Photo: Richard Butler

The Fujifilm X-T30 III is a subtle refresh of the company's least expensive SLR-shaped X-mount mirroless camera. It sits above the rangefinder-styled X-M5, adding a viewfinder, and below the image stabilized X-S20, and shares its 26MP APS-C sized BSI CMOS sensor with all three models.

The update brings more advanced subject recognition autofocus, improved video capabilities and a Film Simulation dial, putting one of its key distinguishing features to the fore.

But how does that leave it fitting into the marketplace, particularly in the light of inflation and tariff led price increases? The Fujifilm X-T30 III retails for $1000, body-only or $1150 with a 13-33mm F3.5-6.3 OIS kit zoom.

We're primarily going to compare it with the similarly-priced Nikon Z50II and Canon EOS R10, both also mirrorless cameras with unstabilized APS-C sensors. We'll also look at the more expensive X-S20, which is built from very similar components but with a different control system and image stablization.

And, although they don't really fit in the tables, we're going to include some detail about the OM System OM-5 II ($1200) and Sony a6400 ($1000) too.

Resolution

There's not much to choose between cameras in this class, in terms of resolution. At 26MP the Fujifilms have a few more megapixels then the EOS R10, but not to a degree that makes any real difference.

There's a bit more of a gap to the 21MP Nikon and the 20MP OM-5 II, but it's still only about a 12% difference in linear resolution, so we wouldn't recommend selecting between these cameras on the basis of pixel count. All the current cameras use sensors that are modern enough that there's not a huge difference in performance (the move to BSI doesn't make a big difference to IQ in sensors this big).

Stabilization

Photo: Mitchell Clark

None of the $1000 APS-C models from Fujifilm, Canon, Nikon or Sony includes in-camera stabilization.

All of them tend to come bundled with stabilized lenses, which means you can use slower shutter speeds without having to worry about hand shake, when you're using that lens. But you'll have to upgrade to a more expensive camera if you want an in-body stabilization system that tends to work better for video. The OM System OM-5 II is the least expensive option, while you'll need to spend a fair bit more again to get in-body stabilization and an APS-C-sized sensor.

Continuous shooting and Autofocus

Photo: Richard Butler

As comparatively lowly models in their respective ranges, none of these cameras is designed as an out-and-out action camera, and yet they all boast shooting rates (at least in their distortion and flicker prone e-shutter modes) that exceed those offered by professional sports cameras, not much more than a decade ago.

None of these models has an especially deep buffer, so don't imagine any of these will perform well, pitch-side, but they'll do pretty well for capturing short bursts of movement.

The Nikon has the most reliable AF system here: tracking whatever you point it at pretty well. The Canon is a touch behind, but still very capable. All four models have subject recognition modes trained to identify and lock onto specific subjects, and if you're shooting one of these subjects, the performance gap between the Fujifilm and its peers definitely narrows.

The Sony is very good at general tracking and eye detection but has little subject recogniton beyond this. The OM-5 II is also limited to humans in terms of subject recognition and its tracking AF is well off the pace.

Viewfinder and screens

Photo: Shaminder Dulai

There's not a lot to choose in this class in terms of viewfinders: they're all built around the same 2.36M dot OLED panels, with the optics mounted in front of them affecting how large the finder ends up looking. Nikon does the best job here, though its large viewfinder hump also making it the tallest camera here by some margin, as a consequence.

There's a bit more of a decision to be made when it comes to rear screens. The X-T30 III has the highest resolution screen, with its 900 x 600 pixel resolution, but it's also the only one that tilts up and down, rather than extending to the side and rotating.

The Nikon promises a slightly larger panel, but with slightly reduced 720 x 640 pixel res. The Canon offers this resolution and the smaller panel. It's a similar story with the OM-5 II: a 2.36M dot EVF with somewhat modest 0.5x magnification, and a 3.0" 1.04M dot fully articulated rear screen. The Sony has the largest viewfinder, at 0.7x magnification but also the lowest res rear screen: approximately 720 x 415 pixels in a 16:9 aspect ratio.

Video

Photo: Richard Butler

Video is one of the areas that distinguishes between cameras at this price. All four of the main cameras we're looking at can shoot 10-bit footage, either as Log footage to maximise flexibility for color grading, or as HDR footage for playback on high dynamic range displays.

All these cameras boast pretty good specs, including the ability to capture 4K/60 if you can tolerate some degree of crop (though it makes capturing wide-angle footage harder and will tend to be noisier). The Nikon has the most dependable video autofocus in this group, and also lets you capture and monitor external audio without the need for adapters. Only the X-S20 has image stabilization, though, and even then it's not the smoothest of systems.

Both the OM-5 II and a6400 show their age or, at least, the age of their processors, by only being able to capture 8-bit video. This limits the flexibility of its Log footage (especially the more ambitious S-Log3 curve, and means it can't shoot true HDR footage.

OM System's in-body stabilization means the OM-5 II is an easier camera to shoot video with than most of the others here, but its autofocus undermines it, in this regard, so all of them will require a bit of work in one way or another.

Dimensions

The X-T30 III is the smallest of cameras here, by some margin, and also the lightest.

There are some definite downsides to this: the X-T30 III has lots of external controls but also the least surface space to fit them on, so, perhaps unsurprisingly, it feels the most fiddly and cramped to operate.

The Nikon is the only camera in this group not to have an autofocus joystick; something that's also the case for the OM-5 II and a6400. And, while the Nikon's tracking AF makes up for this to an extent, we generally find it more engaging to be able to pre-position or move the AF point via a tactile control point.

Ergonomics are ultimately a matter of taste, but it's only really this omission that stops the Nikon being the standout camera, in this regard. For us, the Canon and the Nikon are the most comfortable of this cohort to shoot with.

Kit lenses

Photo: Richard Butler

One of the biggest differences between the cameras in terms of real-world use isn't down to the cameras themselves at all: it's the lenses they come bundled with. A lot of users in this price bracket tend to primarily use these 'kit' zooms, so choosing the most flexible one makes a significant difference.

The X-T30 III comes with a retractable manual zoom that goes much wider than the ones offered by its peers, which is hugely useful, especially if you're used to shooting with the relatively wide angle lenses that smartphones tend to feature. The Nikon and X-S20's power zoom lenses perhaps offer the best balance between wide-angle capability and reach at the other end, but we've liked what we've seen of the new 13-33mm so far.

The OM-5 II's default 12-40mm F4.0 kit lens comes from the company's 'Pro' series and, as the branding implies, it's a rather more substantially built option than its peers. It has a constant F4.0 maximum aperture, so while it's a third of a stop darker in absolute terms and a whole stop darker in equivalent terms at the wide end, it's brighter by both metrics at the long end. And its 24-80mm equivalent range is pretty handy, too, though it takes the combined cost to $1600, $450 more than most of these other rivals.

Summary

The Film Simulation dial is one of the X-T30 III's changes, relative to its predecessor and also represents one of the camera's stand-out features, relative to its peers. Photo: Richard Butler

The cost of an 'entry-level' camera has risen markedly in recent years. There are a couple of cameras for sale cheaper than these, but you really notice the corners that have been cut and the build quality that's been sacrificed. But if you can stretch to the $1000 mark, you have a choice of very capable models.

All these cameras offer excellent image quality, increasingly sophisticated autofocus and video capabilities that would have been unthinkable, quite recently. There are definitely factors to help you choose between them, whether that's the Fujifilm's attractive range of color modes, the provision of an AF joystick or the inclusion of a headphone socket for audio monitoring, but for the most part it's hard to go far wrong.

The Fujifilm X-T30 III is a very subtle refresh of its predecessor. We can't imagine many Mark II owners choosing to make the upgrade, but its specs are enough to keep it competitive against its immediate peers.

Read our intial impressions of the Fujifilm X-T30 III

War photography is incredibly demanding, requiring superb technical skills, a finely tuned kit and the ability to adapt and survive in harsh environments. Photojournalist Jonathan Alpeyrie knows this all too well, having spent more than 20 years covering major conflicts across the globe, including those in Ukraine, Iraq, Syria, Gaza and the international drug trade. In a recent video, Alpeyrie walked through his kit for assignments, while also sharing his experiences and insight into being a conflict photographer.

Alpeyrie said that he has been packing the same way for over 20 years, and his kit is straightforward: a camera, flak jacket, phone, bag and computer. These days, his gear includes the Canon EOS R camera, which he said he likes because it's discreet and allows him to look more like a tourist than anything else.

On the lens side, Alpeyrie recommends not skimping on quality. "The lens is where you want to spend your money. The body you can pick and choose," he explains in the video. His current lens of choice is the Canon EOS R 50mm F1.2L USM. He says the 50mm lens is the only one he uses right now, in part because the wide aperture is ideal for working in dark situations. It's also smaller than other lenses, which is helpful when you're taking cover from artillery fire. He says he has had larger lenses, such as 200mm or 300mm, break in these situations.

Beyond gear choices, Alpeyrie shares lots of valuable insights in the video. He touches on how he protects his camera and memory cards in dangerous places, the importance of knowing your camera and how to use manual settings, tips on framing and composition, and so much more. It's well worth a watch all the way through.

Image: DxO

Software company DxO has announced a modest update for its Raw processing software, PureRaw, which promises to make it easier to use as an alternative to Adobe's Camera Raw (ACR). It should result in a more streamlined and flexible workflow when using PureRaw and Photoshop in combination. The company also announced minor changes to PhotoLab and Nik Collection.

DxO announced PureRaw 5 earlier this year, which offered more robust upgrades. PureRaw 5.5 is a minor update, featuring a single change: the ability to edit non-destructively by opening files from PureRaw as Smart Objects in Photoshop.

The new workflow means users can process files in PureRaw instead of Adobe Camera Raw, and then open them in Photoshop to continue editing. Because it's a Smart Object, users can also re-process the Raw file at any point, even after saving and closing the Photoshop file. It unlocks the ability to use PureRaw as an alternative to ACR while still maintaining a non-destructive editing workflow.

DxO says that PhotoLab 9.2 offers better AI masking tools. Image: DxO

Outside of the PureRaw update, DxO also announced small updates to PhotoLab and Nik Collection. With PhotoLab 9.2, the company says its AI masking tools, which were added to PhotoLab 9 this summer, are now even better. It promises greater precision and fewer artifacts and smudging around selections. Additionally, the company added the ability to reorganize masks and submasks, and created the ability to filter your library by editing stage.

In Nik Collection 8.2, DxO expanded its Analog Efex option with a new paper texture tool. You can access Analog Efex from a toolbar option in Photoshop, and then select from 30 different paper textures, including fine-art matte and watercolor paper. You can adjust various parameters to fine-tune the link, including changing the color of the paper and selecting different blending modes.

PureRaw 5.5 is available for free for owners of DxO Pure Raw 5. All others will need to purchase either a new license for $130 or an upgrade license from DxO PureRaw 3 or 4 for $90. Likewise, PhotoLab 9.2 is free for those with DxO PhotoLab 9, or $120 to upgrade from 7 or 8 and $240 for a new license. Nik Collection 8.2 is available for free to Nik Collection 8 users and costs $100 for an upgrade license or $170 for a new license.

