Vue lecture

How an all-women crew covered one of trail running’s toughest races

Salomon’s new film goes behind the scenes as the team navigates unpredictable weather, demanding mountain terrain, long days and rapid-turnaround decisions to document UTMB.

Misty mountain town at dusk with buildings lit up; centered white text reads “INCREDIBLY CLOSE.”Salomon

I love watching adventure stories, especially when they pull back the curtain on the work required to tell them well. Salomon’s short documentary, The Women Who Took Over UTMB, does exactly that, following an all-women photo, video, and social team as they cover UTMB, one of trail running’s largest and most demanding events.

The team is there to document 23 Salomon athletes across five races and nearly 400 kilometers of mountain terrain over six days. They’re navigating unpredictable weather, road closures, long drives around the Mont Blanc massif, patchy connectivity, tight turnaround times, and the physical effort of carrying heavy camera kits to the places where the most compelling moments might unfold.

The film covers a lot, including the logistics of capturing an event like this. It is easy to see a dramatic mountain-running image or polished race recap and forget the chain of decisions behind it: where to position a photographer, how to get a camera operator ahead of an athlete, when to stop shooting and start transmitting and how to keep creating after little sleep. The crew has to make those calls constantly, while contending with rain, snow, exhaustion and a mid-race course adjustment.

I’ve helped a runner during a far less intense ultramarathon and got a small taste of just how grueling the experience can be, even without the pressure of covering it or the burden of camera gear. Calling this assignment demanding would be an understatement, and the team did a phenomenal job producing photo, video, and social coverage throughout the event.

The fact that the content team is made up entirely of women adds a welcome dimension in a space that has been male-dominated. The film touches on why this team was assembled in the first place and on some of their experiences as women in the field. It also highlights that these are simply experienced creatives doing incredibly difficult work at a very high level, supporting one another and finding the human stories within a massive endurance event.

For anyone interested in adventure, storytelling, sports photography, filmmaking, or the often-invisible labor behind major event coverage, it’s a compelling watch.

About the Author: Abby Ferguson holds an MFA in photography and blends a fine-art background with extensive editorial and commercial experience. She built and led an in-house imaging program for a large vacation rental company and has served as an associate editor at Popular Photography. She also teaches at a local community college and serves on its Photographic Technology Program Advisory Board, sharing her knowledge and enthusiasm for the medium.

Want to stay up to date on the latest product news and releases? Add DPReview as a preferred source to ensure our independent journalism makes it to the top of your Google search results.

add as a preferred source on google

  •  

The Artra Camera One photography-inspired watch got updated with a new movement


The Artra Camera One photography-inspired watch has been updated with a new movement. The three current models (two are already sold out) now come with a Miyota 8N24 – a reliable, Japanese-made automatic skeleton watch movement produced by Citizen. Customers who purchased the earlier version can upgrade the movement for $100.

Use the coupon code LEICARUMORS to get a discount on the watch if you order from their official website:


Additional information on the Artra Camera One photography-inspired watch can be found here:

Too broke for the Leica watch? This stunning new Artra “Camera One” photography inspired watch is a fraction of the price (coupon code included)

Check out this stunning new ArtraLabs “Camera One” photography-inspired watch (coupon code included) 1/4:https://t.co/xaL1dKqHDm pic.twitter.com/XPwMi8l68y

— Photo Rumors (@photorumors) December 15, 2025

Artra Designs’ “Camera One” collection is a series of limited-edition mechanical watches rendered in premium materials with hand-finished movements visible through sapphire casebacks that pay homage to the golden age of photography, drawing inspiration from iconic cameras and lenses dating back to 1878. Each timepiece features dials and details crafted to resemble camera apertures, shutter blades, depth-of-field scales, and film advance mechanisms. The new Camera One limited edition watch comes in five different configurations (two of them are sold out already).

Inspired by the timeless art of photography, the Artra Designs Camera One shatters conventional watchmaking boundaries with two pioneering patents (ZL202530168106.1) (ZL202520671885.1), weaving the soul of film photography into every facet of its design.

At its heart, the dial reimagines a camera’s aperture structure—turn the crown at the upper left, and the aperture blades dance open and closed, unveiling a translucent “film” beneath. As you admire this mechanical rhythm, it’s as if you’ve stepped back into the romantic golden age of film, where every frame was a deliberate, heartfelt act of creation.

