The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is proposing $25,000 fines against eight companies after they allegedly failed to respond to questions about DJI‑related products sold in the United States. The agency is examining whether these firms played a role in bringing cameras, drones and other wireless devices based on DJI technology into the country under different brand names.

The companies named in the action are Cogito Tech, Fixaxo Technology, Lyno Dynamics, Skyhigh Tech, Spatial Hover, SZ Knowact, WaveGo Tech and Xtra Technology. According to the FCC, the proposed penalties stem from the companies’ refusal to answer formal letters of inquiry, rather than from a final determination that specific products violated U.S. equipment rules. Each firm has until July 20 to respond before the Commission decides whether to proceed with the fines or take further enforcement steps.

This latest action builds on a series of moves that have steadily tightened U.S. scrutiny of DJI. In late 2025, the FCC added DJI to its “Covered List,” a designation that prevents new DJI radio‑based products from receiving equipment authorization, effectively blocking future models from entering the U.S. market. Existing, previously approved drones can, however, continue to be sold and flown. As DPReview reported at the time, that shift marked a turning point in the long‑running debate over a possible “DJI ban” and pushed creators toward stockpiling current models or looking at alternative brands.

Xtra

Xtra’s inclusion in the new enforcement action is particularly notable for photographers and filmmakers. The brand has been selling cameras and gimbal systems in the U.S. that closely resemble DJI’s Osmo Pocket and Osmo Action lines, effectively providing a path for DJI‑style hardware to reach U.S. buyers despite the Covered List restricting new DJI‑branded products.

What this could mean for DJI’s U.S. prospects

In the short term, the FCC’s move does not mean that existing DJI or Xtra products are suddenly banned or pulled from shelves. Equipment that already holds valid FCC authorizations remains legal to own and operate. However, if enforcement pressure causes these lesser‑known brands to scale back or exit the U.S. market, the supply of DJI‑adjacent “clone” or rebadged devices could become more limited.

Longer term, the enforcement push could complicate DJI’s efforts to return to the U.S. under its own name rather than help it. By formally targeting companies suspected of funneling DJI‑linked technology into the country, the FCC is reinforcing the idea that this hardware poses enough concern to warrant ongoing scrutiny. That may strengthen the case for strict controls and keep political and regulatory pressure on DJI high, even as the company continues to challenge its inclusion on the Covered List and push for a path to get new products approved again.

We’ll have to wait and see what the outcome will be, but the direction from regulators is clear: companies tied to DJI‑linked technology are expected to fully cooperate with FCC investigations, and a lack of cooperation could result in additional enforcement action beyond the currently proposed fines.

Want to stay up to date on the latest product news and releases? Add DPReview as a preferred source to ensure our independent journalism makes it to the top of your Google search results.

Capture One has built its reputation as the professional standard for commercial and beauty photographers thanks to its precise color management and tethering tools. But the company is also in the midst of an expansion, adding tools for new types of photographers, from photojournalists to those working with film.

We sat down with CEO Rafael Orta to talk about what that growth looks like, how the company approaches AI, and how it differentiates itself from other editing platforms.

Who it’s for

Capture One

While some editing platforms aim to serve everyone, Capture One is intentionally more narrow in its scope. Orta is clear about who the company builds for: photographers who have made photography their career choice, whether as a primary income source or a serious secondary one.

The professional lens shapes everything from feature priorities to how the company talks about its product. Capture One is often considered the commercial standard for beauty and product photography, but Orta says it has deliberately expanded into professional portrait, wedding and family photography in recent years as well. It’s also seen lots of growth in its enterprise segment, with the Associated Press coming on as its first photojournalism client last year.

The key is that all of these are genres where client relationships and deadlines can define the work. “We have a really good understanding of how photographers work with clients, work under deadlines and how clients are the ultimate judge of your work,” Orta says. “It’s a tool that has been built with professional standards in mind.”

AI on its terms

There’s no getting around the fact that AI is everywhere these days, and it’s reshaping many aspects of the photography software market. But Orta is careful about how Capture One positions itself within that shift, and it comes down to trust in the company’s identity. “We are not confused about who we are,” he says. “We are a photography company first, not a software company that happens to serve photographers.”

That identity, according to Orta, is what allows the company to incorporate AI responsibly. He tells me that Capture One owns more cameras than it has employees and that many of the photos on its website and in its marketing are taken by Capture One team members, who are photographers. “We are incredibly protective of usage rights; even in internal presentations, you need to credit the photographer,” he explains. The company also runs a monthly internal photography competition with winning images adorning the walls of their offices.

Orta explains all of this to make it clear that AI tools in Capture One are built by people who take photography seriously; they aren’t added simply to keep pace with competitors. “It’s why we’ve been able to bring AI into Capture One without the backlash others have faced,” he says. “We built it as a participant in the industry, not an operator standing outside it looking in,” he says.

A pulse on the community

Earlier this year, Capture One released a negative film conversion feature. While this could seem like an odd move for an editing platform dedicated to commercial work, Orta sees it as the perfect example of how in-tune with the industry the company is.

“It’s the perfect example of our connectivity in the industry,” Orta says. “We saw early on that there was a resurgence of film photography, and it quickly began to enter the commercial space.” He explains that they want to offer a better way for commercial photographers to integrate all their work into a single platform. Doing so enables photographers to maintain a more consistent workflow and create a more coherent look across both film and digital.

Orta is also clear about how intentional the company is with new features and the work involved in creating those. “We are soaking in the industry, and we listen and respond to the requests,” he says. “But because we’re precious about quality, some of these things may take a bit of time. We spent the best part of two years on negative conversion to make sure the results would be good.”

As an example of how dedicated the team is to its new features, Orta tells me that a few weeks ago, the company held its annual gathering and handed out disposable film cameras to everyone there. Now, the employees are using the negative conversion tool to scan in their own negatives. It’s another example of the team getting real-world experience with the features they develop.

Pricing adjustments

Capture One

Capture One has never been the cheapest option for photographers, and recent pricing increases have made that especially true. The editing platform has raised its prices twice in recent years, and another 6% increase took effect this month. The new price is more than double the cost of Adobe’s Lightroom, a gap that is certainly hard to ignore.

