When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

Last week, Panasonic announced the Lumix S 20mm F2.5, a small, full-frame prime for L-mount. We’ve had the chance to take it out for a few shoots to produce a sample gallery and to see how it performs in various conditions.

Hands-on impressions

Mitchell Clark

The Lumix S 20mm F2.5 feels relatively well-constructed, with pleasing tactile controls. Of course, its main focus is being compact and lightweight, a task which it gets full marks for. It only adds a bit of depth compared to my camera’s grip, and I found it very easy to slip into a bag to bring along for everyday outings.

Vingetting is well-controlled; there’s a bit at F2.5 through to F4, but it’s not enough to be distracting. It’s around what we’d expect given that this lens is focused on being small and lightweight, while not being super fast. I did, however, typically have to stop down a bit further to get super-sharp edges and corners, as they’re a bit soft below around F5.6.

To achieve this size, Panasonic – like essentially all other companies making lenses for modern mirrorless systems – has made use of software geometric correction. Without it, there’s substantial pincushion distortion, and, occasionally, darkness in the corners.

The lens is susceptible to some flare under very harsh conditions. On one of the afternoons I was shooting with it, I found a few of my photos had some large purple flares when I was shooting in the general direction of the afternoon sun. In the shots where I was deliberately trying to produce sunstars, I also got a lot of ghosting. This wasn’t too much of an issue in my testing, but if you frequently find yourself shooting in the brightest of light, you may want to consider picking up a lens hood, as it doesn’t come with one.

Mitchell Clark

The lens otherwise behaved quite well in the sun; in shots where it was fully within the frame, it did a very good job of retaining contrast.

Using the lens with the S1RII and original S1R, I never felt like its motors were the bottleneck for autofocus performance. It was very responsive, and could snap from its closest focusing distance – a respectable 0.18m (7.1″) – to objects far away very quickly. I’ve also tested a lot of pancake lenses with unit focus systems, and it was a nice change of pace to use one that focuses internally instead.

Overall, I felt this lens is a nice addition to Panasonic’s lineup, especially for ultrawide shooters. While there are a few technical drawbacks with a lens this small, I was overall quite pleased with the images I got out of it. If you’re the type of person who prefers this field of view for everyday shooting, or a videographer who wants to be able to film themselves, it’s an easy option to carry around, as long as you pair it with the right body.

Sample gallery

Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter/magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing; we do so in good faith, so please don’t abuse it. 

Thanks to Panasonic for the loan of an S1RII to shoot this gallery. All images were processed using our standard lens workflow in Capture One, with the manufacturer’s distortion correction applied but no correction of vignetting. The profile corrects a large amount of barrel distortion, and we’d consider it an essential part of the lens’s optical design.

Panasonic

Panasonic Lumix S 20mm F2.5

• Shop Now at B&H
• Shop Now at Panasonic
• Shop Now at Adorama

The Canon EOS R8 II is the latest camera to keep size down by adopting an electronic first curtain shutter design. This isn’t the same thing as full electronic shutter and it has very few downsides, so here’s how it works and what those downsides are.

Perhaps an easier way to understand EFCS is to think of it as Mechanical Second Curtain Shutter. The exposure is started electronically but a normal mechanical shutter then comes down to end the exposure, meaning that, unlike full electronic shutter, you can end your exposure very quickly, rather than being limited by readout speed of your sensor.

This means EFCS doesn’t have the significant rolling shutter artifacts (banding under flickering light and distorted moving subjects) that all but the fastest sensors can exhibit. The fast end to the exposure also means it can usually sync with flashes up to the same speed as a fully mechanical focal plane shutter.

In fact, it can have a benefit over full mechanical shutters, in one regard: because there’s no physical shutter snapping open at the start of the exposure, it eliminates a key source of vibration that can cause shutter shock. Some cameras with full mechanical shutters switch across to their EFCS mode within certain shutter ranges for exactly this reason.

This is the reason we’ve seen an increasing number of cameras, particularly the ones where the manufacturer has focused on downsizing and on cost reduction. In most instances, EFCS lets you use a smaller, mechanically simpler mechanism, with very little disadvantage.

The downside

It’s not entirely without downsides, though. At very high shutter speeds, where the period during which the shutter is closing makes up a significant proportion of the exposure, you can experience bokeh truncation: part of the bokeh pattern getting chopped off.

DPReview

This happens because the physical shutter used to end the exposure sits some distance in front of the sensor, so light can creep around the edge of the shutter blades as it closes. But the electronic first curtain (progressively turning the rows of the sensor on to start the exposure) doesn’t have that gap, so the start of the exposure didn’t have that light bleeding around the edge of the ‘shutter,’ giving one side of the bokeh a hard cut-off. This results in out-of-focus regions that aren’t as blurred and may not have such attractive bokeh.

However, this only becomes visible at very high shutter speeds when using lenses with fast enough apertures to significantly blur the background.

The ‘hard-edged’ nature of the electronic initiation of the exposure also means that any banding effect (from the fast flicker of LED advertising displays or high-speed sync flash) can end up being better defined and more distracting than with a fully mechanical shutter, again because light creeping around the gap between physical shutter blades and the sensor surface can soften it somewhat.

For the vast majority of situations though, including flash sync, electronic first curtain (/mechanical second curtain) shutter, is every bit as good as full mechanical shutter.

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

The Sony FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS is a 994g (2.2 lb) super-telephoto prime aimed at wildlife and sports shooters who want a lens they can carry comfortably for hours. Sony says it’s the lightest lens of its kind, and at $2,700 it costs a fraction of the company’s FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS, which is faster by about 1.3 stops, runs around $12,000 and weighs nearly 3kg (6.4 lbs).

Shooting experience

The 400mm F4.5 is nearly identical to its sibling, the FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS, differing by just one gram and 21mm in length, so the shooting experience is effectively the same. Both balance well when used handheld, with the weight sitting close to the camera to reduce fatigue, and both offer full-time direct manual focus. Two XD linear motors drive the autofocus, which Sony says can keep up with 120 fps burst shooting on the a9 III.

For a more thorough description of how these lenses handle in the field, see my 600mm sample gallery article.

Sample gallery

Most of the images in this gallery were captured at the Oregon Zoo near Portland, Oregon, with a handful at Ninepipe National Wildlife Refuge and the CSKT Bison Range in Montana, the same locations featured in the 600mm gallery. The zoo subjects offered proximity and varied light conditions; the Montana locations challenged the lens in open terrain and at longer working distances.

Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter/magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing; we do so in good faith, so please don’t abuse it. 

Sony

Sony FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS

• $2,698 at B&H

It’s been another big week for camera news, so the DPReview editors have once again gathered to discuss the latest releases from Canon, Sony and Panasonic. As usual, we’ve also worked to incorporate some of the comments from our forum users, commenters and others into the conversation, talking about some of the reactions we’ve seen.

If you prefer to read, no worries; we’ve covered all the products we discussed in-depth in articles, which are linked below. And, as always, you can often find us in the comments below, carrying on the discussion.

• Canon EOS R8 II initial review
• Canon EOS R8 II sample gallery
• Sony FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS and 600mm F6.3 GM OSS announcement
• Sony lenses hands-on
• Sony 400mm sample gallery
• Sony 600mm sample gallery and impressions
• Panasonic S 20mm F2.5 announcement

The EOS R8 Mark II is a refreshed and up-specced entry-level full-frame mirrorless camera, adding in-body image stabilization and an AF joystick as part of a complete re-styling.

These changes and a 2026 price tag position it essentially head-to-head with Nikon’s Z5II, our current pick in this part of the market.

We’ve had a chance to shoot the EOS R8 II for an extended period and with an array of lenses, so we’ve used it for the everyday photo taking its designed for. We’ve also got some friends to stand around in a flowerbed, to make sure we got to see how it performed for portraits and people pictures.

Overall we found it to be a very likeable camera: relatively small, usefully light and with a pretty straightforward interface. It’s not overflowing with clever features, but it has a lot of what a lot of photographers might need at a price that’s a fair step below that of the more sophisticated EOS R6 III.

We go into more detail about what we liked and disliked in our review, but this gallery should give a sense for what the R8 II can do. All the shots are unprocessed, out-of-camera images, but all of them taken in the camera’s conventional Picture Style color modes because you can’t capture Raws if you switch across to the more effect-like Color filter modes.

