Welcome back to our Question of the Week series! This reader-focused series aims to get our photographic community to share thoughts on all sorts of photography-related topics in our forums. We pose questions about gear, favorite camera stores, advice, problem-solving and more, and you share your thoughts and opinions.
This week, we’re leaning into the holiday spirit! The season of giving (and occasionally re-gifting) is upon us, and that means it’s time to unwrap some memories – both heartwarming and hilarious.
What are the best (and worst) photography-related gifts you've received?
What’s the best photography-related gift you’ve ever received? Maybe it was a dream lens that caused you to take on an adventure deep in the mountains, or a handmade camera strap that’s now an essential part of your kit. And what about the worst? Perhaps someone thought you needed yet another "World’s Best Photographer" mug, or that odd lens filter set that turned every photo a shade of green.
In this edition of our Question of the Week series, we want to hear your gift stories: the memorable, the useful and the truly baffling. Share your favorites (and flops) in the forum link below. Photos of the gifts (or what you created with them) are also more than welcome! We'll highlight some of your most entertaining and heartfelt responses in next week's roundup.
MOTHRA observing at night. Each mount is equipped with a wide area web cam. Besides the mount in the foreground two others are visible. The skies at El Sauce Observatory in Chile are among the best on Earth for astronomy. The Milky Way is clearly visible, as well as the Large Magellanic Cloud, the patch just right of center. The Large Magellanic Cloud is a neighboring galaxy of the Milky Way. Image: Dragonfly FRO
A new telescope called MOTHRA (Modular Optical Telephoto Hyperspectral Robotic Array) looks less like an observatory and more like a photography gearhead’s fever dream. The system consists of 1140 high-end Canon telephoto lenses, all aimed at the night sky. Instead of a single giant mirror, the rig stitches together the views from every lens to chase down some of the faintest structures in the universe.
This isn't the first time a collection of lenses has been used to function as a single giant telescope. The MOTHRA project stems from the Dragonfly Telephoto Array concept, first commissioned in 2013. It started with eight commercially available Canon EF 400mm F2.8L IS II USM lenses and gradually expanded to two clusters of 24 lenses each. The bug-themed names probably hint at the inspiration they drew from insect eyes, which use a bunch of what are effectively lenses to maximize light capture.
Whereas the Dragonfly array used CCD sensors, the newer project uses nearly 1200 astrophotography cameras built by Atik Cameras. It says it will use an mixture of Apx26 and Apx60 cameras, built around Sony Semiconductor IMX571 and IMX455 BSI CMOS sensors. These are versions of the 26MP APS-C and 60MP full-frame chips familiar in a range of cameras from Fujifilm, Sony, Ricoh, Sigma and Leica. Each camera is controlled by its own Raspberry Pi 4B computer, with another 90 Raspberry Pis helping to guide the array.
Rendering of the completed array. By the end of the year MOTHRA will have 1140 telephoto lenses distributed over 30 individual mounts, in two buildings. Its unique design is optimized for the study of the "cosmic web", a huge network of gas and dark matter that is thought to connect all galaxies in the universe. Rendering: Dragonfly FRO
MOTHRA takes that idea to a new extreme, and represents a "dramatic upscaling of Dragonfly." Like the Dragonfly, though, MOTHRA will use Canon EF 400mm F2.8L lenses, each fitted with ultra-narrowband filters to isolate the faint light of hydrogen gas. The central wavelength of the filters is also adjustable by tilting them, letting each pixel sample a slightly different wavelength. The lenses will be arranged in 30 mounts, which will be held in two buildings, as you can see in the rendering above.
The group says the array of 1140 telephoto lenses will be equivalent to a single 4.8-meter-F0.08 refracting telescope, making it the world’s largest all-lens telescope. The array will be powerful enough to detect ultra-faint gas between galaxies, helping scientists better understand where that gas exists and how it moves through a "web" of dark matter.
The nebula RCW 114, also known as the Dragon’s Heart Nebula, was one of the first objects that MOTHRA looked at. It is the remnant of a star that exploded as a supernova about 20,000 years ago. The MOTHRA image is in the light of ionized hydrogen and spans an area of sky that is 250 times larger than the full moon. Image: Dragonfly FRO
"MOTHRA is a telescope designed around a single idea: maximize discovery space for the dim glow of intergalactic gas," said Pieter van Dokkum, Co-Founder of Dragonfly FRO. "The combination of a huge effective aperture, wide field, and tunable ultra-narrowband filtering opens a new observational regime."
Dragonfly FRO, a research organization spun out of the original Dragonfly Telephoto Array project, is building MOTHRA at the Obstech / El Sauce Observatory in Chile. Construction started in the spring of 2025, and it's expected to be operational by the end of this year.
Dragonfly FRO Unveils MOTHRA: A New Telescope to Reveal the Hidden Universe
Construction underway of world’s largest all-lens telescope, unmatched by any existing instrument on Earth or in space
First-of-its-kind telescope funded by Alex Gerko
NEW HAVEN, CT / TORONTO, ON / NEW YORK, NY / LONDON, UK — March 11, 2026 — Dragonfly FRO, LLC, a Focused Research Organization (FRO), today announced the construction of MOTHRA, a next-generation telescope designed to reveal the cosmic web — the vast network of gas and dark matter that connects galaxies across the universe. MOTHRA employs a first-of-its-kind distributed aperture architecture with special filters to isolate the faint light of hydrogen gas. The FRO, a new type of scientific enterprise, was launched in partnership with Convergent Research and backed by Alex Gerko, the founder and CEO of XTX Markets.
Dragonfly FRO was founded in January 2025, and now introduces its mission, team, and technology alongside the launch of its website: mothratelescope.org.
A Radical New Telescope Design for Probing the Spaces Between Galaxies
MOTHRA is a distributed-aperture telescope composed of 1,140 high-end Canon telephoto lenses, which together synthesize the power of a single giant telescope. This design has grown out of the Dragonfly Telephoto Array concept which demonstrated the capability to find and study extremely faint, extended structures, previously undetected using conventional telescopes.
MOTHRA is a dramatic upscaling of Dragonfly, enabling it to detect ultra-faint gas between galaxies that traces the dark matter distribution of the Universe. This "cosmic web" is a complex network of structures imprinted in space at the earliest moments after the Big Bang, growing to enormous size as the Universe expanded. MOTHRA can be precisely tuned to detect faint glowing light from intergalactic gas trapped by this web of dark matter. The telescope will not just reveal where the gas is, but also how it moves along the spokes of the web.
"MOTHRA is a telescope designed around a single idea: maximize discovery space for the dim glow of intergalactic gas," said Pieter van Dokkum, Co-Founder of Dragonfly FRO. "The combination of a huge effective aperture, wide field, and tunable ultra-narrowband filtering opens a new observational regime."
MOTHRA is being built at Obstech / El Sauce Observatory in Chile. The telescope’s construction started in the spring of 2025 and it is expected to become fully operational by the end of 2026. By fusing its many images together digitally, the array of 1,140 telephoto lenses will be the equivalent of a single 4.7-meter diameter lens. It will be the world’s largest all-lens telescope, with capabilities that are unmatched by any other telescope on Earth or in space.
"This is an ambitious project to build something astronomers have wanted for a long time: a practical way to directly see the cosmic web, and to get it done in a couple of years rather than decades," said Roberto Abraham, Co-Founder of Dragonfly FRO. "MOTHRA harnesses advances in optics, detectors, and computing power to look at the universe in a new way. The telescope is totally unique."
A New Model for Tackling Hard Scientific Problems
Dragonfly FRO is the first Focused Research Organization centered on astrophysics. Inspired by the pace and focus of tech startups, FROs are designed to tackle bottlenecks and build high-impact scientific public goods over a finite multi-year timeline. These efforts are often too large or too infrastructure-heavy for a single academic lab and don’t fit traditional funding structures or market-driven models.
"Focused research organizations are built for precisely this kind of problem: a clear mission, a hard technical bottleneck, and a capability that can benefit an entire field," said Anastasia Gamick, President and Co-Founder of Convergent Research. "Dragonfly FRO brings the FRO model to astrophysics, and MOTHRA is the kind of ambitious, enabling instrument that this model makes possible."
The launch of Dragonfly FRO and MOTHRA has been made possible through a donation from Alex Gerko. "Breakthrough instruments developed at speed often require new approaches — organizationally and technically," said Gerko. "I'm proud to support such an ambitious project focused on generating long-term scientific value, and to help pioneer a model designed to drive meaningful research progress on hard, foundational astronomical challenges."
Pieter van Dokkum said, "Alex's impact on this project extends well beyond funding. He has been a hands-on strategic partner from the start — shaping how we structured the organization, helping us find the right project partners and site, and guiding us through procurement and infrastructure challenges that would have slowed us down considerably."
Pictured: a bounty of riches in 2026. Photo: Richard Butler
If you've shopped for any sort of electronic device recently or have kept up with the news, you've likely caught wind that there's something up with memory chips. But what exactly is going on, and will it affect photographic gear too?
What's happening with the chips?
The inescapable tech story over the past few years has been the emergence of generative AI systems. For reasons that are, frankly, mostly boring, the companies making the AI models need tons of memory and storage to train them. And because investors have been feverishly throwing money at anything branded "AI," they can get their hands on as much as they want. Which is to say: most of it.
RAM vs. memory vs. storage
RAM, aka memory, is the short-term storage that computers and cameras use to store temporary data. Typically, data stored in RAM will disappear once the device is turned off. It's made with DRAM chips.
Storage, meanwhile, is more permanent. That job is handled by devices like SD cards, SSDs, and hard drives. Solid-state storage is typically made using NAND chips.
There are currently three companies making the chips that end up in almost every device with memory and storage: SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron. They've all said that demand for both their DRAM and NAND chips has increased enormously, and that they're essentially selling as much as they can make.
Producing these chips is one of the most complicated things that humans do, so you can't just spin up production overnight; it can take years to plan and build new factories, even if you're willing to bet that this isn't all a bubble and that demand will stay this high. That means these companies have to decide where to allocate their supply: do they use the limited number of silicon wafers and production lines they have to make the high-power, expensive chips that several companies with seemingly infinite money are frothing at the mouth to buy, or the lower-margin, run-of-the-mill stuff that powers consumer devices?
You probably won't be shocked to hear which one is winning out. As a result, the prices that consumers and the companies making any consumer devices that have storage and RAM – essentially any piece of tech – have gone up substantially. As for how that's specifically impacted photographers...
How has it affected SD cards?
Photo: Mitchell Clark
It might seem like SD cards should be completely unrelated to the AI fracas; surely the companies training those models are using something much higher-end, right?
Well, yes, but the rub is that SD cards use the same kind of NAND chips as the super-fast SSDs that datacenters need. They're not as advanced, sure, but making one means not making the other, so SD card makers will almost certainly have to pay more for the storage chips they're using.
This price chart is for the Lexar 128GB Silver SD card, but we saw a similar shape for various other cards from them and other brands. Chart: CamelCamelCamel
We're just starting to see price increases hit camera storage, but it's happened fast; according to data from Amazon price tracking site CamelCamelCamel, several of the cards we checked have nearly doubled in price since the end of 2025. This was true of both lower-end cards with 32GB and 64GB capacities, as well as higher-end ones.
This meme illustrates how some photographers are feeling the price hikes; replacing an SD card might not have been a big deal previously, but now it could really sting.