Photo: Mitchell Clark

Disclosure: DPReview attended Adobe Max, with Adobe covering travel and lodging expenses.

The subscription payment model is a tough one; customers have made it clear that they're fatigued by having to pay for everything every month, and companies have to continuously justify why their software shouldn't just be a one-time payment.

It's an argument we've seen time and time again here at DPReview almost any time Adobe's Creative Cloud comes up, with commenters bemoaning the lost days of simply being able to buy Photoshop once (at least, until the next version came out in a few years).

In the age of generative AI, Adobe seems to have found a new answer: being a one-stop shop for AI services that would typically require separate subscriptions. Partner Models in particular have come up again and again at this year's Adobe Max conference, from keynotes to product demos. And while AI will almost certainly have terrifying implications for society at large and the art of photography in particular, I find myself coming away strangely optimistic for the future of the artform, at least as a hobby.

In the age of generative AI, Adobe wants to be a one-stop shop for AI services

Let's lay some groundwork quickly for those who haven't been following along. This week, Adobe announced and released several new features for Photoshop and Lightroom, programs that many photographers consider essential.

As usual, most of it revolved around AI: there's a chatbot coming to Photoshop that you can ask to make certain edits and complete tasks for you, the Generative Remove tool that lets you erase unwanted distractions is now better, and you can "Harmonize" foreground and background layers to turn compositing into a single-click process.

AI from partners, and Adobe

Photo: Mitchell Clark

The biggest change, though, is the introduction of Partner Models. Up until now, features like Generative Fill, which let you add AI-generated elements to your images, and AI Upscale, relied on Adobe's in-house Firefly models. And while you can still use those, Adobe's now letting you use other models too, such as Google's goofily-named Nano Banana image generator and Topaz Labs' increasingly popular upscale, denoise and sharpen models.

Rather than relying on separate paid subscriptions and apps for each of those services, it all happens within Photoshop using AI credits that are included in your Creative Cloud plan (provided you've chosen the right one).

Put another way, Adobe is mediating your relationship with other AI vendors. It doesn't want you to view them as separate services that you have to manage depending on what tasks you have this month, but tools you can access within its apps that – importantly – you don't have to pay for separately.

The company laid the groundwork for this change in advance, changing up its Creative Cloud subscription earlier this year with its plans now centering around how many AI credits are included. In retrospect, it's obvious that this was vital if it wanted to let its users access otherwise expensive AI models without needing a separate subscription.*

What's the impact?

This could be a sign of profound changes to come for photographers. Not because I think the future of Creative Cloud as a subscription hinges on whether this gambit works. Realistically, that battle is over; it seems like most people are willing to pay the rent, and, realistically, there's probably a lot of overlap between the anti-subscription and anti-AI crowds. (I say this with love.) No, it could be something much deeper.

While many of us hobbyists like to imagine that being a professional photographer would let us pursue all our artistic ambitions in interesting locales, the reality is that the largest market for paid photography is less glamorous commercial work; capturing images to be used in advertisements and other collateral by corporations.

Try as they might, companies have never been able to fully extract the photographer from that equation

But try as they might, companies have never been able to fully extract the photographer from that equation; there's still a human who has to hold the camera and make what are ultimately creative decisions. Generative AI may finally be the thing that lets them do that. At the very least, there's a good chance that human photographers will become less and less important in the creative process. The photo doesn't quite match the senior VP of marketing's vision? They can fire up Photoshop and have generative AI "fix" it with a simple prompt.

To be clear, this isn't a hypothetical future; during its keynote, Adobe showed an example of using the Generative Fill tool to change which direction a model was looking. Higher-ups could always mandate changes, but the barriers to them doing so have never been so low; before, they would've had to weigh the costs of dragging everyone back into the studio. Now, all it takes is a couple of clicks and some AI credits. And with tools like Firefly and Express, Adobe's trying to make it so you don't even have to know which model works best for which purposes.

Our AI, your voice

Custom models are Adobe's solution to living in what it calls a "content-first" world. Image: Adobe

It goes even further. Adobe also introduced something called Custom Models, which lets you feed your existing work into its Firefly AI and train it to produce images in a similar style. There's also a super-charged version for corporations that will let them dump their entire intellectual property into it, generating on-brand content (yuck) without the need for any artistic input. The work of all the creatives that have worked with the company becomes grist for the ever-accelerating content mill.

Okay, so what about the part where I said I don't think it's the apocalypse? Well, for those of us who do photography as a hobby, not a job (which I suspect is actually most of us), this approach could be helpful, especially if AI tools are only a very occasional part of how we work with our images.

Take Topaz's Gigapixel upscaler, something that gets recommended relatively frequently in our forums and comments. It's not something I'd personally spend $12 a month on, but it's something I'd sometimes use to touch up older photos if I had access to it. If it's just included in my Creative Cloud subscription, I can do so without really having to think about it.

The drive to add more and more AI features could also result in more features that are genuinely useful to photographers. Work that went into features like the cloud-based remove tool could inform tools like Lightroom's Assisted Culling tool, which has to recognize eyes that are out of focus and missed exposures.

Lightroom has its fair share of AI features, but largely remains a bastion for people who care about photography.

Cloud processing is making it possible to search your Lightroom catalogue using natural language, rather than having to rely on tags that you've manually added. And while Adobe views the AI Photoshop assistant more as a way to automate repetitive tasks, it could be a powerful tool in helping people learn a piece of increasingly complicated software.

There are clearly still lots of people at Adobe who recognize that photography can be a passion, not just a means to an end, and who are finding ways for AI to enhance what humans do, not replace it. And, at least for now, they still seem to have the space and resources to do that work.

Adobe is building tools for people who don't care to learn the craft they're practicing

However, that work is being showcased alongside the latest innovations in placing business needs over human ones, and tools built for people who don't care to learn the craft they're practicing. See the Firefly video editor, for people who want video edited but don't want to edit it, and Photoshop AI assistant for people who want things photoshopped but don't want to Photoshop it.

At the end of it all, it's hard to say what vision will win out, or what balance will be struck. Certainly, the latter seems to be the one being sold the hardest here at Max, but maybe that's just because it's not as prima facie enticing to an audience that still includes a lot of creative people. I'm not sure who's buying that vision of the future, and I'm honestly a little scared to find out. But I do think that it'll come with a lot of side benefits for photographers, intended and not.

* It also likely represents some big deals between Adobe and other AI companies, which doesn't help assuage my concerns about how bubbly the map of the AI economy looks one bit.

Earlier this week, we released our review of the OM System OM-5 II. We didn't find any surprises when it comes to image quality (it uses the same sensor and processor as its predecessor, so it would've been a bit odd if we had), but, as always, our review processes included using the camera a lot. That leaves us with a collection of images to share with the audience, both as illustrations and as proof that we've put in the work.

Of course, if you're not familiar with what this camera is capable of, the sample gallery will be a good illustration; it includes high-ISO examples, as well as a few shots taken using some of the camera's computational photography modes. You can also check out our pre-production sample gallery below to see more sample images from the OM-5 II.

See the production sample gallery

Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter/magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing (in conjunction with this review); we do so in good faith, so please don't abuse it.

Production sample gallery

Pre-production sample gallery

Photo: Porsche

In 2017, a group of apprentices from Porsche Leipzig GmbH undertook a dramatic conversion of a Porsche Boxster, transforming it into a unique camera car. It was kept behind the scenes, but now, the company has made details of the vehicle public, showing off the highly modified vehicle along with information about its conversion.

Porsche says nine apprentices modified the Porsche 718 Boxster S as part of a project for their second year of training. The idea came about because the previous camera car, an older Porsche Boxster, could no longer keep up with current models on the track. The apprentices were then tasked with converting the new vehicle with guidance from training supervisor Carsten Pohle.

Photo: Porsche

To convert the Boxster, the team removed the soft-top roof and installed a robust roll bar, which doubles as an elevated mounting point. They added steel tube mounts on the front, rear and sides to allow for additional camera positions. The crew also painted the vehicle and all of its add-on parts with matte black paint to cut down on reflections when filming.

Of course, with people aboard the vehicle, safety also needed to be a consideration. Porsche says that they padded both the front and rear luggage compartments and added harness systems. There's also a standing platform between the front seats and rear trunk with the necessary safety harness. There is still plenty of risk for the photographer sitting exposed in the front luggage compartment or standing up in the middle of the car. Still, these positions do enable a very clear view for filming and photography.

Photo: Porsche

The company also provided details on how the car was built with photography and videography workflows in mind, too. For example, the team added internal wiring that allows for a direct connection between the camera and laptop, with the latter able to be securely mounted in the passenger area. There's also an inverter to supply power and recharge all of the camera equipment.

Porsche says that the car has been used regularly for filming shoots on the Leipzig track since its completion. External productions have also used the vehicle, including shoots for Motor Presse Stuttgart. Motorsport legend Walter Röhrl has even been filmed with the camera car. Most recently, the car ventured beyond the Leipzig track, serving as the camera car for the Tutto Bene Hillclimb near Lake Maggiore.

Photo: Dan Zafra

Photography has a way of leading us into rare and unrepeatable moments. Such was recently the case for photographer Dan Zafra, the co-founder of Capture the Atlas. While capturing the dark skies of New Zealand, Zafra witnessed red sprites flashing above the Milky Way. Making it even more special, the scene was accompanied by some Aurora Australis glow and a little comet called SWAN.

Zafra says he was photographing at the Clay Cliffs, South Island, New Zealand, on October 11, 2025 under clear skies when he began to notice faint flashes on the horizon from a distant thunderstorm over the Southern Alps in New Zealand. "At first, they looked like normal lightning, but after a few test shots, I realized my camera was capturing red sprites," Zafra explained.

Red sprites are luminous flashes that occur high above thunderstorm clouds, typically at altitudes between 50 and 90 kilometers (unlike traditional lightning, which is within the lower atmosphere). They are almost impossible to see with the naked eye, but in images, they appear as red tendrils and usually only last a few milliseconds. They are a rare phenomenon, especially in New Zealand, where major lightning storms are rare.

Zafra said it was even more magical because of how things aligned. He explained that he could see the Milky Way glowing above the horizon while seeing red tendrils of light above the storm hundreds of kilometers away. "It was one of those moments when you know you’re witnessing something you’ll probably never see again," he said.

To capture this incredible event, Zafra used a Sony a7 III with a Sony FE 24mm F1.4 GM lens. His settings for the sky exposure were F1.4, 10 sec. and ISO 6400, while the foreground exposure was a longer 2 minutes (with the rest of the settings remaining the same). He says he used minimal contrast and noise adjustments during processing. He blended the foreground for clarity, but didn't use any other stacking or star-tracking techniques.

Zafra also created a timelapse video of the event that shows the sprites flashing in real time. It shows just how fleeting those flashes are.

Zafra added that, as far as he's been able to find, there are no previously registered images or timelapses showing red sprites and the Southern Hemisphere Milky Way together. "I’ll never forget the adrenaline rush of seeing those first frames appear on my camera, realizing what I had captured," he explained. "I felt incredibly lucky to be there; in the right place, at the right time, and ready for it." Moments like these remind us how powerful a tool photography can be.

As previously announced in our forums, on our homepage, and via a Halloween‑orange banner on the site, we will be upgrading the software that powers DPReview's discussion forums. During this upgrade, the forums will be in read‑only mode while we migrate all existing forum data to the new system.

