Nikon ZR review: it might not be what you think
Product photos: Mitchell Clark
Nikon has announced the ZR, a video-focused camera with Red co-branding. It features the same 24.5MP 'partially Stacked' sensor as the Z6III and inherits many capabilities from the more stills-oriented camera, but gains a new Raw video codec, video-focused UI and internal 32-bit float audio recording – a first in the industry.
Key Specs:
- 24.5MP full-frame 'partially Stacked' CMOS sensor
- Nikon Z-mount
- 7.5EV IBIS
- Up to 6K 60p
- R3D (NE) Raw video codec
- 4" 3.07M dot (1280 x 800px) 1000 nit display
- CFexpress Type B / microSD
- Autofocus subject detection for people, animals, vehicles and planes
- Internal 32-bit float
- No mechanical shutter
The ZR retails for $2199 – $500 cheaper than the Z6III, and has been available since October 2025.
Index:
- What's new
- How it compares
- Body and handling
- Video capabilities
- Video image quality
- In use: photography
- Conclusion
- Specifications
- Press Release
What's New
Familiar sensor, new body
While the ZR's heart may be the same as the Z6III, less the mechanical shutter, it's not immediately obvious by looking at it. The camera has a boxy, EVF-less design with a minimal grip, making it easy to mount on a gimbal without having to worry about clearance.
On the back is a massive 4" 3.07M dot display. It's in a video-friendly 16:10 aspect ratio, with a 1280 x 800 pixel resolution. It has a peak brightness of 1000 nits. Nikon says it supports the P3 color gamut, giving you a more accurate preview of what your colors will look like, when working beyond the limits of sRGB.
On the back of the display are the Nikon and Red logos. The ZR is the first camera since Nikon's acquisition of Red to come with both companies' branding (unless you count the Z-mount Raptor's body cap).
R3D (NE) Codec
The ZR includes a new Raw video codec called R3D (NE), alongside Nikon's N-Raw format and ProRes Raw. While it's not exactly the same as the Redcode Raw that Red's cinema cameras shoot, it is made to be cut together with it and uses the same Log curve and color gamut.
Importantly, this means you can use the Look Up Tables, or LUTs, that already exist for Red cameras, making it much easier to cut footage from the ZR and Red's cinema cameras together.
When shooting in R3D (NE), the ZR can capture 6K and DCI 4K at up to 60p, and UHD 4K at up to 120p. These same options are available for N-Raw, though the red-flavored Raw doesn't have any compression settings like the ones available for N-Raw. We'll touch on the differences between the ZR's Raw formats later on in this review, but have covered them in more depth in a separate article.
Cine EI
R3D Raw also comes with a different approach to gain. Instead of applying it in-camera based on your ISO setting, the camera will lock it to either its low (ISO 800) or high (ISO 6400) gain step. If you adjust your ISO, the camera will note it as a metadata tag and adjust its metering to capture a different balance of highlights and shadows, but it won't change the amount of gain added to the footage. This approach is comparable to the Cine EI (exposure index) mode Sony includes on its video-focused cameras, and gives you more control over your video's lightness ("ISO") in post. By contrast, N-Raw is shot with variable gain, just like photo mode, so you can't adjust this after the fact.
Alongside R3D (NE), the ZR supports the two other Raw formats the Z6III could shoot: Nikon's own N-Raw codec, as well as Apple's ProRes Raw. Though, as has been the case in Nikon's previous cameras, the widely-supported ProRes Raw option isn't available at the camera's fastest resolutions and frame rates.
Internal 32-bit float recording
The ZR is the first mirrorless camera to include fully-internal 32-bit float recording for audio. If you're unfamiliar, 32-bit float encodes audio in an entirely different fashion than traditional 16 or 24-bit encoding, allowing it to record a much wider range of values than would be possible. Typically it's combined with dual gain amplifiers to ensure both quiet and loud sounds can be captured.
The benefit is that you don't need to finely adjust gain and worry about clipping (other than the point at which your mic itself it overwhelmed). While we've seen other cameras, such as the Panasonic GH7, that support 32-bit float recording with an external XLR adapter, the ZR can do it without one, obviating the need for a costly accessory.