We found a few CFexpress Type B models that didn't seem to have changed much in price over the past year, but those appeared to be exceptions, rather than the rule. Some of our community members, as well as creators on social media, have found models whose prices have increased by over 100%. While it's still possible to get some for pre-AI boom prices, we wouldn't rely on that continuing to be the case as manufacturers continue to sell through stock.
How has it affected computers?
Even if you're lucky enough to have a computer with replaceable or upgradable RAM, you might struggle to afford the parts. Photo: Mathew Anderson
Computer memory, or RAM, has perhaps seen the biggest impact, with prices on upgrade kits doubling or tripling in price. While consumers don't typically install new RAM into their computers – or indeed, even own computers with upgradable memory (thanks, Apple) – those that do will really have to weigh how badly they need it.
It will also likely hurt if you're looking to buy a new computer; manufacturers will also be facing difficulties getting their hands on memory, and will either have to cut how much they include or raise prices. Before the boom, we would've suggested getting at least 32GB of memory, since it was typically a sensible upgrade that could ensure your computer was usable for longer. Now, though, we'd just advise not going below 16GB, if you can help it.
Storage has also been impacted. While SSDs (both portable and internal) don't seem to have their prices hit as hard, many suppliers seem to be struggling to keep them in stock. Unfortunately, conventional spinning disk hard drives also seem to have been hit as well; we've seen several reports from people struggling to find any available to buy, and manufacturers like Western Digital are saying they've sold out their production capacity for at least the next two years. If you're running out of storage on your computer or think you may in the near future, we would suggest you start looking for an external drive now, rather than later.
What's the impact on cameras?
Somewhere on the a7 V's motherboard (or built into the processor) is a memory chip that acts as the camera's buffer. Photo: Mitchell Clark
While most cameras don't have built-in storage, they still need memory for their buffers and to run their operating systems. So far, we haven't seen any manufacturers explicitly cite the shortage as a problem or raise their global prices substantially. However, we also wouldn't be surprised if we see something like that in the future.
Is there an end in sight?
It's hard to say when the situation will get better. Both Micron and SK Hynix have reported selling out their entire production capacity for the rest of 2026. That doesn't mean that nothing will be produced for consumers – presumably some of that capacity has been sold to companies that will package those memory and storage chips into consumer devices – but it does mean that the supply situation isn't likely to change for a while. It's also hard to imagine the situation changing all that much next year, either. Unless stock market enthusiasm for AI tanks and companies have to severely cut back on how much memory and storage they're buying, it's not like there's a ton of new production capacity set to come online in the short term.
What can you do about it?
As for what you can do about it, I again have to be incredibly unhelpful and say that, in the short term, there's not really much to be done on an individual level. Voting with your dollar doesn't work all that well when you're so economically outgunned.
There are a few options, though: you can continue to make do with what you have, while recognizing that you're using a scarce resource. If you were previously a little careless with your memory cards or external hard drives, now's the time to start taking a little better care of them.
You can wait it out, with the hope that the AI bubble will deflate before you need to make any purchases
If you know you'll need to purchase new computer equipment, memory, or storage in the near-to-mid term, you can just accept that prices are more likely to go up, rather than down. Sadly, that means stocking up on what you know you'll need. Or, you can wait it out, with the hope that the AI bubble will deflate before you need to make any purchases... and that when it does, it's in a controlled enough manner that memory and storage prices are still in your top 10 biggest financial concerns.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Ricoh GR IV Monochrome | F2.8 | 1/640 sec | ISO 320 Photo: Richard Butler
We're hard at work on finishing up our review of the Ricoh GR IV Monochrome, a version of the company's latest enthusiast compact with its color filter array removed. We've already seen how it performs in our studio, but in the process of testing it, we've also taken it out and about to capture the world (minus a bit of color).
Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter/magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing; we do so in good faith, so please don't abuse it.
Sample gallery
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.
Laowa is continuing to be the torchbearer for bringing tilt-shift lenses to modern mirrorless mounts. The company's latest release is the 17mm F4 Zero-D Tilt-Shift / Shift, which is available for Sony E, Nikon Z, Canon RF, Fujifilm GFX, Hasselblad XCD and L mount, though the latter comes with a pretty big caveat that we'll cover in a bit.
There are two versions of the lens, both of which use the same optics: 18 elements in 12 groups, with four extra-low dispersion lenses, two glass aspherical elements and five ultra high refraction glass elements. They both have 14-bladed apertures.
One just supports shifting, which gives you the ability to change perspective while keeping the camera level, which can be especially helpful when shooting architecture. The shift-only model supports 11mm of shift in either direction on full-frame system, or 8mm on a medium format camera.
Image: Laowa
The tilt-shift model bumps that up to 12mm of shift on a full-frame, and adds 12° of tilt (10° on medium format), giving you the ability to manipulate the plane of focus. You can use that to either maximize your depth of field without having to worry about diffraction or to create the miniature effect that tilt-shift lenses are famous for.
The company promises that the lens has no barrel distortion, and says it can focus on subjects as close as 0.25m (9.8") away. It has an 86mm filter thread and a built-in Arca-Swiss compatible lens foot. The mount can easily be rotated with a click of a button and has preset rotation positions in 15° increments. It weighs 810g for the tilt-shift model and 770g for the shift model.
Given that the lens is manual focus only, and that Laowa has brought its other tilting and/or shifting lenses to a wide variety of mounts, it's not surprising to see this lens coming to mounts that are usually more restricted. It is, however, worth noting that the company says the L-mount version isn't compatible with some of the system's most popular cameras: the S5II/X, S1II, S1RII and S1IIE. The company told us this is because the overhang of those cameras' EVF housings protrudes forward over the lens mount. While you can physically mount the lens on one of the camera, the barrel will run into the EVF cladding essentially as soon as you try to rotate it, which severely limits the lens' functionality.
Given that we haven't seen major camera manufacturers like Canon or Nikon release tilt-shift lenses for their most recent systems, it's exciting to see Laowa continue to expand its lineup of them.
The 17mm F4 Zero-D Shift costs $999, and the Tilt-Shift costs $1249. Both are available starting today.
Manufacturer samples
Sample gallery
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.
Laowa 17mm F4 Zero-D Tilt-Shift specifications
Principal specifications
Lens type
Prime lens
Max Format size
Medium Format (44x33mm)
Focal length
17 mm
Image stabilization
No
Lens mount
Canon RF, Canon RF-S, Fujifilm G, Hasselblad X, L-Mount, Nikon Z, Sony E, Sony FE
Aperture
Maximum aperture
F4
Minimum aperture
F22
Aperture ring
Yes
Number of diaphragm blades
14
Optics
Elements
18
Groups
12
Special elements / coatings
4 extra-low dispersion, 2 asph., 5 ultra high refraction
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Image: Frame.io
You can now use Frame.io, the video and image workflow platform that integrates with several pieces of editing software, to automatically upload stills files from certain Nikon cameras to the cloud. The software has supported this kind of workflow for video files for a while, but the new JPEG and Raw support could be convenient if you have a Z6III, Z8, Z9 or ZR.
While some cameras from companies like Fujifilm and Panasonic can connect directly to the Adobe-owned service, that's not quite what's going on with Nikon's implementation. As Frame.io's update notes say: "Using NX MobileAir (iOS and Android), images upload directly from the camera to Frame.io—no need to remove cards or manually transfer files before sharing. From there, editors can move seamlessly into Adobe Lightroom for immediate editing and delivery." It feels a bit funny to describe images as being uploaded "directly" when you need another app in the mix to do it, but theoretically it should be relatively hands-off once you establish the connection.
Nikon offers similar capability with its Imaging Cloud service
If this all sounds familiar, it may be because Nikon offers similar capability with its Imaging Cloud service. With it, supported cameras can automatically upload images to Nikon's cloud, which will then transfer them to services like Dropbox, Google Photos or Lightroom.
While that approach is more convenient in some ways – you use it by directly connecting your camera to Wi-Fi, rather than your phone – the Z8 and Z9 famously haven't received support for Imaging Cloud, despite lower-end cameras like the Z5II and Zf having it. This update gives owners of those cameras an easy way to offload the images they take directly to a cloud service, even if it is a little less flexible.
Adobe has announced that its "AI Assistant" for Photoshop is now available in public beta. It's designed to let you describe how you want your image changed to a chatbot, and either have the program carry out the edits for you or tell you how to do them. And, if you're willing to use generative AI, you can even draw on your image to have it add new elements or remove existing ones.
When you open a picture in Photoshop for web or mobile and activate the assistant, it analyzes the image to come up with some suggested edits: things like brightening the foreground or cropping in on the subject. The suggestions come in two categories: do it for me, or show me how. If you have your own edits in mind, you can also type what you want done into the box, and it will either go off and do it or tell you what you should do, sometimes complete with links to the tools you'll need.
The company has been working on the feature behind closed doors for a while now, teasing it early last year before finally announcing it at its Max conference in October. When I spoke to a Photoshop product manager at Adobe's Max conference last year, it was clear that the company is thinking of the AI assistant as an automation tool first, and a learning tool second. However, in the little bit I played around with it, the current version seemed to be at its best when instructing, rather than executing.
This is exactly the kind of edit a beginner might need help with, and I think the answer it came up with is pretty decent for that audience, especially since it gives you links to open the tools.
As an example, I asked it how I could brighten the shadows in an image without also raising the highlights. It came up with a genuinely good answer: add a curves adjustment layer, and drag the shadow adjustment point upwards. It even gave me a link that opened up the Curve tool. However, it also told me it could do it for me, so I told it to give it a shot.
Instead of taking the steps it described, the assistant added a brightness/contrast adjustment layer and just raised the brightness of the entire image, blowing out the highlights. The bot then said: "Shadows are now brighter! 🕶️✨ The adjustment layer focused on lifting the dark areas (like faces and clothing), while the highlights stayed crisp and untouched-no blown-out windows here!" (Especially ironic since the chat box was covering most of the image except for the now blown-out window.)
The tool is at its best when using the tools that Adobe's already been working on automating, such as subject masking and adjustment, and removing objects.
Theoretically, this approach would've worked had it created a layer mask, an edit it was happy to do in other situations, but for whatever reason, it didn't decide to do that. Some other issues I ran into: when I asked it to brighten the foreground of an image, its initial selection was completely incorrect, including patches of the sky, resulting in an oddly splotchy result (though, in fairness, at the end the bot realized things hadn't gone to plan). On another photo, one of the suggested edits was to "enhance the colors for a more vibrant look," which would've been a reasonable suggestion had it not been a black and white photo.
The tool showed me the selection as it was making it, and I thought, "Well, that's not going to go well." And, indeed, it did not.*
There were some successes. Perhaps unsurprisingly, given all the work Adobe has put into distraction removal, the model did a decent job when I asked it to remove extraneous objects from a photo. It's also worth noting that the AI assistant's edits are broken down in the edit history pane, so if it fell over at the last step, you can just undo that and take control yourself. It also shows the tools being used on screen as it (slowly) runs through each step, potentially making it easier to do it yourself next time.
Adobe has also introduced a tool called AI Markup, which lets you sketch something onto your photo and have generative AI add it in for you. AI image generation in Photoshop is nothing new, but this should make it that bit easier to make sure the elements you're trying to add end up where you want them to.
I'm tired of every tool I use showing me endless pop-ups about their AI assistants, but...