The watch crystal, meanwhile, transcends its role as a mere protector, doubling as a camera lens. Through its clear transparency, it doesn’t just guard time—it captures it, freezing moments of wear into lasting memories. Even the crown rotating ring is reborn as a zoom ring; with each turn, you’re not just adjusting a watch component, but mastering the very rhythm of light and shadow, just as a photographer does when fine-tuning their lens to craft the perfect shot.

From aperture to lens to zoom, the C1 is more than a watch—it’s a wearable love letter to photography, a piece that lets you carry the romance of film in every second that ticks by.

A Tribute to the Legend of 135 Film Format


In 1925, Leica pioneered a groundbreaking idea by rotating the Super 35 film frame 90 degrees, laying the foundation for the 135 film format. Later, Kodak popularized photography among the masses by launching the Kodak Retina camera that adopted this 135 standard. A legendary chapter in imaging history was thus written. Taking time as our medium, we have integrated this legacy into watch design to create the “Light & Shadow Scale” Camera-Themed Watch, allowing the passion for imaging to flow through time.

Rekindling the love for photography

Check out this stunning new ArtraLabs “Camera One” photography-inspired watch (coupon code included) 2/4:https://t.co/xaL1dKqHDm pic.twitter.com/jG2tpKlK4V

— Photo Rumors (@photorumors) December 15, 2025

When viewed head-on, the internal “film” of the watch is arranged vertically, replicating the classic composition of traditional film frames. Every time you raise your wrist, it is a look back at the original aspiration of imaging. When the watch is rotated 90 degrees, the depth-of-field scale on the side emerges clearly, and the outline of the watch instantly aligns with the shape of a camera, like a “mini camera” that can command time, rekindling the love for photography.

Horse in Motion

Check out this stunning new ArtraLabs “Camera One” photography-inspired watch (coupon code included) 3/4:https://t.co/xaL1dKqHDm pic.twitter.com/6xxkmPPhKC

— Photo Rumors (@photorumors) December 15, 2025

The depth of field scale on the left and the rotor on the back, featuring the iconic image of “Horse in Motion,” the first moving image ever taken by Muybridge in 1878, pay tribute to the history of photography in every detail. More than just a timekeeping tool, it embodies the art of photography on the wrist—encapsulating the inspiration and essence of photography within its compact dial. Every glance at the time feels like a touch of photographic art, embarking on a journey of photographic exploration on the wrist.

Hidden Ingenious details

Check out this stunning new ArtraLabs “Camera One” photography-inspired watch (coupon code included) 4/4:https://t.co/xaL1dKqHDm pic.twitter.com/AQSXlfnvC1

— Photo Rumors (@photorumors) December 15, 2025

The bottom of the watch is equipped with an ISO and shutter speed display, identical to that of Leica cameras, fully replicating the core elements of a camera. Every design detail pays tribute to the legend of the 135 film format, presenting a wrist accessory that combines passion and quality for those who cherish both imaging and time.

“Sunny 16” principle




The bezel is designed based on the classic “Sunny 16” principle. The luminous pearls indicating the F-number correspond to ISO and shutter speed. This universal principle in photography allows photographers using film to align the luminous pearls with the aperture value at different film speeds, and quickly match the ISO indicated below the inner bezel to the appropriate shutter speed. This allows for simple metering, integrating photographic parameters into the time-reading process and seamlessly integrating timing with the professional logic of photography.

The post The Artra Camera One photography-inspired watch got updated with a new movement appeared first on Photo Rumors.

  •  

Enlarging a small photo for a large print without quality loss

Enlarging a small photo for a large print without quality loss.

A photo can look perfectly sharp on a monitor and still look noticeably softer when printed at 20 × 30 or 24 × 36 inches. When the source file doesn’t have enough resolution for that print size, enlarging it can make fine details look softer and edges less defined.

Wildlife is a good example. A 12MP DSLR can produce a perfectly usable photograph, but if the subject occupies only a small portion of the frame, cropping can leave only a fraction of the original pixels for the final image. The same thing can happen with a modern high-resolution camera- a 45MP file sounds like plenty, but a heavy crop can quickly reduce the resolution available for a large print.