What's more, it can be used to record audio from the camera's internal microphone – using OZO directional technology from Nokia – as well as from the 3.5mm microphone jack, meaning you can use it all the time.
Digital hotshoe
While the ZR has a traditional 3.5mm microphone input, it also includes a digital hotshoe with support for audio. Nikon sells a compact microphone that uses it, and Tascam offers an XLR adapter.
Currently, it's unclear what abilities other third party companies have to create accessories for it. For example, some DJI wireless microphone receiver packs can plug directly into the digital hotshoes on Sony's cameras, making it so you don't have to connect them with a 3.5mm cable. Whether they'll make something comparable for Nikon's system remains to be seen.
How it compares
You only need to look at the ZR to recognize that it's a competitor to Sony's FX range of cameras for film makers. Its lack of viewfinder will draw immediate comparison with the FX3 and APS-C/Super35 FX30 models, but the price is more in line with the FX2. However, the Nikon has a sensor much better suited to video than the FX2, which uses the rather slow to read-out chip from the a7 IV.
Despite the apparent similarities (high res 60p Raw capture), it's not quite a like-for-like competitor to Canon's C50, which launched on the same day. That is an unstabilized, actively-cooled camera, rather than a hand-held model. The provision of capabilities such as a timecode socket, desqueeze preview modes for working with anamorphic lenses and the option of bolt-on mount adapters suggests a focus on industry use, rather than beginners and owner-operator outfits.
| Nikon ZR | Sony FX2 | Nikon Z6III | Canon C50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSRP at launch |
$2199 | $2699 | $2699 | $3899 |
| Sensor res | 24MP | 33MP | 24MP | 32MP |
| Sensor type | Partially Stacked CMOS |
BSI CMOS | Partially Stacked CMOS |
CMOS with dual pixel AF |
| IBIS rating (Center / Periphery) |
7.5 / | 5.0 / 5.0 | 8.0 / | N/A |
| Mechanical shutter | No | No | Yes | No |
| Media types | CFe B / XQD UHS-I Micro SD |
CFe A / UHS-II SD UHS-II SD |
CFe B / XQD UHS-II SD |
CFe B UHS-II SD |
| Viewfinder | N/A | 3.68M dots 0.7x mag tilting |
5.76M dots 0.8x mag |
N/A |
| Rear screen | 4.0" 3.07M dots (1280 x 800 px) 1000 nits |
3.0" 1.04M dots (720 x 480 px) |
3.2" 2.09M dots (1024 x 680 px) |
3.0" 1.62M dots |
| Maximum res/rate | 6K/60 | DCI 4K/30 60 with 1.5x crop |
6K/60 |
7K/60 |
| Proxy rec | To same card | Yes | To same card | Yes |
| Raw options | R3D, N-Raw, ProRes RAW | Output to Atomos Rec | N-Raw, ProRes RAW | Canon Raw Light |
| Cine EI option? | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Audio capabilities | 4ch 32-bit float / 24-bit | 4ch 24-bit | 4ch 24-bit | 4ch 24-bit |
| LUT upload | 10 Preview only |
12 Preview, Embed, Apply |
No | Apply only (Built-in Preview LUTs) |
| Anamorphic desqueeze | No | Yes (2.0 or 1.3x) |
No | Yes (2.0, 1.8, 1,5 1.3x) |
| Active cooling? | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Battery life (CIPA) Actual / Cont |
155 / 100 min | 100 / - min | Not specified | |
| Dimensions | 133 x 81 x 49mm | 130 x 78 x 104mm | 139 x 102 x 74mm | 142 x 88 x 95 |
| Weight | 630g | 679g | 760g | 670g |
The Nikon ZR looks essentially like one of Sony's small FX models but without their active cooling. And, in the same way that the FX2 and FX3 share much of their hardware with the more photo-focused a7 IV and a7S III bodies, respectively, the ZR is essentially a video-ized Z6III. So, while you lose the viewfinder, photo-friendly body shape and mechanical shutter, you gain more Raw video options, a hotshoe with digital inputs and 32-bit float audio. Despite this, Nikon has brought the ZR in at a price significantly below that of the Z6III.