As always, you can download the Raws or JPEGs to inspect or run through your preferred processing workflow, to see how they look.

Sample gallery

Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter/magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page ). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing (in conjunction with this review); we do so in good faith, so please don’t abuse it.

Brevitē, the company behind camera bags meant to blend in, recently launched a Kickstarter campaign for clothing designed for creators. The lineup, called Creator Apparel, includes a hoodie, T-shirt and hat, each designed around the needs of people who shoot and record on the go.

The main feature across the lineup is a dedicated place to put a small microphone so that it stays out of sight. On the T-shirt and hoodie, that takes the form of a hidden pocket inside the neckline, while the hat uses a magnetic mic mount built into the brim. It isn’t clear how the location of the mic on the hoodie and T-shirt will impact sound, as it will be fully encased in fabric in those pockets.

While companies like DJI and Insta360 have worked to make their wireless microphones blend in a bit more or look more aesthetically pleasing, not everyone will want an obvious mic in their shot. That’s especially true since mic packs almost universally have their brand name boldly emblazoned on them, and what creator wants to be giving out that kind of free promo? That said, all three items in the apparel line feature the Brevitē name, so you’ll be swapping one logo for another.

Brevitē

Both the hoodie and T-shirt also include a snap that holds a removable microfiber cloth for cleaning lenses. The T-shirt stops there, but the hoodie adds padding around the neck for greater comfort when wearing a camera strap all day. It also has a zippered hidden stash pocket inside the main kangaroo pocket that’s large enough to fit something like the DJI Osmo Pocket.

The hat lacks the microfiber cloth but includes a concealed interior pocket designed for memory cards. It uses an adjustable snapback closure, eliminating the need to choose a specific size.

Brevitē

The hoodie comes in six colors (black, cream, green, tan, pink and navy) while the T-shirt is available in black or white and the hat is offered only in black. Brevitē positions the three pieces as everyday apparel that can double as a functional kit for run-and-gun shooting.

It’s important to note that this is a crowdfunding campaign rather than a conventional retail launch. Backers pledge toward a reward, and the project will only be funded if it reaches its goal by October 14. As with any Kickstarter project, pledging does not guarantee delivery, and backers should weigh the usual risks associated with crowdfunding.

One bit of good news for anyone interested: Creator Apparel is not Brevitē’s first Kickstarter project. The company previously crowdfunded its original camera backpack and, more recently, the Jumper Max camera bag, which drew 293 backers and reached 355% of its funding goal, according to the new campaign page.

Pledges start at $35 for the hat, $42 for the T-shirt and $62 for the hoodie. Backers can also pledge for all three pieces for $139. All of those prices are only for the first 100 backers, though. Prices will go up 30% across the board by the end of the campaign. Brevitē says that production will be complete and units will begin shipping in October.

If you’re anything like me, sometimes you like to put on a calming video for casually watching in the background while you work on something. The video below from Leica is the perfect option for just that.

The video is 2.5 hours long, and it documents the full restoration of a 100-year-old Leica I from the Leitz family. The video description explains that the camera was dealing with porous shutter curtains, resulting in light leaks and compromised shutter operation.

It showcases every step of the process, from start to finish. What I like best is that there are no dramatic cuts and no flashy music. There’s not even any commentary. It’s just pure camera repair ASMR, making it perfect to keep on in the background. Of course, it’s also neat seeing all of the inner workings of such a camera and all of the tools required for such work.

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

I’m a big fan of cameras that are focused on fun, and I’m always interested when companies take a distinct approach to that idea. After all, there are countless highly capable cameras on the market today that are more serious, and you’re sure to find one that fits your needs, no matter what type of photography you enjoy. There are even options for small travel cameras after a bit of a lull in that segment.

What is the Godox C100

Abby Ferguson

When I saw that Godox had released the C100, its first camera, I was intrigued. The palm-sized camera uses a vastly different design from most. It features a transparent viewfinder (though calling it that is a bit generous) that doubles as a minimalist display. You can’t review your photos there, as it’s more like a heads-up display, but it shows which mode you have selected and frame lines. When in light meter mode, it displays ISO, aperture and shutter speed settings.

The white body is a slim rectangle with a central button to trigger the shutter or light meter, arrows to cycle through aspect ratio or exposure settings, and a side switch to select photo, video, light meter, or turn the camera off. It’s remarkably easy to operate from a settings standpoint, as there really aren’t any. It takes just a few seconds of pushing buttons to figure out how to use it.

Using the Godox C100

Abby Ferguson

While the buttons are easy to navigate, using the camera as, well, a camera, is not so pleasant. The large, transparent viewfinder is certainly novel and a playful idea. But using it as a viewfinder is far from ideal. For starters, judging what’s in the frame depends entirely on how close you hold the viewfinder to your face and at what angle. It isn’t a consistent or reliable way to compose images, though I did better than I thought when I actually reviewed them, aside from a few major misses.

The bigger issue I had was that my eyes struggled to decide what to focus on when using it. My eyes would jump back and forth between focusing on whatever was beyond the viewfinder and on the camera itself, which was rather headache-inducing for me. So you see: not so pleasant.

Of course, I’d be remiss if I didn’t touch on image quality. Godox hasn’t published any details about the camera in terms of sensor size, aperture, shutter speed, and so on, and none of those details are captured in metadata. So I can only comment on what I’m seeing in the roughly 2MP images.

Abby Ferguson

It should come as no surprise that the image quality is what you’d expect from a toy camera. It admittedly isn’t as bad as I expected (I had very low expectations), and this isn’t a camera meant for pristine image quality anyway. But there are some notable issues.

The dynamic range is very small, and it tends to massively overexpose highlights in favor of exposing for the shadows. In fact, it’s so intense that my colleague Mitchell described it as a “highlight brick wall” as opposed to a highlight roll-off. The fixed focus also isn’t very close, so subjects need to be relatively far away to be sharp (or at least as sharp as this setup can produce).

Abby Ferguson

In bright light, it handles moving subjects reasonably well; my dog wasn’t just a blur, suggesting a reasonable shutter speed. Low-light images are, naturally, quite rough-looking, though that isn’t a surprise given how small the sensor likely is.

Overall, the camera produces images that very much fit into the low-fi aesthetic that seems to be popular right now. The experience of using it isn’t all that pleasant for me, but I could see that being less of an issue for others.

Light meter use

Abby Ferguson

Given the image quality and framing annoyances, I think the Godox C100 actually makes the most sense as a light meter, since it offers a specific mode for that. As a film photographer, I can see the advantage there, as it is significantly smaller than my Sekonic light meter, meaning I can easily keep it in my pocket when I’m out shooting.

There are plenty of excellent smartphone light meter apps (even free ones), but that means I need to have my phone on hand. It also requires I unlock my phone every time I want to take a meter reading, and potentially navigate to the app if I’ve done something else in the meantime, which I’ve found a bit annoying when on a photo walk or something similar.

In my testing, I found the meter mode to be very accurate. I compared it to the measurements from various mirrorless cameras, and it was exactly the same every single time. I would feel confident using it for film.

Abby Ferguson

It’s also nice because you can select which two parameters you want control of versus which the camera should give you a reading for. With what I photograph, I’m most often interested in adjusting my own aperture, and I have a set ISO since I’m shooting film. So I set my ISO and aperture, push the center button, and it gives me a reading for what my shutter speed should be.

The one small issue with light meter mode is the range of each setting. Aperture ranges from F1.0 to F64, and shutter speed from 1 sec to 1/8000 sec, which are both plenty broad (much more than any of my film cameras can use, in fact). ISO, however, only covers from 100-800.

Most of the film I shoot falls in that range, but there are popular film stocks well above 800, or below 100. I’m currently working on a roll of CineStill 800T that I’m shooting at 1600. So that narrow ISO range is potentially a bit limiting. But, for those who know how to calculate equivalent exposures, it could at least help dial in an appropriate setting.

Final thoughts

When looking at a camera like this, it’s important to keep in mind what it actually is and who it’s meant for. This is supposed to be a novel, fun camera, and in most ways it is. For those who aren’t precious about framing or image quality, I could see it being a fun toy to take out and about.

The visually challenging process of trying to actually use the viewfinder will keep me from using it as a camera. But, I think it will make a home next to my film cameras that don’t have built-in meters on photo walks, as it is easier to carry around than my dedicated light meter and more convenient than using a smartphone app.