The forums will enter read‑only mode on Friday, October 31, at 1:00 pm Pacific (20:00 UTC). During the read-only period, you can continue to browse, read, and search the forums, but you won't be able to create new posts or upload photos. We expect the forums to come back online beginning Wednesday, November 5.

The move to a modern platform will ensure the forums remain healthy, secure, and sustainable for the years ahead. It will allow us to roll out important performance improvements and new features.

When the upgrade is complete, your discussions, posting history, photo albums, private messages, and other data will all be preserved.

Want a preview of the new forums? Our Community Manager, Mathew Anderson, put together a 5‑minute video walkthrough, which you can find at the top of this article.

To learn more about the upgrade and why we're doing it, please see our detailed forum post.

Read our post about the forum upgrade

We've also published a comprehensive FAQ about these changes. If your question isn't covered, add it to the FAQ forum thread and we'll find the answer.

Read the FAQ

Finally, thank you to everyone who's contributed to the forums over the years – the experts, the beginners, and yes, even the trolls. We can't wait for more discussions, debates, and shared discoveries in the years ahead.

Photo: DJI

The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently voted unanimously to give itself sweeping new powers to ban electronic devices retroactively. The vote makes a nationwide DJI ban even more likely after December 23, 2025. This decision builds on years of threats to ban DJI products due to apparent security concerns and legislative action against the most popular drone maker.

The move, first reported by The Verge, means that the FCC can ban devices previously approved for entry into the US if it deems the company behind them a national security risk. It's being framed as a national security measure aimed at protecting US networks from backdoors in Chinese telecom gear. But it's also part of intensifying efforts to restrict technology from foreign companies, especially Chinese firms.

The FCC's decision is just the latest threat to DJI. There have been calls to ban DJI products since 2017, driven by worries that the drones could send sensitive data to China, a risk the company has repeatedly downplayed. At the end of last year, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the annual defense spending bill, outlined a potential path toward a ban, although it did not specifically name DJI. It requires an "appropriate national security agency" to declare that a company's products don't "pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States." That risk audit must be completed by December 23, 2025.

"It would result in an automatic ban of all new DJI products that use radio transmitters in the US"

If the risk assessment isn't completed by December 23, DJI products (and those by other companies) will be added to the "Covered List" under the Secure and Trusted Communication Networks Act. That move would result in an automatic ban of all new DJI products that use radio transmitters in the US, which would include drones, gimbals and the Osmo line of pocket-sized cameras. At the time of writing, no security agency has taken up the audit, despite more than 10 months having passed and only a few months to go before the deadline.

In a statement to The Verge, DJI's global policy head, Adam Welsh, said the company welcomes an investigation. "As the deadline approaches, we urge the U.S. government to start the mandated review or grant an extension to ensure a fair, evidence-based process that protects American jobs, safety, and innovation," he said.

"[T]he continued use of such equipment that is already in the hands of users would remain authorized"

There are limits to the potential ban, though. A 60-page document outlines how the FCC order will work; importantly, it won’t confiscate or deactivate products that are already in the hands of consumers in its current form. "[T]he continued use of such equipment that is already in the hands of users would remain authorized," it says. Additionally, it says the FCC must provide public notice, conduct a "public interest analysis," and allow the opportunity for public comment for a minimum of 30 days.

With the December deadline approaching, DJI's future in the US market remains tenuous. The company hasn't made any of its releases this year officially available in the US (though some units have snuck through to stores), and that looks likely to continue as DJI’s next steps remain uncertain.

Plate: Markus Hofstätter

While many choose to focus on the fast-moving world of modern photography, Markus Hofstätter, an award-winning photographer, builds his art on patience, tradition and tangible connection. Using large-format analog cameras and labor-intensive wet plate processes, he creates portraits that are as much about human interaction as they are about photographic technique. I had the opportunity to (virtually) sit down with Hofstätter, learning more about his background, technique and mindset.

His passion for photography began around 2008, well past film's heyday, while photographing billiards games, a challenge that soon turned into far more than a casual hobby. After learning the ropes, Hofstätter started capturing weddings, local events and more, to make money from his photography. It was all digital, though. But one day, he picked up a Mamiya 645E. While Hofstätter still photographs digitally, from that point on, analog processes became central to his personal work.

Plate: Markus Hofstätter

With his Mamiya 645E in hand, Hofstätter started taking portraits of people on the streets, which sparked a general love of portrait photography. Another turning point came when he had a friend let him try a 4x5 Linhof Master Technika. The large-format camera sparked a new interest for him.

However, Hofstätter says he got a bit bored with that as well. He then stumbled on a video of photographer Ian Ruhter making massive collodion wet plates and fell in love. "I tried to learn that by myself on 4x5 plates, and I failed so badly for many months. I only made black plates, so that was very frustrating," he said. But he didn't give up. He picked up a book by Quinn Jacobson and started making his own chemicals, eventually figuring out the process. Hofstätter says he hasn't looked back since.

These days, Hofstätter uses a Kodak 2D camera (which he modified, as you can see above) for studio setups and a Century No.2 for outside. He's mostly working with historical processes like wet plates and salt prints.

He explained that he is a very independent person and loves to work with his hands, which is part of why he's so drawn to the old analog processes. It is stressful trying to get everything right for a successful print, but Hofstätter says the demanding process keeps him sharp, a kind of creative tension that helps him focus. "I was always a little stressed or anxious before pool tournaments," he said. "Then I learned that when the stress comes, it means I get extra energy. It means I'm ready now, and I'm going to be extra careful and extra good because the stress is here. It's the same in the darkroom."

Hofstätter sees benefits for portraiture from the slow analog process. His sessions result in only a single plate, which is drastically different from a portrait session with digital cameras. Of course, that also introduces challenges. You only have one shot to produce an image, after all. Hofstätter said that means you have to really figure out the individual before starting to take the photograph.

Plate: Markus Hofstätter

Hofstätter also explained that with wet plate processes, the subject is involved in the whole process. They get to see the plate getting prepped, the camera set up, the development and so on. That means he gets a lot more interaction with the people he's photographing, which lends itself to a different type of connection. The longer exposure times also lend themselves to unique results for portraiture. "I get to capture something different with the process because you have to sit still for two to three seconds," he explained. "You cannot fake good energy if you're not in a good mood for three seconds. So you get a different kind of personality, a real personality."

"If you want really great portraits, take at least 30 minutes per person."

Looking at Hofstätter's work reveals truly intimate, powerful portraits. Creating portraits like that involves a deep knowledge of how to work with people. "Portrait photography is mostly not about technique, it's about how you handle people," he said. It also requires a lot of trust and connection with the subject. When asked how he builds that trust, Hofstätter emphasized the importance of time. His main suggestion: take time. "If you want really great portraits, take at least 30 minutes per person," he said. "Chat with them before you even get started. Get to know who they are."

Plate: Markus Hofstätter

Of course, every person is different. Each individual will require a slightly different technique to get them comfortable in front of the lens. One method he likes to use is to have the subject close their eyes and only open them when they are ready. Then, when the eyes open, he takes the photograph. It gives the subject time to collect their thoughts and relax before he creates the image.

When asked whether he plans to explore other historical processes, Hofstätter said it isn’t a priority right now. "I want to create, I don't want to try. I figured it out now, and I just want to create portraits. At some point, when I'm limited, then I'll try something new," he explained. He gave an example of this problem-solving from when he was photographing a couple comprised of a woman with really dark skin and a really light man. The process is only blue-light sensitive, so she nearly completely disappeared. So, Hofstätter had to figure out a different recipe for his chemicals and tweak his lighting, which enabled him to get all of the skin tones to better handle such situations.

That doesn't mean Hofstätter is entirely opposed to trying new things, of course. A few years ago, he came across an antique retouching desk dating back to the late 19th and early 20th century. While many only associate retouching with digital processes and Photoshop, retouching has been around nearly as long as photography itself. After staring at it for those few years, he finally decided to put it to use. In a recent video and blog post, Hofstätter shared the process of learning how to retouch a plate with the antique table, which he said is more comfortable than the LED table he had used in the past.

Hofstätter was retouching his plates prior to buying this table using Photoshop. He explained that his retouching is always to make the digital copy look like the original. Seeing a plate in person is a much different experience, since tilting it or moving around it changes how the shadows and highlights appear. Because of that, he'll dodge and burn in Photoshop to get the digital version closer to the original. These days, he also shares videos of his plates to provide a better view of how they look in real life.

A preview of "The White Rabbit," an image included in his storytelling-based portrait series. Plate: Markus Hofstätter

As his practice continues to evolve, Hofstätter is preparing a book that pays tribute to the individuals who have inspired him. At the same time, he is delving into more story-driven work, weaving narratives into his plates while continuing with these historical processes. You can see more of his work on his website, his Instagram or his YouTube channel, and you can sign up for his newsletter to stay up to date on his Inspired series.

Photo: Mitchell Clark

Disclosure: DPReview is attending Adobe Max, with Adobe covering travel and lodging expenses.

Over the past few days at the Adobe Max conference, I've been able to talk with product managers from the Photoshop and Lightroom teams, and demo some new and in-the-works features that didn't get much time, if any, in the keynote presentation. We'll go over the most interesting ones here, and wrap up with some of the things I'd like to see in future releases.

The Lightroom Demos

Assisted Culling and Auto Stacks

The tool lets you fine-tune most of the parameters.

The headlining Lightroom feature this year is Assisted Culling, which is available as an "early access" feature in Lightroom and Lightroom Classic. We've gone more in-depth on it here, but essentially, it's a way to quickly sort through dozens or hundreds of photos so you only see the ones that are exposed properly and in focus. There are controls to set how picky you want it to be, and you can easily mark photos the system rejected as selects, or vice versa.

The culling tool can be accessed either in your library or in the import window, depending on where you're trying to use it.

Adobe has also updated the Stacks feature in Lightroom. While it has long been able to group photos by capture time, it can now do so based on visual similarity too (and, again, you can choose how similar photos have to be to be stacked together). Combining the two features lets you process a lot of photos very quickly. When you have your selects, you can run a batch process on both them and the rejects, applying colored labels, star ratings and/or flags, or adding them to an album.

The system generally works with both files in the cloud and on local files, though at the moment, you can only do visually similar stacking on local files in Lightroom Classic, not Lightroom.

Adobe says Assisted Culling is currently geared towards portrait photography, but that we can expect to see controls that make sense for other genres of photography in the future.

A better remove tool

Note that this selection doesn't include the player's shadows.

Adobe has also been hard at work on the remove tool, which photographers can use to automatically get rid of distracting elements in their photos. For one, it can now detect and delete dust spots from your sensor or lens, and can do so as a batch process. So, if you've just come back from a shoot and realized your sensor was dirty, you won't have to go through each photo to fix them manually one by one.

The remove model also now supports smarter object detection. Previously, if you selected a person and asked Lightroom to remove them, it'd do it, but might leave their shadow or reflection. Worse, it might look at the image, see that there's a shadow, and try to insert something into the selected area, defeating the point entirely. Now, if you select the Detect Objects box, it will automatically detect and remove shadows and reflections too, even if you've only selected the object.

