14mm position, while the EL-1 V2 is 14m (45.9') with the same settings. At the 200mm position, the EL-1 offers a guide number of 60m (196.9') at ISO 100, while the EL-1 V2 is 2m (6.6") less.
The new model also offers a small increase in battery life. Canon promises 340 full-power flashes per charge with the EL-1 V2, 5 more than the original EL-1. Given that there's slightly less power, that slight bump in battery life makes sense.
Other than those two things, the EL-1 and EL-1 V2 are identical and looks, size and other specs. Both are designed for professional users and offer 24-200mm coverage, a 0.9 second recycle time, an active cooling system, three flash modes and the same wireless radio control technology. Like the original, the EL-1 V2 is also weather-sealed, making it possible to use the flash in poor weather conditions.
Images: Canon
Hopefully, availability will be the most significant change here, though. Canon's EL-1 has had stock issues for a long time. PetaPixel reported last year that some users had been waiting a year for the flash. Even since then, it's consistently been out of stock at B&H and Canon's website, as is the case at the time of writing. Perhaps Canon addressed some of its production process that will enable it to keep the new model in stock.
The EL-1 V2 also comes with a steeper price tag for US customers. It costs $1349, whereas the EL-1 launched at $1099 in 2021 and currently sells for $1199. That's up 12.5% from the current price of the EL-1, which is roughly in line with Canon's pricing increases related to the US tariffs. It does appear that the cost of the EL-1 V2 outside of the US may be consistent with the current price of the EL-1, coming in at £1229.
You can preorder the Canon Speedlite EL-1 V2 as of today through B&H and Canon. Canon has an estimated arrival date of September 25, though, so you'll still have to wait a bit to get your unit.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Introduction
The RX1R III is Sony's latest full-frame, prime lens compact. It's a 61MP update of a series that dates back to the original RX1 in 2012 and that hasn't seen a refresh since 2015's RX1R II.
But a lot has changed in that time. The original RX1 arrived a year before Sony introduced its first full-frame photo-focused mirrorless camera, the a7. Since then we've seen four generations of a7, five of the high resolution a7R series and, more recently the introduction of the more compact a7C models. It's these, and the high-resolution a7CR in particular, that draw the RX1R III's specs into sharp relief.
Especially given the a7CR was launched for $3200/€3700/£3200, whereas the RX1R III has a list price of $5100/€4900/£4200.
Does the cheaper, more flexible camera obviate the need for an updated RX1, or is there more to the story? We dig a little deeper.
It's entirely fair that people would look at the RX1R III and wonder whether Sony's budget high-res a7CR model can't do more, for (a lot) less, mainly because of the high degree of commonality between the two cameras' spec sheets.
Both cameras have the same 61MP full-frame BSI sensor at their heart, and combine this with Sony's latest Bionz XR processors and "AI processing unit," meaning the two cameras should provide comparable image quality, speed and AF capabilities. The co-processor is dedicated to running the complex algorithms developed by machine learning to recognize and track a range of subjects.
They also share the same viewfinder: a 2.36M dot unit with optics that deliver 0.7x magnification. That resolution is relatively low by modern standards, but is one of the highest available in the 0.39 Type (∼8 x 6mm display) panel format. Most higher resolution displays are 0.5 Type (10.1 x 7.6mm), which take up more space with a larger panel, surrounding case and optics. In both these models, the EVF panels have been chosen to minimize the amount of camera taken up by the viewfinder.
Size
Image is based on Sony renderings, presented precisely to scale
The key difference between the two cameras is probably size. The a7CR is very small for a full-frame ILC, but that's quite a significant qualifier. The RX1R III's body is significantly smaller, in practice, than the a7CR's.
Add in a lens and the difference becomes even greater. The RX1R III's lens pushes back almost to the point of touching the sensor, whereas the a7CR has to leave room for a mechanical shutter and lens mount between the sensor and the rear element. Though of course the a7CR lets you select from lots of lenses if you're willing to be a little flexible on focal length and aperture.