But, more significant is that it undercuts the price of the FX2, which isn't built around an especially video-adept sensor, and at nearly half the $4100 asking price of the FX3, which has comparable rolling shutter, but captures native 4K, rather than the Nikon's 6K. In most regards, the ZR looks like a bargain.
Body and handling
The ZR is a relatively compact body, immediately bringing to mind the original Sony FX3, but without the prevalence of 1/4-20 mounting points, and without the finned exhaust ports, as the ZR does not feature active cooling.
It's just as much a Z6III shorn of its viewfinder as anything else, and has a similarly solid-feeling build. It uses the same fibre-reinforced plastic that Nikon has been using for some years, which gives a good sense of solidity without adding excessive weight. This is likely to be a benefit if you choose to mount it on a gimbal.
Ports
The ZR has most of the ports you'd expect from a video camera: USB-C, running at 3.2 speeds and 3.5mm headphone and microphone jacks. The one surprise is the presence of micro, rather than full-size, HDMI. It does make sense given the camera's smaller form-factor, but those planning to routinely plug in monitors or external recorders to this camera will likely wish for a more robust connector.
Its storage mediums are also unconventional. While its CFexpress Type B slot is exactly what you'd expect on a high-end video camera, the secondary UHS-I microSD card slot isn't. It's not fast enough to support most of the formats that the camera can so you can't use it to backup your recordings, nor can it be used to record proxies (though if you're shooting in R3D (NE) or N-Raw, proxy files will be recorded to the main card). Most people, then, will likely just use it for transferring settings and LUTs, or perhaps for shooting stills.
Battery
The Nikon ZR uses the same EN-EL15c battery as the Z6III. It's a 16Wh battery which powers the Z6III to a respectable 390 shots per charge when shooting photos and 100mins of "actual" video shooting, according to CIPA's standardized tests.
Nikon hasn't provided the rated values for the ZR, but they're pretty comparable: good, but not exceptionally so.
Video capabilities
As you might expect, Nikon is putting most emphasis on the ZR's Raw capabilities, but for many people, good 10-bit Log footage offers a less data-intensive workflow with plenty of editing flexibility (there's a much smaller difference in editing flexibility between 10-bit Log and 12-bit linear Raw than between JPEGs and Raw stills).
Encoded options
The ZR offers plenty of gamma-encoded video options, in a choice of All-I ProRes 422, 10- or 8-bit 4:2:0 H.265 or 8-bit, 4:2:0 H.264 MP4s.
As is often the case, the most data-intensive options aren't available in ProRes. And, like the Z6III, the ZR needs to crop in to an APS-C / Super35 region to shoot 4K/120 or 100.
| Resolution | Framerates | Region | ProRes 422 10-bit MOV |
H.265 (4:2:0) 10 or 8-bit MOV |
H.264 (4:2:0) 8-bit MP4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.4K | 60 / 50 | Full-width | No | Yes | No |
| 30 / 25 / 24 | Yes | Yes | No | ||
| 4K (3840 x 2160) |
60 / 50 / 30 / 25 / 24 | Full-width or 1.5x crop |
Yes | Yes | No |
| 120 / 100 | 1.5x crop | No | Yes | No | |
| Full HD (1920 x 1080) |
120 / 100 | Full-width or 1.5x crop |
Yes | Yes | No |
| 60 / 50 | Full-width or 1.5x crop |
Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| 30 / 25 / 24 | Full-width or 1.5x crop |
No | Yes | Yes | |
| 240 / 200 | 1.03x crop | No | Yes | No |
Raw options
Even if they're not necessarily the easiest options to capture or work with, the ZR's Raw video modes are likely to be the most eye-catching.