With the "Detect objects" option selected, Lightroom fully selected the players' bodies and their shadows, even though I didn't completely scribble over them.

Adobe also says it's updated the model used in its reflection removal tool, allowing it to handle more complex situations.

While all the features we've talked about so far have been available on the desktop versions of Lightroom, there's a new one coming exclusively to the Mobile and Web versions (for now): automatic blemish removal. It's available as a Quick Action in the retouch menu, and, as with most Quick Actions, there's a slider to control how strong you want the effect to be. Adobe says it's one of the most requested features, but that it's rolling it out in Early Access to get feedback before making it more widely available (it is messing with people's faces, after all).

Smarter searching

It worked in this example, but didn't do so well in others. When I tried "black and white portraits" and "people with cats," it included images that didn't match those descriptions, and didn't find all the ones that did. Clearly still a work in progress!

Another feature that's in beta is an improved search tool that's much better at the semantic-type searching you may be familiar with using in cloud-based photo management tools from the likes of Apple and Google. While you've been able to search for things like "dog" or "person" for a while now, the improved search is much more granular. In the demo I saw, the presenter searched for "man standing at the end of a pier," and it was able to find the photo he was looking for.

It's currently only on Lightroom for the Web (which means it only works on photos you've uploaded to your account), and it has to do a scan of your library after you turn it on. While Adobe says it plans on bringing it to the desktop in the near-to-mid-future, you'll currently have to go to your profile, then enable the Improved Search feature in the Technology Previews section to use it.

What the heck is color variance?

The color variance slider, with no changes applied. Photo: Richard Butler

If I'm being honest, when I originally wrote about Adobe adding a "variance" slider to the point color panel, I wasn't completely sure what it did. After seeing it in action, though, I get it: it essentially lets you select a hue in your image, and then move similar hues either closer to it or further apart, removing or adding color contrast.

Turning the slider up can (in this case, over-)emphasise the difference between similar hues in your image.

The original use for it was for evening out skin tones, which helps demphasize blemishes without entirely smoothing someone's face. However, it can also be used to emphasize subjects in your scene without having to resort to globally increasing contrast, saturation or clarity. I saw demos of it being used to make foliage, which had looked relatively monochromatic in the original picture, really pop, or to make the Taj Mahal stand out despite being behind a thick layer of smog.

Agentic Editing

Suggestions are like presets, but instead of preset changes, they analyze the actual image you're applying them to.

The Lightroom team also showed me a beta feature called Edit Suggestions, which they described as their first toe into the waters of "agentic style" editing. It's a bit of a mix of the current Quick Actions found in Lightroom Mobile and Web and the Adaptive Profiles that analyze your photos to give you a better baseline for your edits (though the team tells me it doesn't rely on the tech from the latter).

Essentially, it's a tab that says "make my photo look" and then gives you several pre-made options, such as "vintage" or "cinematic." It will then change a bunch of parameters, such as color mixing, grain settings, curves and, of course, the standard exposure sliders.

Lightroom explains what changes it made, and of course lets you refine the tweaks it made.

The team made it clear that these aren't just presets, though; it won't make the same exact changes each time. Instead, the adjustments it makes, and how far it takes them, will be based on the specific photo. Ask for the same thing on a different photo, and you'll get different settings.

It's easy to imagine a more open-ended version of this in the future, similar to the AI assistant that's coming to Photoshop, though the team isn't making any announcements in that direction yet.

The Photoshop demos

With Photoshop, I didn't get to see many features that I hadn't already written about, but I was able to get some insight into how they worked under the hood and how the folks at Adobe were thinking about them.

Same remove tool improvements

To start, the Remove tool received the same updates as the one in Lightroom, and should now be better at removing both an object and any reflections and shadows it may cast. And while the process still uses cloud-based generative AI, Adobe says that they were able to make the model so efficient that the feature doesn't cost any of the generative credits that come with its plans (which is good news for those using the standard Creative Cloud plan or the inexpensive Photography plans, which only come with a few).

I also got a pro tip from Stephen Nielson, Sr. Director of Product Management of Photoshop, who said that people often try to use the Generative Fill feature to remove unwanted elements from an image, rather than the Remove tool. He doesn't recommend that. For one, it costs credits, and two, it's actually not as good at erasing something from an image; you might end up with the problem that most of us are likely familiar with, where you try to get rid of something, only to have it replaced by something else.

Generative Fill and Partner Models

You can now use Topaz's Gigapixel upscaling model from right within Photoshop, though doing so will require premium credits.

With that said, Generative Fill has gotten a big upgrade with the introduction of Partner Models, which let you do image generation not just using Adobe's own Firefly AI, but also with services like Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (AKA Nano Banana) model. Nielson says the new models available, including Adobe's latest-gen one, will now be much better at following prompts, when they couldn't before (though that didn't stop users from trying). For example, if you wanted it to change the color of someone's sweater, or even add a whole new overcoat, Generative Fill is now much better equipped to do so.

While a lot of photographers would rather not use generative AI to alter their images, Partner Models touches on other features as well. For example, if you frequent DPReview's forums and comments, you'll likely have seen recommendations for several of Topaz Labs' AI tools, such as the Gigapixel upscaler and its denoise software. The AI models underpinning those are now available to use in Photoshop, alongside Adobe's own models, without you having to have a separate subscription for them.

The local selection

The select tool did a pretty decent job with this very complex object (even if it did miss a few very low-contrast spokes and treat the two bikes as one).

Speaking of AI models, the subject select tool, which lets you cut out an object from an image, has been improved, too. Nielson said this actually came in April, when Adobe added the ability to run the subject recognition process in the cloud, using a more complex model that could do a better job with fine details. Now, though, that model no longer requires the cloud; it can run right on your computer.

I asked Nielson if that was something the Photoshop team was interested in bringing to more AI features, and while he cautioned that not every model could even be run on today's desktops and laptops, it was definitely something the team considered. "If we can bring a model to run locally, yeah, we'll do it," he says.

Jarvis, label my layers

The splashiest feature was likely the Photoshop AI assistant, which I actually didn't get to see a demo of; it's currently only available in closed beta and in Photoshop for the Web. The idea is that you'll have a chat box that you can type commands into that an AI will try to execute within Photoshop. The crowd-pleasing demo shown during the keynote asked it to name all the layers, but Adobe says it'll be able to make adjustments to how your image looks and even give you feedback on your current edits.

The latter part was, to me, a surprisingly big focus for Adobe. Nielson says the AI isn't analyzing whether the image or design is good or bad, per se, but rather just looking for ways that it could be better (though it wasn't exactly clear where the definition of "better" comes from). While he conceded that it could be used as a tool to learn how to do more complex edits or to remind you how to do a specific operation, he says they don't want it to just be a super-powered help tool. They view the AI more as an automation tool, something that'll do repetitive tasks that you can't be bothered with, but with a contextual understanding of your image that you wouldn't be able to get with, say, Actions or macros. Speaking of, though...

Action-packed

Adobe is carefully reworking the Actions panel. Image: Adobe

I also got a sneak peek at some of the progress being made to the updated Actions panel, which can also suggest edits to you based on the image you're working on. According to Pete Green, another Photoshop product manager, it pulls suggestions from a bank of over 500 pre-made actions. The team is also working on revamping the workflow for creating and recording custom actions, letting you add icons and labels to them to make them easier to pick out from the list.

According to Green, there's been a lot of effort to make sure the actions made by the new system are backwards-compatible, and that all your existing actions should still work. He says the team is being meticulous about the updates it makes, with the knowledge that actions are a long-standing and vital part of many people's workflows.

What's next?

Looking at the demos I saw this week, the thing that stood out to me most is that the gap between Lightroom and Photoshop's purposes has never been wider. Photoshop has become Adobe's main tool for dealing with imagery, and several of its features may seem like utter anathema to those who care about capturing moments and whatever truths may lie within them. Lightroom, meanwhile, is laser-focused on the needs of photographers, gaining features that I suspect will be quite popular, especially with our audience.

I do think there's room for a bit more of Photoshop to bleed into Lightroom, though. I was honestly surprised that Lightroom isn't getting the Topaz partner models, as I can imagine a lot of photographers wanting to use those, especially on older photos. The Lightroom team told me that they haven't ruled out the possibility of adding them and that customer feedback would be an important part of their considerations.

That raises the question: what would you like to see in Photoshop or Lightroom? Leave a comment down below or in our forums.

As previously announced in our forums, on our homepage, and via a Halloween‑orange banner on the site, we will be upgrading the software that powers DPReview's discussion forums. During this upgrade, the forums will be in read‑only mode while we migrate all existing forum data to the new system.

The forums will enter read‑only mode on Friday, October 31, at 1:00 pm Pacific (20:00 UTC). During the read-only period, you can continue to browse, read, and search the forums, but you won't be able to create new posts or upload photos. We expect the forums to come back online beginning Wednesday, November 5.

The move to a modern platform will ensure the forums remain healthy, secure, and sustainable for the years ahead. It will allow us to roll out important performance improvements and new features.

When the upgrade is complete, your discussions, posting history, photo albums, private messages, and other data will all be preserved.

Want a preview of the new forums? Our Community Manager, Mathew Anderson, put together a 5‑minute video walkthrough, which you can find at the top of this article.

To learn more about the upgrade and why we're doing it, please see our detailed forum post.

Read our post about the forum upgrade

We've also published a comprehensive FAQ about these changes. If your question isn't covered, add it to the FAQ forum thread and we'll find the answer.

Read the FAQ

Finally, thank you to everyone who's contributed to the forums over the years – the experts, the beginners, and yes, even the trolls. We can't wait for more discussions, debates, and shared discoveries in the years ahead.

Image: Sony

Sony has released firmware updates for the a9 III, a1 II, FX30, FX3 and PXW-Z300 camcorder, bringing C2PA content credentials to video for the first time. Additionally, Ver. 4.00 for Sony's two flagship mirrorless models promises to improve autofocus capabilities and add other upgrades.

Sony first teased Content Credentials for video at the launch of its PXW-Z300 camcorder this summer, saying the feature would be available via a future firmware update. Now, that time is here, with it and the a9 III, a1 II, FX30 and FX3 getting support for the "Write Digital Signature" function for movies.

The embedded digital signature confirms that the content was captured by a specific Sony camera and not generated by AI. Going even further, Sony says that the system can "detect 3D depth information in video content, enabling highly accurate verification that videos were captured of actual, existing subjects" to offer two levels of authentication.

As with the stills Digital Signature tool, this is a paid license. And, as of now, that license is only available for certain media outlets, not for general use. The firmware update page reveals that Sony still hasn't specified when its Camera Authenticity Solution, and therefore Content Credentials, may be expanded to general users.

It plans to add support for C2PA standards for video on the a7R V, a7 IV and a1 in November

Still, it's good to see Sony expanding its content authenticity efforts, and the feature showing up for video on Alpha cameras alongside the cinema cameras is a good step, especially as more and more news agencies adopt them into their workflows. Sony added that it plans to add support for C2PA standards for video on the a7R V, a7 IV and a1 in November 2025, and the a7S III sometime in 2026.