For some users, the difference isn't going to be meaningful: once a camera is too large to be pocketable, the degree to which it's not pocketable isn't as important. But as a carry-everywhere camera or a camera you want to be relatively unobtrusive, the difference may well be critical to some.
In terms of weight, at 498g, the RX1R III is 3% lighter than the a7CR even before you add a lens. Attach the Sigma 35mm F2.0 we used in the graphic above and the ILC comes out as 70% heavier.
Stabilization
Other than the ability to switch lenses, perhaps the most obvious difference between the a7CR and the RX1R III is that the CR has image stabilization.
There's certainly an argument to be made that a bright 35mm lens doesn't need stabilization (hence so few primes historically having the feature), and that the a7CR's stabilization is more valuable when you mount longer lenses on it.
But, even though, in principle, more moving elements risk denting absolute image quality, in practice the extra stability a good IS system brings means more shots that deliver the full capability of the 61MP sensor.
The RX1R III uses the same Zeiss-branded lens as the 2012 version and, in the name of size, illuminates the sensor and very little beyond it: it would need to project a larger image circle to allow sensor-shift IS (making both the lens and body bigger), or would need a complete redesign to have optical stabilization incorporated into the lens itself.
Shutters
As alluded to in the previous slide, the a7CR has a physical shutter in front of its sensor. In this case it only has a series of shutter blades to end the exposure: an electronic first curtain shutter approach. In most respects this works as well as a full mechanical exposure plane shutter with the only risk being misshapen bokeh when used with wide apertures and very short exposures. The a7CR's flash sync is limited to 1/160 sec.
By contrast, the RX1R III has an in-lens, 'leaf' shutter, which closes in from several directions, rapidly creating an ever smaller aperture as it does so. This affects the light level to the entire sensor as it closes and opens, meaning it has a whole-sensor, 'global' shutter action. This allows the RX1R III to sync with flashes up to its maximum shutter speed.
However, it's worth noting that the camera's maximum shutter speed varies with aperture, because the shutter has more distance to cover when the aperture diameter is large. Like the previous model, the RX1R III can shoot at up to 1/2000 sec when wide open, 1/3200 sec at F4 and narrower, and 1/4000 sec when stopped down to F5.6 or beyond.
Batteries
The larger body of the a7CR has enough room for Sony's largest NP-FZ100 battery, a honking-great 16.4Wh unit that powers the a7CR to a CIPA battery rating of 530 shots per charge using the rear screen and 470 through the viewfinder.
The RX1R III makes do with the smaller NP-FW50 battery, which has a capacity of 7.3Wh. This helps give the smaller camera ratings of 300 and 270 shots per charge, respectively. Which aren't as impressive but also aren't terrible. This is big improvement over the 4.5Wh BX1 battery used in the previous RX1 models which, despite ratings of 220/200 shots per charge, were limiting enough that the RX1R II invited jokes about giving such a film-like experience that it felt like you were limited to 36 shots at a time.
Screens
The knock-on effect of the move to the larger battery - the NP-FW50 is twice as deep as the one used in the previous model: taking up 18.5mm of a body that's only around 31mm, front to back - is that Sony has decided a moving rear monitor would add too much additional depth. It features a 2.36M dot (1024 x 768px) panel, but one that can't be moved away from the camera for waist-level shooting.
By comparison, the a7CR has a 1.04M dot (720 x 480px) display but one that's mounted on a fully-articulating hinge, making it more useful for waist-level work, video, selfies and tripod-based photos. On which note, the a7CR also has a multi-shot high res mode (arguably best suited to landscape work), which the RX1R III lacks.
It should, perhaps, be noted that the first four generations of X100 sold quite happily with a fixed rear screen, as did the first two generations of Leica Q and all Ricoh GRs to date. However, there is certainly a part of the audience for fixed-lens compacts that finds it useful as both Fujifilm and Leica have adopted tilting screens in their more recent models.
Summary
Perhaps ironically, several of the decisions that have been most criticized: the small, hence low-resolution, EVF and the fixed rear screen of the RX1R II, were made to keep the body as small as possible, and maximize the size difference between the RX1R III and the a7CR. And yet its these same compromises that will, to many photographers, make the a7CR look more attractive.