Orta doesn’t shy away from the pricing question, though. “What we have committed to is yearly pricing increases, and we will do them in a modest way,” he says. As for the why, Orta simply cites inflation and foreign exchange as factors in the decision.

Naturally, he points to what subscribers get in return. Orta says that Capture One has been pushing more than one update per month to at least one of its platforms, bringing a constant stream of improvements. He explains that these include server-side updates to things like its collaboration tools (Live, Live for Studio) and admin platform, not just desktop and mobile app updates. Some of these updates are visible to a user, while others aren’t. He adds that the company has simplified its product lineup in recent years to make pricing tiers clearer. Overall, Orta frames the increases less as a burden and more as a reflection of ongoing investment in the product.

A clear vision for the future

For Orta, all of Capture One’s recent changes, including the newly added Hasselblad support, point in the same direction: a company that’s clear on who it is and who it’s building for. “We try to serve specific genres and build products and services that are perfectly adapted to the needs of each one,” he says. For a company with its roots in commercial studios, that’s a wider net than it used to be, but it doesn’t mean that the focus is any less intentional.

Want to stay up to date on the latest product news and releases? Add DPReview as a preferred source to ensure our independent journalism makes it to the top of your Google search results.

Insta360 is teaming up with 3D printer company Bambu Lab to encourage custom accessories for the new Luna Ultra gimbal camera. To that end, the pair has launched a co-branded Luna Ultra Design Challenge and made official design files available for creatives.

The challenge is hosted through Bambu Lab’s MakerWorld platform, a community where creators can share and 3D‑print custom designs. To make things easier for those interested in creating accessories, Insta360 has published official 3MF and STL design files for the Luna Ultra. Insta360 is the first camera brand with an official presence on MakerWorld, and it’s certainly not typical to see a company sanctioning third-party 3D-printed, precision-fit accessories for its cameras. That hasn’t stopped people from making their own accessories, but having an easier means to do so will likely be appreciated by many users.

The contest has two entry tracks: Track A is about designing and uploading actual 3D-printable parts for Luna Ultra, while Track B is about showcasing or pitching those ideas through content across major social platforms.

Track A is geared toward 3D designers and engineers and is meant for fully realized models. It consists of two categories: The Practical Add-ons category includes things like stability mounts, filming rigs and advanced creator tools, while the Creative Mods category focuses on aesthetic covers, playful themes and stylistic upgrades. Those submitting to Track A should use #PrintForLuna within MakerWorld.

Track B can include finished 3D-printed products, but it’s also open to hand-drawn design concepts and creative accessory ideas, so even those without a 3D printer can still take part. Those interested in submitting projects in Track B should tag their posts with #PrintForLuna, #BambuLab and #Insta360LunaUltra on Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook or Reddit (r/Insta360).

Insta360

The challenge has prizes up for grabs. Insta360 says there are a total of 40 joint awards, with selected winners receiving the Insta360 Luna Ultra camera and either the Bambu Lab X2D Combo or A2L Combo 3D printers. There will also be other hardware prizes, along with gift cards and coupons. Additionally, the company says the best ideas may be selected for further development and possibly turned into an official product. Creators of those designs will have access to “exclusive collaboration opportunities and additional rewards, with full details confirmed with the winners directly.”

The Luna Ultra Design Challenge runs from now through August 9, with winners announced on August 20. You can download the 3MF and STL design files from MakerWorld, and learn more about submission requirements on the challenge page.

Want to stay up to date on the latest product news and releases? Add DPReview as a preferred source to ensure our independent journalism makes it to the top of your Google search results.

A new video from Kodak and movie studio A24 follows actress Olivia Wilde as she tours Kodak’s Film Lab in New York City. The tour is technically a promotional stop for “The Invite,” a recently released dark comedy Wilde both directed and stars in, though it doesn’t come across that way. Instead, the four-minute video offers a short glimpse into what goes on behind the scenes when movies are shot on film.

In the video, Wilde walks through various parts of the lab with technicians who briefly explain what they do, from loading the film in the darkroom to running it through the development steps and splicing it all together. What struck me is how very low-budget the space looks. Aside from the required specialized equipment (I especially love the fancy machine used to dry the negatives), it looks like any gritty big-city studio/lab space. Piles of miscellaneous items are piled everywhere, there are old radiators with paint rubbed off, and the people working there don’t seem fussed by any of the attention. It’s far from a glamorous space.

The video is a short watch, so it absolutely doesn’t get into the nitty-gritty details of the process. But it’s a nice overview of how the lab turns exposed negatives into usable images, and it’s always neat to see behind-the-scenes looks like this.

Want to stay up to date on the latest product news and releases? Add DPReview as a preferred source to ensure our independent journalism makes it to the top of your Google search results.

Fujifilm has announced the GF19-35mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR, a cinema power zoom lens. This marks the second power zoom lens for the GFX system, joining the GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR.

The GF 19-35mm T3.5 offers a 35mm equivalent focal length of 15-28mm, providing an ultrawide perspective. It offers the widest angle of view for the GF format, though it just achieves that by only 1mm over the GF 20-35mm F4 R WR. Like Fujifilm’s first power zoom lens, the 19-35mm T3.5 covers the GFX Eterna 55’s full sensor, making it compatible with the camera’s open gate recording mode.

The lens’s built‑in focus motor enables the GFX Eterna 55’s full suite of autofocus modes, making it suitable for everything from handheld documentary work to more controlled studio productions. Its internal servo system lets users control focus, iris (aperture) and zoom directly from the GFX Eterna 55 body for more precise, integrated operation on set. It features built-in image stabilization, ideal for run-and-gun filming.

Fujifilm

The lens consists of 23 lens elements in 15 groups, including four extra-low dispersion (ED) elements and three aspherical elements, which Fujifilm says successfully suppress aberrations. Fujifilm says its optical design suppresses focus breathing, keeping the angle of view consistent as the focus is adjusted. It features a 13-blade aperture.

The GF 19-35mm T3.5 shares the exact exterior dimensions as the GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR, measuring 222mm (8.7″) and weighing 2.1 kg (4.6 lbs), making it possible to use the same accessories and setups. It also shares the same controls, with geared rings for focus, iris and zoom, all of which use the same 0.8m gear pitch as existing Fujinon cinema lenses.