Beyond content authenticity, the firmware updates for the a1 II and a9 III also bring about some autofocus upgrades. Both now support improved subject detection and tracking capabilities. According to the company, the updated system will provide "stable recognition of people even in complex situations such as crowds or team sports." Ver. 4.00 also promises more precise and consistent tracking, even when the subject is small or if they are temporarily obstructed.

Additionally, the a9 III is being updated to let you to set the subject recognition to Auto, instead of manually selecting your subject type. That feature was available on the a1 II when it launched, but it is new on the a9 III. Like the a1 II, you'll be able to exclude certain types of subjects from the auto mode for faster processing.

There are smaller updates for the cameras, too. Both now offer Sony's FL2 (Film 2) and FL3 (Film 3) to the Creative Look options, promise improved metering when using bounce flash and add support for the Preset Focus function with non-power zoom lenses. The a9 III also enables the ability to customize whether you change the Shooting Mode, Drive Mode or Focus Mode using the dial or the menu.

You can see all of the changes available in Ver. 4.00 for the a9 III and a1 II, and download the new firmware on the respective support pages.

Sony a9 III Ver. 4.00

Sony a1 II Ver. 4.00

Image: Affinity

At the beginning of this month, rumors were buzzing as creative app platform Affinity pulled all of its software from sale. Now, we have answers to why, as parent company Canva has announced an all-new version of Affinity. The update is a complete refresh, resulting in a single, free app.

Previously, Affinity was a suite of three apps: Affinity Designer, Affinity Photo and Affinity Publisher. Now, under the direction Canva, all vector, photo and layout tools are in a single app called Affinity. A "one app to rule them all" type of situation, if you will. That means users can tackle a diverse range of tasks, from graphic design to Raw photo processing and retouching to laying out brochures. The app's file support reveals how diverse the platform is. It supports PSD, AI, PDF, SVG, TIFF, IDML and more.

Affinity provides access to familiar photo editing tools and supports non-destructive editing. Image: Affinity

Like previous versions of Affinity Photo, the new app supports non-destructive editing, so users can go wild on edits or changes without losing the original. It also features tools to help speed up repetitive edits, including Smart Selections, live filters and batch processing. Affinity also says that GPU acceleration helps keep editing fast. It promises a high-performance engine with real-time updates, instant previews and edits at up to 10,000,000% zoom, even with endless layers.

Affinity says the updated app is fully customizable, letting users can build a workspace that flows with their process. It says you can choose what tools are (and are not) displayed and rearrange panels. You can also save multiple setups for different types of projects and share those customized views with others. That could be an ideal feature for creative teams or educators.

The new Affinity allows you to fully customize what tools are displayed. Image: Affinity

The new Affinity offers some integration with Canva as well. Users can export Affinity projects to Canva with a few clicks, making it easier to share with clients.

One of the concerns when Canva acquired Affinity in 2024 was that a subscription model would be introduced. After all, Canva operates on a subscription model, but Affinity Photo and its other apps were the go-to perpetual license option for photographers who wanted to avoid Adobe's subscription. Luckily, with this announcement, Affinity says the app is free for everyone. Ash Hewson, the CEO of Affinity, even goes so far as to say it is "completely free, forever."

Tabs on the top allow you to switch between different tools related to design, photo editing and layout. Image: Affinity

There is a slight catch, though. One of the key features of the Canva integration within Affinity is its AI tools. However, using those AI tools requires a Canva premium account, which costs $120 per year. With that subscription, users have access to the new Canva AI Studio, which offers Generative Fill, Expand & Edit and Remove Background. However, it also includes tools that most people honestly won’t need or use, a scheme that's similar to what the other big Adobe competitor, Davinci Resolve, does.

Affinity told us that the server connection AI tools require comes at a cost, but they know not everyone wants to use AI tools. So, those who don't want AI features can use the app for free, and those who would like access can pay a month-to-month fee. The company clarified that no one is locked into a year-long subscription with cancellation fees, and that you don't lose access to your work if you stop paying. Hewson also specified that Canva AI "runs on the user's device, and work is not accessed to train AI features."

The new Affinity is available today for Mac and Windows. An iPad version is coming next year. Existing Canva users can activate Affinity with their existing account, but existing Affinity customers (and new users) will need to create a free Canva account to download Affinity.

Image: Canon

As with other brands, Canon's lenses feature many letters and acronyms in the lens names. Seeing something like Canon RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM can leave you scratching your head if you don't know what each of those things means. Each acronym refers to something useful, though, so understanding how to decipher Canon lens names can help you quickly grasp what the lens offers without digging into specs. In this article, we'll be breaking down Canon's common lens terminology, demystifying the company's lens names.

Lens mount type

The Canon RF-S 14-30mm f/4-6.3 IS STM PZ lens is built for mirrorless RF mount cameras. Image: Canon

As with most first-party lens offerings, the first part of every Canon lens name refers to the lens mount. It's important to know what mount your camera uses so that you buy lenses that are compatible.

RF and RF-S

If the lens name starts with RF or RF-S, the lens is specifically designed for the company's EOS R mirrorless cameras, which use the RF mount. These lenses are not compatible with the company's DSLR cameras, which use the EF mount.

It's also important to know the difference between RF and RF-S. RF lenses are built for full-frame cameras, while RF-S lenses are Canon's APS-C lenses designed for its crop sensor cameras.

Both use the same mount, so you can use RF and RF-S lenses on any Canon EOS R camera. However, since RF-S lenses are meant for APS-C cameras, they project smaller image circles. The camera will automatically crop for you, but using such a lens on a full-frame body will only utilize part of the sensor, meaning you’ll lose the full-frame sensor’s benefits and image area. Using an RF lens on an APS-C camera, on the other hand, primarily results in a change in field of view due to the crop factor.

EF-M

EF-M lenses are for Canon’s discontinued EOS M mirrorless cameras, which use APS-C sensors. Canon officially discontinued the system in October 2023, focusing development on the EOS R lineup.. You cannot use EF-M lenses on EOS R cameras.

EF, EF-S

Lastly, Canon EF and EF-S lenses are the brand's legacy DSLR camera lenses. EF stands for Electronic Focus. These lenses work with Canon's full-frame DSLRs and APS-C DSLRs. You can also get adapters that allow you to use EF lenses on EOS R mirrorless cameras.

EF-S lenses are designed for APS-C DSLRs. They are not compatible with full-frame DSLR cameras. You can, however, use EF-S lenses on EOS M and EOS R cameras with an adapter.

Focus systems

The Canon RF 85mm F1.4 L VCM uses a VCM autofocus system. Image: Canon

After the focal length and aperture information, you may see various acronyms in the lens name that refer to the type of autofocus motor the lens uses.

VCM

The VCM in the lens name means it uses a Voice Coil Motor to drive autofocus. VCM autofocus systems are powerful, fast and quiet, and they are typically used in higher-end, professional-grade lenses.

USM

USM stands for Ultrasonic Autofocus Motor. These lenses offer manual focus override and fast, smooth and comparatively quiet autofocus. The original, 'ring-type' USM system is typically used in Canon's DSLR lenses and its professional telephoto lenses.

Though not in the lens name beyond USM, many more recent lenses use a Nano USM autofocus system. Nano USM is a specific type of motor that combines attributes of both USM (speed) and STM (smoothness) technologies. These lenses are generally meant for action photography and videography.

STM

STM stands for Stepper Motor, which provides quiet and smooth autofocus ideal for video applications. Canon's consumer and enthusiast lenses typically use its stepper motor.

Optical technology and image quality

The RF 85mm F1.2 L USM DS lens features Canon's Defocus Smoothing coating. Image: Canon

You may see additional acronyms when a lens offers special optical technology or image quality features. These include IS, DO, DS and BR.

IS

IS stands for Image Stabilizer. As with any brand's image stabilization system, it aims to reduce the effects of camera shake to produce a sharper image. If you see IS in the name, that means it offers optical image stabilization, and you can see how many stops of stabilization it offers in the lens's description.

DS

DS, which stands for Defocus Smoothing coating, is meant to improve the out-of-focus elements (bokeh) in your photos. Canon says it makes bokeh smoother compared to lenses without this feature.

DO and BR

Both DO and BR Optics refer to lens elements. DO, or diffractive optics, are special Fresnel-style lens elements that allow for a more compact size while maintaining quality. For example, they allow Canon to make telephoto lenses, like its EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II USM, smaller than they otherwise would be without DO elements. Canon’s DO lenses often have a green ring on the front for quick identification.

Though not included in the lens name, you may see BR, also referred to as BR Optics, in descriptions of Canon lenses. BR refers to Canon’s Blue Spectrum Refractive lens element, which it says eliminates color fringing and chromatic aberrations.

Lens class and special features

The Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z lens is part of the L lineup of professional lenses and is compatible with Canon's Power Zoom Adapter. Image: Canon

Finally, just like other lens companies, Canon has some specific lens classes or special features that may be included in the lens name.

L

If you see an L in a Canon lens name, such as in RF 85mm f/1.2 L USM DS, that means the lens is part of the brand's L series, which stands for Luxury Lens. L-series lenses are Canon's professional offerings, made with higher optical quality, improved weather sealing and build quality and better overall performance. They demand steeper price tags as a result. Beyond having an L in the name, L-series lenses also typically have a red ring around the end of the lens.

Z and PZ

If you see a Z in a Canon lens name, that doesn't mean it works with Nikon Z mount. Instead, it means that the lens is compatible with Canon's Power Zoom Adapter PZ-E2 and PZ-E2B. Those adapters enable motorized control of the zoom ring for smoother video work.

You may also see PZ, which stands for power zoom, in the lens name. That means the lens offers an electronic zoom mechanism instead of a zoom ring. Just like the Power Zoom Adapter, PZ lenses are ideal for video applications.

Macro, TS-E and MP-E

Canon now spells out its Macro lenses, with the name simply including the full word. If you see Macro in the name, that means the minimum focusing distance is smaller, allowing you to get closer to your subjects. Some EF mount macro lenses are labeled as MP-E, though, indicating 'Macro Photo.'

TS-E refers to tilt-shift lenses, which allow you to adjust the focal plane (tilt) and perspective (shift). Canon hasn't released any tilt-shift lenses for its mirrorless system, so all TS-E lenses are EF mount offerings.

Adobe Sneaks 2025

Disclosure: DPReview is attending Adobe Max, with Adobe covering travel and lodging expenses.

This year at Adobe Max, the company held its traditional "Sneaks" show, where the engineers show off tech demos of features they've been working on that may eventually make it into production. As an example, last year it showed off a feature called "Perfect Blend," meant to automatically match lighting and color between layers in Photoshop. This week, it officially launched as a feature called "Harmonize." We had the chance to catch the show live, getting a preview of some of Photoshop's potential future features.

Project Surface Swap

The car was originally a goldish-yellow, but the presenter was able to select it with a single click and change the color using Photoshop's standard tools.

The first Photoshop "sneak" was for something called "Project Surface Swap." It's essentially a more context-aware selection tool; in the demo the presenter used it to change the color of a car, despite it not being particularly easy to select with Photoshop's traditional selection tools because of the reflections and shadows on the paint. He also showed off the ability to select a wooden countertop in a photo, despite it being covered with other wooden objects, like a sushi rolling mat and a cutting board.