I’ve tried standard resizing, sharpening, and dedicated AI upscaling tools to deal with this problem over the years. I can get very good results with Lightroom and Photoshop, too, especially when I’m willing to spend more time fine-tuning the image. The same is true of more specialized upscaling tools—the results can be excellent, but getting there sometimes takes a fair amount of hands-on work. So I was a little skeptical when I first tested Aiarty Image Enhancer.

After trying it on a range of photos, I was pleasantly surprised by how clean and natural the results looked. In many cases, I could move the enlarged file into the rest of my editing workflow without additional cleanup. It became a useful option when a cropped or low-resolution photo didn’t have enough pixels for the print size I wanted.

How Aiarty Enlarges Photos for Large Prints

When I prepare a photo for a larger print, I first look at how far the cropped file is from the pixel dimensions I need.

This is where I usually turn to Aiarty. If the file is only slightly short, I usually start with 2× rather than pushing the image further than necessary. For a heavily cropped or very small source, I may go to 4× or 8×, depending on how the result holds up. If I already know the final print dimensions, I can also set a custom output resolution and choose a suitable DPI for the final print workflow.

When enlarging a photo for a large print, things like high-ISO noise, compression artifacts, and slight softness can become much more obvious. I used to expect some cleanup after upscaling, but with Aiarty, I often get a cleaner starting point without having to spend as much time fixing those issues manually. I can then take the enlarged file into Lightroom or Photoshop for the final adjustments.

You can try Aiarty Image Enhancer for free to see how it enlarges your own photos before committing to a larger print. A 49% off lifetime license is also currently available for 3 PCs or Macs, with no subscription fee and free lifetime updates.

Real Test #1: Enlarging Wedding and Portrait Photos

Wedding and portrait photos are a good test for large-print enlargement because they are often printed as wall portraits or framed enlargements. Once I looked closely at the enlarged file, even small flaws in facial details, hair, and skin texture became easier to spot.

For this test, I started with a 3500 × 2333-pixel wedding photo. On paper, it’s a healthy file for standard albums. But when I checked the numbers for a 20 × 30-inch wall print, it dropped the native resolution to a meager 117 PPI. At that size, the print could look noticeably softer up close

Alt: Original wedding photo with blurry facial details at 180% zoom

I enlarged the image 2× with Aiarty, producing a 7000 × 4666-pixel file. At the same 20 × 30-inch print size, that increases the pixel density to about 233 PPI. That gave me a much more comfortable starting point for the 20 × 30-inch print than the original file.

Alt: 2× enlarged in Aiarty, More-Detail GAN model, Face Restoration enabled

Real Test #2: Enlarging a Cropped Wildlife Photo

Wildlife photography is a revealing test for photo enlargement because the subject often occupies only a small part of the frame. A high-resolution original can lose a significant amount of its available pixels after a tight crop.

Here, the cropped image was 1728 × 2592 pixels, taken from a much larger original. At 200% on screen, I could already see some noise and softness in the feathers.

I wanted to use it for a 16 × 24-inch wildlife wall print. So I enlarge it 2x to 3456 × 5184 pixels. The feather detail was easier to see, and the noise was less distracting. The additional pixels also provided more room for larger prints without changing the original composition.

Alt: Aiarty 2× enlarged wildlife photo, More-Detail GAN model

With feathers, I was careful not to push the sharpening too far, since it is easy to turn fine texture into something hard and artificial. I noticed that the sharpening could be adjusted based on how much detail was already there. That made it easier to stop once the image looked clearer without making the fine texture look unnaturally crisp.

Alt: Original photo 100% crop vs Aiarty 2× enlarged photo 100% crop

Real Test #3: Old Family Photos and Small Scans

Some of the most meaningful photographs were never captured at high resolution in the first place. Old family photos often exist as small scans or low-quality JPEGs, with faces already looking soft before any enlargement takes place.

Alt: Source old family photo, 640 × 427 pixels, all faces are blurry in the photo

The source image was only 640 × 427 pixels. The original was quite blurry, and the facial details were difficult to make out. Because the file was so small, I knew I would need more than a simple 2× enlargement if I wanted to make a useful framed print. I went with 4×, bringing the image to 2560 × 1708 pixels. The enlarged image looked noticeably clearer overall and was suitable for the larger print I had in mind.

The faces were the area I watched most closely, as they were already soft in the original scan. This is where I found Face Restoration particularly useful. It made the facial features easier to see while keeping them looking natural, and I could adjust the strength if the enhancement started to feel too strong.