The GF19-35mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR will be available on July 23 at a suggested price of $5499.95.

Want to stay up to date on the latest product news and releases? Add DPReview as a preferred source to ensure our independent journalism makes it to the top of your Google search results.

Stuart Palley

When Stuart Palley began photographing California wildfires in 2013, the data already pointed toward more serious wildfire problems ahead. Over the next 13 years and nearly 200 fires, he watched that prediction come true. Fire seasons grew longer, fires burned faster and more aggressively, and January 2025 brought an inferno to the hills of Los Angeles at a time of year that usually felt like a safe time.

Through all of it, Palley has been there with a camera, building a visual record of the American West’s fire crisis. I had the opportunity to chat with him about his journey capturing wildfires, the toll it takes and Terra Flamma, his current ongoing series dedicated to a fresh perspective.

Fire as light

Stuart Palley

While Palley is still very focused on the journalistic side of his photography, his Terra Flamma series blends the boundaries between documentary and fine art. The project involves using long exposures to photograph fires at night, and Palley was drawn to making these images in part because of the colors they allow.

Palley explained that he frequently thinks about a quote from Vincent van Gogh, who said, “I often think that the night is more alive and more richly colored than the day.” Van Gogh’s paintings, like “The Starry Night ,” were direct inspiration for Palley’s fire-lit nightscapes. “That use of color and night scenes just always stuck with me from growing up, and I just loved access to the color palette that wasn’t otherwise available,” he said.

Stuart Palley

The images grasp onto that idea, showcasing landscapes in a manner we don’t often see. “Fire is its own light source, and it bathes everything in this warm light,” Palley explained. “When you add in smoke and other geographic features, it can either be an enormous warm softbox, or it can paint everything in orange and red, and then contrast it against a more blue or purple night sky. So it creates this incredible color palette that is only available when the fires are happening.”

Terra Flamma isn’t just about color, though. The long exposures give you a different look at the fire’s behavior, too. “You see what it’s doing, you see where the smoke’s going, and it sort of illuminates the scene,” said Palley. The long exposures also showcase the landscape, providing a bigger view of the situation. “Ultimately, the goal of Terra Flamma is to take these landscape photos of fire and put them in the context of where they are,” he said. “Is this happening in the mountains in the middle of nowhere? Is it happening near downtown LA?”

Stuart Palley

Palley has also expanded the series to include stories beyond the fire itself, including firefighters, crews, communities, air quality, forestry management and more. “The fire has become part of a broader ecosystem when it comes to storytelling about climate and natural disasters here in the American West,” he told me.

While Terra Flamma occupies the fine art end of his work, it represents only part of what Palley does at a fire. During the day, he’s working as a photojournalist documenting firefighters, crews and affected communities with the same immediacy as any news photographer. The long-exposure landscapes come when the sun dips down.

Putting gear in the line of fire

Stuart Palley

Of course, long exposures create logistical challenges that daytime images don’t. Fires are dynamic and can change rapidly, and setting up for a long exposure requires time. Thankfully, most of his long exposures give him the benefit of distance as a safety buffer. “A lot of times when I’m doing these longer landscape exposures, it’s from further back, looking at the fire in context across a canyon or down a hill,” he said. “So, I typically have some space built in that gives me both geographic safety and the time to make these images.”

That’s not always the case, though. Palley remembered one image in particular where he was much closer to the fire, with a 30-second exposure capturing embers swirling around him. “I had to stand there holding my camera in the wind, getting pelted by embers,” Palley said. “I’ve got like a hood, a helmet, goggles and all this stuff. So, I was fine. But I decided at that point that it was worth making that picture because it showed the ember cast in such a wild way that it was worth sitting there for the 30-second exposure.”

Stuart Palley

Thankfully, fires haven’t been the direct cause of damage to Palley’s gear. “I’ve certainly damaged and destroyed multiple cameras at these fires, but it’s not necessarily from negligence,” he said. He recalled one time in 2015 when he dropped his camera after getting attacked by a displaced beehive because they were attracted to his yellow Nomex suit. Another time, he melted a lens hood because it fell into burning grass.

The most common issue, he says, is smoke. “The cameras smell like ashtrays,” he said. “You get smoke and ashes on it, but you get alcohol wipes, and you wipe the cameras down every day to reduce smoke exposure and things like that.” He also sends them off yearly for a cleaning to maintain his gear. “But ultimately, it’s a tool and tools used in challenging conditions just often need more maintenance,” he explained.

Training is key

Stuart Palley

While Palley, of course, wants to create incredible photographs, he draws a clear line. “The key thing here is no photo is worth me getting hurt or getting in the way of firefighters,” he said. He’s always putting his safety and the job of firefighters first.

That focus on safety has only increased over the years, too, as fires have become more intense. “I’ve always been safety oriented, but I’m very, very conservative now on how I approach these fires because the fire behavior is so extreme,” he said. “From having been at almost 200 wildfires at this point, the fire behavior continues to surprise me with how aggressive and rapid it is.”

Stuart Palley

Palley’s safety record is no accident. Since early on in his career, he has devoted a lot of time to making sure he is well-trained, knowledgeable about fires and has the right gear. “When I first started photographing fires, I had basic Nomex PPE, but the boots didn’t quite fit right. I didn’t have the right fire shelter,” he told me. “So within the first year, I went to a private wildland fire school for a week to get my general wildland firefighter training.”

He’s also careful to continually update his gear so that it meets current standards. For example, he recently purchased a $3000 radio because many agencies have updated their radios, and he needs an easy way to listen to what’s going on to stay safe and out of firefighters’ way. “When I’m at fires, I want to be there to tell the story, not become part of it,” he said.

Stuart Palley

Palley has also started sharing his knowledge with others. He recently led a two-day wildfire media safety course for 20 Reuters staffers and freelancers. “It’s a blend of some very general wildland fire behavior and training that’s standardized for firefighters, but it’s sort of customized in a curriculum I just developed to teach journalists,” he explained. That information can then help other journalists stay safe, while producing informative coverage of these events.

That directness extends to how he talks about irresponsible coverage more broadly. Palley is a genuine believer in the democratization of media and is all for more people covering these events. But he has little patience for journalists or creators who treat dangerous situations carelessly. “When I’ve seen so many extreme fires, fatality fires, homes burn down, I don’t have time to sugarcoat these explanations,” he said. “Sometimes you have to just be direct and tell people to get their shit together. This is serious stuff happening. It needs to be taken seriously.”