As the name implies, the tool was also able to load a reference image and use it as a texture, automatically applied with the correct perspective and tiling. When making selections it could take some factors, like varying opacity, into account and, like other selection tools in Photoshop, could be used for creating masks..

Project Light Touch

Project Light Touch is a tool that allows the user to "relight" a scene, imagining what a photo would look like had a light been turned on, rather than left off, or if the lighting had been diffuse instead of harsh sunlight that cast shadows. It also lets the presenter create a virtual light that would interact with the entire scene. He, of course, demoed it by adding a virtual candle to a picture of a carved pumpkin, showing it first lighting the outside of the pumpkin, and then lighting it from the inside, taking depth and occlusion into account.

Project Trace Erase

If I were betting, Project Trace Erase seemed like the demo most likely to turn into a real feature from this year's presentation. It builds on top of the existing Remove Tool, letting the presenter select an object from a photo with a single stroke, rather than having to make multiple passes to take out the object, its shadows, and reflections. Part of the demo involved removing a person walking down a sidewalk, along with their shadow and reflection in a glass wall. Even more impressively, the presenter used it to remove a stove and the smoke it was emitting, a lamp and the light it was putting, and a lens flare that was washing out essentially the entire frame.

The demo showed an impressive amount of contextual awareness. When the presenter selected a person walking in a snow, it also automatically removed the footprints they had left, and did something similar with a jet skier's wake. Each demo took just a few seconds, and didn't require particularly precise selections.

Project Clean Take

On the video side, Adobe showed off a a demo called "Project Clean Take," which focused on improving audio in a variety of ways. In the demo, the person was able to fix some incorrect dialogue by editing the transcript, and then "regenerating" the speech with a convincing simulation of the presenter's voice (despite the clip only being a few seconds long). They also showed off the ability to completely replace an audio track with a regenerated one, changing the presenter's voice to sound more enthusiastic, or to make it sound like they were speaking in a whisper.

The software was also able to take a single audio track and break out separate components, such as the presenter's voice, background sounds, and music playing in the background.* That not only allowed the presenter to mute or tamp down on unwanted noise, but replace copyrighted music with something that sounds similar from Adobe Stock, and then automatically match the reverb and other acoustic properties that were present in the original clip.

* Fun fact: Peter Jackson (yes, that Peter Jackson) used similar tech on a demo that John Lennon recorded, which is how we got the new Beatles song "Now And Then" in 2023.

Project Frame Forward

There was also Project Frame Forward, which showed off a feature that I've personally dreamed about forever. The presenter took a video, made an edit to the first frame in Photoshop, then brought the edited frame back into the tool. It was then able to apply the change he made to the rest of the frames in the video.

Unsurprisingly, the tool relies on generative AI, not tracking and masking, which allowed it to remove particularly tricky subjects like a car ripping around a track, billowing smoke from its tires. It was also able to handle multiple edits, including replacing the sky, changing white balance, and removing multiple people from the background.

A reminder

Again, these features aren't necessarily coming to Photoshop, Lightroom or Premiere anytime soon, or even at all. But they do offer an interesting look at some of the interesting projects Adobe's engineers are working on that may someday become features in the software many of us use.

You can watch the entire presentation on Adobe's YouTube channel.

Image: MirageC / Moment via Getty Images

Last week, as part of our 'Question of the Week' series, we asked how you handle defective lenses, otherwise known as bad copies. Unfortunately, such lenses are just a fact of life for photographers. Bad copies happen even with well-reputed lenses and can cause issues like uneven sharpness, obvious blurring and more. They can significantly impact overall image quality, or they could cause only a subtle change.

Of course, everyone takes a slightly different approach to dealing with such lenses. Here's what you all had to say.

Deal with minor faults

Many of you said that if the lens has minor faults, especially if it's a budget lens, you simply deal with any imperfections. Jon555 also pointed out, "There are two issues, sample variation and actually getting a dud." ProfHankD added to this thought, sharing insight from his experience: "Commercial products are designed to meet specifications, not to be perfect – which is good, because no lens is ever perfect. With over 300 lenses, I have had easily measurable imperfections in every one I've tested."

Return

Major faults or issues with pro-grade glass are significantly less tolerated. With those, DPReview members overwhelmingly prefer to return defective lenses. "When I’ve come across a bad copy, I usually test it thoroughly – checking sharpness, corners, and consistency at different apertures. If it shows clear defects, I return or exchange it. Life’s too short to struggle with a lens that isn’t performing properly," says Julia90.

How you go about returning depends on where you purchased the lens, with many of you specifying that you only purchased from trusted sellers that have robust return policies. "Buy new from a reputable source who's return policy is solid. Especially if its a 3rd party lens with a reputation for QC issues and you know there is a solid chance you might not be happy with the first copy," says TBLF.

Some of you shared that dealing with returns to the manufacturer is much more challenging, while retailers are more understanding, resulting in a straightforward return and/or replacement process. "It is usually better to exchange unsatisfactory copies with camera stores (which are usually generous) rather than Nikon (they sometimes have interesting ideas about what 'meets specifications' means)," said BasilG.

For many of you, replacing the faulty lens is the preferred process.

For many of you, replacing the faulty lens is the preferred process. You are willing to try a second (or third) copy to get a quality lens. However, others said they will look for something else entirely. "Generally, if I encounter a defective lens, I return the lens and look for an alternative. If the QC on that lens was that bad it's unlikely that others in the lot will be much better," said Thomas Kachadurian. "I'm not one of those people who will try and return several copies of the same lens looking for a jewel in the rocks."

Last resort: repair

For just about everyone, sending the lens off for repairs is a last resort. AshleyMC shared their four options, with repair not part of the list. "Over the years, I have never exercised the repair option," they said. Most of you said that repairing a lens is only considered when return and replacement are not possible. "If I bought new and can't return then I'll try for a warranty repair," said Gato Amarillo.

Even then, most of you stressed getting a lens repaired under warranty to avoid pricey bills. Gato Amarillo went on to say that "A paid repair would be far down my list of options. Modern lenses are extremely complex and built to very tight tolerances. I wouldn't trust anything other than a factory repair, and I'd be worried about that."

Be sure to test your lenses

Another common theme was the importance of testing your new lenses. Many of you shared various methods for testing your lenses. They range from simple and real-world practical, like photographing a flat surface of some variety. For example, RussW said, "First thing I do when I get a new lens or camera is to test it by photographing my garage door." Some shared about the four corners or upside-down methods. A smaller number of you have more in-depth processes, such as photographing detailed scenes or specific charts.

If you wait too long, the return period may lapse, or the warranty for the lens may run out.

No matter how you test, timing is essential. "This is why I think it's important to test your lenses when you get them and deal with any quality issues sooner rather than later," said Sirhawkeye64. If you wait too long, the return period may lapse, or the warranty for the lens may run out. That means you'll have to pay for a replacement or repairs out of pocket.

MikeyL shared his experience of not discovering the issue until it was too late. "In one other case I also bought from this same retailer but did not discover the issue until it was out of the time period for a replacement," he wrote. "At that point I had to deal with the manufacturer. It was a 3rd party manufacturer, and they wanted 2/3rds of the price of the lens just to fix it (even though it was defective from purchase). So in that case I had no recourse. That lens still sits on a shelf in my hobby room today, pretty much useless."

No matter what, your best bet is to test your lenses early to catch any possible issues. How you handle it from there depends on your needs and preferences, and what options your retailer has.

Image: Oppo

Oppo has announced the Find X9 Pro, its latest flagship smartphone, which it says has a camera system tuned by Hasselblad. But as impressive as the cameras included on the phone may be, it's a sold-separately accessory that really caught our attention: the Hasselblad Teleconverter is a lens that attaches to the phone via a custom case. It gives the telephoto camera a 230mm equiv field of view and offers a true 10x zoom from the main camera.

Even without augmentation, though, the base cameras are still relatively impressive. The main shooter pairs an optically stabilized 23mm equiv. F1.5 lens with a 50MP Type-1/1.28 Sony LYT 828 sensor (74.4mm²), and is joined by a 70mm equiv. F2.1 telephoto camera, again with OIS, and a 15mm equiv. F2 ultra-wide. As with previous models, Oppo also includes another sensor dedicated to measuring ambient light to make sure your colors are accurate even in difficult lighting conditions.

The telephoto camera is the only one explicitly branded as Hasselblad (the company says it uses Hasselblad's "Natural Colour Solution" processing). But the camera app also has a branded "XPan" mode that gives you a wide aspect-ratio preview and the ability to switch between color modes that emulate film stocks. There's also a "Master Mode" that lets you manually set ISO, shutter speed, focus and white balance.

Image: Hasselblad

While Oppo says you can zoom in up to 120x using a combination of center cropping and AI upscaling, telephoto enthusiasts have a better option. The pocket-sized 3.28x Hasselblad Teleconverter lets you forget digital zoom and use optics instead. However, some early reviews have mentioned that, unsurprisingly, it can be a little hard to frame such a long focal length handheld with a phone.

Image: Oppo

Aside from the cameras, the phone is bursting with all the features you'd expect for a top-of-the-line model. It has two side buttons – one for launching the camera app, the other to act as a customizable shortcut. It also features a 6.78" display that runs at 120Hz and can reach 3600 nit peak brightness. There's a massive 27.34Wh battery that supports 80W charging over a wire when paired with a charger that uses the company's "SUPERVOOC" tech, and up to 50W with wireless charging. It's powered by a MediaTek Dimensity 9500 SOC, paired with 16GB of RAM.

Pricing for the Find X9 Pro will vary by region, and, as usual for Oppo phones, it's not available in the US. In the UK, it sells for £1099, and in Europe it's €1299. Oppo hasn't officially said how much the Teleconverter accessory will cost, or when it will be for sale.

Photo: Moment

Camera accessory brand Moment has introduced a new line of camera bags that take a fresh look at lightweight packs. The Moment Fast & Light camera bags aim to offer slimmed-down, minimalist options for adventurers, with looks that can transition to everyday carry.

Moment says the Fast & Light line was inspired by running and cycling gear, and that's especially true of the vest, the most interesting offering in the lineup. After all, the Exposure 10L Vest looks more like a running vest than a traditional photographer's vest. Moment says the vest can be worn loosely or tightened down for a no-bounce fit using bungees on the sides. It also features bungee sternum straps instead of the front zipper closure found on photographer's vests, allowing a snug fit.

The front pocket design also takes cues from running vests. It offers a zippered stretch pocket and a quick-access stretch pocket on the front straps for easy access to things like film, your phone or those ever-important snacks. The back design borrows features from a cycling jersey, with stretch back pockets that allow for no-look access without removing the vest.

There's a main compartment that supports up to a 14" laptop, a tablet or a hydration bladder. A dedicated battery pocket in the main compartment is connected to a charging channel that lets you run a charging cable through the vest to keep your phone charged while in the front stretch pocket.

Moment says it's designed to keep your gear close to your body so that it "moves the way you do." The pockets disperse items between your side, front, and back, which helps get rid of bulk and keep the weight comfortable. The vest is also lightweight, at just 0.8kg (1.7 lbs). It's made of the company's 210-denier fabric called LiteWeave Ripstop and features a durable water repellent (DWR) coating for protection against the elements. It comes only in black but is available in two sizes: S/M, which fits chest sizes 38-45 inches, and L/XL, which fits chest sizes 45-55 inches.