I'm tired of every tool I use showing me endless pop-ups about their AI assistants, but I think there's definitely a place for something like this in a program as complicated as Photoshop. As long as it's not too insistent that you use it, it could wind up being a useful teaching tool for those getting into photo editing, or for more obscure edits that you don't quite remember how to do (not everyone will have memorized CollegeHumor's Photoshop tutorial rap for redeye removal). It seems like Adobe has a bit of work to do before the tool can reliably automate tiresome tasks, but the bones for that system are clearly here.
The AI Assistant is available in Photoshop for the web and mobile, and AI Markup is available in the web version. Adobe says Creative Cloud subscribers will have unlimited image generation with the tool until April 9th; after that, it'll presumably fall back to using however many credits are included in your plan. If you're a free Photoshop for web user, you'll get 20 image generations.
* - In fairness, giving it a JPEG with such high contrast wasn't really setting it up for success, but I at least expected it to select the black part of the image and try to brighten it. I would've tried it with the Raw, but Photoshop for web couldn't open it.
Google recently released its latest entry-level smartphone, the Pixel 10a. The updates are modest overall, with the most visible change being a redesigned camera array that now sits flush with the back of the phone. We took the 10a on a recent trip to Japan for CP+ to see how its cameras handled a variety of situations.
Despite the slimmer design, the camera hardware is unchanged from the Pixel 9a. Like the previous model, it features a 48MP main camera with a Type 1/2 (~31mm²) sensor and a 13MP ultra wide camera with a Type 1/3.1 (~19mm²) sensor. Google has carried over some of the AI-focused photography features from the 10‑series phones, such as Auto Best Take and Camera Coach, which aim to help users capture stronger images with less effort. Otherwise, the Pixel 10a feels very familiar if you have used the 9a.
"The Pixel 10a feels very familiar if you have used the 9a."
That similarity extends to image quality. You would be hard-pressed to tell the difference between photos from the 9a and 10a. In good light, the phone's two cameras perform well enough. When the light gets dim, though, along comes the noise. That's especially evident in the night photos with vast expanses of open sky or other dark areas, which you can see in the gallery below. Night Mode does seem to help with some of that noise, and also adds some lightness at times. But it's important to note that, unlike other phones, the Pixel 10a does not automatically switch between camera modes. If you want to use Night Mode, you'll need to manually select that in dark conditions.
The Pixel 10a is not aimed at photographers who want to use their phone as a somewhat serious camera; that role remains reserved for the higher-end 10‑series models, especially the Pro versions. But for people who want a compact, relatively affordable phone that can reliably capture everyday memories, the Pixel 10a’s cameras can get the job done.
Sample gallery
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.
Mitchell and Abby got to experience the (overwhelming) magic of a Yodobashi camera store for the first time on their trip to CP+. Photo: Abby Ferguson
The DPReview team recently returned from CP+, the camera industry's official trade show held in Yokohama, Japan. Most of our focus was, naturally, on the show and interviewing executives from the major camera and lens companies. However, we also had some time before and after CP+ to wander around, taking photographs and checking out some of Japan's camera store offerings.
This trip marked Abby's first time in Japan, and it was a second journey to the country for me (Mitchell). Now that we've been back for a bit, we wanted to take some time to reflect on our experiences there beyond CP+.
Seeing a new place through the same lens
Nikon Z8 | Viltrox 35mm F1.2 Lab | F8 | 1/400 sec | ISO 64 | Processed in Capture One Photo: Mitchell Clark
Mitchell's thoughts
If you've spent any time on gear-related forums such as ours, there's a bit of advice you've probably seen pop up anytime someone asks about upgrading their equipment: you should spend the money you would've spent on a camera/lens on taking a trip with your current kit instead.
While I obviously don't think that's always true, this trip showed me that there is definitely some wisdom there. Being in a completely new place (I've been to Osaka, which has quite a different vibe from Tokyo and Yokohama), where many things are unfamiliar, helped get me out of my photographic rut. I found interesting new angles to shoot things in, and tried out things I might not have at home, just because I was inspired and excited to be doing photography again. Travel, even if it's mainly for work, was a great way to get my creative energy going (especially after what's been a particularly dull and uninspiring winter at home).
Even when I wasn't taking pictures for work, I was constantly pulling out my phone to capture interesting compositions that I saw.
iPhone 15 Pro | Rear wide camera | Cropped to 4:3 Photo: Mitchell Clark
As someone who often shoots at night, I was also delighted to find that Tokyo, in particular, is one of the most well-lit cities I've ever been in. That meant that I was still able to get pictures late into the evening, no matter where I went, something that's definitely not the case in my more rural neck of the woods.
It's also astoundingly dense, its streets and alleyways bursting with people and things to take pictures of. If I'm doing a photowalk in downtown Spokane, it might take me an hour or two to come up with 10-15 good images, especially if I'm trying to find subjects I haven't shot before. In Tokyo, it felt like I could do that or more in fifteen minutes and a few blocks.
Abby's thoughts
The colors, textures and lights in Tokyo and Yokohama were feasts for my eyes. Edited in Adobe Photoshop.
Panasonic S1RII | Viltrox AF 16mm F1.8 | F3.5 | 1/80 sec | ISO 500 Photo: Abby Ferguson
I'll start by echoing Mitchell's comments about taking a trip somewhere new. Just like he experienced, this trip to Japan felt like a little rekindling of my photography. It was very refreshing to be someplace new in general, especially somewhere drastically different in almost every way from where I currently live.
Both Tokyo and Yokohama, where I spent all of my time, are absolutely filled with color and lights. The densely packed architecture and infrastructure of both places create lots of interesting opportunities for photography, with rich lines, textures and shapes to play with. It was like a photographer's playground in many ways.
SOOC JPEG
Panasonic S1RII | Viltrox AF 16mm F1.8 | F2.2 | 1/20 sec | ISO 640 Photo: Abby Ferguson
Now, this could very well be the case in any major city (which I do not live in at the moment), but it was still fun to have so many opportunities for photographs. I went out with my 35mm film camera on my last day, with just a few hours before needing to catch a train to the airport and easily shot through an entire roll of film. It typically takes me a few days to do that, even when I'm in new locations that I'm excited about.
Another thing I noticed was that we were far from the only photographers wandering around, even well away from CP+. Yokohama is a tourist-rich city, so that may be part of it, but I saw a good number of people walking around with dedicated cameras, which is quite different from what I'm used to. Even though I live in a touristy area, I rarely see photographers out and about. Maybe I felt emboldened by this, but I even worked up the courage to ask two women who were painting near a bridge if I could photograph them, something I never do where I live.
A rich camera history: Shinjuku's used camera stores
I was in constant awe, looking around the used camera stores. Photo: Mitchell Clark
Abby's experience
I love old cameras, particularly old film cameras. Where I currently live, and really everywhere I've lived in the US, options for shopping around for these cameras in person are remarkably slim. There are a few stores more than an hour's drive away from me right now, but the selection is very small at each. That's also more than I had access to in most of the other places I've lived, and this is the seventh state I've called home.
My experience in Japan was completely different. We went to Shinjuku City while in Tokyo, and within just a few block radius, went into six different camera stores. There were more in that immediate area that we didn't check out, too, and countless beyond that one neighborhood. Even in Yokohama, I found a handful of shops within walking distance and a few more within public transportation distance of CP+.
While most of these shops were quite small, they were absolutely filled to the brim with cameras and lenses. Each was packed with glass cases with rows and rows of cameras and lenses, and many also had boxes on the floor with even more to choose from, if you were willing to hunt through them to maybe find a gem. The selection was downright overwhelming at times, especially since I didn't have a specific one in mind (other than my husband's request for a Canon P). I could have easily come home with a suitcase full of cameras if my budget had allowed for it.
I hadn't set out specifically for the Olympus M-1. But I saw one in the last shop I checked out, and looked it up since I hadn't heard of it before. The history (and condition of this one) sold me.
Google Pixel 10a | Rear wide camera Photo: Abby Ferguson
It was also fascinating seeing so many brands and cameras that I'd never even heard of. I am kicking myself for not writing some of them down to look up later, because there were some very intriguing names and form factors. I ended up buying an Olympus M-1 for myself, which I hadn't even heard of before I looked it up in the store after seeing one.
Mitchell's experience
My one thought as a 1.8m tall American who was wearing a backpack to carry all our filming gear: these stores were DENSE. I barely had room to turn around, and trying to get to a specific aisle could feel like a sliding tile puzzle if someone was between you and it. I remember one store in particular where it was the three of us, and then another person shopping there; when two more people came in, the shopkeeper laughed, saying, “Too many people!”
This isn’t at all meant to be a complaint – it’s part of the density that gave the city its charm – but it’s worth being aware of if you’re going shopping at them. Had I realized just how small they were, I might’ve opted to film with a phone, rather than my full-size camera and backpack full of supporting gear.
Experience of Yodobashi Camera for the first time
My local Best Buy is a surprisingly competent camera store, but certainly doesn't stock every color of the Nikon Zf... nor practically every other camera and lens that Nikon makes.
iPhone 15 Pro | Rear wide camera Photo: Mitchell Clark
Mitchell's thoughts
As part of our trip, our coworker Dale Baskin recommended that we all go to the Yodobashi Camera store in Akihabara, partially for the sheer experience of shopping at a photographic Mecca, and partially because he thought it'd make for a really good video for social media (it did). And despite all the things he told us about it, it still ended up being a much more interesting experience than I'd thought.
The first thing that became apparent right when we walked in was that, despite its name, the store sells much more than camera gear (though I suppose that should've been obvious given that it was seven stories tall). You don't even get to the main photography section until the third floor, after you've gone through a maze of smartphones, computers, monitors, networking equipment, printers and enough cables and accessories for the aforementioned to make a Best Buy blush.
Once you make it to the photo level, though, it is absolutely glorious. They have pretty much every current camera and lens, not just available, but out on the shelves for you to play with. (Though, perhaps unsurprisingly, the one camera I didn't see was a Fujifilm X100VI). Basically, every kind of photography is represented: there were booths for pretty much every brand, as well as displays for various lens makers, video cameras of all shapes and sizes, flashes, film cameras and film to put in them and more. They had pretty much every kind of Instax (which we noted were all completely sold out), and even a wide array of itty-bitty toy cameras for the kids or camera-curious.
It's not all fancy cameras at Yotobashi; they also stock the increasingly popular cheap point-and-shoots and charm-sized cameras. Photo: Dale Baskin
Of course, it's not just the cameras, it's the accessories too. You can get flashes, tripods, printers and paper for them, bags, film, straps, whatever. The experience really highlighted the fact that there's currently nothing even remotely comparable where I live; no stores that I could go to and feel assured that they would have a particular hotshoe cover or filter ring adapter. For most types of photo gear, if I want it, I’ll have to order it and wait a few days for it to arrive. It’s very cool to experience a store that sells basically everything I could ever want as a photographer.
One final note is that I was told to expect complete sensory overload, and I have to say that I was a little disappointed. Sure, the constant music and announcements took some getting used to, but it wasn't particularly overwhelming; I was mostly just excited to be there. However, your mileage may vary: it may just be that I've completely cooked my brain by listening to YouTube videos at 2x while also playing video games, and that others would find the sheer density of products and information to be too much to take in.