Building trust and the ethics of wildfire photojournalism

Stuart Palley

Trust is also a factor when photographing these fires. Palley is often working in the vicinity of firefighters, and they need to know that he’s not a liability and that they can trust him to be responsible and safe. “If you’re a journalist there, to a wildland firefighter, you’re the X-factor,” he said. “Trust is one of the biggest things, and that’s the reason why I’m big on having the right gear and the training and knowing how to use it.”

Trust extends beyond wildland firefighters and safety crews, too. Palley often photographs communities when people return to their homes after fires, a traumatic and emotional experience. “When you’re photographing people on the worst day of their lives or the most stressful day of their lives, sometimes they don’t want that to be photographed,” he described.

“I want to respect the dignity that people deserve in these situations and build that trust,” Palley said. Because of that, he gives people space when requested, moving on to other areas and photographs. “To me, that’s more important than making that picture,” he told me.

The cost of the work

Stuart Palley

Palley considered conflict photography early in his career before deciding against it, in part because of the mental health toll he knew it could take. The irony is that wildfire photography has its own cost.

“Journalists deal with vicarious trauma, and if it’s not treated, it essentially develops into PTSD,” he said. He’s clear about what the work actually demands. “When these fires happen, you’re working 16, 18-hour days on assignment. It’s just very intense,” he said. “The human body and mind are not designed for that level of stimulation for that amount of time.”

There’s been a growing movement in both journalism and the firefighting world to acknowledge this, and Palley learned it firsthand. In 2023, he was feeling the burnout and stepped back from photographing fires for about a year.

Chiara Dollak

Recovery, for him, has meant therapy, stepping away from social media during intense fire periods and making space to decompress. “When it’s been a really intense fire reporting period, just kind of be present, literally touch grass, rest, get away from the digital screen,” he said.

The cost of this work is real, but so is Palley’s commitment to it. He returned to the fire line when the LA fires broke out in January 2025 and hasn’t stepped back since. For those looking to stay informed, he recommends Watch Duty, a free nonprofit app he volunteers for that sends real-time alerts about fires and evacuations across the United States.

His parting advice, after 13 years and nearly 200 fires, is straightforward: “If you’re worried about a fire and you haven’t gotten an evacuation order, you don’t have to wait for an evacuation order to leave. You can always leave.”

You can follow along with Palley’s work on his Instagram , YouTube channel and website .

Fujifilm

Fujifilm is celebrating the 40th birthday of the QuickSnap series of single-use 35mm film cameras. To mark the occasion, the company has announced two new additions: the QuickSnap Black and White and Active.

The QuickSnap Black and White is Fujifilm’s first one-time-use camera that uses monochrome film. That perhaps isn’t too surprising; while Fujifilm has produced black and white film under its Neopan brand since 1952, the line has been whittled down over the years to just a single stock, Neopan 100 Acros II.

Fujifilm

The new disposable camera uses 400 speed film, but Fujifilm hasn’t specified an emulsion. Given that Fujifilm’s only black and white film in production right now is 100 speed, it isn’t that. But it isn’t clear if this is a proprietary emulsion made for the camera, or if it’s sourced from a third party like Ilford. Either way, Fujifilm says the film stock is “designed to capture rich contrasts, tones and textured grains.”

The black and white camera uses a 1/140 sec shutter speed and a plastic, 32mm lens with fixed focus and F10 aperture, as is typical on single-use film cameras. It features a built-in flash with a range of roughly 3 meters (10′), and a switch to turn the flash on and off. It offers 27 exposures and can be developed with C-41 chemistry.

Fujifilm

The QuickSnap Active replaces the previous waterproof QuickSnap. It’s designed to withstand rain and underwater adventures up to 10 meters (33′), thanks to an integrated waterproof housing. It also uses a 32mm plastic lens with F10 aperture and fixed focus, though a slightly slower 1/125 sec shutter speed.

The Active uses an 800 speed color negative film. The previous waterproof camera likely used Superia X-TRA 800, but it isn’t clear yet if that continues in the new Active. Unlike the black and white offering, the Active does not feature a flash. It is capable of 27 exposures and can be developed with C-41 chemistry.

The Fujifilm QuickSnap Active and Black and White will be available for purchase in early September for $25 and $23, respectively.

Capture One / Hasselblad

Capture One and Hasselblad are partnering up: a new update is adding support for editing Raw files from some of the camera-maker’s medium format models.

At launch, Capture One will support Raw files from the X2D II 100C, the X2D 100C and the CFV 100C digital back. Support for tethering is coming later in 2026 as well.

Capture One long declined to support Hasselblad Raw files, and the company was fairly candid about why. The roots of the tension trace back to Capture One’s origins as part of Phase One, a direct Hasselblad competitor in the medium format space, before the two were split into separate companies by private equity firm Axcel in 2019.

In an official support article , CEO Rafael Orta said that the decision came down to both technical considerations and “the nature of our relationship with the manufacturer.” He went on to say that “the relationship between Phase One and Hasselblad was notoriously antagonistic, and as I’m sure you’ll know from life experience, it takes a second to blow up a bridge and a very long time to rebuild it.”

Capture One / Hasselblad

It seems that the bridge has now been rebuilt, and the relationship is strong enough for a partnership. While the tension between the two companies may have eased since Capture One became its own entity, it wasn’t a simple step to add support for Hasselblad Raw files. In an interview with Orta ahead of the partnership announcement, he told DPReview that it “takes quite a bit of work to support super-capable cameras, especially the latest generations.”

Orta explained that Capture One only adds support for cameras after the team has had a chance to use them and create thousands of images. He said they work to develop a deep understanding of how individual image sensors, file formats, and each brand’s color science work.

The process involves very close collaboration with the partner companies, and adding support for Hasselblad Raw files was no different. “Every camera and every manufacturer is special,” said Orta. “Each one has its own take on color science and how they process sensor data inside its cameras. We’re very dedicated to making sure that when you open that file, you’re seeing colors that are true to our standards.”