Photos: Moment

Also in the new lineup is the Sequence 23L Camera Backpack, which looks like a much more traditional camera bag, though with plenty of useful features. Inside the bag are padded dividers that you can fold away when they aren't needed. A removable waist belt adds stability and comfort when needed. It offers two access points, including top access for quick-grab items like layers, and front access for camera gear.

The pack also features vest-inspired shoulder straps with pockets, LightWeave Ripstop fabric with a DWR coating and a laptop sleeve that doubles as a hydration bladder compartment with a pass-through hole for the tube. Side stuff pockets allow you to store water bottles, a tripod or additional layers. It's available in black, white and green.

The 1.5L sling is designed for compact cameras and essentials. Photo: Moment

Finally, the Fast & Light line includes 4L and 1.5L slings. Both can be worn as waist packs or crossbody bags and offer one-handed quick adjustments without hanging straps to dial in fit. They also each offer a front mesh pocket for quick access items and two zippered pockets for better organization. The 4L sling features a removable three-point stability strap that keeps the bag against your body when you're on the move and straps for jackets and tripods.

The new bags are now available for pre-order through Moment's website. Moment says the first 100 units will ship by the end of December, but the second batch won't arrive until March. The Exposure Vest costs $120 and the Sequence Backpack $230. The 1.5L sling is priced at $55, and the 4L sling at $99.

82%

Overall score

Jump to conclusion

The OM System OM-5 II is a Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera that uses the same stabilized 20MP sensor as its predecessor. It also features the same processor as the OM-5, so the list of new features is relatively subtle, but it gains some minor updates that make it feel a bit more modern.

Key Specifications

• 20MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor
• 50MP handheld high-res multi-shot mode
• Up to 7.5EV stabilization with Sync IS lenses
• Up to 30fps continuous shooting, configurable pre-capture
• 2.36M-dot 0.68x OLED viewfinder
• IP53 dust and water resistance rating
• USB-C for charging / data transfer
• Updated menu system

The OM-5 II retails for $1199 body-only, the same as its predecessor, and is available now. It comes in black, silver and a "sand beige" tan.

Index:

• What's new?
• How it compares
• Body and handling
• Image Quality
• Autofocus
• Video
• In Use
• Conclusion
• Sample gallery
• Specifications
• Press release

What's New

USB-C

When the OM-5 launched in 2022, its use of a micro USB port instead of a USB-C one felt like a huge omission, especially given that the European Union was already well on its way to mandating the more modern charging and communication standard. Thankfully, the OM-5 II doesn't repeat that mistake; it uses USB-C for charging and connecting to your computer, where it retains the ability to act as a webcam without any additional software or drivers via the UVC/UAC protocol.

This is mostly an upgrade to the charging experience. You'll still want to use an SD card reader for offloading photos, as the type C port still runs at USB 2.0, less than a tenth the speed of the 5Gbps "SuperSpeed" ports found on a majority of modern cameras.

Updated grip

While the OM-5 II's design is mostly unchanged from its predecessor's, OM System has made the grip a touch larger to help with ergonomics. Compared to the OM-5's, it fills out your hand just a bit more, which helps make it a touch more comfortable and easier to handle.

New menus

The OM-5 II's menus, like those on the rest of the company's modern cameras, now look and work a lot like Canon's.

OM System has also brought over its updated menu system from the OM-1 and OM-3, with color-coded sections and tabs. Unlike its predecessor, the camera will try to give you an explanation for why certain items are unavailable instead of leaving you to guess what you need to change to access those features.

You can navigate through the sections using the front dial and switch pages using the rear one, which can be very quick once you get the hang of it. The four-way controller is required for changing your settings; you can use the touchscreen to switch tabs and sections, but not to navigate through or adjust the settings themselves.

CP button

OM System has replaced the OM-5's exposure compensation button with the 'CP' button that debuted on the OM-3. It gives you quick access to the camera's myriad computational photography modes; giving it a single press will activate your last-used mode, and if you press and hold it, you can use either command dial to scroll through the various modes and select the one you'd like to use.

The OM-5 II doesn't gain any new computational features compared to its predecessor, which is a bit of a shame since we've found the Live Graduated ND feature included in the higher-end models to be useful in some situations (though that may only be possible because of those cameras' Stacked sensors, which capture images faster, with less risk of rolling shutter). However, the OM-5 II still has a suite of useful computational modes:

All the multi-shot modes are processed in-camera, making them much more convenient to use compared to similar modes from other brands that have to be stitched with desktop software. However, that can take a while for some modes; the most taxing are the handheld high-res shots, which lock up the camera for over 15 seconds; even the progress bar won't move from the EVF to the display or vice versa if you move your eye to or away from the camera.

New color modes

Standard Color Profile	OM Cinema 1	OM Cinema 2

The OM-5 II includes the two video-only "OM Cinema" color modes from the OM-3, which are made to capture the same level of highlight information as the Log mode but without the extremely low-contrast, low-saturation logic that requires grading. The company says the OM Cinema 1 mode is designed to highlight yellows in the bright parts of your image and blues in the darker areas, while Cinema 2 adds a bit of cyan to the highlights and shadows while lowering contrast.

Like Log mode, these modes capture the additional highlight information by using a minimum ISO of 400, meaning they're designed to receive one stop less exposure than standard mode.

Light, camera, action

Speaking of video, the OM-5 II now features a red LED in the top right corner on the front of the camera, which acts as a tally light to make it obvious when you're recording video.

A little help

The OM-5 II adds two new assistance features: a 'Night Vision' mode that boosts the live view's brightness, making it easier to focus and/or compose in dark environments and a 'Handheld Assist' mode that shows you how stable you're keeping the camera during long exposures. It gives you a target that shows how much you've moved the camera since you started taking the picture. It makes it easier to tell whether your photo will come out blurry since you'll know whether you've moved more than the stabilization system can compensate for.

How it compares

The OM-5 II is mainly focused on people looking to capture their outdoor adventures, a niche that's often serviced by action video cameras. However, there's nothing about its design that precludes it from being a general-use stills camera. As such, we're comparing it to several comparably-priced APS-C cameras that are good for photos (no EVF-less, e-shutter only, single-dial cameras here) but that still include some decent video specs.

* - the original OM-5 could shoot at 10fps mechanical, but not with continuous autofocus.

In some ways, OM System sets itself apart by offering features you'd usually need to pay more for, such as a stabilized sensor and weather sealing. You have to jump up to at least $1499 and the Fujifilm X-S20 to get them in a mirrorless APS-C camera, and OM System is one of only two camera companies to offer a specific IP rating rather than a vague claim of "weather resistance." The other being Leica.

Like Fujifilm, there's a wide array of sensible lenses available you can pair with the OM-5 II, though Micro Four Thirds offers lighter and more compact options than even APS-C. It also offers an unusually high number of multi-shot modes with in-camera processing, that can boost its performance.

However, the OM-5 II misses out on some features that are quickly becoming table stakes, such as the ability to shoot 10-bit video or stills for playback on HDR displays, a 60p video mode, and a wider array of AI-derived subject detection modes for its autofocus system. At this point, there are cameras well under $1000 that have these features, so they feel like notable absences.

Body and Handling

Like its predecessor, the OM-5 II is very light, while still managing to remain well-balanced when paired with larger lenses like OM System's 40-150mm F4 Pro. The extra grip helps in this regard, filling out your palm and making the camera feel more substantial without adding much weight or bulk.

The OM-5 II has a selection of buttons and levers, and as is tradition for the brand, most of them can be customized to do pretty much anything you'd like. While the buttons around the four-way controller are fixed, you're free to do what you wish with the buttons on the top plate, including the two semi-circular ones atop the power lever. The settings are separate for stills and video modes.

It also has OM System's customary function lever, which is unfortunately much more limited; it can only be used to power the camera on or off (leaving the dedicated power lever to do nothing), turn the camera into video mode, or to switch between a small subset of dial functions or autofocus settings. It does not recognize the eye recognition mode, so you can't use it to switch between, say, tracking autofocus and continuous autofocus with eye recognition – unlike many other cameras, you can't have both human detection and the general tracking mode on at once.

It also features a locking mode dial, with settings for all the major exposure modes, along with video, scene and art filter modes. Its two top-plate command dials have relatively aggressive knurling, making them easy to manipulate even while wearing gloves.

Despite the revised menus, one of the OM-5 II's best features remains its "Super Control Panel," which is mapped to the OK button by default. It lets you easily access and control most of the camera's main shooting settings on a single touchscreen panel: drive mode, AF mode, face and eye detection, exposure and ISO control, etc. You can just tap on the screen and spin a command dial to change all the camera's key settings.

EVF and Monitor

The OM-5 II's viewfinder remains unchanged from the 2.36M dot 0.68x (equiv.) magnification model found on its predecessor. While it's relatively small, it usually gets the job done, and it's good to have in bright conditions where the fully articulating 3" LCD – also unchanged – will get washed out.

Battery

The OM-5's tripod mount is somewhat controversial, and OM System tells us it's unchanged for the II.

The OM-5 II uses the same 8.5Wh BLS-50 battery as its predecessor, which the company says will last for around 310 shots based on CIPA test standards. While you can generally expect to get more shots than the rated number in real-world use, it's a useful indicator for comparing across cameras. In this case, it's relatively low; if you're going into the wilderness for a weekend, you may want to pack a spare battery or plan on topping it up with your USB-C power bank.

Image Quality

The handheld high-res multi-shot mode is easier to access than ever on this camera, and can be used to gain a bump in image quality. But it only works with very still subjects, and is slow to process. OM-5 II | OM System 25mm F1.8 II | F5.6 | 1/500 sec | ISO 200 Photo: Mitchell Clark

Our test scene is designed to simulate a variety of textures, colors, and detail types you'll encounter in the real world. It also has two illumination modes, full even light and low directional light, to see the effect of different lighting conditions.

To start by answering the obvious question: there are no discernible differences between the output of the OM-5 and the OM-5 II that couldn't be explained by run-to-run variation; the two cameras perform virtually identically in our tests.

That's not necessarily a bad thing, as the original provided solid image quality. At base ISO, the OM-5 II's Raws have good levels of detail, roughly in line with what the Canon EOS R10 and Nikon Z50II capture, and slightly more than the Fujifilm X-S20 (though that may come down more to the difficulty some programs have with processing pictures taken using Fujifilm's X-Trans color filter). Given its smaller sensor, it's unsurprising that it has more noise across the tonal range than its APS-C competitors.

This also translates to worse low-light performance, though the images from the OM-5 II are still usable at mid-range ISOs and its stabilized sensor will let you shoot at slower shutter speeds (depending on your subject) than with its unstabilized competitors, so you may not have to use the higher ISOs as often.

Its JPEG processing generally does a good job of sharpening and reducing noise at base ISO, though Canon and Nikon have a slight edge when it comes to preserving fine details. At higher ISOs, the OM-5 II does a good job of reducing noise without smoothing away details, as do the rest of the cameras in this lineup.

We found the colors in the OM-5 II's JPEGs to be quite pleasing. They're not overly punchy, but are saturated enough to make images pop.