Abby's thoughts
Overall, I very much agree with Mitchell's takeaways. I was surprised by the sheer variety of items at Yodobashi, as there's plenty there that has nothing to do with photography. I really enjoyed and appreciated how well-rounded the photography items were, though. There were products for every step of the photographic process. That included a wide range of inkjet papers, which you normally don't see in camera stores.
Where our opinions differ, though, is in regards to sensory overload. I have not destroyed my brain like Mitchell has, so I did find it completely overwhelming. I was very glad to leave the store when we did for the comparatively quiet streets of Tokyo.
Get ready for another AMA (Ask 'Me' Anything) with the DPReview editorial team!
The CP+ Japan trip team
Dale Baskin (Managing Editor)
Mitchell Clark (Reviews Editor)
Abby Ferguson (News Editor)
On Wednesday, March 11th, from 5:30 p.m. to 8 p.m. UTC (9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. Pacific Time / 12:30 p.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern Time), our team will join you in the forums to answer questions live about their trip to Japanese camera stores. You can ask anything related to the used stores we visited, cameras we may have seen, what we thought of Japan, and the state of the camera industry around it all.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Photo: Richard Butler
As we're working on reviewing the Ricoh GR IV Monochrome, we've put it in front of our studio test scene to see how it performs. And, while it's one thing to know intellectually that the lack of a color filter array improves certain aspects of image quality, it's impressive to see it actually in action.
Our test scene is designed to simulate a variety of textures, colors, and detail types you'll encounter in the real world. It also has two illumination modes, full even light and low directional light, to see the effect of different lighting conditions.
Image Comparison
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.
Like its color sibling, the GR IV Monochrome's 26MP BSI CMOS captures a very good level of detail in its Raws. However, thanks to the lack of demosaicing, the black and white images look noticably sharper, even compared to the files from the higher-resolution Fujifilm X100VI.
The Monochrome doesn't have a noise advantage if you compare its base ISO performance to that of the color version, but its base ISO is 2/3EV higher, so it's delivering a comparable result despite being exposed to less light. Once you bump up to ISO 200, and give the two versions the same exposure though, the difference starts to become apparent: the GR IV Monochrome has less noise than its APS-C counterparts, and comes much closer to full-frame cameras.
This continues to be the case through mid to high ISOs, and the GR IV Monochrome continues to produce passable images well into ranges that we wouldn't bother with on a color camera; in addition to not losing light to any color filters, it probably helps that luma noise won't be as distracting as chroma noise to most viewers. Ricoh lets you go all the way up to a ludicrous ISO 409,600, though by that point the image has, unsurprisingly, truly fallen apart.
As we saw with the GR IV, Ricoh's JPEG engine doesn't quite manage to include all the detail that the camera's Raws do, though the results are still very nice to look at. At higher ISOs, though, the effects of noise reduction on the Monochrome's images are less noticeable; the JPEGs show more detail than their color counterparts, even if you compare images that received a stop less light".
This is typically where we'd discuss the JPEG colors but, of course, the GR IV Monochrome doesn't capture any. There is a cost for the extra detail and improved noise, after all.
Like the standard GR IV, the Monochrome offers excellent dynamic range performance with relatively low read noise, giving you room to boost shadows, or to shoot at ISO 160 for maximum dynamic range and brighten to your preferred lightness in post without introducing too much additional noise.
With that said, it's worth remembering that once your highlights are clipped on a monochrome camera, they're gone. With a color camera, you have the chance of pulling back at least some detail from one of the three color channels, but that's not an option with the Monochrome.
If you want to go into more detail on the 28mm equiv. F2.8 lens that this camera shares with the original GR IV, you can check out our review of that camera. The short version, though, is that it's impressively sharp edge-to-edge given its size, even wide open, though it has a fair amount of vignetting throughout its aperture range.
Our studio scene didn't reveal anything surprising about the GR IV Monochrome, but that's not a bad thing. It turns in an impressive performance, producing sharper images with less noise than the standard GR IV, at the same settings. Given that the GR IV was already a benchmark in image quality for a camera of its size, we can't complain about that.
It’s been less than a week since I returned from Japan and my first time at the CP+ Expo, and I’m still processing all that I experienced there. We’ve already shared our team discussion from Yokohama, but after a bit of time (and while still fighting some serious jet lag), I wanted to jot down a few thoughts about what stood out the most from my first time at CP+.
The show isn't just about gear
OM System had two gallery spaces, one with black walls and one with white. Photo: Abby Ferguson
One of the biggest surprises for me, as a CP+ newbie, was how many non-gear-related activities and displays there were. Prior to attending, I was under the impression that the show was strictly about lenses, cameras, lights, tripods and so on. I assumed the focus was entirely on the technical side of photography, not necessarily the creative.
While I certainly appreciate the gear side of things (I do work at DPReview, after all), the creative side is where my foundation in photography began and is what continues to fuel me. So I was pleasantly surprised and very excited to see so many things dedicated to the craft of photography outside of gear.
Every major booth had a stage where they hosted photographers to give presentations on their work. Unfortunately, I don't speak Japanese, so I couldn't understand any of them, but it was still exciting to see. Each major manufacturer also had at least a small gallery (some had more than one) with prints from photographers. Those images were, of course, meant to showcase how good the company's gear is, but I still appreciated that they were highlighting interesting pictures.
Fujifilm had very attractive books dedicated to each of its different film simulations. Photo: Abby Ferguson
My favorite creative parts of CP+, though, were the book-related ones. Sigma's booth featured a long bookshelf full of photo books. Some were iconic photo books by artists like Robert Mapplethorpe, Vivian Maier and Ed Ruscha. There were also two books that marked the kick-off of the Sigma Foundation, a funding mechanism to support and promote photographic artists. As a side note, the Sigma booth featured a beautifully minimalist design with flowing white curtains, which reminded me of some of my all-time favorite works by Carrie Mae Weems.
I couldn't resist this photo book by Daisuke Yamamoto at the zine fair. Photo: Abby Ferguson
We also stumbled on the zine fair at CP+, which was a delightful surprise. This was the first year for the zine section at CP+. It replaced the used camera market that used to be at the show, and perhaps signals a move by organizers to include more art moving forward. The zine festival was separate from the main floor and consisted of a large room filled with tables featuring individual creatives showcasing their photo-related books and zines. It was wonderful to walk around, talk to the artists about their work and see the creativity and diversity of the work on display. I even bought a photo book, since I couldn't resist leaving with something.
Yes, the gear is impressive
It's really neat seeing a wall of cameras and lenses. Photo: Abby Ferguson
I know I just wrote about how much I loved that the show isn't only about equipment, but gear is still the main focus of CP+. And it is indeed cool to see brands put all their lenses, cameras, and accessories on full display in one small area. Regardless of your brand loyalty, it's flat-out neat (and very satisfying) seeing a wall of pristine lenses.
Walking through the show floor was a good reminder of the sheer number of options we have these days as photographers. It is almost overwhelming seeing it all in one place, in fact. No matter your style, needs, or preferences, there will be gear that fits, and seeing everything on display made that abundantly clear.
Like-minded individuals
Photo: Abby Ferguson
Photography can be an isolating activity. After all, so much of the medium happens behind a camera or a screen. As an introvert, it’s easy for me to stay in that bubble, focused on my own projects. But every time I put myself in situations to join other photographers in some manner, it's refreshing.
While I wasn't necessarily talking with lots of people on the CP+ show floor outside of brand interviews, it was fun to simply be surrounded by so many (so very many) people interested in photography in some capacity. It was a refreshing change of pace to be among others who understand that same pull toward creating pictures (or videos), and a good reminder that there are so many who can relate to what you enjoy doing. If you haven't ever attended a photography-specific expo, conference or event, I'd highly suggest doing so at least once, to remind yourself of the importance of community.
I captured this photo in the Shinjuku neighborhood of Tokyo, Japan, a couple of years ago while visiting used camera stores in the area. In addition to the used camera stores, however, Shinjuku lights up at night, becoming a bright, colorful playground for photographers.
This month, we want to see your most brilliant photos of artificial light sources that light up the night. There's a myriad of possibilities, ranging from city lights and fireworks to carnivals and neon signs. The creative possibilities are endless. Our favorites will be featured in an article on the DPReview homepage.
Photos can be submitted between Sunday, March 15, and Saturday, March 21 (GMT). The challenge is open to photos captured at any time.
Important: Images MUST include a title and a caption of at least 25 words to be eligible. We need to be able to share the story behind your photo. We will consider both photos and captions when selecting our winners, so make sure to tell us that story!
Visit the challenge page to read the full rules and to submit your photos for consideration as soon as the challenge opens.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Nikon Z8 | Viltrox AF 35mm F1.2 Lab | F5.6 | 1/800 sec | ISO 64 Photo: Mitchell Clark
Late last year, Viltrox announced that it was bringing its 35mm F1.2 Lab lens to Nikon's Z mount. Given that the company pitches its Lab lenses as including "flagship optical design," we're happy we got the opportunity to test one out in a variety of conditions.
Image quality
Nikon Z8 | Viltrox AF 35mm F1.2 Lab | F1.8 | 1/125 sec | ISO 64
Wide-open, we found that the 35mm F1.2 Lab has good levels of sharpness in the center, and does a decent job at maintaining that to the edges. It's not quite as sharp as the best F1.2 optics we've seen, but for the price, it's hard to complain about the performance of our copy. Vignetting is also around what we'd expect for an F1.2 lens, almost entirely clearing up around F4.
I find the lens' out-of-focus rendering to be quite pleasing, but at F1.2, the cat's eye effect on the specular highlights outside the center of the frame can be a bit lopsided and uneven in a way that can be distracting if your background only has a few bright lights in it (the effect is less noticable if the bokeh is made up of several light sources blending together). By F2 the bokeh is closer to circular, but past that it becomes a bit more geometric.
F1.2
F1.4
F2
F2.8
F4
F5.6
We found that the lens maintained contrast well, even when shooting with bright backlight, and that it resisted flare in all but the most intense conditions.
If you go looking for chromatic aberration, you'll definitely find some, but it's typically not distracting in all but the most challenging scenarios.
Usability
To start with the elephant on the camera, this is a large, heavy lens. However, that comes with the F1.2 territory, and it's not unduly so; it's actaully lighter than Nikon's own 35mm F1.2 S (though around 23% heavier than Sigma's second-gen 35mm F1.2). While it wouldn't be my first choice as a travel lens, I never felt particularly burdened by it as I carried it around Japan while I was there for CP+.
The Viltrox AF 35mm F1.2 Lab Z isn't big and heavy for a F1.2 lens, but it is still big and heavy. I also don't find the top display to be especially useful or aesthetically pleasing, but your mileage may vary on that. Photo: Becky O'Bryan
While we don't make it a point to test gear's weather sealing, I did end up shooting in light rain for an hour or two with this lens, and it didn't miss a beat, and has continued to work afterwards with no issues. I'm not saying that you'll definitely get the same results, or that this lens is capable of withstanding any weather, but it did at least hold up well when I got caught in a drizzle.
The control ring is a bit of a mixed bag. It's nice that it can be clicked or declicked, especially for controlling aperture, but the control is inconsistent. Sometimes I would turn the ring one click, and the aperture wouldn't change at all, and I'd have to turn it a few more clicks to get it to go up or down 1/3 of a stop. Sometimes, though, one click was enough. This inconsistency basically put me off using it entirely, though I'd be interested to see if it performs the same way on a Sony body.