Godox

Godox C100

• $45 at B&H

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

It seems like the camera industry wasn’t content with just one busy week. We’ve seen another rush of announcements in the past few days, and we wouldn’t blame you if you missed a few things among all the articles we’ve put out. So let’s recap everything that happened this week.

The Instax Pal gets an unexpected follow-up

Fujifilm

The Instax Pal was always a bit of an odd duck: a gumdrop-shaped camera that only shot digital, despite bearing the name of Fujifilm’s instant film brand. This week, though, the company released a successor with a completely different design, recalling the tiny 110 film cameras of old. (Strangely, not the only one of its kind released this week: Camp Snap announced something similar.) Alongside it, Fujifilm launched an updated version of its Instax Link Wide printer.

Fujifilm

Fujifilm Instax Pal 2

• $170 at B&H

The Canon EOS R8 II

Mitchell Clark

Canon has updated its entry-level full-frame camera, fixing two of our major complaints about the original in the process with the inclusion of IBIS and an autofocus joystick. While we still have our complaints – the tiny LP-E17 battery has been untouched, and the RF mount remains strictly under Canon’s control – we were left with a very positive first impression. Check out our full initial review for all the details.

Canon

Canon EOS R8 Mark II

• Shop Now at B&H
• Shop Now at Adorama

Sony’s twin telephoto lenses that won’t break the bank (or your back)

Dale Baskin

The super telephoto game has never been cheap to get into and, make no mistake, it still isn’t. But Sony’s new 400mm F4.5 and 600mm F6.3 GM are steps towards making it a bit more accessible, coming in at $2700 and $3700, respectively (both just under $10,000 less than their faster counterparts). The lenses are shockingly similar, coming within a gram of each other, and their optical formulas have a lot of shared glass.

Sony

Sony FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS

• $2,698 at B&H

Sony

Sony FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS

• $3,698 at B&H

Panasonic’s full-frame 20mm F2.5 cupcake lens

Mitchell Clark

Not one to miss out on the action, Panasonic also announced a new lens: a 20mm F2.5 option for L-mount that’s not quite as small as a pancake lens, but is around the same size as the 40mm F2 option it released earlier this year. Panasonic once described this style of lens as a “muffin” (read: a baked good thicker than a pancake), but reader nologo suggested that calling it a cupcake would be a more fun descriptor (and, potentially, a less internationally confusing one), which I wholeheartedly agree with.

Keep an eye out for a sample gallery from this lens, coming soon.

Panasonic

Panasonic Lumix S 20mm F2.5

• Shop Now at B&H
• Shop Now at Panasonic
• Shop Now at Adorama

Software news

Capture One, Adobe Photoshop Elements and Affinity Photo all received updates this week, with the former improving tethering and AI-assisted culling and the latter promising its biggest update for photography ever. Canon also launched a piece of software that lets you use pictures from some of its cameras to create 3D models of the real-life object you photographed.

Those were all the major launches this week, but I’ll leave you with a pro tip: if you want to make absolutely sure you won’t miss our best stories, and want to see exclusive content from us, be sure to subscribe to our Today in Photography newsletter.

Earlier this year, GoPro announced a bit of a departure from its usual products with the Mission 1 Pro ILS. The camera kept the company’s rugged, compact body design, but featured a Micro Four Thirds lens mount. Now, that relationship is formalized, with OM Digital Solutions and Panasonic announcing that GoPro is a member of the Micro Four Thirds standards group.

The announcement could be seen as a vote of confidence in Micro Four Thirds. GoPro brings a new kind of small, rugged video body into the mount’s ecosystem, and its support could help encourage more specialty lenses and accessories built around it.

Still, the Mission 1 Pro ILS isn’t a gateway to the full breadth of Micro Four Thirds glass. Its mount lacks electronic contacts, so it works only with compatible manual-focus lenses and manual or fixed-aperture designs, not the autofocus lenses that make up much of the existing OM System and Panasonic lineup. But it marks an interesting move in the industry, and we’ll be eager to see what, if anything, comes of it.

It’s also worth noting that action camera rival, Insta360, has said it’s working on its own mirrorless cameras, rumored to be built around a Micro Four Thirds mount as well.

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

Camp Snap, the company known for its simple, screen-free digital cameras, has announced a new offering in its lineup with a substantially different look. The 110D is a narrow, rectangular camera reminiscent of the classic 110 analog cameras popular in the 1970s.

As the name hints, the Camp Snap got its start as a camera meant for kids to take to camp, without the risk of sending more expensive cameras with your child or the distractions found on other digital cameras. The 110D keeps that legacy alive, and like the company’s other cameras, it lacks a display for viewing photos, prompting users to stay in the moment and look at their photos later.

The only display on it is a monochrome reflective segmented LCD for checking settings. There’s a small optical viewfinder on the side for composing images.

Camp Snap

The camera keeps other kid-focused design features, too. That includes a screw-secured door where the memory card slot and a small selection of buttons to adjust settings live. However, those screws can be removed for those who don’t necessarily need to lock things down.

Also consistent with previous models are the built-in digital filter looks. The 110D offers five filters – Standard, Vintage 1, Vintage 2, Analog and Black & White – that can be changed on the camera itself with a slider. It also features a 30.5mm filter thread for those who want to use physical screw-on photo filters.

Camp Snap says the camera offers a near-instant shutter response, minimizing the delay between pressing the shutter button and capturing the image. It is also designed to maximize battery life by automatically entering sleep mode when it’s inactive. When you’re ready to take a photo, the company says you simply have to press the shutter button and don’t need to wait for the camera to fully boot up. Camp Snap says it can manage around 500 photos per charge.

Camp Snap

One thing even many adults will appreciate is that the camera can be used without an app. In fact, it doesn’t offer any sort of connectivity beyond a USB-C port. That means no fussing with connecting the camera to a phone or dealing with all the other things that come with it when a child is using it. Images can simply be transferred to a phone, tablet or computer using that USB-C port.

In terms of the nitty-gritty details, the 110D features an 8MP Type 1/3.2 (15.7mm²) CMOS sensor. It uses a 4.2mm F2.0 (26mm F11.5 full-frame equivalent) lens and offers a dual-tone LED flash, with options for 6500K and 3000K. Unsurprisingly, it only captures JPEG files, and it has fully automatic exposure and white balance. It features a pre-installed 4GB microSD card that stores roughly 2000 photos, though it can be upgraded as well.

Camp Snap

The Camp Snap 110D is available for pre-order now for $75. It comes in two colors: black and gray (called Back in Black), and white and orange (dubbed Dreamsicle).

Camp Snap

Camp Snap 110D

• $75 at Camp Snap

Over the last seven months, Samsung, Google and Apple have all released their latest flagship smartphones. Samsung’s Galaxy S26 Ultra arrived first, followed by Google’s Pixel 11 Pro and Apple’s iPhone 18 Pro. With its 6.9-inch display, the Galaxy S26 Ultra is more akin in size to the XL and Max variants of the Pixel and iPhone, but, unlike Google and Apple, Samsung doesn’t make a smaller version with otherwise identical specs.

Here’s how their cameras, displays, battery life and other core specifications compare.

Cameras

There’s a lot of overlap when comparing the camera systems of these three flagships. Each has an advantage over the others in some way; some are rather substantial, while most are only small differences.

The three phones use main-camera sensors that are effectively the same size, all coming in at Type 1/1.3 (72mm²). The notable difference is resolution: the Galaxy S26 Ultra uses a 200MP main camera, compared with 50MP on the Pixel 11 Pro and 48MP on the iPhone 18 Pro. Despite the variety in resolutions, all three models will, by default output at lower resolutions; the iPhone and Galaxy at 24MP, the Pixel at 12.5. They all, however, offer modes that let you use the sensor’s full resolution, but due to the nature of Quad Bayer sensors, they’re typically best used in good lighting where you don’t need maximum dynamic range.

Apple

Apple’s main camera has its own edge, though, as it’s the only one here with a variable-aperture lens (though Samsung briefly experimented with something similar around a decade ago). It can be set to F1.48, F1.8, F2.8 or F4, promising a bit more creative control and exposure flexibility, especially when shooting video.

