Is the Fujifilm X-M5 worth the wait?
![]() |
The X-M5 seems to have turned into a hot-ticket item. |
Despite being released in late 2024, the Fujifilm X-M5 isn't the easiest camera to get your hands on, especially in the US – a situation not helped by tariffs. That raises the question: is it worth putting in an order to try and get one, or are there more readily available cameras that will scratch the same itch?
As with the X100VI, the answer will depend on why you're considering an X-M5 in the first place (though, thankfully, it's not essentially unique like Fujifilm's fixed-lens offering). If you want one primarily for shooting video, the best alternative will be different than if you're looking for a small, sub-$1000 mirrorless to mainly shoot stills with.
I want an X-M5 just for stills
![]() |
While the X-M5 is shaped like a lot of vlogging cameras – it has a boxy body with no EVF, and a rather insubstantial grip – it's generally nicer to shoot with than most vlogging-focused cameras thanks to its two top-plate dials. It also has a mechanical shutter, essential if you want to shoot flash.
The Nikon Z30 shares the same list of benefits and has a very similar form factor, and while its autofocus system will probably be about as reliable as the X-M5's, it's not Nikon's latest and greatest: it has fewer subject recognition modes, which can make it easier to set your focus point, depending on what you're shooting. While the Z mount has a more limited selection of lenses than X mount, Nikon has started allowing third-party companies to make some autofocusing primes for its system. If you want a zoom lens, though, you're still stuck with Nikon's lackluster offerings.
![]() |
The Z50II has different styling, but is aimed at a similar audience. |
If you're not married to the easier-to-pocket boxy shape, you'll have even more options, such as the Nikon Z50II and Canon EOS R10. Both cameras include viewfinders, which makes them easier to use in direct sunlight at the cost of some bulk. The Z50II has a newer autofocus system than the Z30, as well as a color profile system that can at least get you closer to the aesthetic choices you can make with Fujifilm's famous film simulations. The EOS R10, meanwhile, has a healthy selection of zoom lenses, including some quite fast options from Sigma and Tamron.
I want an X-M5 for video
![]() |
The X-M5 is aimed at content creators and has a fairly robust suite of vlogging features, dedicated microphone and headphone jacks, and the ability to shoot 6.2K open-gate and 4K60p video, though the latter comes with a 1.29x crop.
If you're mostly interested in video, the Sony ZV-E10 II is a worthy alternative. It can't shoot open-gate, so you won't have as much flexibility in post, but it makes up for it with much more reliable autofocus and tracking and a faster sensor with less rolling shutter distortion and less of a crop in 4K 60p. It's also capable of producing nice photos, though the experience of taking them won't be as engaging, thanks to its lack of a second top-plate command dial.
While the Z30 is also pitched as being good for video, it falls short of the X-M5 in a number of ways: it doesn't have a headphone jack, can't shoot 4K 60p and can't shoot 10-bit video, which provides you more room to color-grade in post.
![]() |
The Canon PowerShot V1 is another option, though it's quite different from the other cameras on this list. It's explicitly aimed at video creators but has a built-in 16-50mm equiv. F2.8-4.5 lens rather than a mount and uses a smaller Type 1.4 (226mm²) sensor instead of an APS-C (~367mm²) one. That means you lose out a lot on flexibility and a bit on image quality, but given how many people only ever use their camera's kit lens, that may not be a huge con for you. It has a fan for extended recording time, a built-in ND filter and quite reliable autofocus, making it a useful video tool if you're willing to put up with its limitations.
I was hoping to shoot a little of both
![]() |
Part of what makes the X-M5 so interesting is that it packs a lot of photo and video capabilities into a small, stylish body. It's that last part where most of its peers don't quite measure up; if you want something with this form factor that has classic styling and is equally capable for photos and videos, you may well need to wait for the X-M5.
If you're willing to get something a bit bigger with less emphasis on aesthetics, though, the story is the same as the stills. The EOS R10 and Z50II are both quite capable hybrids and have more reliable autofocus, though their 4K60p modes come with a slightly higher crop than the X-M5's (1.56x and 1.5x, respectively).
Ultimately, there's no direct substitute that does everything the X-M5 does, especially if you're attracted to the wide range of lenses available for X-mount. But depending on your priorities, there are at least some reasonable alternatives, unlike with the X100VI.