It can take several clicks of the control ring to get the aperture to change at all.
The lens's autofocus motors are relatively quick and responsive, though it doesn't quite seem capable of immediately snapping from minimum focus to infinity like other lenses with linear motors we've tested. It's hard to say how much of this is on the camera, though. I also found that my Z8 was hunting for focus or slightly missing it more frequently than I'd expect, based on my experience using it with other first-party or officially licensed lenses.
While the lens was still very usable, this issue was prevalent enough that I checked to make sure there wasn't a firmware update available that might improve it; at the time of writing, there is not, though the company did just release one for the E-mount version of the lens.
Summary
Pictured: my friend ogling the Leica Noctilux M 35mm F1.2 Asph., a lens that costs around $8500 more than the Viltrox. While I'd certainly rather carry the Leica around, I'm not sure I actually liked the images it produced that much more (though the Lab's slightly odd bokeh is highlighted in this picture).
While you can certainly find things to complain about with the images it produces, it's worth remembering that the Viltrox 35mm F1.2 Lab for Z mount costs $1000. That's substantially less than F1.2 lenses typically cost, especially the ones from first-party companies like Nikon. The Nikkor 35mm F1.2 S may have nicer bokeh, sure, but it also costs three times as much, so it had darn well better.
With that said, we'd typically urge anyone thinking about picking up this lens to at least consider how much benefit they really expect to get from the extra 1/2 or 1EV it provides compared to its F1.4 and F1.8 rivals. If you're willing to give up the extra speed, you can get a lens with fewer compromises, and that will be significantly smaller and lighter, a proposition that I personally find very tempting. Many will also be cheaper, too.
If you absolutely need F1.2, this is one of the most affordable ways to get it
However, if you absolutely need F1.2, this is one of the most affordable ways to get it (at least, if you want modern amenities like autofocusing, which, believe me, is very nice to have if you're shooting such a fast lens). And while I've gone over some of my complaints with it, it's still a very competent lens capable of producing great images. It does a lot of things reasonably well, especially given its price.
The final wrinkle is, of course, that Nikon is currently taking legal action against Viltrox, so the future of the company's lenses on Z mount is a bit up in the air at this point. That may be something worth keeping in mind if you're looking at spending what is still a fair chunk of change on this lens.
Sample gallery
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Click here to open it in a new browser window / tab.
Harman Photo is keeping the ball rolling on new film, releasing a creative color film called Switch Azure. As the name suggests, the company's latest offering "switches" the colors for a more experimental look.
Switch Azure's color swap results in rendering blues as orange, bright yellows as azure and reds as hues of purple or blue. Harman says that greens are less affected, but even those will shift depending on the original hue. It promises to provide similar results to Lomography's Turquoise film. Sunsets effectively become inverted, skin tones are a bit alien-like and common objects become a bit strange. Those who like realistic, natural colors from their film won't be fans, but for creatives who like to play around with unexpected results, it's an interesting option.
Don't expect normal colors from this film.
Photo: Vitor Lopes Leite / Harman Photo
Adding another layer of complexity is that Harman specifies that the type of scanner used will significantly affect the colors. An example image on the Switch Azure product page shows a scanned sunset photo: the Fuji scan renders a very blue image, while a Noritsu scan produces warmer colors.
Harman's new film is rated at ISO 125, and the company says the film is best used outside while metering for the mid-tones. It's available in 120 format and in a 35mm DX-coded cassette with 36 frames. The film can be processed with standard C41 processing.
Harman Switch Azure film is starting to trickle into stores, and you can use the Harman Photo website to find a location near you. Pricing varies by location, though most are around $13 for 35mm and $12 for 120.
Sometimes you just need some joy in your life, and, at least for me, watching other people experience joy can be a way to fulfill that need. A recent video of Jeff and Susan Bridges unboxing the first two models of their Widelux-X camera does just that, with Jeff absolutely giddy about what he's seeing. You'll have to head to the Widelux-X website to watch the video, as it is only hosted there, but it's worth a watch if you need some wholesome excitement.
For those unfamiliar, Jeff Bridges is a very big fan of the Widelux, a panoramic, panning-lens film camera that was originally developed in Japan in 1958. A factory fire and other factors ended production roughly 20 years ago, and they are now highly sought-after collector items. Bridges has said that most of the images he creates are with the Widelux, and he's taken some incredible behind-the-scenes shots on movie sets with it.
Image: SilverBridges
Bridges is such a fan of the camera that he decided to recreate it through his SilverBridges company. The team revealed a handmade working prototype in November of last year. Recently, two models were mailed to the Bridges in LA, and the pair unboxed them for a video that is hosted on the Widelux-X website.
It's very evident that Bridges is absolutely ecstatic about the camera, and the pair immediately took some portraits of each other and a selfie. It's fun to see how excited he is, and it's also neat to see additional shots of – and from – the camera. The team hasn't unveiled any new details, but it appears the project is at least moving forward, which is good to see, even if it will be well out of my budget.
2026 Sony World Photography Awards Professional Finalists
The World Photography Organization has announced the professional finalists and shortlists for the 2026 Sony World Photography Awards. While the Open competition (for which the 2026 category winners were announced last month) celebrates standout single images, the Professional awards focus on cohesive series that tell a story over multiple frames. The professional finalists offer a counterpoint to the Open winners, revealing how photographers are using image sequences to deepen storytelling beyond what a single photo can achieve.
This year's announcement highlights long-form projects across 10 categories, from Documentary Projects and Portraiture to Landscape and Wildlife & Nature. For the 2026 edition, 30 photographers have been named finalists, and more than 65 others have been shortlisted for series that range from intimate personal narratives to wide-ranging explorations of social and environmental change. The judges evaluated each body of work on its narrative strength, visual consistency and conceptual ambition, rather than on a single standout frame.
Selected images will be exhibited at Somerset House in London from April 17 to May 4, alongside hundreds of images from across all divisions of the World Photography Awards. Category winners and the overall Photographer of the Year, who receives a substantial cash prize and gear from Sony, the sponsor of the competition, will be announced at a ceremony in London on April 16. Work from the Photographer of the Year will also be shown in a solo presentation at next year's exhibition.
We've included a small section of the finalist images below, but you can see all of the finalists and shortlisted images at the contest website.
Architecture & Design
Photographer Name: André Tezza
Image Name: Loja e Mercado Marielen
Year: 2026
Image Description: Named after one of the owner's daughters, this store in Campo Largo is a family-run business integrated into the same building where the family lives, merging domestic space and commercial architecture into a single, everyday structure.
Series Name: Everyday Structures
Series Description: This ongoing project documents small neighbourhood grocery stores on the outskirts of Curitiba, in southern Brazil. These modest structures form an architecture of resistance that persists even as large retail chains reshape the city. Often family-run and linked to domestic spaces, the stores merge work, memory and dwelling into a single building. While the city centre undergoes gentrification, the periphery remains culturally dense and visually vibrant. This series reflects a belief that architectural beauty exists in ordinary, overlooked places.
Image Description: There is no record of the first disappeared woman in Mexico, but official figures state that 23 per cent of cases correspond to women.
Series Name: The Black Album
Series Description: With more than 130,000 individuals currently reported missing in Mexico, and a new disappearance occurring approximately every 40 minutes, The Black Album transforms archival imagery into a haunting collective portrait of absence, loss, and unresolved grief. Rather than documenting disappearance directly, this photographic essay reinterprets the past to question the future. Through an intervention in a photographic archive, the project constructs a symbolic 'album' of Mexico's disappeared — an unsettling reflection of a country living through a prolonged dark era in which absence has become routine and invisibility systemic.
Series Description: The Palm, On Piru is a photographic series exploring the spiritual connections and collective identities of rappers from South Los Angeles with Pirus/Bloods gang affiliations. The work focuses on the people and places central to the origins of West Coast hip-hop's G-funk music genre, and California's parallel gang culture, examining the interplay of their environment, community and artistic expression. The series was shot on colour infrared film, with its distinctive red and pink tones creating links between the environment and the artists, members, and families that form the Red side of the cultural divide, and the backbone of West Coast Hip Hop.
Image Description: Darwin, a young Venezuelan coca leaf picker (raspachín), rests on freshly harvested coca leaves in Putumayo, Colombia, before they are processed. The raspachíne's work is physically demanding, but the shifts are usually only half a day and are paid in cash. For many migrants, coca harvesting is one of the few reliable sources of income.
Series Name: Under the Shadow of Coca
Series Description: In the southern Colombian department of Putumayo, coca cultivation remains one of the few economic options for rural families in this neglected border region. This project follows farmers and families whose livelihoods depend on an illicit economy shaped by poverty, weak state presence, and armed control, as well as members of Comandos de la Frontera, the armed group that controls the territory and the cocaine trade. While some families try legal alternatives, coca often provides the only stable income. Under the Shadow of Coca shows that many of the local producers are not traffickers, but campesinos (farmers), and that it is usually armed groups who profit from the trade of coca.
Image Description: The photograph happened quickly. The flowers, the same colour as the detainee's sneakers and cap, immediately motivated him to pose. Many young people have experienced a similar scenario: drug dealing, then prison. He tells the photographer his story with ease: 'I started at 10 o'clock, in a small park, with a bag. Inside, there was really a big package. A lot of money.'
Series Name: Sixteen and a Half: Eight Months in a Juvenile Prison
Series Description: Over a period of eight months, Alexandre Bagdassarian documented the daily lives of young detainees in one of France's six juvenile prisons, one of the country's least visible institutions. The photographer sought to understand what it means to be young and confronted with prison, not from the perspective of legal texts or institutional discourse, but by observing the trajectories, voices, and bodies of those living this reality. Often relegated to silence or the margins, their stories are rarely told, and when they are, they reach us through a media or political lens, the photographer explains, sometimes 'shaped by security driven ideologies.'
Image Description: A family footing turf for domestic use. Ticknevin, County Kildare, Ireland.
Series Name: Beneath | Beofhód
Series Description: Beofhód — 'life beneath the sod' in Irish — evokes the primal significance of bogs in Celtic tradition. The series examines the cultural and environmental aspects of bogs in Ireland and contemplates themes of social and environmental justice, topographical mapping and the evolving perception of peatlands in an era of de-industrialisation. Although urgent ecological imperatives have ended large-scale peat extraction, they have also created tension with small-scale harvesting for domestic use, which still persists. Referencing Joseph Beuys' assertion that bogs are 'the liveliest elements in the European landscape' and 'preservers of ancient history,' this work reflects on the endangered status of these habitats in the artist's post-industrial surroundings. In this project, bogs are used as 'a metaphor for Ireland and the Irish psyche, and for local, human and personal exploration of a global issue.'
Image Description: Jinwar is an eco-feminist village founded during the Syrian war as a refuge for women. The village, powered in part by solar energy, was built collectively and inaugurated in 2018. Amal arrived here a year ago and says that 'the relationships among women are beautiful; I love everything here. I hope to be reborn here, with a clear mind, and to live in peace — here it's possible.'