We believe a fixed-lens camera is thing unto itself: it isn't just an interchangeable lens camera with restrictions. And, much as we love them, we recognize that the greater flexibility of an ILC will often win out over the size and focus of a fixed-lens camera for the majority of people.
We suspect the respective pricing of the RX1R III and the a7CR will reduce the compact camera's appeal still further. But until we've shot with it more, we're not going to just assume that the more flexible camera is inherently better.
Image: Mininyx Doodle / iStock / Getty Images Plus via Getty Images
Today, July 16th, is A.I. Appreciation Day. Well, at least it is according to A.I. Heart LLC, the company that invented this "holiday" in 2021. It's intended to be a day to acknowledge the positive impact A.I. has on society, as well as promote discussion about ethics and the responsible development of A.I.
While we recognize A.I.'s potential to revolutionize fields from healthcare to scientific research, we're also more than a little uneasy about the flood of A.I.-generated imagery, much of which is based on training using photographs taken by actual human beings, usually without their permission.
While we're not going to get that particular genie back in the bottle, we've decided to celebrate A.I. Appreciation Day by doing something really appreciative: showcasing real photos by real photographers in the DPReview community. These photos highlight some of our favorite images from our Editors' photo challenge series in 2025. We hope you enjoy them as much as we have.
Oh, and we would be remiss if we failed to mention that July 16th is also Corn Fritters Day, National Personal Chef Day and National Hot Dog Day. Just in case you need an excuse to celebrate.
Description: High up in the Andes Mountains of Peru near the Sacred Valley a girl walks with her pet llama. Even the llama is wearing red, green, blue, and white.
Description: A young girl watches soap bubbles with a mesmerized expression on Southbank, London. If you look carefully, you can see reflections of the Tate Gallery in the individual bubbles.
Description: Waiting for the defroster to kick in, Spokane, WA, on January 26, 2025. On a bright, cold morning following a night of ice storms, the water came out to play as leaves of crystal.
Description: Built this jump with my friend over a week, turned out a little larger than we had imagined. The day we tried hitting it was a little muddy, so getting up to speed was a challenge. After a few run ups, he pulled the trigger. Neither of us were expecting to get that much height of the lip!
Description: It was one of those July afternoons when the air is still and heavy, and the sun burns your skin. The city seemed to be slumbering under the oppressive heat. For three young friends, boredom was about to take over, until their parents brought them to a park that held a secret. At first, it was just a path like any other, lined by a wooden fence and topped by a pergola of climbing plants. But then, as if by magic, a thick, cool cloud began to descend from the pergola. It was a tunnel of mist. This photo captures the exact moment when shyness turned into pure joy. After a brief moment of hesitation, one of them darted off, and the others followed without a second thought. They are running not just to find relief from the heat, but to cross a portal into another world.
Description: Heliskiing was a bucket item I thought I'd never get a chance to experience, but I got an opportunity in 2019 and couldn't pass it up. It allowed the group to experience amazing skiing and breathtaking views. One of my favorite views came together with the helicopter dropping us off at the top of the mountain and being able to take in the entire view.
Description: A kayaker faces up to the ultimate challenge: riding the Grade 5 rapids at the Zambezi River, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe. These are some of the most intense rapids known to Man.
Description: Carrog Station is located on the Llangollen to Corwen heritage railway. Here we see the Station Master Platt saying good afternoon to the resident of the station house.
Description: My daughter was deathly afraid of the "swing swinger" at first. Then, after one ride, she kept asking, "One more time?" We bought an unlimited ride bracelet after that.
Equipment: Canon AE-1 Program + Canon FD 50mm F1.8
Description: Every year, the San Francisco Low Rider Council holds the "King of the Streets" event, where lowriders cruise along Mission Street. This year I caught a skateboarder come riding by one of the entrants, between 17th and 18th Streets. We all survived the encounter.
Description: With its 100th anniversary, Harris Hill in Brattleboro, Vermont, is one of the oldest ski jump hills in the US. It is a FIS-approved 90-meter hill that has been around since 1922. This image is a view of a jumper passing in front of the judge's tower on the way down!