At 8 × 12 inches, the 2560 × 1708-pixel output provides about 213 PPI, compared with only about 53 PPI from the original file. For me, that made the enlarged version much more practical for a framed print while still preserving the character of the original scan.

Alt: Aiarty 4× enlarged old photo, Face Restoration enabled (80% restoration strength)

Real Test #4: Product Photos for E-Commerce and Large Displays

Product photography is another area where low resolution can really bite you. If you need to repurpose a smaller product shot into a large display or poster, any softness or pixelation instantly makes the item look cheap and unpolished to potential buyers.

For this test, I used a 1920 × 2400-pixel photo of a doughnut. Even at 100%, some fine details looked soft and weren’t as clear as I wanted. I then enlarged the image 2× with Aiarty, bringing it to 3840 × 4800 pixels.

Alt: Aiarty 2× enlarged product photo, More-Detail GAN model, 2-Pass processing enabled

The source also had some visible noise and compression artifacts, so I decided to use 2-path processing rather than simply enlarging the file in one pass. After processing, the chocolate drizzle, colorful sprinkles, and doughnut texture looked cleaner and more polished, closer to what I would expect from a professionally finished product photo.

Alt: Original vs Aiarty 2× enlarged detail comparison of the doughnut photo

My Large-Print Workflow in Aiarty Image Enhancer

1. Start with the Best Original and Final Composition

Whenever possible, I start with the RAW file or highest-quality JPEG/TIFF rather than a compressed or social-media copy. I also make sure the image has the final framing I want before enlarging it.

If the photo needs to be cropped, I crop it first. The crop determines how many pixels I actually have available for the final print. If the composition is already right, I can simply move on to enlargement.

2. Calculate the Target Dimensions

I work backward from the final print size to estimate how many pixels I need and whether the image requires 2×, 4×, or a larger enlargement.

A Nikon D90, for example, produces 4288 × 2848 pixels. At around 150–200 PPI, that can already be enough for many large prints without enlargement. The main issue comes when the image is tightly cropped and much of that original resolution is lost.

Here are the pixel requirements for common print sizes at different PPI levels:

Print Size

300 PPI

240 PPI

200 PPI

150 PPI

8 × 10 in

2400 × 3000 px

1920 × 2400 px

1600 × 2000 px

1200 × 1500 px

12 × 18 in

3600 × 5400 px

2880 × 4320 px

2400 × 3600 px

1800 × 2700 px

16 × 24 in

4800 × 7200 px

3840 × 5760 px

3200 × 4800 px

2400 × 3600 px

20 × 30 in

6000 × 9000 px

4800 × 7200 px

4000 × 6000 px

3000 × 4500 px

24 × 36 in

7200 × 10,800 px

5760 × 8640 px

4800 × 7200 px

3600 × 5400 px

These are target dimensions rather than strict quality limits. A large wall print does not always need 300 PPI, especially when viewed from several feet away. Cropping, viewing distance, and print medium all affect the practical resolution needed.

For example, a 2000 × 3000-pixel crop printed at 16 × 24 inches provides about 125 PPI. A 2× enlargement brings it to 4000 × 6000 pixels, or about 250 PPI at the same size. This is a more typical situation where AI enlargement can help bring a cropped image closer to the target resolution.

3. Upscale and Fine-Tune in Aiarty

I start with the appropriate AI model and a moderate enlargement, then adjust the Strength Slider while checking details such as feathers, skin, product edges, or fine textures. If the image needs a quick crop, size adjustment, or minor color correction, I can also handle that here instead of moving the file between different apps.

Before exporting, the output DPI can be set according to the requirements of the print workflow. For more advanced retouching, I then move the enlarged file to Lightroom or Photoshop for final color and editing.

Final Thoughts

If you are planning to print your photos at a large size, you don’t necessarily have to be limited by the megapixels of your camera. As the examples above show, the right enlargement process can give a lower-resolution or heavily cropped image enough additional resolution for larger prints while keeping important details looking natural. Aiarty Image Enhancer is one option I use when a standard resize isn’t enough.

If you’re preparing photos for large prints, Aiarty Image Enhancer is currently 49% off at $79 (originally $155) for a lifetime license covering 3 computers. There’s no subscription fee, and lifetime updates are included.

The post Enlarging a small photo for a large print without quality loss appeared first on Photo Rumors.

  •  
❌