Series Name: Jinê Land: Where Women Keep the Earth Alive
Series Description: Jinê Land: Where Women Keep the Earth Alive tells the story of women shaping the ecological and social future of Rojava in northeast Syria. In a region that is still recovering from war and fragmentation, women lead the fight for environmental restoration, sustainable agriculture, and community self-governance. Since 2012, Kurdish, Assyrian, Arab, and Armenian communities have self-organised under a model inspired by democratic confederalism, integrating women's liberation and ecology. Women manage schools, cooperatives, health centres, and local councils, ensuring their leadership in both social and ecological spheres. Villages such as Jinwar embody this vision: female-led, sustainable, and resilient, offering a space for education, self-reliance and communal life. Through photography, this project captures the intersection of freedom, ecology, and community, revealing a radical social experiment where women are both the stewards of the land and the architects of a new society.
Image Description: The first mountain climb ever traversed by the Tour de France has earned its mythical status as one of the hardest cycling climbs.
Series Name: Mountain Roads
Series Description: Mountain Roads is a series of photopolymer etchings of iconic European mountain roads. This ongoing project aims to document the greatest cycling roads spanning the Alps, the Pyrenees, the Dolomites, the Picos and the Spanish Islands. It celebrates the permanence of mountains and the feats of engineering and construction required to navigate and build a route through and over these formidable climbs.
Series Description: This series of abstract landscapes depicts oyster farming on the French coast of Normandy and Brittany, where the farms stretch along the entire coastline, shaping the character of the landscape. With a tidal range of up to 12 metres, the oyster beds disappear from view at high tide but are fully exposed at low tide. Yet it is only from a bird's-eye view that the vastness of these abstract landscapes, reminiscent of Roman legions, can be appreciated.
Image Description: Sheriff Knight (centre), the 'Dancing Cowboy,' leads the line dance during International Cowboy Day.
Series Name: Country Music in Kenya
Series Description: This series was photographed over an 11-month period, with the highlight being the International Cowboy Day festival, in Nairobi, Kenya. The festival drew around 3,000 country music fans to Ngong Racecourse in the final week of July. Country Music has been played on the radio in Kenya since colonial times and the popularity for the genre is growing, with shows being held by various artists in local bars a few times per week.
Series Description: 'My wife and I lost our child to stillbirth at 18 weeks of pregnancy. In the days leading up to the cremation we spent time together at home, during which time I took many photographs. In contemporary society, photographs are easily shared, generated and consumed, and with the rise of social media and artificial intelligence, the meaning of photography as a medium continues to shift. However, pressing the shutter in front of my child brought a renewed awareness of photography's fundamental qualities — its relationship to time and to the body. These photographs were not taken for the purpose of record or explanation. They are made simply to face the time that undeniably existed in that place. For me, looking at these photographs is an act of reaffirming the sensation of being alive.'
Image Description: A priest distributes communion during Pope Francis's funeral mass. Some 4,000 priests concelebrated the mass for approximately 200,000 mourners. Ritual persisted through the institutional transition, with the Eucharist administered regardless of papal presence.
Series Name: The Faithful
Series Description: Between the death of one pope and the election of the next, crowds gathered in St. Peter's Square, Vatican City, for an event that functions simultaneously as sacred ritual and global spectacle. The photographers explain that pilgrimage took on the traits of fandom, as rosaries, flags and prayer gestures were performed with full awareness of the attendant cameras and media. Individual devotion unfolded 'within a choreography shaped by mass attendance and global broadcast.' The portraits in this series capture that 'doubled consciousness': believers performing acts of faith within a mediated public space, where personal conviction merges with stadium-scale performance.
Image Description: The K-pop group Blue Flame, established in 2023, during a rehearsal in the Bucheon University gym. Bucheon University in Tashkent is a branch campus of a Korean university and has become one of the main meeting points for this scene, bringing together young people from different backgrounds who share the same enthusiasm.
Series Name: Koryo-Saram: How Descendants of Deported USSR Koreans Are Rediscovering Their Roots in Uzbekistan
Series Description: Koryo-saram are the descendants of ethnic Koreans from the former USSR who were forcibly deported to Uzbekistan through Stalin's ethnic cleansing policies. Over time, they became an integral part of Uzbek society, but their connection to Korea gradually faded, and by the 1990s, few could even read or write Korean. Today, most Koryo-saram identify as Uzbek citizens, with only faint traces of Korean cultural heritage remaining. However, a new generation, influenced by the 'Korean Wave,' is rediscovering its roots through music, film, dance and language, particularly in Tashkent, where this revival also includes many young Uzbeks.
Image Description: Taken during the same buzkashi match, this series shifts from a strict documentary approach towards an 'emotional truth grounded in real events.'
Series Name: Buzkashi
Series Description: Buzkashi (literally meaning 'goat pulling' in Persian) is the fierce, ancient sport of Tajikistan. It is similar to polo, but there are no teams and no boundaries. The ball is the eviscerated, headless carcass of a goat and the aim is brutally simple: seize it, hold it, break free. The game was born among the nomadic horse cultures of Central Asia, where strength and horsemanship were measures of identity. For centuries, chapandaz (riders) have hurled themselves into this churning mass of hooves and bodies, fighting for honour and a moment of clear sky among the dust.
Series Description: In the shadowed arch of an underpass in Lagos, Nigeria, far from the gleam of professional rings, a raw and resonant rhythm of ambition pulses. Beneath the Bridge documents a makeshift gym where amateur boxers — boys and girls alike — forge their discipline and dreams with nothing but tyres, rope, water and willpower. The project creates an intimate, visceral portrait of grassroots aspiration, exploring universal themes of resilience, gender equality in traditionally male spaces, and the profound human need to carve a place of purpose from the margins. Photographed in the natural light of the underpass, shadows and hard light sculpt the boxers' bodies, as textures of rust, rope and sweat become central to the narrative. This is not a story about winning or losing, but of preparing; a testament to the unadorned, potent moments where character is built before a single punch is ever thrown.
Image Description: A pistachio remains encased in its natural husk, left on the fruit beyond its ideal time. The husk has gradually darkened and started to break down, showing wrinkles, irregularities, and the first signs of decay. The contrast between the pale shell and the darkened husk highlights the pistachio's natural transformation, from fresh to weathered by time.
Series Name: The Bronte Pistachio
Series Description: For almost a year, Daniele Vita photographed the pistachios of Bronte, Sicily, from the trees to the harvested nuts. Studying them one by one, he realised that although they seemed alike, each was unique. This experience became a reflection on a society 'that tends to standardise and erase differences', and the photographer set out to capture the individuality of every natural element. In the final stage presented here, the pistachio stops being immediately recognisable and becomes an open image, where anyone can find their own perspective and meaning.
Series Description: Talking Without Speaking is a series of photographs of everyday objects that have become symbols of protest. Each of the objects can be connected to a specific historical period, a particular rights struggle or a particular country. Some have been intentionally brought to the streets to support a cause, while others have unexpectedly found their place in the public sphere, revealing their symbolic power over time.
Image Description: All of the images in WILD were taken with wildlife cameras set up in forests and along rivers in the UNESCO Rhön Biosphere Reserve in Northern Bavaria, Germany. The image titles indicate the time at which it was captured.
Series Name: WILD
Series Description: The photographs in this series were taken by a wildlife camera. Exposures were made when animals activated the camera via motion sensors, in the absence of the photographer and without his intervention. He was responsible for the preparation and follow-up work; installing the wildlife cameras in carefully selected locations and evaluating and processing the images that were generated over a period of months. The finished work is thus a co-production with the wild animals, whose decisive part — the moment the image is created — was not chosen by the photographer.
Image Description: Passengers in a car watch a capybara eating grass by the side of a road running through the private city. The animals attract attention, and many people stop during the day to take photographs of them.
Series Name: Capybaras at the Forefront of the Dispute and Resistance in Buenos Aires
Series Description: Nordelta is one of the best-known private developments in Buenos Aires, Argentina. It was built on a wetland, an ecosystem in which the land is covered by water, which is the main factor controlling plant and animal life. In recent years, the development's 45,000 upper-class residents have seen numerous capybaras enter the neighbourhood. Social media has been flooded with videos and photographs of the area's original inhabitants in swimming pools, crossing the street, or, more tragically, run over or trapped in drains or sewers. In a little over three years, the capybara population tripled to 1,000, leading the Buenos Aires government to approve population control plans that include selective sterilisation and contraception. At the same time, the presence of capybaras has divided the community, with neighbours arguing for and against the capybaras; for the rights of nature and against uncontrolled urban growth on natural land.
Canon EOS 5D Mark III | 135mm | F7.1 | 1/1600 sec | ISO 200 Photo: DianeMiller
DPReview community member DianeMiller (Diane D. Miller) is an active participant in our wider community and a talented self-taught photographer. Although she earned a Ph.D. in biochemistry and pursued a career in science, she always had a love of photography.
Her life took a different turn early on, though, after meeting her future husband, a pilot and adventurer. For their honeymoon, the couple flew around the world in a single-engine Beechcraft Bonanza – the first around-the-world flight not intended to set a record.
After years spent on aviation adventures and raising two daughters, Diane returned to working on her photography. Today, she is rooted primarily in nature, from studies close to home to expansive and beautiful landscapes and stills of the quiet night skies.
Favorite camera and lens: Canon R5 with the Canon RF 100-500mm – her favorite for its remarkable, handholdable reach.
Typical photo scenes: Nature close to home, birds, flowers, landscapes, and, increasingly, astrophotography including the Milky Way, deep-sky objects and celestial events.
“I've been playing with cameras since I was 10 or younger. I love being able to capture things I see and things beyond what I can see," she says.
Diane describes herself as a self-taught photographer who prefers to work alone or with a very small group of like-minded people. While she has traveled around the globe, she has found deep satisfaction in exploring familiar places, discovering beauty in nearby wetlands and in mystical views of the night sky.
Over the last decade or so, she has become much more serious about astrophotography, building a deep-sky setup while also experimenting with wide-angle Milky Way scenes. Recently, she developed a method of using astrophotography software to overcome limitations of shooting with regular cameras – a tutorial she is publishing on her website.
M31, the Andromeda Galaxy, shot with my astro rig.
Bag: A well-worn LowePro backpack (model long discontinued)
DianeMiler's camera bag.
Photo: DianeMiller
What other gear makes a difference?
"For my birding expeditions, I find the Spider hip belt holster and Olympus EE-1 dot sight for fast aiming at extreme focal lengths especially useful," she says.
Diane admits that her bag is usually packed to capacity. “Maybe I'm too ‘focused’ on photography and I can barely lift the bag as configured for most shoots, so not much else goes along except water.”
Recently fledged Western Bluebird.
Canon EOS R5 | 726mm | F13 Photo: DianeMiller
How do you adapt your setup to outdoor challenges?
Diane frequently repacks and reconfigures her bag depending on whether she is heading out to capture birds, flowers, macro shots or landscapes. For wildlife, the long lens and teleconverters dominate. For flowers and insects, macro tools and specialized lighting take priority. For landscapes and night skies, wide-angle lenses or her full astrophotography rig come along.
“It depends on the season and on what I am doing," she says. "If I travel alone like an explorer, I reduce everything to the minimum. If I have to photograph an organized event and stay in one place for three or four hours, I bring what makes the wait comfortable."
"My strength is that I always have the right focal length ready. The cameras are set in manual mode, usually with the aperture wide open. If necessary, I close it, but I like to isolate the subject and react quickly.”
Laguna de Santa Rosa on a foggy morning.