Description: On one of the last hot days in autumn 2011, just before our southern Australian Easter swell kicked in, I had just finished a long session of surfing some pretty big, clean waves when I decided to get back in to capture some in-water shots of the rest of the crew. Most of the shots I got that morning were pretty average, except for this one of a young guy duck diving under the closed-out section of a 5-6 foot wave. It made my day!
While rainy weather is often seen as a negative, it can allow for stunning photographic moments. However, such conditions also result in a dilemma for photographers. Is it worth getting your camera and lens soaked to get some photos, or should you play it safe and stay inside?
Rain and snow don't have to mean the end or cancellation of a session or outing. With some precautions and the right equipment, you can use your camera in wet conditions. Whether you're caught in an unexpected shower or purposefully getting out there in wet weather, here's what you need to know to keep your gear safe.
Know your gear
In the camera and lens world, you'll come across mentions of weather-sealing or weather-resistance. Put simply, weather-sealing refers to gaskets and rubber rings around buttons, dials, switches, seams and ports to keep moisture out. Unfortunately, companies don't use those terms consistently, and they can mean vastly different things even within one brand. As a result, it can be difficult to decipher what weather-sealing actually means.
High-end cameras and lenses typically offer fairly robust weather-sealing, whereas budget cameras often lack much weather-sealing. OM System and Leica are the only two companies offering a specific IP rating, and only for some of their cameras.
Some companies may share diagrams highlighting where the seals are on their cameras and lenses, though that's not very common. If you can find specific information about your gear's weather-sealing, that may help you make decisions about how much rain it can handle. Some will be fine with longer stays in fairly heavy downpours, whereas others are best kept to short stints in rain.
How to use your camera in the rain
Photo: ugis bralens / iStock / Getty Images Plus via Getty Images
Broadly speaking, even cameras with minimal weather-sealing are okay in rain and snow without special gear. You don't need to panic if you get caught in a shower, and it isn't necessary to avoid purposefully going out in inclement conditions.
No matter how much rain you're in, a lens hood will be helpful. It will reduce the number of raindrops landing on your lens, keeping it clearer for your photos. Of course, if there's heavy wind blowing rain around, it won't help much, but it's better than nothing. Keeping your hot shoe cover on (unlike the photo above) in damp conditions is also smart. Water could ruin the electrical contacts there, damaging your hot shoe.
If you want to stay out for longer periods in rainy weather or need to withstand epic downpours, there are additional steps you may want to take. Having at least some cover for your camera could give you better peace of mind, but that doesn't mean you need to buy anything. Things in your environment can block rain, such as dense overhead vegetation, an overhanging cliff or an awning on a building. If you don't like being tied to one spot, an umbrella is a shelter you can take anywhere. Or, if you're wearing a jacket, you can tuck your camera inside, only removing it when you want to take photos.
Rain covers are ideal for especially wet conditions, or for giving you more peace of mind.
Photo: ThinkTank
If you want to be cautious or are in particularly wet conditions, you could pick up a rain cover for your camera. A plastic bag will work in a pinch, but camera-specific covers will offer more protection and make it easier to use your camera. These can be lightweight rain sleeves that are essentially camera- and lens-shaped plastic bags or ones that are more like rain jackets for cameras.
Rain sleeves are ideal to keep on hand in case the weather turns unexpectedly, since they are lightweight and compact. They are also highly affordable, but they aren't all that durable. The more heavy-duty covers are meant for repeated use, which is likely the better option if you know you'll be in wet locations frequently.
Finally, it's smart to have some clean, dry microfiber cloths on hand to wipe raindrops off your lens as they appear.
Don't forget aftercare
What you do after the rainstorm is perhaps more important than preventing your camera from getting wet in the first place. The general "never store anything wet" phrase also applies to camera gear. If your camera gets wet, dry it off as much as possible before packing it in your bag. Otherwise, it will sit in moisture, which isn't great for electronics.
Once you are out of the wet environment, take the camera out of your bag, fully dry off the camera and leave the bag open so both can dry out. You can also use silica gel packets to help dry things out.