The multi-shot high resolution modes, which are thankfully processed in-camera rather than in a desktop app, can be used to gain a bit of extra detail under the right circumstances. They only work with very still subjects, such as landscapes (as long as there's not a lot of wind), which limits their usefulness.

Dynamic Range

Shot at base ISO and exposed to preserve highlights. Shadows lifted in Adobe Camera Raw and edited to taste. OM-5 II | OM System 20mm F1.4 Pro | F4 | 1/160 sec | ISO 200 Photo: Mitchell Clark

The camera offers good dynamic range performance, giving you lots of flexibility to shoot to preserve highlights and to raise shadows in post. However, it doesn't have the advantage in read noise that it once did; when the OM-5 came out, we found it had substantially cleaner shadows than the (much more expensive) Panasonic GH6. Comparing it to the GH7, that's no longer the case, not that we suspect most people will be choosing between these two cameras, despite their shared sensor size.

Exposure Latitude | ISO Invariance

Autofocus

The OM-5 II doesn't have eye detection or animal detection, but the tracking can do a decent job, even on somewhat wiggly subjects. OM System 20mm F1.4 Pro | F2.8 | 1/8000 sec | ISO 800

The OM-5 II has several autofocus modes: single, continuous and continuous with tracking, as well as a special star autofocus mode for shooting the night sky. In the standard modes, you have several selection point shapes to choose from, ranging from a small single point to the whole area. You can also set up four custom-size zones and exclude whichever target modes you want from the menu.

To move the autofocus point or area, you can use the screen for tap-to-focus or the four-way controller. You can also enable the "AF targeting pad," which lets you use the right half of the screen as an autofocus controller while looking through the EVF. These options do a decent job of making up for the lack of an autofocus joystick, though we still occasionally found ourselves missing that direct physical control.

The OM-5 II's autofocus points only cover around 60% of the sensor, which means you'll have to be a bit more cautious when composing, trying to track a subject, or setting up your camera to get a shot when something enters the frame.

The OM-5 II has face/eye detection, which works in single, continuous, and manual focus modes, but it feels like a decidedly first-generation implementation. It typically only recognizes humans' eyes, not animals'. It can occasionally struggle to identify human faces if they're wearing glasses, tinted or clear. And unless you're using tap-to-focus, the camera won't respect your chosen focus point if it recognizes a face; it'll snap to it, and you'll likely have to turn detection off to get it to focus on something else.

The face detection also doesn't work in conjunction with tracking mode; you can have either it or tracking. And, frustratingly, you can't just switch to the C-AF + Tracking mode to turn off face detection; you have to turn off face detection to even be able to access the option, though the camera will automatically switch back to tracking in some (but not all) circumstances.

Autofocus Performance

The OM-5 II's single and continuous autofocus performance is snappy and accurate, generally doing a good job of driving the lens to get the subject in focus without having to hunt. There were very occasional misteps that resulted in slightly soft images, but overall we were quite pleased with it.

Its tracking performance is a slightly different story. While it could do a decent job of keeping the autofocus point on a selected subject, it does feel a ways behind what companies like Nikon, Canon and Sony are doing. The tracking point isn't always as tenacious as we'd like, and it was sometimes unable to lock onto lower-contrast subjects at all. It would also occasionally start to drift off the subject being tracked, and the tracking box the camera displays sometimes lagged behind what it was supposed to be tracking.

Because of its identity as an outdoor adventure camera, the tracking performance means you may have to work a bit harder if you're trying to photograph wildlife or athletic activities. For some, that won't be an issue, but it could lead to a slightly frustrating learning curve for beginner photographers who may otherwise find the OM-5 II's price and relatively robust feature set attractive.

Video

The OM-5 II's 4K/30 video is reasonably sharp for everyday use, but falls well short of the image quality you can get from other cameras like the Nikon Z50II and Fujifilm X-S20. It includes a Log profile that lets you shoot footage designed to retain flexibility for color grading, but unlike its more expensive siblings, can only do so in 8-bit, which severely limits that flexibility. It also lacks a 4K/60 mode for higher-resolution slow-motion.

It also lacks some of the assistance tools that are increasingly becoming standard for serious video shooting, such as a waveform monitor or false color preview, HDR output, or in-camera support for LUTs (though there is at least preview assistance when you're shooting in Log). And while it has a microphone socket, you won't have any way to monitor the audio, given its lack of a corresponding headphone port and apparent* lack of support for a USB-C to 3.5mm adapter.

This isn't to say that the OM-5 II isn't capable of casually shooting video, but it'd be a frustratingly limited tool for more serious shoots. For capturing clips, though, the IBIS is relatively effective at smoothing out hand shake and other movement, and the autofocus generally does a good job, though it can occasionally drift, especially when capturing more complex scenes.

This is made all the more disappointing as its rolling shutter performance is excellent, taking 10ms to read out the sensor when shooting in 4K/24.

* - We tested with one to no effect, but they're not always universal.

In Use

When I reviewed the OM-3, I found myself very willing to try out the handheld high-res mode to get a bit more image quality, even in situations where I was a little unsure whether it'd produce good results. That wasn't true with the OM-5 II; I quickly learned that the time it takes to process the 50MP images was far longer than I'm willing to wait. The other computational modes – made easier to access by the "CP" button – are a bit quicker, but it's the area where this camera's processor most shows its age. I also found that they ate through the camera's already relatively meager battery quite rapidly. That made me far less willing to use them outside of very specific scenarios where I knew I'd get the full benefit.

There are very few other cameras that I'd be willing to put in my backpack when paired with a 100-400mm equiv. lens. OM System 50-200mm F2.8 IS Pro | F2.8 | 1/100 sec | ISO 2500

That frustration was somewhat offset by just how easy it was to take this camera anywhere. It's nowhere in the realm of pocketable, even with a small prime attached, but it's small enough that I found myself throwing it in whatever bag I was taking, just in case I ran into interesting things to photograph. That included bringing it along on a backpacking trip and a kayaking outing (my confidence perhaps a bit too buoyed by the IP53 rating), where I was able to get photos that looked substantially nicer than what my phone could've produced.

None of this will be a revelation to the Micro Four Thirds faithful, but it's a benefit worth reiterating. Although in theory someone should be able to build an APS-C rival with a comparable feature set, the OM-5 II still offers an unmatched combination of size, price and capabilities.

It's also hard to overstate how far the new menu system goes to making the camera feel more modern than the original OM-5. While there will be those who prefer a vertical tab system versus a horizontal one, the color coding and improved tips that give you a hint as to why certain options aren't selectable go a long way to making the camera feel more approachable. Their inclusion here makes their exclusion on the original OM-5 all the more baffling, but at least they're here now.

Minor complaint: if you set the function switch to act as the power switch (letting you turn the camera on and control it with the same hand), the default power switch on the left side of the camera becomes completely useless.

The new menus don't solve OM System's issue of its features not necessarily integrating with one another. It remains frustrating that you can't use the mode toggle switch, which would otherwise be a very handy feature, to switch between, say, continuous autofocus with facial recognition, and Tracking autofocus. The face detection mode (and any other modes added after the switch first appeared on the OM-D E-M5 II) can't be controlled by the switch; it will simply stay on, overriding Tracking AF. Still, the camera is very customizable, letting you reassign most of its buttons and dial directions.

Of course, USB-C is also a massive improvement, especially given that the OM-5 II has just okay battery life. Being able to charge your camera using the same equipment you have for your phone, computer, etc., is a luxury that you don't miss until it's gone, and it's a tradeoff this camera no longer asks you to make. Particularly for traveling, this is valuable.

Speaking of tradeoffs, though, we'll also point out that the OM-5 II isn't compatible with OM System's FL-LM3 flash unit, which we consider to be the best pack-in flash unit. We've written an entire article on the matter (and have since attached the flash to our OM-5 II to confirm it didn't work), but felt it deserved a mention here, given that the FL-LM3 did work with the original OM-5.

Conclusion

By Mitchell Clark

When viewed in a vacuum, it's hard to find much to complain about with the OM-5 II. It has a winning combination of good image quality, ergonomics and usability, combined with extra features you normally wouldn't get at this price point like an IP rating, computational photography modes and very solid IBIS. If this was your first camera, or if you were coming from a much older model, you'd probably be pretty happy with it.

There are, however, places where it starts to show its age. And unfortunately, it's in the basics. Autofocus is perhaps the most glaring; in 2025, even much cheaper cameras (which, admittedly, lack those aforementioned features) will provide more reliable tracking and offer greater AF area coverage and additional subject recognition types. Most will also have better video specs, with more flexible 10-bit recording modes and a headphone jack.

This camera's hardware also makes OM System's computational photography features – a major selling point on some of its other cameras – less appealing, because of just how long it takes to process them. That also means it's less convenient to use the high-resolution modes to gain back some of the image quality you give up by going with a smaller sensor.

The OM-5 II's biggest problem, at least initially, may be the original OM-5 itself, which is now selling for significantly less money. It's not that the Mark II doesn't offer any meaningful upgrades, because it does. But if you're willing to put up with microUSB and the old menus, you're getting essentially getting the same camera, but with slightly faster fixed-focus mechanical shutter burst rates and support for one of the best small flashes out there.

We do think there's a market for the OM-5 II. Like the company's other cameras, it still fits well into its niche as a tool for those traveling outdoors who may encounter bad weather and who don't necessarily want to bring a tripod. But as the entry point to that system, there are enough asterisks that you'd have to really want the specific things the OM-5 II is offering to choose it.

In theory, it's the kind of camera we'd love to recommend to people just starting out with the hobby, but its once ground-breaking spec is just a bit too far behind (in a way that cameras like the OM-3 and OM-1 / OM-1 II aren't) at this point for us to do that. As such, we don't feel as if we can grant it an award.

Scoring

Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category. Click here to learn about what these numbers mean.

Compared to its Peers

The Canon EOS R10 will provide more capable autofocus with better general tracking, face detection, and support for detecting other kinds of subjects. Some users will also greatly appreciate the ability to select an autofocus point with a joystick, rather than a touchscreen or four-way controller, and others will benefit from its much better video spec and higher burst rates. While Canon tightly controls what lenses are available for APS-C RF cameras, the selection that's available now is quite good for most types of shooting, even if it's not as extensive as the Micro Four Thirds system. Of course, it does ask you to give up weather resistance and sensor stabilization.

The Fujifilm X-S20 also has better face-tracking and more subject detection modes, but the autofocus performance gap between it and the OM-5 II isn't quite as big as with the Canon. However, it's even more capable when it comes to video – the headphone jack is great for monitoring audio – and is the cheapest APS-C option to offer a stabilized sensor (though its US price has crept up by a few hundred dollars since we listed it as a competitor).

The Nikon Z50II's comparison will reach much the same as the Canon's; it has much better autofocus and video than the OM-5 II, but is slightly held back by lens selection and an unstabilized sensor. Like the OM-5 II, it lacks an AF selection joystick, though the reliability of its '3D Tracking' system means you may find yourself missing it less. It's also the only APS-C camera in this price range to make a claim of weather resistance, though it's the typical vague promise, rather than the IP rating OM System tests for.

Sample Gallery

Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter/magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing (in conjunction with this review); we do so in good faith, so please don't abuse it.

Pre-Production Sample Gallery