Capture One / Hasselblad

“The way we see it, it’s a labor of love, to be honest,” Orta said. “We give each individual device the same process, but we also understand that each device has its own technology.”

The new Raw support and upcoming tethering won’t be the extent of Capture One’s partnership with Hasselblad, according to Orta. “Tomorrow is the start line, and we’re excited to see where photographers take this,” he said.

Raw support for the X2D II 100C, the X2D 100C and the CFV 100C digital back is available starting today. Users will need version 16.8.3 of the desktop app and version 3.3.4 for the mobile app. A free seven-day trial is available from the Capture One website.

Want to stay up to date on the latest product news and releases? Add DPReview as a preferred source to ensure our independent journalism makes it to the top of your Google search results.

Blufftonian

A ton of great content and related photography is created by the DPReview community in our forums: lively discussions, sharing of gear and photography in spotlight articles, collaborative photo events and more. In this “What you missed” roundup for June, we highlight community forum activity from the past month, including some of the photography that didn’t make it into articles.

Scroll down to the section of interest as previewed in this list:

• Article of the month: Joining a local photography group
• ‘What’s in your bag?’ community member spotlights
• Question of the week
• Join our collaborative photo chain
• Discussion of the month: Why is it so difficult to buy a first camera today?

Article of the month: Joining a local photography group

DPReview’s Features Editor, Abby Ferguson, wrote a great piece about the benefits of joining local photography groups . As a community manager, I naturally found this article fascinating and the kind of advice I feel all of you would find a great insight into photographers outside our forums. After reading her article, I even took it upon myself to look up some photography groups in my local corner of Texas, United States.

“Despite my reluctance, I knew meeting other photographers would only be a good thing. Plus, as this is a place my husband and I will be for the long term, I wanted to set down some roots and finally make some connections here. And so, last fall, I finally put aside my reservations and attended a meetup.” – Abby

What’s in your bag? A community member spotlight

Every week, we spotlight a community member’s unique photographs and gear in our ‘What’s in your bag?’ series . The series highlights a reader’s favorite camera gear and how they use it. You’ll also get tips and tricks on capturing your own photography.

Mark Lamb shared his portrait photography in celebration of our week of portrait-themed community content. Below is an interesting excerpt from Mark’s story about his fondness for portrait photography in Britain. The photo above is a new one he provided us that we couldn’t fit into the article.

“In recent years, my work has become centered on a long-term project called One Thousand Contemporary Portraits , an attempt to create a broad and inclusive portrait archive of contemporary Britain. The project has taken me from fishing communities and military veterans to Goths, performers, campaigners, artists and ordinary people whose stories might otherwise go unrecorded.”

Check out this month’s other reader spotlights:

• Brian Ach: From Prince to NYC streets: A photographer’s life in two worlds
• Giacomo Farabegoli: This DPReview reader backpacks with a Sony a7R IV in the mountains
• Alberto Tanikawa: Knives, whiskey, and RGB light: Inside one photographer’s obsessive still-life work

Question of the week: we ask, you tell

Every other week, we ask the community a question about their photography, usually on a specific topic, with the results spotlighted on DPReview’s front page and in the forums the following week. There are often many great photos submitted that we don’t get a chance to spotlight them all in a single article.

Here is a newly revealed reader’s photo and excerpt of their story from the latest question.

What camera is your most memorable?

thorstenwulff

Featured quote : “My first love was the F3. In the summer of 1987, she went to New York with me and a box of T-Max 400. Paired with a 24mm F2.8 lens, it was my perfect combo for street photography, even if you had to get a bit closer. The other lens was the 105mm F2.5. In early May this year, I took them back to Manhattan, but was put off a bit by the flood of gimbal-toting influencers everywhere Instagram deems worthy of a shot. This couple is one of my favorite pictures from 39 years ago. I love the tenderness between them.” – thorstenwulff

Participate in community-led photo initiatives

Dale Baskin

Every week, new community-created photo discussions and mini-challenges pop up across the forums. Usually, these start as a discussion about a particular camera brand or type of photography . For the month of June, we wanted to highlight Alan WF’s invitation to take fresh photos with your adapted lens cameras .

Visit our Community photo threads index for the latest opportunities to share a photo from your collection. We would also love for you to participate in DPReview’s own initiatives: Weekly photo exhibitions and the new Collaborative photo chain .

Discussion of the month: Why is it so difficult to buy a first camera today?

FrancoD

Community member, BernardoSC , asked a great question in the forums that has gained quite a bit of traction. He asked everyone, “Why is it so difficult to buy a first camera today?” This is an excellent question, BernardoSC! I have asked this question of myself recently about various purchase interests, from cameras to computer equipment.

Here is a peek at what others had to say:

JT26 : It’s hard as there are so many options now. New cameras and new versions of the above are using new tech and are not sold in millions like they used to be, so they are naturally more expensive.

ahaslett : The optical viewfinder is what limits your choice. Apart from retro designs, cameras these days are nearly all mirrorless. There isn’t much between a phone and a camera for £1,000, given how fast phones have improved.

Plankowner110 : In the 1960s, you simply adjusted aperture, shutter speed, and focus ring, and it didn’t matter if you were using an inexpensive Sears Tower (camera) or a rugged pro-body Nikon F. The major variable was selecting which film to use. Cameras all operated basically the same way, and one could easily pick up any brand of camera and begin shooting. We didn’t have to peruse a myriad of menu settings or press tiny re-programmable buttons all over the camera body.

What community content did you enjoy reading, and what more would you like to see in these regular updates? Let us know in the comments below.

For even more content directly from our readers, join the discussion forums and share your camera gear and photography curiosities!

Editor’s note: Future editions of this article may include camera use and photo-taking tips and tricks, additional quotes from community members in various discussions and more. If you are interested in seeing community content presented this way, please let me know.

Want to stay up to date on the latest product news and releases? Add DPReview as a preferred source to ensure our independent journalism makes it to the top of your Google search results.

Hasselblad Masters 2026 winners

Hasselblad has announced the winners of the Hasselblad Masters 2026 photography competition. The contest awarded 7 photographers from 70 finalists, chosen from more than 108,000 submissions across 160 countries.