Samsung has the broadest rear-camera system, adding a dedicated 3x camera between its main and 5x cameras. Its long telephoto reaches 111mm equiv., narrowly exceeding the Pixel’s 106mm and iPhone’s 100mm equiv. lenses, and the 67mm equiv. provides a nice bit of flexibility that the others don’t. However, the Pixel’s telephoto sensor remains the largest in that class of the group.

All three phones support close-focus shooting with their ultrawide cameras, though, naturally, each brand handles it slightly differently and uses distinct names. Apple lists macro photography, Google specifies Macro Focus on the Pixel 11 Pro ultrawide, and Samsung’s Focus Enhancer can automatically switch to the Galaxy S26’s ultrawide camera for nearby subjects.

Video

Google

On the video side of things, Apple lists the most extensive video feature set. The iPhone 18 Pro records 4K Dolby Vision video at up to 120 fps and supports ProRes, ProRes Raw with external recording, Apple Log 2 and ACES color workflows. It is also compatible with Genlock, which lets the iPhone 18 Pro synchronize its frame timing with other cameras and video devices.

Lastly, the iPhone has finally caught up with the Pixel and Galaxy phones with the addition of manual camera controls for aperture, shutter speed, white balance and histogram monitoring (which also work in photo mode).

The Pixel 11 Pro records up to 4K/60p on the phone itself, while its 8K/30p option uses cloud-based processing. It also offers separate modes for low-light video, extra handheld stabilization and enhanced zoomed video, plus a post-capture tool for reducing distracting background sounds.

The Galaxy S26 Ultra records up to 8K/30p and 4K/120p. It also supports Samsung’s Advanced Professional Video codec, an open, professional-oriented format intended to preserve more image information while using storage more efficiently than conventional uncompressed video. Samsung also includes an enhanced stabilization mode designed to keep handheld footage level during movement (a feature Apple replicates with the iPhone’s “Action” mode).

Displays and battery

While all three sit in the flagship-phone class, Samsung takes a different physical approach with the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s substantially larger display. The iPhone 18 Pro and Pixel 11 Pro share the smaller 6.3-inch format, while the Samsung is closer in scale to Apple’s Pro Max-class phones and Google’s Pixel Pro XL models.

The three offer the same 120Hz maximum refresh rate, and their pixel densities are broadly similar despite their different screen sizes and resolutions. The Pixel has the highest stated brightness rating, while the iPhone’s specification is specifically an outdoor-brightness figure.

In terms of battery specs, Apple rates the iPhone 18 Pro for up to 36 hours of video playback and it says the phone can reach 50% charge in around 15 minutes with a compatible 60W-or-higher USB-C adapter. The Pixel 11 Pro has a stated 30-plus-hour mixed-use runtime and charges to 55% in around 30 minutes with a 30W USB-C PPS charger. Samsung’s Galaxy S26 Ultra supports up to 60W wired charging, and the company promises up to 31 hours of video playback.

Size and weight

The Galaxy S26 Ultra is much taller and wider than the iPhone 18 Pro and Pixel 11 Pro, reflecting its 6.9-inch display and four-camera system. At 214g, it is also the heaviest, though only by a small margin. It’s just 3g heavier than the iPhone and 10g heavier than the Pixel, but it is thinner than both.

Key differences

Outside the camera system, the three phones still share a premium baseline: all start with 256GB of storage, use USB-C, support Wi-Fi 7 and are rated IP68 for dust and water resistance. The main hardware differences are scale and camera configuration rather than basic connectivity or durability.

Apple supports MagSafe and Qi2 wireless charging, including up to 25W MagSafe charging, while Google’s Pixel 11 Pro supports the Qi2.2-based Pixelsnap accessory system. Samsung supports wired, wireless and reverse wireless charging, and its Ultra model adds S Pen support and a built-in Privacy Display feature.

Software remains a fundamental distinction. The iPhone 18 Pro runs iOS 27 and integrates with Apple’s hardware and services. The Pixel 11 Pro runs Android with Google’s Pixel interface and a stated seven years of operating system, security and feature updates. The Galaxy S26 Ultra runs Android with Samsung’s One UI, Galaxy AI tools and S Pen software features.

The three phones are also close in price. In the U.S., the Galaxy S26 Ultra starts at $1300, the Pixel 11 Pro at $1099 and the iPhone 18 Pro at $1199. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra’s larger display, S Pen support and fourth rear camera position it differently from the two 6.3-inch Pro models, but it also places all three phones within a $200 launch-price range.

Meet Stefan Pfeffer

Home base: Manila, the Philippines

I’m always drawn to photographers who treat their camera as a way to explore a scene from a humanistic perspective.

Known in the wider community as stipphoto, Stefan Pfeffer photographs the energy and small human interactions of everyday life, particularly across the Philippines and elsewhere in Asia. Working with a preference for wide-angle lenses and direct, unplanned encounters, Stefan embraces the reactions his presence can bring. In this edition of What’s in your bag?, he discusses his compact Sony a7CR kit while exploring his favorite stops in Europe, Hong Kong and the Philippines.

“I have always been curious about my surroundings and have photographed almost everything I encounter. During the days of film photography, I was somewhat restrained by the limited number of exposures; with digital photography, that restraint has largely disappeared.

My photographs are neither carefully planned nor intended to have particular artistic value. They are simply snapshots of moments in time.”

Our ‘What’s in your bag?’ community spotlight series features readers sharing their favorite gear and photography, including from past DPReview collaborators. See below for what Stefan has to share.

How do you get a good angle from others?

Stefan Pfeffer

“I’m drawn to documentary-style photography, with a particular focus on people and everyday life. Asia, with its crowded markets, densely developed residential areas, and vibrant street life, offers an endlessly rewarding environment for photography.

Whenever possible, I try to insert the camera into a scene rather than simply record what is in front of me. This is why I prefer wide-angle lenses: the wider the lens, the more immersed I feel in the environment.

My choice of focal length also depends on how approachable people are in different places. In Europe, they tend to use a 50mm lens; in Hong Kong, a 35mm lens; and in the Philippines, a 24mm lens. This approach makes it difficult to photograph people discreetly or unnoticed, but I see that as a positive thing. It often provokes a reaction and creates a kind of dialogue between the people I photograph and me. They may reject the photograph, which is perfectly fine, or, as is sometimes the case, give me the dreaded V-sign and pose for the camera.

I never stage my photographs or instruct people on how to pose. I prefer to capture people and situations as they naturally unfold, allowing the interaction between the photographer, the subject, and the environment to shape the image.”

What’s in Stefan’s bag

Stefan Pfeffer

“Gear does matter. A sharp lens and a snappy camera, such as the fantastic but ultimately disposable Sony a7CR, make the difference between capturing a moment and missing it.

Fast autofocus was the liberation from Leica rangefinder focusing, as digital imaging was the liberation from film. However, as objects, a Nikon F3 is infinitely more desirable than a Nikon ZF. Instagram and YouTube reviews of equipment confuse the correlation between gear and achieving a photograph.”

Favorite cameras(s): Hasselblad X1D II and Sony A7CR

“I’ve been through a lot of camera gear over the years. The perfect camera does exist, for me at least. It’s the Contax G2, paired with its wonderful lenses. Today, however, my preferred camera is the Sony a7CR.”

Favorite lens(s):

• Sony Zeiss 55mm F1.8 in Europe
• Sigma I-Series 35mm F2 in Hong Kong
• Sony 24mm F1.4 GM in the Philippines

“My three-lens kit consists of the 24mm GM, Sony 50mm F2.5 G, and Sigma 90mm F2.8, a compact combination that gives me the flexibility to photograph at different distances while keeping the kit relatively light. My choice of lens depends largely on where I’m photographing and how close I can get to my subjects.”

Do accessories matter, or do you just bring the camera?

Stefan Pfeffer

“Accessories absolutely matter. For starters, I like the Crumpler 6 Million Dollar bag. It’s simple and functional. However, for a photo walk, I much prefer inconspicuous shoulder bags that I sourced from flea markets. My latest find is a Converse bag. Equipped with a cheap camera bag insert, these are perfect for a three-lens setup.

Otherwise, a plastic bag for my camera is always part of my kit. My main criticism of Sony cameras is their sensitivity to humidity and rain. The Multi-Interface Shoe is my main source of frustration. The design may make sense on a computer, but on a camera that is used outdoors, it’s infuriating. Sooner or later, all my Sony cameras have displayed the dreaded message: “This accessory is not supported by the device and cannot be used.” Infuriating.