Don't let rain hold you back
Shooting in the rain can allow you to create some truly dramatic and amazing images. In fact, some of my favorite photos were taken in the rain or snow. While you shouldn't let rain stop you from getting out there, you still need to know your gear's limits and take care of your camera afterward. With those things in mind, you'll be able to stay creative even in wet weather while keeping your camera safe.
Sony had an embargo on the RX1R III camera's price and pre-order time in Europe that just expired. This was a strange move, typically seen in the US. At the same time, the RX1R III was available for immediate pre-order in the US - a notable exception to the usual 24-hour delay.
Sony RX1R III pre-orders are now open in Europe and Canada:
Ricoh Imaging has announced a new app for its GR series cameras. The GR World app will provide features beyond what's available with the company's existing Image Sync app, unlocking more capabilities for GR users.
Like most companion apps, the GR World app allows users to view and transfer photographs from their GR camera to their smartphone. Once the photos are synced, you can create and organize albums to help keep photos sorted. There's also widget function to display those albums as widgets on the home screen. Additionally, the app can pull a phone's location and record location information from the smartphone directly to images, provided it's connected via Bluetooth.
The left two screenshots show the image import process, while the right shows filter options.
Screenshots: Ricoh
Outside of file storage and organization, users can register and name their GR cameras, which will make connecting to the app faster after the initial connection. With the camera paired, you can check the Bluetooth connection status, whether location information is being recorded, battery level and the remaining number of shots on your memory card.
The app allows users to register and name their cameras and view basic information, such as battery level and memory card space.
Screenshots: Ricoh
The app also unlocks remote shooting, though its functionality is quite limited and is only compatible with GR III series cameras. You can use the app to operate the shutter release or set a basic self-timer, and that's all. There are no controls over exposure settings or anything else, which many other brands offer in their companion apps.
GR World is compatible with all Ricoh GR III cameras, including the GR III, GR III HDF, GR IIIx and GR IIIx HDF. It's also compatible with the GR II. The app is free and available for both Android and iOS. It will be available for download on July 23.
Press release:
RICOH GR series dedicated application “GR WORLD” now available
TOKYO, July 15, 2025 －RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. is pleased to announce that it will begin offering “GR WORLD,” an application that enables users to transfer images taken with compatible models of the RICOH GR series of high-end compact digital cameras and configure various settings on connected smart devices, from July 23.
Main Features of the “GR WORLD”
Camera registration function that allows you to register and name the connected camera
Image import function that allows you to display images stored in the camera on your smart device and transfer them via wireless LAN
Remote shooting function that allows you to operate the camera’s shutter release and self-timer from an application when connected via Bluetooth
Location information transmission function that sends the smartphone’s location information to the camera while connected via Bluetooth®* and records the location information on the captured image
Album and widget compatible functions that allow you to organize imported images into albums and display them as widgets on the home screen of your smart device
App Name: “GR WORLD”
Release date: July 23, 2025
Price: Free
Compatible models： RICOH GR III / GR III HDF: V2.00 or later
RICOH GR IIIx / GR IIIx HDF: V1.50 or later
RICOH GR II: V1.10 or later
Download: Install from Google Play or App Store
Compatible OS: iOS 16-18, Android OS 13-15 * Operation is not guaranteed on all devices..
◇ Please refer to the product page for details of each function.
Sony TG-2 is a dedicated thumb grip that attaches to the Multi Interface (MI) Shoe to provide stable holding and operability, including when operated with one hand. When attached to the body, the metal material and high-quality paint finish provide exceptional design unity.
Sony LCS-RXL is a compact body case dedicated to this camera model intended to protect the camera from scratches and dirt and enhance its elegance with its refined texture material. The body case allows access to all ports—USB, HDMI, battery, memory card, and tripod attachment—without removal. The grip design improves the holding experience.
Sony LHP-1 is a lens hood made specifically for this camera. It features a robust construction using lightweight and high-strength aluminum material, protecting the lens from impact and dirt. The bayonet mount allows for quick and secure attachment.
Connexion