Winners were selected across seven categories: Landscape, Architecture, Portrait, Art, Street, Wildlife, and Project//21. The winning photographers were selected by the Hasselblad Masters Grand Jury, which included representatives from National Geographic, Magnum Photos, Aperture Magazine, Getty Images, Foam, The Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Three Shadows Photography Art Centre. Images were chosen based on their conceptual strength, originality, creativity and technical excellence.

The competition drew some attention earlier this year when Hasselblad confirmed it had disqualified one shortlisted photographer for including AI-generated elements in violation of competition rules, replacing them with a new finalist. It’s worth noting that the finalists were selected through an internal selection process at Hasselblad, not by the acclaimed photographers on the Grand Jury. A representative has confirmed that all of the winning images were “thoroughly vetted, and EXIF data was confirmed,” and that they are all authentic photographs.

Each winner receives the title of Hasselblad Master, a Hasselblad medium format camera, two XCD lenses, and a €5,000 creative fund. Their work will also be featured in the commemorative Hasselblad Masters book.

We’re showing one image per winner below, but you can view all three selected images for each photographer on the Hasselblad Masters website . Traditional captions and EXIF data were not available, and the descriptions and jury quotes accompanying each image are taken directly from Hasselblad’s competition materials.

Art winner: Yudha Kusuma Putera

Yudha Kusuma Putera | Waste Colonialism (Sapi-Sapi Piyungan) | Indonesia

Rooted in everyday life and inspired by its complexity, Yudha Kusuma Putera turns a keen eye toward the social issues that hide in plain sight, exploring the tensions between humans, nature, and the systems we build around us.

The winning images are part of a project examining how developed nations export their waste to developing countries, where labor and costs are lower. This logic repeats on a smaller scale too: within cities, landfills are built on the outskirts, kept out of sight and out of mind. At Yogyakarta’s Piyungan landfill, a city’s waste is sorted by scavengers and consumed by cows, quietly piling up into a second hill.

He photographed the backs of these cows stacked together, with their forms mirroring the landscape of trash around them. The work does not seek to assign blame, but to invite collective reflection on the waste we produce, and the futures we are building from it.

“On the surface, the images appear direct and unambiguous, and yet they consistently resist easy reading, generating a sense of visual uncertainty that keeps the viewer engaged and questioning. The images do not announce themselves loudly, but reward sustained attention with a slow-building sense of strangeness that is both intellectually stimulating and visually striking,” says Kalle Sanner, Executive Director at the Hasselblad Foundation.

Architecture winner: Kevin Boyle

Kevin Boyle | DaySleeper | Movieland | Canada

Kevin Boyle was shaped by the open skies and close-knit communities of the Canadian prairies. After the loss of his father, he returned home, only to find the places he once knew hollowed out and silent, their gathering spaces boarded up and left to disappear. For over ten years, his photographic journey has been a profound tribute to the abandoned architecture of North America’s local communities.

The winning series is comprised of photographic montages, with each part of the building lit with flashlights and blended in post-production to create an ethereal ‘portrait’ of once important gathering places. Through his lens, these forgotten spaces become vibrant, glowing symbols of community heritage and shared human connection.

“The composition, and the fact that the images are empty of people, triggers our imaginations, taking us back to a time when these buildings would have thrived with the community meeting for evening entertainment. By making this series, the photographer invites us to consider the myriad of small venues that make up the social fabric of small communities,” says Sonia Jeunet, Photography Consultant and Education at Magnum Photos.

Portrait winner: Svetlana Jovanovic

Svetlana Jovanovic | Otherness | The Netherlands

With a psychology background, Svetlana Jovanovic’s portraiture is driven by a deep curiosity about identity – how we experience the world, construct our sense of self, and see ourselves through the eyes of others. Her style brings together fine art portraiture and a commitment to visual beauty, believing that the conceptual and the aesthetic are inseparable: each gives the other meaning.

The winning images are part of Otherness, an ongoing long-term project exploring identical twins and the tension between shared identity and individual presence. While twins share so much, it is the small differences that emerge over time, the subtle ways each person’s character becomes visible within the shared image, that lie at the heart of the work. Each portrait is a collaboration, shaped as much by the relationship between the twins as by the photographer’s own vision, inviting viewers to reflect on how we define ourselves both apart from, and through, one another.

“Through precise use of light and composition, this portrait series explores the themes of mirroring and duality. Whether capturing two sides of the same face or the closeness of two kindred souls, the images reveal subtle layers of emotion with quiet precision,” says RongRong, Co-founder and Artistic Director at The Three Shadows Photography Art Center.

Landscape winner: Rohan Reilly

Rohan Reilly | Ephemeral Visions | Ireland

Rooted in the discipline of a composer, Rohan Reilly’s images strip away complexity to reveal the essentials, which are texture, tone, and stillness. His signature long-exposure technique transforms moving water and shifting skies into silk-like surfaces, while vast negative space and low saturation give his work a poetic, meditative quality that transcends documentation. The process is one of patience and preparation: studying weather patterns, returning season after season, and waiting for the precise conditions that cannot be engineered but only earned.

This winning series captures a row of poplar trees planted along the banks of the River Po in Italy, which are natural guardians against flooding, now standing immersed in perfectly still water beneath soft, diffused light. What was once a purely functional landscape transforms into something surreal and dreamlike. In this quietly breathtaking scene, the photographer’s vision can find its fullest expression: nature distilled to its core, and time momentarily held still.

“A forest of birch trees could be a monotonous subject. But these photographs are hypnotic objects of meditation, creating something expansive through repetition and ostensible sameness,” says Zack Hatfield, Managing Editor at Aperture Magazine.

Project//21 winner: Panitbhand Paribatra Na Ayudhya

Panitbhand Paribatra Na Ayudhya | Dwellers of the Night | Thailand

Panitbhand Paribatra Na Ayudhya is a young underwater photographer and scuba diver from Thailand. His work is rooted in a quiet dedication to the ocean, documenting its life, its fragility, and the ecosystems that sustain it, in the hope that what is seen through his lens will not be forgotten.

His winning series was captured in the waters of Anilao, Philippines, where pelagic and larval marine life migrate from the depths each night to feed under the cover of darkness. Using slow shutter speeds to capture the elegant motion of his subjects, and carefully chosen coloured lighting to reveal their form and beauty, he illuminates a world rarely seen. For the ribbon eel, a diffused warm light conjures a subtle sunset behind the subject – crowning it as a master of the night. Some of these creatures spend their entire lives in the open ocean, making the pelagic ecosystem as fragile as it is extraordinary.