Canon EOS 5D Mark III | 170mm | F10 | 1/320 sec | ISO 200 Photo: DianeMiller
Diane's advice for other photographers
Diane’s philosophy is simple and ongoing: “The paint never dries.” She embraces photography as a lifelong process of refinement, curiosity and discovery. She also jokes that she loves her “dimroom, Lightroom and Photoshop!” where the creative process continues after the shutter is pressed.
If you’d like to share your photography setup, tell us about your main camera, lens choices, key settings and photography strategies. You could be featured next!
Editor's note: This article continues a series, 'What's in your bag?', highlighting DPReview community members, their photography and the gear they depend on. Would you like to be featured in a future installment? Tell us a bit about yourself and your photography by filling out this form. If you're selected for a feature, we'll be in touch with next steps.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Updated March 5th, 2026
Well over a decade after Panasonic introduced the first mirrorless camera, it's a design that now dominates the interchangeable lens camera market. They include cameras designed for a wide range of photo and video pursuits and models at everything from budget to professional price points.
We've used and tested just about every current mirrorless camera on the market and picked out what we think are the stand-out models. We'll start with the most affordable models, then work our way up from there. In general terms, as you move up the price ladder, you'll see larger sensors with better image quality, higher resolution, faster burst rates, and more capable video specs. We'll explain why we've chosen each camera and try to explain the advantages and disadvantages of each choice.
Rolling shutter 'jello effect' present in 4K video
Crop when recording 4K/30p video
The Sony a6100 is an entry-level APS-C mirrorless camera. While it's one of the older cameras still available, its 24MP sensor, touchscreen for easy focus placement and Sony's excellent autofocus tracking, which especially excels at focusing on people and pets, still make it an excellent value for its price.
It's happiest if you prefer to point-and-shoot in an auto mode. The wide range of lenses available for it provide room to grow if you find yourself catching the photography bug and, if you shop smart, you can get the body and a lens for around $1000 (though we'd recommend staying away from Sony's default 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 II kit option).
The a6100 is the most basic model in the a6000-series and doesn't feel quite as robust as its step-up siblings. It offers a lower-resolution electronic viewfinder, and twin control dials that are both thumb-operated. Its touchscreen flips upward 180-degrees for easy selfie framing and vlogging.
Sony's autofocus system has been trained to recognize people and pets as subjects, and will follow them flawlessly throughout the frame. Coupled with the ability to touch the screen to place a focus point, it's a system that will serve beginner users very well, whatever they're shooting.
"The a6100's autofocus can effortlessly track whatever you point it at"
The a6100 makes it easy to record 4K footage or slow-motion 1080 video. There's a socket to connect an external mic but no way to connect headphones for monitoring. It can be set up for tap-to-track autofocus in video, too. There's significant 'jello-effect' distortion in the 4K footage though, especially in 24p mode.
The a6100 is a good entry-level camera with a very powerful, easy-to-use autofocus system. We're not huge fans of the kit zoom and the interface isn't especially welcoming, but with a few settings changes, it can help you get excellent shots, easily.
The Nikon Z50II is an entry-level APS-C mirrorless camera, built around a 21MP CMOS sensor. It features Nikon's '3D tracking' autofocus system, and can recognize nine subject types.
It represents a step up over the a6100, offering similarly powerful autofocus (though with more autofocus subject recognition types) and much more welcoming controls for when you want to be more involved in the photo-taking process. Nikon places some restrictions on what lenses third parties can make, but there are increasingly more sensible options; if the ones you want are available for it, the Z50II is the best option at this price point.
It has a solid grip, twin top-plate control dials, and a wide variety of customizable buttons, including one that, by default, controls color mode. Focusing is handled using the touchscreen or four-way controller.
Autofocus is very good with subject detection being especially good. However, human detection doesn't seem as sticky and 3D Tracking isn't as dependable as on Nikon's higher-end models. Otherwise, the camera is snappy and can even do 30fps pre-capture, though it's JPEG only.
The Z50II delivers on the basics without breaking the bank.
The Z50II can shoot Log or HLG video and has a waveform monitor to help set correct exposure. A headphone socket helps maintain audio quality but the lack of in-body stabilization counts against its use for video.
The Z50II is a solid hybrid camera, with several features from Nikon's higher-end cameras. The lack of a stabilized sensor is the one mark against what are otherwise very good video specs, and you may find the lens selection limited if you want a camera to grow with you.
The Fujifilm X-T5 is an enthusiast-level APS-C mirrorless camera built around a stabilized, 40MP BSI CMOS sensor with the company's X-Trans color filter array. It has plenty of features for both photo and video shooters.
What really lands it on this list, though, is how lovely it is to use. There are physical controls for all your exposure settings alongside configurable top-plate command dials, a big, bright EVF, and its JPEG colors are especially pleasing with a wide range of sensible (and more out-there) "Film Simulation" color modes. Though there are more technically capable APS-C cameras on the market, for a lot of photography, we'd give up a bit of AF tracking performance and speed for the X-T5's user experience.
The X-T5 features dedicated control dials for ISO, shutter speed and exposure compensation, along with a film-era SLR-style low-profile front grip. Its rear screen tilts up and down but also hinges outward for portrait-orientation shooting.
The X-T5 can detect a variety of subjects from animals to vehicles, and tracking performance is quite good with these. Tracking for unrecognized subjects is less dependable and eye detection is prone to false positives. Buffer depth while shooting at 15fps is reasonable.
The X-T5 foregoes some of the X-H2's video features to offer a more photo-centric experience with classic styling
Video performance can be either full width but less detailed, or oversampled from a crop of the sensor. The use of SD cards means it doesn't share the X-H2's high-data-rate ProRes options. There's no headphone jack but audio can be monitored through the USB port with an included adapter.
Having the X-H2 and X-H2S available to meet the needs of videographers allows the X-T5 to fulfill photographers' desires for stills-centric handling and features. For photographers who enjoy Fujifilm's traditional dial-based controls, there's no more capable body than the X-T5.
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content.
What are my other APS-C options?
The Sony a6700 is the most capable APS-C camera on the market, with extremely strong autofocus performance, image quality and video capabilities. Sony's E-mount also has the most complete array of APS-C lenses after Fujifilm's, largely thanks to support from third parties. However, we don't find it as pleasurable to use as the X-T5 – its viewfinder is smaller and lower-res, and the lack of an AF joystick makes picking a focus point a bit more of a chore – but if technical prowess is what you seek, the a6700 is your best bet.
Fujifilm's X-T50 is also worth considering if you're looking at APS-C cameras
Photo: Richard Butler
Finally, if you were enticed by the X-T5 but are on a budget, we'd suggest considering the Fujifilm X-T50. It packs the same sensor and processor into a smaller, lighter design. While the viewfinder isn't as nice, and the controls are a little more fiddly, in return, you get the film simulation dial, which encourages you to play with different looks. It can also be kitted with the excellent 16-50mm F2.8-4.8 OIS zoom, which is significantly better than the lenses bundled with other companies' APS-C offerings
Full-frame cameras (those with image sensors the same size as traditional "35mm" film) offer the potential for better image quality than smaller formats, simply because they have a larger area on which to capture light. However, you don't get something for nothing: even if you can find an affordable, compact full-frame camera at a good price, the lenses needed to make the most of it will be larger and will typically cost more than those for APS-C or Four Thirds sensors. Broadly speaking, there's a balance to be struck between image quality, size and price, which is worth contemplating before you make the assumption that full-frame is the best (or even 'better') format.
The Nikon Z5II is a full-frame mirrorless camera built around a 24MP BSI CMOS sensor.
Don't be scared by the "value" part of this pick; the Z5II doesn't feel cheap, and there aren't obvious features cut for cost. In fact, we suspect most photographers would struggle to push its limits, and unless you must absolutely have faster or higher-resolution shooting or top-end video, it's hard to argue that most people truly need anything better.
The Z5II is a solid camera with a deep grip and plenty of customizable buttons. It's comfortable to use, even for long sessions using a relatively large lens.
The autofocus is very good, especially in subject recognition modes. It's not quite as dependable at recognizing people in low light, but it's very competitive and light-years better than even higher-end cameras from just a few years ago.
The Nikon Z5II is almost unimaginably good for a camera priced under $2000.
Video quality is good, though with a decent amount of rolling shutter, and it offers advanced options like Log, HLG HDR and N-Raw capture. Autofocus isn't as dependable as it is in stills.
Image quality is excellent, and the Z5II can capture HLG HDR images using HEIF files for a more life-like viewing experience.
The Z5II is an impressive all-rounder that delivers excellent image quality and good video, underpinned by very good autofocus in a body that's well-designed and comfortable to use. It's hard to see what more an enthusiast photographer could want from a camera.
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content.
What are the other entry-level full-frame options?
We also think the Canon EOS R8 is worth considering if you're looking for a comparatively affordable full-frame camera. Like Nikon's Z-mount system, Canon's RF lens ecosystem is also somewhat short on affordable lenses to pair with an entry-level camera.
Its usability is what keeps it from topping this guide; it has shorter battery life and a smaller viewfinder than the Z5II, and lacks in-body image stabilization, a second SD card slot and an AF joystick. However, it can shoot 4K60 video without a crop, which could be interesting to videographers, though, unlike the Z5II, it doesn't offer any Raw options.
Good autofocus tracking with auto subject recognition mode
Extensive choice of video resolutions and codecs
What we don't:
Peak dynamic range lower than peers
N-Raw video format has limited support
Nikon controls 3rd-party lens options
The Nikon Z6III is Nikon's third-generation full-frame enthusiast mirrorless camera, with a 'partially stacked' 25MP CMOS sensor.
The Nikon Z6III is a significant step up for the Z6 series, and is a very capable camera for both stills and video. Its main benefit over less expensive models are its sensor readout speeds – and, therefore, rolling shutter performance in video. At its MSRP, at least in the US, it's not quite as good as its similarly priced rivals, but it's routinely available for hundreds of dollars off, a price that makes it a bit more attainable as this category gets increasingly expensive.
The Z6III has an ample grip and easy-to-use control scheme. Nikon's menus and touchscreen layout are also well-refined, but the camera lacks the company's traditional AF mode button or front-corner switch.
The Z6III is a genuine do-anything camera with excellent video and photo capabilities.
Autofocus is generally reliable, and the camera includes Nikon's 3D-tracking system and plenty of subject recognition modes. It can shoot 20 raws per second, or 60fps in JPEG mode.
The Z6III shoots many video formats, including Raw, and has dependable subject-tracking autofocus and a waveform display. Its 4K and 5.4K modes produce excellent detail, even in 60p, and its rolling shutter performance is outstanding.
Image quality is very good, with lots of detail and acceptable amounts of noise. There is a recognizable dynamic range tradeoff for that speed, but it's only noticeable in extreme situations.
The Z6III is a significant step-up from its predecessor and is to-date the most all-round capable camera in its class. It excels in both stills and video.
Full suite of video recording modes and assist features
What we don't:
Overheating in ambitious video modes
Dynamic range isn't as strong as its best competitors'
Hitting buffer's limit slows camera down
The Canon EOS R6 III is a full frame enthusiast camera, with a 33MP sensor.
It earns its place on this list by being a complete package that's enjoyable to use. Its image quality, burst rates and autofocus are capable of helping you tackle pretty much any subject, and it's also a powerful video camera. No matter what your needs it's hard to imagine you'll find that the EOS R6 III holding you back.
It has plenty of customizable buttons and a decent range of settings for them. It's comfortable to hold, but its viewfinder and display aren't the nicest around.