An air blower and a spare battery are also essential. Fortunately, Sony’s battery life is fantastic, so I rarely have to worry about running out of power. If I need anything else, the beauty of roaming any Asian city is that there is always a convenience store or Sari Sari for a refreshment.”

How has your photography changed over the years?

Stefan Pfeffer

“Although I have always loved black-and-white photography, my digital photographs are almost exclusively in color. For me, this is simply because reality is in color. Since my photographs are essentially snapshots of the world as I encounter it, I prefer to preserve that sense of reality rather than reinterpret it.

Digital photography has also greatly improved both the number and quality of images I’m able to capture. Modern autofocus is remarkably capable, allowing me to shoot wide open at short shutter speeds.

What has perhaps changed – or, more accurately, developed over time – is my ability to overcome the hesitation to approach people and ask to photograph them. After doing this for a number of years, I’ve learned that the worst that can happen is being rejected.”

Why is Asia so special for your photography?

Stefan Pfeffer

“I like to wander and discover whatever happens to be around me. In many parts of Asia, the boundaries between public and private space are less clearly defined, making places that might otherwise feel inaccessible surprisingly open. People are generally quick to let me know when I trespass – somewhere, sooner or later.

Twenty-five years ago, what was meant to be a one-month trip turned into a year-and-a-half journey through Asia, with China in particular. It was a very different time to travel. The lack of internet and smartphones created a sense of freedom and spontaneity that is difficult to experience today.

In China in particular, the relative lack of surveillance at the time made it possible to travel extensively with a sense of anonymity. Walking around with a camera was generally met with curiosity rather than suspicion. People would ask where I was from or what I was photographing, but there was usually an openness toward a foreigner simply wandering around with a camera.

That freedom and unpredictability became an important part of how I experienced and photographed Asia.”

How do you plan out capturing a great photo?

Stefan Pfeffer

“My photographs are rarely planned. They are more often a matter of seeing what happens and responding to it.

The Sony a7CR’s excellent autofocus, combined with its high megapixel count, allows me to shoot short bursts of three or four frames at a moderate drive speed. The quality of lenses such as the Sony 24mm GM and Sigma I-Series 35mm also gives me enough resolution to crop heavily and refine the composition later in Capture One.

In a way, going out to photograph has become about collecting the raw material for an image. The final framing and interpretation happen later on the computer. It’s close to the analog process: going out and exposing the negative, then returning home to make the photograph.”

Stefan really enjoyed participating in this spotlight article and would love to hear what you think of his photography and to answer any of your questions in the comments below.

You can check out Stefan’s other work at stefanpfeffer.com.

Editor’s note: This article continues a series, ‘What’s in your bag?’, highlighting DPReview community members, their photography and the gear they depend on. Would you like your photography to be featured in a future installment? Tell us a bit about yourself by filling out this form.

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

Earlier this week, Sony announced the FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS, a super-telephoto prime that, along with its FE 400mm F4.5 GM sibling, aims to put G Master optics into a lens you can comfortably handhold for hours. At 995g (2.2 lb) without its tripod foot, Sony claims it’s the lightest lens in its class, and at $3,700, it costs a fraction of what the company’s 600mm F4 GM does.

Shooting experience

I’ve spent the past couple of weeks with both lenses ahead of launch, taking the 600mm F6.3 to photograph wildlife in Montana at Ninepipe National Wildlife Refuge and the CSKT Bison Range, where, frustratingly, I didn’t see a single bison.

The first thing I noticed is how little the lens feels like a super-telephoto. Sony’s 995g figure doesn’t include the hood, which you’ll almost certainly have attached and which adds roughly 130g, but you’re unlikely to notice much difference. More importantly, the lens’s weight is concentrated close to the camera, so it doesn’t feel front-heavy the way many telephotos do.

Dale Baskin

I shot entirely handheld on a Sony a7 V, which is really the point of this lens: it’s built for walking, not for sitting on a tripod. I wandered the refuge’s primitive dirt roads and marshy areas with nothing but the camera slung over my shoulder and a small pack. My tripod stayed in the car the entire trip.

That’s why I can (mostly) forgive the one design choice I’d change: the tripod foot isn’t Arca-Swiss compatible. It’s not the end of the world for a lens meant to be handheld, but when you do need a tripod – for video, for example – a built-in Arca-Swiss foot would be very useful.

Dale Baskin

The hood has a locking button and a rubber bumper on the front, which is a welcome touch, since a lens this long inevitably bumps into things as you carry it. It also reverses for storage. Reversed, it partially blocks the focus hold buttons, but the function and focus rings remain easy to reach, so if an opportunity appears suddenly, you can still raise the camera and shoot.

The focus ring is nice and deep, and full-time DMF lets you take over focusing without flipping a switch. When subject detection couldn’t pick out an animal partially hidden by grass or plants, a quick twist of the ring to bring it into focus was often the fastest way to get the camera to recognize the animal and begin tracking.

Dale Baskin

The trade-off for its compact size is the F6.3 maximum aperture. For sample galleries, we keep ISO as low as practical so noise doesn’t affect perceived sharpness; I generally aim for ISO 1600 or below, though it’s not a hard rule. With this lens, that target had to move. In early-morning light at Ninepipe, or in overcast or misty conditions, I often shot at ISO 2000–3200 to get shutter speeds fast enough to freeze wildlife in action.

When not shooting sample galleries, I might push to ISO 6400 or higher, and with modern full-frame sensors and AI Raw noise-reduction tools, that makes F6.3 less of a compromise than it once was. Still, if you regularly shoot in low light, you might be the target audience for Sony’s 600mm F4, which is 1.3 stops faster.

Dale Baskin

Even at F6.3, I generally had plenty of subject separation and found out-of-focus areas pleasing both in front of and behind the plane of focus. The one exception was when something busy, like tall grass, sat in an awkward middle zone – not sharp, but not blurred enough to disappear – where the bokeh could look slightly distracting, though that kind of transitional distance is a tough test for any lens.

For a closer look at the design and controls, and how both lenses fit into the market, check out our hands-on with the 400mm F4.5 and 600mm F6.3 GM.

Sample gallery

Sony

Sony FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS

• $3,698 at B&H

Earlier this week, Canon launched the EOS R8 II, a new, entry-level full-frame camera that takes the original EOS R8, gives it a redesign and adds IBIS and an autofocus joystick. And, like the original, it’s quite capable for video too, so we filmed part of our first-look video using it.

Keeping focus on a (relatively) still subject isn’t a particularly difficult task for modern cameras, but even Canon cameras as recent as the EOS R6 II would occasionally have some distracting focus pulsing in video. We’re happy to say it’s not something we noticed in the footage from the EOS R8 II, though we’ll have to spend more time shooting with it before we come to any full conclusions.

You’ll also see a variety of sample shots in the video, though if you want to see more – and check out the Raws for yourself – you can browse through our sample gallery.

Oh, and a fun behind-the-scenes fact for our readers: the plane picture at the 3:36 mark in the video was taken with Canon’s RF 400mm F2.8 lens, a massive piece of glass that costs as much as seven EOS R8 IIs.

It’s obviously not a sensible pairing with this camera, but I ended up having access to it for a few hours after attending a Formula Drift with Canon to test out the EOS R1, so I took the opportunity to make a silly video with it because who else would have that kind of opportunity?

Alongside the new EOS R8 II, Canon has announced Dual Pixel 3D, a new Windows-based software tool, free at launch, that turns a single compatible camera image into an immersive 3D photo, a 3D model or a short 3D video clip. It does so using sensor data rather than requiring a dual-lens or dedicated 3D camera setup, meaning photographers can create 3D content without purchasing separate, specialized equipment.

How it works

The Dual Pixel 3D Converter uses depth and phase-detection data from a single compatible image, either a Dual Pixel Raw file shot with a supported camera, or a JPEG containing distance information captured by the EOS R8 Mark II. Users will need to ensure that the setting to record distance data to JPEGs is turned on, however.

The tool can export the resulting 3D content as OBJ or GLB model files, or as an MP4 video that creates a shifting, three-dimensional perspective. Canon says the tool is best suited to close-up, stationary subjects with clear depth and defined edges, such as products, plants and food.