“I’m drawn to the quiet whimsy of these sea creatures. Set against black, the creatures feel almost otherworldly- strange, delicate, and entirely captivating. There’s a simplicity to the presentation that allows their inherent oddness to shine, reminding us how unfamiliar and compelling the natural world can be when seen without distraction,” says Alex Pollack, Director of Photography at National Geographic.’

Street winner: Gosse Bouma

Gosse Bouma | Morning Ritual | The Netherlands

Gosse Bouma is a photographer whose work is driven by a quiet pursuit: to offer moments of tranquility in a world that rarely slows down. His distinct style lies at the intersection of urban geometry and natural elements, pairing the hard lines of architecture with the soft, unpredictable textures of weather. Each photograph is infused with the intention of invoking serenity amidst the chaos of everyday life, creating visual experiences that invite stillness and reflection, even if only for a fleeting moment.

His winning series, taken across the Netherlands, turns to the street market as its subject, a space where people of all ages and backgrounds meet, exchange a few words, share warmth, and move on. In capturing these small, unhurried encounters, Bouma preserves something increasingly rare in contemporary life: a genuine sense of togetherness.

“The photographer understands atmosphere, scale and timing. The small lit kiosks within the vast blue urban emptiness create images that feel both intimate and monumental. Here, genuine photographic tension emerges. The series uses color structurally, not decoratively. Mist, artificial light and architecture form one coherent world,” says Aya Musa, Senior Curator at Foam.

Wildlife winner: Alfred Minnaar

Alfred Minnaar | The Forest I Roam | South Africa

Alfred Minnaar’s creative process often begins with observation and patience. Rather than simply documenting his subjects, he seeks to understand their behavior, environment, and relationship with the surrounding ecosystem. Over a decade of global exploration, his fine-art philosophy has evolved from a traveler’s passion into a powerful voice for conservation, capturing fleeting deep-sea and wildlife narratives to inspire the preservation of our planet.

The winning images of a tiny goby living amongst coral were created to challenge our perception of scale and encourage viewers to look closer. Rather than focusing solely on the fish, the photographer wanted to use it as a point of reference within a much larger world. By placing the goby within its environment, the reef itself becomes the subject, inviting viewers to imagine its vastness from the perspective of one of its smallest inhabitants.

“The vibrancy of the palette immediately draws you in, and the way the small fish are framed against their environments creates a sense of scale that almost reads as landscape. There’s a nice balance here between detail and composition, with the micro subjects holding their own within a larger, almost abstracted environment,” says Alex Pollack, Director of Photography at National Geographic.

Want to stay up to date on the latest product news and releases? Add DPReview as a preferred source to ensure our independent journalism makes it to the top of your Google search results.

Mykim Dang

After teasing the Osmo Pocket 4P at the Cannes Film Festival in May and giving media and influencers hands-on time with the device at the beginning of June, DJI has finally fully unveiled its higher-end camera gimbal via its Chinese and Southeast Asia platforms.

DJI has yet to give Western media a clear timeline when full details can be published; we were told we could only post hands-on photos of the device, without any information about it. This is particularly unusual, since outlets in China have already been allowed to post their reviews, and it’s available for purchase in China and Southeast Asia, making much of the information we’re not allowed to share – specs, pricing information, test footage, etc. – public.

Like the Osmo Pocket 4 , the 4P features a camera with a 20mm equiv. lens with F2.0 aperture. However, DJI opted for a new Type 1 (116mm²) sensor featuring LOFIC technology, rather than the conventional CMOS sensor used in the base model. In addition to that is a dedicated 60mm equiv. telephoto camera, allowing for greater flexibility than a single camera (contentiously, it’s not the only gimbal camera to offer this ). The telephoto camera uses a Type 1/1.28 (75mm²) sensor (only 35% smaller than the main sensor) and a slightly faster F1.8 aperture.

Mykim Dang

The camera supports up to 12x digital zoom for video and 9x for stills. The company’s subject tracking (ActiveTrack 8.0) is compatible with the 12x zoom range as well, helping to keep subjects centered in the frame even when fully zoomed in.

DJI claims the 4P’s main camera provides 17 stops of dynamic range, which is 3 stops more than the Osmo Pocket 4. As usual with DR claims, we’d take that figure with a massive grain of salt; 17 stops would be exceptional even for a much larger sensor. The company has developed a new, flatter Log curve, D-Log2, which can encode a wider dynamic range, explaining the increased claim, compared to the Osmo Pocket 4, despite its use of the same camera. It’s important to note that D-Log2 is only available with the main camera.

The camera can shoot at up to 4K 240p, enabling dramatic slow motion footage. It also offers a “Pro” mode that gives users control of the shutter speed from 1/16,000 sec to 1/4 sec, allowing for more creative control. As a gimbal camera, it benefits from three-axis mechanical stabilization for smooth footage even when you’re moving. It also supports gesture control to start tracking and recording, and the ability to rotate the touchscreen to power the camera on and start recording.

Mykim Dang

While primarily meant for video use, the Osmo Pocket 4P does provide some photo features, too. It is capable of 37MP photos and can take images in 1:1 or 16:9. It also features a Live Photo mode, recording 1.5-second clips for every photo.

The Osmo Pocket 4P offers 103GB of integrated storage and supports microSD cards up to 1TB. It promises 210 minutes of runtime on a charge and is compatible with the existing Osmo lineup of accessories. It will be available in white and black

Unfortunately, there’s still confusion about the timing of the full release of the DJI Osmo Pocket 4P. It is available in China as of today for ¥3799 (roughly $559), but full global availability – and whether it will come to the US – is still unclear.

Leonp

Happy World Camera Day! In honor of the day, we are sharing your responses to last week’s Question of the week . We asked you which camera was (or is) your most memorable, and to share a photo of the camera and an interesting story about it. This is a spin-off of another question asked a couple of months ago about which camera brand was your favorite, but this time, it may not have been your favorite camera brand that took the spotlight.