The camera can capture either the Red-derived R3D NE Raw or the existing Nikon N-Raw at up to 6K/60. It has to drop to 30p to utilize the more widely-supported ProRes RAW codec.
| Resolution | Region | Frame rates | R3D NE | N-Raw | ProRes RAW HQ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0K | 6048 x 3402 | Full-width | 60/ 50 | Yes | Yes | No |
| 30/ 25/ 24 | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| 4.0K | 4030 x 2268 | Full-width | 60/ 50/ 30/ 25/ 24 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 3984 x 2240 | 1.52x crop | 120/100 | Yes | Yes | No | |
| 60/ 50/ 30/ 25/ 24 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
It's worth noting the different ways the R3D and N-Raw modes handle ISO. Currently, most software doesn't support lens corrections for R3D NE, though the format itself does, and they can be added using Red's RedCine-X Pro transcoding software.
Shutter angle
The ZR is the first Nikon camera to let you set exposure in terms of shutter angle, out-of-the-box (it's was added to the Z8 and Z6III in firmware, post-launch). This is especially valuable on a camera that can shoot 60 and 50 fps footage as readily as it can 30, 25 or 24p, as it means you can switch frame rates and have the exposure time respond accordingly, avoiding the risk of forgetting, and shooting footage with too high or low a shutter speed, after you switch.
Video image quality
As with the Z6III, the ZR's compressed footage is very detailed in both 4K and 5.4K. However, Nikon has clearly changed how it processes this footage, and it appears to be applying less, or more subtle, sharpening than the Z6III.
Compared to hybrid stills/video cameras, the ZR has similar levels of detail to the similar-pixel-count Panasonic S1II, as well as to the Canon EOS R6 III's oversampled 4K mode. However, the Canon's 7K open gate footage provides much more detail than the ZR's 5.4K capture, though it will take up more storage and has to be edited before delivery. The highest-resolution footage you can get from the ZR offers more detail than the Sony a7 V's oversampled 4K footage, though some of that is almost certainly aliasing. That's also the case if you compare the cameras' 4K output, with the ZR's having more aliasing, thus not necessarily representing the scene better. It's also worth noting that the ZR comes in at a substantially lower price point than those cameras (though with a corresponding decrease in stills capabilities).
While bumping up to 60p doesn't come with a cost to field of view or detail, if you want to shoot in 120p, the camera will have to crop down to a smaller APS-C region of the sensor. This results in less detail being captured, as is expected given the extra noise coming from using a smaller region of the sensor, and the higher shutter speeds required for shooting at higher frame rates, though it's the same amount as captured by the APS-C 24p mode.
Nikon ZR | 1/320 | F8 | ISO 800
The ZR shares a video IQ quirk with several of Nikon's other cameras, in that, for around the first second of an H.265 recording, the bitrate is substantially lower, resulting in noticeably softer and blockier footage. While it's certainly a ding against a hybrid camera, having to leave a second of lead time on each of your shots is borderline unacceptable for a video-focused camera.
Three flavors of Raw
The Nikon ZR supports internal Raw recording to three different formats: N-Raw, ProRes Raw, and R3D NE, a format currently unique to it. They all have the common caveats associated with Raw recording – using it will require post-processing (often using specific editing software), and the difference between Raw and Log isn't anything like as great as the difference between Raw and JPEG for stills – but for those that need it, it's available.
As you'd expect, the ZR's three flavors of Raw capture comparable amounts of detail at their 6K settings, though their default LUTs offer fairly different foundations to build your own grade on. Despite the similar image quality each version of Raw offers, there are substantial differences between what it's like to shoot them. You can read our in-depth comparison below.
N-Raw or R3D NE: how to choose
Log isn't just log
The ZR's N-Log mode for H.265 does more than just record in a different gamma; it also has a big impact on the amount of apparent detail in the footage compared to the camera's default H.265 color mode. Even with the LUT applied to roughly match color and lightness, the footage is substantially softer. When shooting in N-Log, the camera doesn't appear to apply any of the "Picture Control" adjustments, including sharpening, which may account for some of the visual differences; rather than doing it in-camera, it seems like Nikon is assuming that those shooting Log will want control over sharpening in post.
Despite sharing a sensor, Log footage recorded in H.265 from the ZR clearly has more noise reduction in the shadows than footage shot on the Z6III with the same settings. This noise reduction isn't applied to Raw footage, but for those who would prefer smaller file sizes will have to give up some control over how sharp the footage is straight out of camera. Given the controversy around the Z6III's relatively noisy and sometimes flickering shadows when recording Log, it's not surprising that Nikon has made some changes.