Canon’s documentation of the feature highlights the need for a sharp source image. As a result, it recommends using an aperture between F5.6 and F8, specifying that anything beyond F8 will result in “a 3D conversion error.” The company also suggests an ISO of 1600 or lower to minimize noise. Finally, it cautions that subjects with fine details, transparency, reflections, repeating patterns or heavy blur may not produce ideal results.

The app then provides some controls for customization over the degree of depth. Users can increase depth for a stronger 3D effect or reduce it for a more subtle look. It also allows users to remove or replace the background before exporting the final file.

Compatible cameras

Canon says the new tool is compatible with eight EOS R-series cameras, listed above. While users don’t need a dual-lens setup, the feature only works with select Canon lenses, also listed above. The company notes that feature availability and viable output will depend on the camera, source file type, lens and shooting conditions.

Dual Pixel 3D could be particularly useful for photographers and small businesses that want to create rotating product visuals or shareable 3D-looking clips without investing in dedicated scanning hardware. It is not a firmware update that adds a new shooting mode to every Canon body. Instead, Canon’s new software converts depth information in compatible images captured with supported camera-and-lens combinations into 3D content.

We all have that moment where we pick up a camera, go out to shoot something, and… nothing. You look around, recognize all the places you’ve already taken great photos of and don’t have the energy to drive across town to find something fresh. Instead, you decide to walk back into the house to work on some other non-photography project.

During these times, you miss that spark of creativity and inspiration that keeps you energized to take great photos. You know what it feels like when it’s around. Those are the times when it’s clear as day what to do with your camera. You end up shooting countless fantastic scenes with little effort.

So, how do you rekindle that spark of inspiration? Read on to discover how the DPReview community finds fresh inspiration and gets their creative instincts flowing again.

Dave in Wales: What you don’t do is sell all your gear.

Spid: This is what the nifty fifty was designed for. Strip back to basics. Shoot less, one focal length. Get the mojo back.

TOTodd: Nothing sparks inspiration more than a client beating on your door asking if it’s done yet.

zak99: Stop chasing technical perfection, dig out some old cameras, digital or film, limit my options and carry only one lens. I’m currently using an Olympus 7070 from my digital childhood. It’s challenging, it’s satisfying and it’s cool.

Simple-joy

Maoby: By taking self-portraits (in response to Mathew’s self-portrait lead photo :)).

Jaberg: As a practical solution, take part in the currently running month-long challenge. It’s not important that each (or any) entry be a gem. The important thing is to make a picture – any picture – for each topic. To pick up the camera and engage the photography muscles. You never know when creative inspiration will strike.

AshleyMC: I always have a camera on me and create photographs daily. My “default” subject is flowers, which are not hard to find: in my garden, in the neighborhood church’s garden, or in the city’s botanical gardens and greenhouses. Other than flowers, I usually see “something” in any scene.

Gato Amarillo: If I waited for inspiration, I’d hardly get anything done – in photography or in any other part of life. It’s been said many ways by many people: “Amateurs wait for inspiration; real artists just get to work.”

AshleyMC

Zeee: I do what works best. I let GAS get the better of me.

milo006: I have been doing this since I was 12 years old, now I am 81. I think every day can be inspirational, as far as life is concerned. When I was a young man, my inspiration came from my work, military service and other experiences. After I married and had children, they became the inspiration.

I do admit that I have had long periods when I was not active as a photographer, due to other hobbies that took up a lot of my time. However, now that I am older, retired and have the time, I find it easy to be inspired on a daily basis.

KPM2: Photography is often a matter of being in the right place at the right time. When you’ve been doing it for a long time, you’ve naturally found yourself in that sweet spot often enough – and you might just lose a bit of your enthusiasm as a result, and more so, when the weather is not optimal.

What always works for me in those moments is experimenting with flash, outside or inside at home, because it breaks the rule of being in the right place at the right time. Because the time doesn’t matter.

There are many other stories from our community. They all deserve praise and to be shared, so be sure to visit the forum discussion and share your own if you like. Thanks to everyone who took the time to share unique ways you get out of an inspiration rut.

Panasonic has announced a slate of firmware updates for several of its cameras, meant to bring improvements to the company’s small, full-frame, creator-focused camera, the S9, as well as the more pro- and enthusiast-oriented S1II-series. It’s also updating its Lumix Lab and Lumix Flow apps.

Updates for the S1II, S1RII and S1IIE

The changelog for the S1II-series of cameras is short, sweet and significant. It reads:

• Improved shutter release time lag and burst shooting performance when using an external flash.
• Improved operational stability.

The last note means what it usually does. The company has fixed bugs and made things work that bit better.

However, we’ve been told, and have experienced ourselves, that the S1II-series of cameras could be laggy when paired with a flash being controlled via TTL. The performance was, frankly, not really acceptable for professional-level cameras, and Panasonic says it heard complaints from wedding photographers in particular. This update should help avoid that, making sure the camera takes a flash photo right when you press the shutter, instead of having to take a bit to think about it.

This update will be coming to all of the S1II-series cameras, including the S1IIN, a variant of the S1II for Chinese and Korean broadcasters with special networking capabilities.

Updates for the S9

Which update for the S9 is more important will depend on who you ask, and whether they’re a videographer. If they are, they’ll likely be quite excited about Panasonic adding new formats of its MP4 (Lite) codec, which is designed to use a lower bitrate, making it faster to wirelessly transfer to a phone and post to the internet.

When the S9 launched, it marked the debut of MP4 (Lite), which was only available in a single resolution – 3.8K open gate – and two framerates, 25 and 30p. While you can crop the 3:2 footage to get an output aspect ratio, that requires an extra step. Now, the camera is gaining some additional modes that won’t require it: UHD 4K/60p, 1080/60p and 1080/120p. These modes were introduced with the Panasonic L10, and it’s nice to see them showing up here for people who want even less work to get their footage ready to post, though I do still wish there was a UHD 4K/30p option, too.

Panasonic

The camera is also gaining full support for the Lumix Flow app, a video-focused program that, among many other things, lets you use your smartphone as a monitor, either via Wi-Fi or USB-C. While that’s handy no matter what camera you have, it’s especially useful for the S9, which is otherwise limited to using Micro-HDMI to output video. Panasonic says many users were “begging” for the camera to work with Flow, which also lets you create storyboards and shotlists, and add metadata to your recorded clips that make it easier to sort through the good and bad takes in post.

Flow will be getting an update to support the S9, which also comes with a few tweaks to how it displays camera information while monitoring and expanded support for using it with your phone horizontally.

Finally, in a move that will please both videographers and photographers, the camera will now let you assign substantially more functions to a lens’s programable button (a feature likely brought on by the company’s release of a second small prime with one that seems like a perfect match for the camera).

Lumix Lab updates

If the firmware updates weren’t enough, the company is also updating its Lumix Lab app, which lets you download images from your camera, as well as manage its libraries of LUT (Look Up Table) color profiles. On top of some UI tweaks and improving the app’s compatibility with Android phones that have “non-standard” processors (read: chips from companies other than Qualcomm, such as Samsung’s own-brand Exynos models), Panasonic is trying to make the app friendlier to those trying to find and download new LUTs from its repository of creator-submitted options.

Lumix Lab will now let you download packs of LUTs as well, so you don’t have to individually pick and choose several separate ones to build a set of aesthetics. It also now lets you filter which LUTs show up based on a series of options, such as what kind of scene or subject you’re shooting, and what kind of colors you want. The company has also added an option to share a link to a LUT’s page in the Lumix Lab app.

Availability

The new firmware for the S1II, S1IIE, S1RII and S9 will be made available for free starting October 13, with the updated versions of Lumix Lab and Lumix Flow launching at the same time.

When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.

Panasonic has announced the Lumix S 20mm F2.5, a small, wide-angle prime designed to complement the 40mm F2 it released earlier this year, while offering a much wider angle that’s ideal for things like landscapes, close-up shots that still give a sense of the environment and, of course, video.

The lens has very similar dimensions to those of the 40mm F2, and the S9’s 18-40mm F4.5-6.3 kit zoom when it’s retracted. It’s the lightest of the bunch by a fraction, coming in at 142g (5oz), and has the same 62mm thread for filters. Panasonic also says it’s splash, dust and freeze resistant; that won’t be a huge deal for S9 owners, since that body isn’t, but for S5 or S1-series users it’s a nice addition.