Several of you, as expected, mentioned more prominent brands like Canon, Nikon and Sony, but others made unique selections dating back to brands that no longer exist. While the technology of those cameras is now dated, dusty and rusty, the photographs and the memories they conjure up are forever, as they say. With our community over 25 years old and its members’ collective experience spanning well beyond that, there were plenty of memories shared.

Keep reading to see which cameras our readers chose as their most memorable.

Your most memorable camera

Leonp : “In the late 1970s, my nephew bought a Pentax camera. My father was jealous, so he bought one for himself, too. My father wasn’t really into high-tech stuff and never made it through the manual, so I must have sneaked into his bedroom to take the above photo in the mirror using a diving lamp as a light source, which, if you look closely, is also a selfie of me. It took years for it to become my camera, and it changed the way I looked at the world forever.”

Daithi : “The Nikon D850. It was a troubling time for the birth of mirrorless cameras. They were all basically the ugly litter of the well-established DSLR world. For me, this camera kept on truckin’ for many years. The D850 had peerless resolution/image quality, and still does to a large degree.”

GruberSrb : “Minolta Dynax 9xi (with booster). It was hated in photography circles, but its tech and fabulous design remind me of a ballerina in ‘Swan Lake’. It still works flawlessly with a carbon shutter 1/12000sec like new, despite very heavy usage over the last 30 years in some of the worst conditions on Earth, from Patagonia to Kamchatka.”

Thorstenwulff : “My first love was the F3. In the summer of 1987 she went to New York with me, and a box of T-Max 400. Paired with the 24/2,8 it was my perfect combo for street photography, even if you had to get a bit closer. The other Lens was the 105/2,5.”

lonewolf1983

lonewolf1983 : “I present you the Sony A850. I had been shooting with the Sony APS-C SLT cameras (A57/A77/A77ii) and picked up the A850 to complement them and check out what the full-frame thing was all about. I took it soon after on a trip to New Zealand, and captured some amazing images with its 24mp sensor, rock solid build quality, amazing OVF and IBIS, clicking that shutter and hearing the mirror/shutter was just glorious.”

LJ – Eljot : “Canon G3: My first digital camera. Introduced in 2003, a 4MP digital compact. This one was aimed at enthusiasts and featured RAW images. Unusual at that time. Base ISO is 50, and it is basically unusable at the max ISO of 400. It takes about a full second to take a picture after pressing the shutter button. A terrible camera, but I learned to love the tilt-screen. And at ISO 50, the images look quite good, actually. Good macro capability as well. And a hot shoe with full flash compatibility.”

fatplanediaries : “The Sony a6300. It overheated like crazy and had rolling shutter only comparable to the most wobbly of jelly, but it was the camera where I honed my photography and learned videography. I shot my film school application film with it on a homemade gimbal.”

GeoffRG : “The Olympus OM1: I bought it in 1979, and it traveled with me to Seattle, Tanzania, Trinidad, and Australia. I sold it in 1990, along with my OM2n, a pair of OM4s, and a pile of lenses and accessories. I still don’t understand why Olympus discontinued the motor drive system.”

wood_gnome : “The Certo SL 110, because it was my very first camera. I bought it secretly and conspiratorially from pocket money when I was 9 (!) in March 1980.”

Gato Amarillo

Gato Amarillo : “Always my favorite, my Deardorff. The above is a 5×7 model, but I used it with a 4×5 back. The lens is a Schneider Symmar 180mm, a longish normal for 4×5. Contrary to what most might expect, I used it mostly as a portrait camera. The camera was a basket case when I got it. My partner said it looked like something that had fallen off a truck on the freeway. You may notice a couple of odd knobs – I was never able to get together a full matching set.”

Don Sata : “I loved my X-Pro1 to the point that I sold a Sony full frame prize camera from the Sony World Photography awards to get this gem with three primes (18, 27 and 60 mm). In this picture, the camera is posing with a set of Zeiss lenses lent to me for a month. I shot the camera, banged it on rocks, got it splashed, scratched and dented until the shutter died.”

Otto Union : “Without a doubt, my long-gone Leitz Minolta CL with 40/2 Rokkor and 90/4 Elmar lenses. I bought these with tax refund money in April 1978. It was my first real camera and a real gem. It was extremely pocketable and accompanied me to many concerts in the late 70s / early 80s. It was stolen from my residence in 1983, and I’m still gutted about it.”

cbf_si : “I was introduced to photography at 17 during the era of the first AF film cameras in the second half of the 1980s. My classmates were enthusiastic about cameras like the Canon EOS 650 and the Minolta Dynax 7000, but the Minolta X-700 caught my eye. I only got a used one when I got a job in 1998. Like many others, I initially equipped myself with the classic three focal lengths, 28 mm, 50 mm, and 135 mm. Today, I have lenses with focal lengths from 7.5 mm to 250 mm.”

RLHN

RLHN : My most memorable (and first serious) film camera was the Petri 7S, a rangefinder film camera with a selenium cell meter that required no batteries and used “match needle” metering, which made it trivial to tweak exposure. I bought it “used” at a local camera store with my high school graduation gift funds, after someone traded it in because it was “too complicated”. It was barely used, if at all. I took many great photos with it for years, until the photo cell sadly died.

BobKo : I’ve had many cameras, but the camera I remember most fondly is a Panasonic Lumix GH5. I primarily shoot video, and the GH5 was just a video beast. It made shooting really high-quality video a pleasure, and it really upped the quality of my YouTube uploads. Suddenly, my videos looked as good as the big boys. I got my GH5 in 2018, and it still works fine today — I use it for a back-up camera and to shoot time lapses. What a great camera!

Gramar : The one stand out camera from the many I’ve owned over the past 50 + years has to be the original Sony RX100. I bought mine new in 2016 four years after they were launched. I found it ticked every box and was always my go to camera until I sold it in 2024 for almost what I paid for it new. It went everywhere with me despite owning a number of other camera during those times.

So many other stories we couldn’t fit in this article are shared in the forums. Thanks to everyone who took the time to explain what your most memorable cameras are and why.

Keep watch for the next Question of the week every other Wednesday to participate in this series. New questions are posted here on the homepage and in the forums . We can’t wait to read and share your stories!

Want to stay up to date on the latest product news and releases? Add DPReview as a preferred source to ensure our independent journalism makes it to the top of your Google search results.