The EOS R6 III has very dependable autofocus across its selection of tracking and subject recognition modes. It can shoot at bursts up to 40fps (though with reduced dynamic range), and supports pre-capture for up to 0.5 sec before you press the shutter.
Rather than "jack of all trades, master of none." It's a master of most.
Images from the EOS R6 III have very good levels of detail and pleasing colors. The camera's peak dynamic range can't match the best of its competitors, and it'll struggle a bit more in e-shutter mode, but it's good enough for most use cases.
The video quality from the camera's open gate, Raw and oversampled 4K modes is quite good at 24p, though its higher-framerate and subsampled modes suffer a bit. Its rolling shutter performance is great, and it's quite nice to use for shooting video. However, its overheating performance could limit its most ambitious modes in hot shooting environments.
The EOS R6 III is an abundantly capable camera for most kinds of stills and video shooting. It pairs great performance with excellent ergonomics and a refined user experience.
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content.
The enthusiast rivals
The category of mid-range enthusiast full-frame cameras is perhaps the most competitive in the industry: each option is very capable, but with different strengths and weaknesses. Depending on your needs, the Sony a7 V or the Panasonic S1II may be slightly better options than the EOS R6 III or Z6III, but for most users, it's hard to go wrong with any of them. For more info on the subtle differences between them, check out our full best cameras under $3000 buying guide.
Some other notable mentions: if you shoot outside a lot and need a compact system with excellent weather sealing, the OM System OM-1 II is worth considering; outside of that use case, it's probably worth considering other options unless you're heavily invested in Micro Four Thirds lenses.
Sony'sa7C II is also a reasonable choice, as its high-resolution sensor is good for stills, though its slow readout speeds limit its video capabilities. Its autofocus isn't quite as advanced as that of the a7 V, but it's appreciably smaller than its rivals. This does mean that the viewfinder is small, and there's no AF joystick, though, which are the main reasons it's not one of our main picks: it's better on paper than in the hand.
Best high-end mirrorless camera: Canon EOS R5 II
45MP Stacked CMOS sensor | Eye-controlled AF subject selection | Up to 30fps continuous shooting
Slight reduction in dynamic range in extreme scenarios
Temperamental eye control
Temperature limits in heaviest video modes
The Canon EOS R5 II is one of the most capable cameras we've ever tested and will almost certainly be up to any task that most photographers can throw at it. It shoots at high resolution, has an excellent autofocus system and sports plenty of video features.
The grip is very well-shaped and proportioned, and the controls are all well-placed and comfortable to use for extended periods. Eye Control for autofocus is excellent when it works, which isn't always
The EOS R5 II has excellent tracking and subject-tracking autofocus performance. The subject detection is effective without getting in your way. It can shoot Raws at up to an extremely rapid 30fps.
The EOS R5 II does a vast range of things, most of them extremely well: it's impressive for action, landscapes, video, you name it.
It has plenty of video options up to Raw 8K/60p, offering high levels of detail, though it can overheat when shooting in its most impressive modes. Its rolling shutter rates are generally quite good.
The 45MP Raws are highly detailed, and the JPEG sharpening and noise reduction are sensible. It can't quite match higher-resolution cameras like the A7R V, but performs well in its own right.
The EOS R5 II excels at almost everything it tries to do, and that's a long list. It's hard to imagine what photo or video need it won't support you in.
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content.
A worthy competitor
The strongest competitor to the EOS R5 II, besides the original EOS R5, is Nikon's Z8. And, frankly, there's very little to choose between them. Canon's high-end model has some features that could be useful to certain photographers, like Action Priority AF and Eye Control, but outside of that, your choice should again be dictated by lens selection, as they're both supremely capable cameras.
The Sony a7CR takes most of the features of the more expensive a7R V and provides them in a smaller package. The viewfinder is disappointing for such an expensive camera, but nothing gives you so much image quality in such a small, capable package.
The a7CR is impressively small for a full-frame camera. The addition of a front control dial improves handling significantly. Notably, there’s no joystick for positioning the AF point, and the viewfinder is small and very low resolution for a camera costing this much.
Autofocus performance on the a7CR is very good and is helped by a dedicated processor for crunching complex machine learning-trained algorithms. Subject recognition is quick, and the AF system tracks subjects tenaciously around the frame in either stills or video. 8 fps burst shooting with continuous AF results in a dependably high hit rate.
"If you're looking for maximum resolution in a travel-sized body, the a7RC is tough to beat."
The a7CR captures 4K video at up to 60 fps. The most detailed, oversampled footage results from a 1.2x crop of the sensor, which makes it challenging to maintain wider focal lengths. Auto Framing mode uses AI algorithms to mimic the way a camera operator might punch in on subjects, keeping them framed and in focus.
The a7CR's 61MP sensor can capture a lot of detail, putting it ahead of most full-frame rivals; though it is a little noisier in low light. JPEG colors are pleasing, and excellent sharpening makes the most out of the 61MP sensor. Raw files provide plenty of latitude to pull up shadows at base ISO.
The a7CR delivers impressive results for its size. It essentially provides the same level of image quality, and most of the same features, as Sony's a7R V, but in a smaller package. In exchange for the small size, you make a few compromises, like no AF joystick, but if you're looking for maximum resolution in a travel-sized body, the a7CR is tough to beat.
The Fujifilm GFX 100S II is a 100MP medium format mirrorless interchangeable lens camera with built-in image stabilization.
This camera is perhaps the most specialized pick on this list: it's not especially fast or versatile, but in terms of image quality, it essentially offers the best levels of detail we've ever seen. It's a true step up over even the best of its full-frame rivals (some of which comes from its lenses - the GF primes often being particularly good).
Sample gallery
This widget is not optimized for RSS feed readers. Please open this article's permalink in a browser to view this content.
What are the other high-end options?
Just about all the cameras that cost $3000 and up are, unsurprisingly, rather good. We go into a little more detail about their relative merits in our High-end camera buying guide. As with any budget, the key things to consider are what types of photography you plan to do (and hence, which features and capabilities are most important to you), and whether the lenses you need are available at a price you're willing to pay.
Why you should trust us
This buying guide is based on cameras used and tested by DPReview's editorial team. We don't select a camera until we've used it enough to be confident in recommending it, usually after our extensive review process. The selections are purely a reflection of which cameras we believe to be best: there are no financial incentives for us to select one model or brand over another.
For last week's Question of the week, we’re turning the spotlight on something photographers love to debate: what’s your favorite camera brand? Some of you swear by one trusted name and have used it for decades, while others have explored multiple brands before finding 'the one'. There were quite a few of you who also talked about your experience in switching from one camera brand to another – a brave decision.
What I personally found interesting was how many of the responses talked about camera and lens brands that aren't often discussed on our forums. The Mamiya, Bronica, Siruis or TTArtisans of the world.
Keep reading to see which camera brands our readers chose as their favorites.
Your favorite camera brand
Skinma: OM System / Olympus. Nothing else comes close. I love the size of the cameras, as I can take a body and two lenses, a water bottle, food, and a flash all in my Lowepro sling bag. Performance is also great. I still have my original Olympus E-M5 as a backup body, and its image quality is fantastic compared to that of more modern cameras.
capanikon: A friend showed me his Nikon F3. I was impressed with the industrial rawness of it, the metal and hardness. The haptic shutter speed dial, buttons and switches. It felt like a real machine. I like the style of the F-mount lenses with their clicky aperture rings and bunny ears, helicoid focus, and rubber focusing rings. So, I sold my EOS and switched to Nikon. First, a used N8008; later, an F4s and an F3hp.
Satyaa: None! Every time I started to like a brand, they lagged in something I needed, and I had to switch. I like different bodies and lenses for different reasons, but no favorite brand right now. I am speaking as a hobbyist on a budget. If money is no constraint, I guess one could get anything in any brand. Leica might be my favorite brand at that point.
Photo: maoby
Kipplemaster: I have used a lot of different stuff and am definitely not a brand loyalist. Currently have a selection of Sonys as well as a couple of Nikon 1s. Out of ‘millions’ of lenses I've owned, that one is surprisingly easy to call. Probably my ‘sweet spot’ for loving my camera kit was the original Canon 5D and associated L lenses. My second-favourite lens is the Canon 200mm F2.8L.
I like trying weird stuff like the original Lytro and the Nokia 808 PureView, a 40MP camera on a weird Nokia phone in the days when 40MP wasn't even available on any DSLR. Most of them have been fun. All of which is a long-winded way of saying I don't really have a favorite brand. I almost forgot to mention that some of my other favourite lenses have been Sigmas.
greycell: I've followed DPReview for at least 15 years, and weirdly never felt compelled to comment before. I even hesitate to say Olympus (slash OM System) is ‘my favorite’, but it's what I'm used to and work with within my own means and limitations. I chose it originally because it's what my dad used, and I inherited all his classic manual lenses from the OM-1 era onward. I know it's not even the best for the low-light concert photography I like to do, but it feels good enough with modern processing tools.
SimonV: Having tried and owned almost all brands, there's only one that stands out and doesn't feel like it does things the same as others, and that's Fujifilm. I wouldn't call myself a fanboy in any regard since many of their models are a bit too fiddly for me and seem built for smaller hands and fingers, but they're the only company I've found that is both capable (albeit not at the top of any category) and, most importantly, Fun to shoot with.
If I were a pro, I'm sure it would be different, but I'm a hobbyist, and the most fun I've had has been with Fujifilm. Especially their later models like the X100VI and GFX100RF, which provide both fun and excellent image quality.
Photo: dimpsey
sportyaccordy: I shoot Sony because I'm just super picky about lenses and will compromise everything else for that. I really loved shooting with Canon. On paper, yes, sometimes Canon isn't the best, but the shooting experience/build quality, etc., make up for that. And now on the body side, at least I think they are basically back on top. Lenses are getting better, but still not where I want them (and even if/when they get there, I'm not switching again).
LLW902: I've got a Sony a7c II with a 24-70mm F2.8 and a Fujifilm X-E5 with a 23mm pancake lens, both sitting on my desk right now. Both are great cameras, but I'd reach for the Fujifilm first for almost anything, except a professional opportunity where it was absolutely critical I not miss focus on the first try. I guess that's a rather roundabout way of saying that Fujifilm is my favorite, even though, on the merits, it is a less accomplished device.
Tony5D: Currently using Nikon Z7II, but decided to change from Fujifilm (XE2, XT2, then XH1) mainly because my main subjects are landscape and architecture. The Nikon offers full-frame and 42MP, and is not much bigger than the X-H1. I have also used just about everything else because I was in the industry. Old favorites? Minolta CLE is easy to pack for flights, and the Canon G5 X Mark II, which I carry at all times, is a backup.
dizzeeK: Let's be honest, for someone shooting stills that aren't birds or sports, anything will work. I can only speak for me personally, though. I have to say, Canon. I have been through many cameras/systems since the film days, and I am most happy with Canon, despite the RF system not being the ‘best’ on paper. It is a joy to use, and the results are great. Who else has a 70-200mm F4 that is that compact and well featured?
So many other stories we couldn't fit in this article are shared in the forums. Thanks to everyone who took the time to explain why your favorite camera brand stands out to you.
Keep watch for the next Question of the week every other Wednesday to participate in this series. New questions are posted here on the homepage and in the forums. We can't wait to read and share your stories!