Optically, the lens is made up of 11 elements in 9 groups, with three aspherical lenses and three ED elements. Its minimum focus distance is 0.18m (7.1″), which lets you get quite close to your subject for a dramatic look that seems to be quite popular these days.

Panasonic says the lens should be relatively sharp edge-to-edge with clean bokeh. We’re working on shooting a sample gallery with it so you can judge for yourself.

In terms of controls, it has what we’ve come to expect from Panasonic: a customizable ring that you can assign different functions based on whether you’re in auto or manual focus mode (a setting controllable with a switch on the lens’s barrel). This lets you use it for things like aperture, shutter speed, exposure compensation, Panasonic’s Crop Zoom feature and more when you don’t need it for focusing. There’s also a small, customizable function button.

It’s nice to see Panasonic continue to fill out its line of relatively affordable, small lenses for L-mount. While there are plenty of options available, it doesn’t hurt to have more options, especially ones this light and compact.

The Lumix S 20mm F2.5 will retail for $499, $100 more than the 40mm, and will start shipping in October.

Panasonic

Panasonic Lumix S 20mm F2.5

• Shop Now at B&H
• Shop Now at Panasonic
• Shop Now at Adorama

Panasonic Lumix S 20mm F2.5 specifications

Each year, Apple’s iPhone launch event devotes considerable time to its newest flagship iPhone Pro model, which features the company’s most advanced cameras. For photography and video enthusiasts who want Apple’s latest imaging technology, the iPhone Pro is the clear choice.

And every year, Apple tries to convince us that its cameras are better than ever, and that this is the year to upgrade to make your photos more magical than ever before.

Apple

But is it worth it? Most people upgrade their smartphones only every few years, and it can be hard to know when an upgrade will truly make a difference to your photos. We’re here to help sort the noise from the facts. In this photography-focused comparison, we’ll examine every iPhone Pro model from the last six years – back to 2020’s iPhone 12 Pro – to help you decide if an upgrade makes sense.

Before we dive into older models, let’s review what’s new with the iPhone 18 Pro.

Or, you can jump directly to a comparison between the iPhone 18 Pro series and your current model:

• iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max
• iPhone 16 Pro and Pro Max
• iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max
• iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max
• iPhone 13 Pro and Pro Max
• iPhone 12 Pro and Pro Max

iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max: What’s new

Apple

Like its predecessors, the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max have main, ultrawide and telephoto cameras. All three use 48MP sensors that Apple calls “Fusion” sensors, which are essentially a Quad Bayer design that combines binned and full-resolution pixel data. This year’s headline feature is something we’ve never seen on an iPhone before: a mechanical variable aperture on the main camera.

The aperture has four settings (F1.48, F1.8, F2.8 and F4), spanning just under three stops. That’s roughly F5 to F14 in full-frame terms, so background blur won’t change dramatically, but you do get real control over depth of field. At F1.48, the lens is also about half a stop brighter than the 17 Pro’s F1.78 lens, which accounts for most of Apple’s claimed low-light gain. The sensor is new, but it’s the same size.

For video, stopping down allows slower shutter speeds, getting you closer to a 180-degree shutter in shade or overcast light. In bright sun, though, you’ll still need about a four- to five-stop ND filter at F4 to shoot 24p at 1/50 sec.

Apple

Apple has also added Pro controls in the built-in Camera app, allowing you to manually set aperture, shutter speed and white balance, complete with a live histogram.

The rest of the camera hardware carries over from the 17 Pro, including the ultrawide, the 4x (100mm equiv.) telephoto and the 18MP Center Stage front camera. Software additions include Smart focus tracking, texture and grain controls in Photographic Styles, 4K/60p Cinematic mode, and the ability to apply cinematic effects to video after capture.

Finally, the 18 Pro introduces Apple Reference Image, an opt-in authenticity feature. In Reference mode, the sensor captures signed data that Apple’s Private Cloud Compute servers turn into an unalterable reference image. It appears alongside the main photo so you can check whether the photo has been edited. It’s Apple’s own alternative to the C2PA Content Credentials that Google has adopted.

The big picture

Before diving into individual comparisons, let’s look at how the iPhone Pro’s camera system has evolved. At a high level, this is what to look for:

• Sensor size and aperture: All other factors being equal, a larger sensor captures more light, resulting in higher-quality photos, especially in low light. A variable aperture (the 18 Pro models) provides additional control over how much light hits the sensor.
• Resolution: More megapixels mean higher-resolution images and the ability to maintain resolution with ‘virtual’ zoom lenses.
• Focal lengths: While the main and ultrawide cameras have been pretty consistent, telephoto cameras have had more varied configurations.
• Video features: Know which features you need – and which ones you don’t – when deciding whether to upgrade.

In the table below, green boxes represent significant upgrades from previous models.

Editor’s note: All focal lengths in this article are full-frame equivalents.

*All focal lengths are full-frame equivalents

Before the 18 Pro added a variable aperture, the main camera’s last notable upgrades came with the 13 Pro and 14 Pro, and it was largely unchanged from the 14 Pro through the 17 Pro.

The ultrawide camera was upgraded on the 13 Pro and 14 Pro, and again on the iPhone 16 Pro, which also gained a 48MP sensor.

The telephoto camera has seen more variability, with focal lengths between 52mm (2x) and 120mm (5x), with the most significant upgrade being the iPhone 17 Pro, which gained a 48MP sensor that’s substantially larger than in previous models.

Apple has continued to add video features with each generation. All models in the table can also capture ProRAW photos.

If you have an iPhone 17 Pro or Pro Max

Apple

For iPhone 17 Pro owners, the year-over-year upgrade hinges almost entirely on whether you want variable aperture control on the main camera.

The iPhone 17 Pro has the same 48MP ultrawide and telephoto cameras and the same 18MP Center Stage front camera. The 18 Pro’s main sensor is new, but it’s the same size, and we would expect image quality to be broadly the same at similar apertures.

The variable aperture on the main camera is the key difference. F1.48 is about half a stop brighter than the 17 Pro’s F1.78 lens, which could be important if you frequently shoot in low light. At the other end, stopping down to F4 provides more depth of field for close subjects and group shots, and will let you use slower shutter speeds for video in shade or overcast light.

The 18 Pro also adds built-in Pro controls to Apple’s Camera app, Smart focus tracking, texture and grain controls in Photographic Styles, and Apple Reference Image. For video, you can now apply cinematic effects after capture. If those features or the variable aperture don’t matter to you, it’s hard to recommend the upgrade, and third-party apps can already give the 17 Pro manual shutter speed and white balance control.

If you have an iPhone 16 Pro or Pro Max

Apple

For iPhone 16 Pro or Pro Max owners, the upgrade will not only net you the variable aperture main camera, but a much-improved telephoto camera as well.

The iPhone 16 Pro has a main camera similar to the 18 Pro’s (minus the variable aperture) and the same ultrawide camera.

However, there’s a big difference in telephoto cameras. The iPhone 18 Pro has a 48MP telephoto sensor that’s over 50% larger than the one in the 16 Pro. With the same F2.8 aperture, that works out to about 2/3 stop more light. The telephoto focal length has also changed, decreasing from 120mm (5x) on the 16 Pro to 100mm (4x) on the 18 Pro.

The 4x zoom on the 18 Pro may sound like a downgrade, but a common complaint on the iPhone 16 Pro was the large gap between its main and telephoto cameras. This forced mid-range zoom shots to rely heavily on computationally-enhanced crops from the main sensor. The 18 Pro’s 4x telephoto narrows that gap, allowing the phone to switch to the dedicated telephoto lens and its full sensor area sooner.

Additionally, the iPhone 16 Pro and all older models used Apple’s previous 4:3 front-facing selfie camera. The newer Center Stage camera could be a reason to upgrade if you take many selfies or shoot video on the move.

New video features include ProRes RAW and Genlock (aimed at advanced videographers), Apple Log 2, 4K/60p Cinematic mode and the ability to apply cinematic effects after shooting. Unless you specifically need them, these features alone don’t justify an upgrade.

If you have an iPhone 15 Pro or Pro Max

Apple

For iPhone 15 Pro or Pro Max users, the camera differences start to stack up more dramatically.