In use: a photographer's perspective
By Mitchell Clark
As with other video-focused cameras, there will be photographers who ignore the ZR's Red branding to focus purely on the sensor and the boxy shape, reminiscent of a rangefinder. If that's you, we implore you: do not buy this camera.
Of course, it can take stills, and it even has a switch on the top to go between its photo and video modes. But its lack of a mechanical shutter essentially rules out flash photography (it can only sync at 1/60 sec), and means you may have to deal with banding when shooting under artificial lighting. And while I'd welcome a rear display this large and bright on a hybrid camera, I still found myself missing an EVF when shooting pictures with the ZR.
While I, like many of you, would love it if Nikon (or anyone, for that matter) released a camera roughly this shape and size aimed at photographers, the ZR isn't it. It's a video camera that can shoot the occasional still when needed, and should be treated as such.
Conclusion
By Mitchell Clark
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
As the Nikon ZR is a video camera, we thought it best to present the majority of our conclusion as a video, primarily shot using the ZR and with lots of sample footage.
To briefly summarize: on the vlogging to production workhorse spectrum, the ZR sits far closer to the Sony ZV-E1 and Panasonic S9 at the vlogging end of things side of things, rather than on the S1H and FX3 side. But for those who are looking for that kind of camera, which will likely be the majority of shooters, it's remarkably capable at that job.
The ZR has a few first-gen quibbles, which isn't necessarily a surprise. As it stands, it feels like Nikon was able to incorporate some of Red's expertise as it finished up the ZR, rather than building it from the ground up with that knowledge. What's there is quite good, but it'd be interesting to see what a version of this camera would look like if that production-focused perspective were available earlier in the process.
Nikon also seems to already be taking some of the user feedback to heart. At the time of writing, the company is promising a firmware update to the ZR that will:
- Allow users to record using the more sophisticated Log3G10 in H.265, instead of being stuck with N-Log
- Bring "general quality improvements" to H.265
- Let you use focus peaking and view assist concurrently when shooting in R3D NE
- Add a further compressed version of R3D NE, as is available when shooting N-Log (a big help in the time of skyrocketing storage costs)
If all of that comes to fruition, the ZR will be further refined as everyday vlogging/video camera. And while it may not be the best pick if your intent is a multi-operator, budgeted production, its very competitive price certainly makes that easier to accept. This capability, combine with a price that makes the camera punch a fair bit above its weight, earn it our Gold award.
Scoring
Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category. Click here to learn about what these numbers mean.
Nikon ZR Category: Mid Range Full Frame Camera |
Build quality Ergonomics & handling Features Metering & focus accuracy Image quality (raw) Image quality (jpeg) Low light / high ISO performance Viewfinder / screen rating Optics Performance Movie / video mode Connectivity Value | PoorExcellent | ||||
Conclusion The ZR is one of the best vlogging cameras we've seen, providing plenty of headroom for expanding your production values. | |||||
| |||||
| |||||
Compared to its peers
Compared with Nikon's own Z6III, the ZR is the obvious choice for video-first shooters, thanks to its larger, brighter display with video-focused menu, 32-bit internal float, and the option of using the more sophisticated R3D NE format. By default, the ZR sharpens its footage less, which we find to provide a better starting point for editing, though it also has more aggressive noise reduction, which is especially noticeable when shooting H.265 in Log. That means you lose a touch of detail in the shadows, but we'd consider it a fair trade-off (and one that could be fixed with a firmware update). For anyone intending to regularly shoot stills, though, the Z6III will be a much better option.
While we haven't tested the Sony FX2, we are familiar with its sensor, which has much slower readout speeds and requires a crop to an APS-C region to do 4K/60, which the ZR does not. Unless you have a very specific need for a production-focused camera, the ZR is a much better choice, thanks to its faster sensor, 32-bit float audio, choice of Raw and Log workflows, and larger screen. The FX2 will likely have cleaner footage in the deep shadows, and has a mechanical shutter and EVF for stills, but those qualities can also be had in cameras much better suited to both stills and video than it.