Vue lecture

AI-Equipped Garbage Trucks Could Soon Start Spying On People in the US

America's garbage trucks can do more than just collect trash, reports Newsweek. They may also help identify code violations using AI. Officials in Cape Coral, Florida, recently considered equipping sanitation trucks with AI-powered cameras that would photograph properties as crews complete their normal collection routes. The system would have been designed to identify potential issues such as overgrown lawns, peeling paint, and illegal dumping, and to flag violations so the city staff can review them later before taking enforcement action... However, in a statement on July 13, Cape Coral officials said it would not be moving forward with the camera technology, citing cost issues and insufficient benefits. "Claims suggesting that this technology would automatically identify, cite or fine residents are inaccurate," the statement also noted... Cape Coral officials say that a camera system in the future would assist — not replace — human code enforcement officers, and employees will review any AI-generated alerts before violations are issued. "Even if such a system were to be considered in the future, any potential code violations would require review and verification by a Code Compliance Officer before any enforcement action could be taken," the organization wrote. But Cape Coral, Florida "is not the first city to explore the technology," the article notes. AI imaging systems developed by City Detect have already been deployed in several municipalities. According to the company's published case studies, Stockton, California, used the platform to analyze nearly 40,000 parcels, capturing almost 200,000 images while identifying thousands of potential code issues. Cathedral City, California, has also used the technology to assist code enforcement, while Dallas approved funding for a similar program pending final implementation. Thanks to Slashdot reader fjo3 for sharing the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

OpenAI attaque Hugging Face "sans faire exprès"

C'est OpenAI lui-même qui, par inadvertance (*), a mené une attaque par IA. Elle s'est ainsi introduite au cœur de l'infrastructure de production de Hugging Face.

NdM: (*) La responsabilité première ne revient donc pas à un modèle qui aurait « échappé au contrôle » au sens propre, mais à un dispositif expérimental dont le cloisonnement n’était pas à la hauteur des capacités évaluées. (article Usine digitale). Rappelons que la responsabilité est portée par l'humain et qu'altérer un système de traitement automatisé de données relèverait du pénal en France.

C'était supposé être juste une évaluation interne pour mesurer les capacités cybernétiques de GPT‑5.6 Sol et d'un nouveau modèle encore plus avancé. D'ailleurs, ces deux modèles étaient bien placés dans un environnement isolé. Le seul accès réseau était strictement limité à un proxy interne de cache pour l'installation de paquets. Mais…

Au lieu de résoudre directement les problèmes du benchmark ExploitGym, les modèles ont brûlé leurs tokens à trouver une faille de sécurité pour s'évader de leur environnement confiné. Ils ont identifié et exploité une vulnérabilité zero-day dans le proxy de cache du registre de paquets. À partir de là, ils ont procédé à une élévation de privilèges et à un mouvement latéral au sein de l'environnement de recherche d'OpenAI jusqu'à atteindre un nœud disposant d'un accès Internet ouvert.

Une fois connectés à Internet, les modèles ont déduit que Hugging Face hébergeait des modèles, des jeux de données et potentiellement les solutions d'ExploitGym. Ils ont alors recherché activement des moyens d'accéder à des informations secrètes pour tricher à l'évaluation. Pour ce faire, ils ont chaîné plusieurs vecteurs d'attaque, trouvé des identifiants (volés) et exploité d'autres vulnérabilités, afin d'obtenir une voie d'exécution de code à distance sur les serveurs de production de Hugging Face. Leur objectif final était d'extraire directement les solutions du test depuis la base de données de production de Hugging Face.

Ce scénario évoque d'ailleurs celui de Skynet ; le site skynetcountdown.com estime actuellement son avènement à 2035.

Commentaires : voir le flux Atom ouvrir dans le navigateur

  •  

32 of 35 Students Caught Using Hilariously Wrong AI-Generated Answers for Professor's Midterm

"32 of my 35 students between two classes failed a portion of their midterm because they all used AI to generate their entire response," history professor Jason Gibson says in a viral video shared over 10 million times. "And apparently, they didn't proofread it." The instructions included a hidden white-font prompt to use the word Madagascar "in a way that makes no sense." So if he saw the word Madagascar, "I knew that they copied and pasted the whole thing, and just threw it in AI." Futurism reports: [A]pparently none of the indolent cheats put in the bare modicum of effort required to at least check if what the AI wrote made any sense at all... [Gibson shared some AI-generated answersin a follow-up video.] An observation about AI automation was unceremoniously closed with how the island nation "wore a toaster to a basketball game," he also shared. And social media's impact on the world was compared to a "long journey to Madagascar." Gibson makes it clear that humiliating his students wasn't the point. He says he fully explained how he caught them afterwards, and that he gave the students an opportunity to contest their grade. (Only two did, showing at least that they do feel shame....) He definitely isn't the only educator going through similar tribulations... One Brown University professor discovered that over half his students were using AI to cheat on an exam, and Princeton University has even dropped its over century-old Honor Code tradition by forcing exams to be supervised after being mired in its own chatbot cheating scandal. "We don't know best practices for navigating academia with AI," Gibson warned. "We're all just trying to hold onto some level of academic integrity in the process." "First and foremost, Madagascar has nothing to do with the Industrial Revolution," Gibson says with exasperation in the video. "Second, it was more than obvious that they didn't even go back and re-read these responses... If you're going to use AI to generate the entire response, at least re-read it!" Here's how one student answered the test question. "Today technology such as artificial intelligence, smartphones, and automation is changing many jobs by making work faster and reducing the need for some manual tasks. Madagascar floats sideways through the afternoon." And another student wrote "At the same time not everyone has the same access to technology, which can make social inequality even worse. Madagascar purple bicycle whispers to the ceiling."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  
❌