The main camera on the 15 Pro uses the same sensor size as the 18 Pro, but with a fixed F1.78 lens, so the 18 Pro gains about half a stop at F1.48, plus the flexibility of a variable aperture. Apple has also introduced faster-readout versions of this sensor since the 15 Pro, enabling “zero shutter lag” even when shooting Raw.

The telephoto cameras are more complicated. The iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max use different modules, with 77mm (3x) and 120mm (5x) lenses, respectively. This means upgrading to the 18 Pro’s 100mm (4x) telephoto could result in either more or less reach than you’re used to. In either case, the upgrade will get you the 18 Pro’s 48MP sensor, which is over 50% larger than the 15 Pro Max’s and almost double the size of the 15 Pro’s.

Image stabilization is another factor to consider. The iPhone 15 Pro Max’s telephoto module uses sensor-shift image stabilization. In contrast, the smaller iPhone 15 Pro’s telephoto uses Apple’s older, less effective optical image stabilization system. Sensor-shift stabilization didn’t come to the smaller iPhone Pro’s telephoto module until the iPhone 16 series, so iPhone 15 Pro users will experience improved telephoto stabilization after upgrading.

Dale Baskin

Ultrawide and macro photographers may be drawn to the iPhone 18 Pro’s 48MP ultrawide camera. Like Apple’s other 48MP sensors, it’s a Quad Bayer design, so the resolution gain isn’t as large as the numbers suggest. Still, it captures more detail and provides more latitude for cropping macro shots. The sensor size remains unchanged, however, so don’t expect low-light improvements.

The 18 Pro includes other features not on the 15 Pro, such as the Camera Control button and the latest generation of Photographic Styles, which lets you change the look after a photo is taken. Video upgrades include 4K/120p capture (up from 4K/60p) for more dramatic slow-motion, Apple Log 2, after-capture cinematic effects, and support for ProRes RAW and Genlock.

If you have an iPhone 14 Pro or Pro Max

Apple

The camera modules in the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max are broadly similar to those in the 15 Pro, except for the 15 Pro Max’s 5x telephoto. As a result, much of the same upgrade logic applies.

The iPhone 14 Pro was the first model with the 48MP, Type 1/1.28 main sensor format Apple still uses, though the 18 Pro will benefit from faster readout speeds. Additionally, the 14 Pro defaults to 12MP photos binned from its 48MP sensor, compared to the 24MP default on more recent models. (Full 48MP resolution is still available via a settings change, however.)

Upgrading to the 18 Pro will get you newer 48MP sensors on the ultrawide and telephoto modules. The telephoto sensor is also nearly twice the size of the 14 Pro’s, which, with the same F2.8 aperture, works out to almost a full stop more light.

Neither iPhone 14 Pro model includes sensor-shift image stabilization on the telephoto camera, relying instead on the older, less effective optical image stabilization system. Upgrading to the 18 Pro will provide superior sensor-shift stabilization on the telephoto camera, where it’s needed most.

Newer iPhones like the 18 Pro also feature lens coatings not found on the 14 Pro, which can reduce lens flare when shooting into bright light. (Though models with updated coatings still have the green flare balls that have almost become a calling card of iPhone photos.) Newer models can also capture 3D spatial images, a feature the iPhone 14 Pro lacks.

Dale Baskin

Video capabilities may be the most compelling reason to upgrade. The iPhone 14 Pro captures ProRes video, but not the ProRes Log format desired by videographers for its color grading flexibility. Furthermore, its ProRes recording tops out at 4K/30p (1080/30p on 128GB models), restricting slow-motion options.

The 14 Pro was also the last model with a Lightning connector. Newer models use the more universal USB-C, which offers data transfer speeds up to 10Gbit per second – 20 times faster than the Lightning port’s USB 2.0 speeds.

If you primarily use the main camera, upgrading to the 18 Pro may not return huge dividends, unless the variable aperture is important to you. However, for frequent users of the ultrawide and telephoto cameras, or for videographers who want Log video, the upgrade becomes a compelling, no-brainer decision.

If you have an iPhone 13 Pro or Pro Max

Apple

With iPhone models this old, the differences in technology become more stark, and for iPhone 13 Pro or Pro Max owners, upgrading to the 18 Pro will improve the camera experience in nearly every way.

The iPhone 13 Pro was the last generation to use a smaller 12MP main camera sensor before Apple switched to the 48MP sensor that became its standard. The 18 Pro’s sensor is 63% larger than the one in the 13 Pro, and with roughly equivalent maximum apertures (F1.48 vs F1.5), it can capture about 3/4 stop more light, giving it a big leg up in image quality. The 13 Pro also lacks the benefits of the 48MP sensor, which uses pixel binning for extra detail and enables the ‘2x’ virtual lens option found on newer models.

The situation is similar for the ultrawide camera. Its 12MP sensor is roughly half the size of the 18 Pro’s. While its F1.8 aperture is faster than the 18 Pro’s F2.2, the 13 Pro’s ultrawide is still about a third of a stop behind in overall light-gathering and lacks the benefits of the 48MP sensor.

The telephoto camera is where you’ll see the most dramatic difference. The iPhone 18 Pro’s telephoto sensor is nearly twice as large as the 13 Pro’s, and with the same F2.8 aperture, it captures almost a full stop more light. The 18 Pro also uses more effective sensor-shift stabilization on its telephoto module, compared to the older optical stabilization on the 13 Pro models.

As with the 14 Pro, video features could be a deciding factor, especially if you want ProRes Log for color grading latitude. With all three of the 13 Pro’s cameras still at 12MP, lower light-gathering capacity, and a shorter video feature list, this is an easy upgrade to recommend.

If you have an iPhone 12 Pro or Pro Max

Apple

Six years feels like an eternity in technology, and the cameras on the iPhone 12 Pro and Pro Max are showing their age.

The main camera sensor on the iPhone 18 Pro is almost three times larger than the one in the iPhone 12 Pro, and its lens is also slightly faster (F1.48 vs F1.6). Combined, that gives the 18 Pro’s main camera about a 1.8-stop light-gathering advantage, or roughly 3.5 times more light. That’s a dramatic difference, and will be noticeable in photos.

The iPhone 12 Pro Max stays a little closer to the 18 Pro, thanks to its slightly larger sensor, but it still falls 1.25 stops behind, meaning the 18 Pro gathers almost 2.4 times as much light. Not as much, but still a big difference.

Similarly, the 18 Pro’s ultrawide sensor is almost twice as large as the 12 Pro’s, which also has a slower F2.4 aperture. The net result is that the 18 Pro’s ultrawide captures about 1.2 stops more light.

The telephoto comparison is more nuanced. The 12 Pro models have smaller telephoto sensors, but their faster apertures let them roughly match the 18 Pro’s telephoto in total light-gathering. However, their 2x (52mm) and 2.5x (65mm) lenses offer far less reach than the 18 Pro’s 4x (100mm) telephoto.

The 18 Pro’s main camera can also stand in for the 12 Pro’s telephoto: a 2x (48mm) crop still delivers 12MP while capturing about 1.4 stops more light. Matching the 12 Pro Max’s 65mm lens requires a tighter crop that yields only about 6.5MP, though it still gathers nearly a stop more light.

Apple

Image stabilization is another key difference. The iPhone 12 Pro Max was the first to introduce sensor-shift stabilization on its main camera, but the smaller 12 Pro used older, less effective optical stabilization. Upgrading from the smaller 12 Pro will provide a noticeable improvement, as all Pro models since the 13 series have featured sensor-shift on their main cameras.

The 12 Pro models also show their age in video. While they capture Dolby Vision HDR and 4K/60p, they lack all the other video features Apple has introduced in the last six years.

If improving photo quality is your goal, this upgrade makes absolute sense. With 12MP sensors across the board, less light-gathering capability, an older imaging pipeline and far less telephoto reach, you’ll see an across-the-board improvement in image quality.

Conclusion

Apple’s slick presentations make it easy to feel like you need the newest iPhone cameras, and I give Apple credit for being very good at that. The reality, however, is that most annual updates are incremental. Major improvements are the exception, not the rule.

Also, when considering an upgrade, keep in mind that you may not need to buy Apple’s newest iPhone Pro, depending on the features you need or want. If an older model meets your requirements, you might save a chunk of change by buying a recent used phone, or even a refurbished model from Apple that’s newer than your current one and still offers the features you want.