Vue normale

Il y a de nouveaux articles disponibles, cliquez pour rafraîchir la page.
À partir d’avant-hierFlux principal

ConFoo Montreal 2025 : l’appel à conférences est ouvert

La conférence ConFoo est de retour pour sa 23ᵉ édition, du 26 au 28 février 2025 à l’Hôtel Bonaventure de Montréal ! Venez découvrir pourquoi ConFoo est devenu l’un des événements phares pour les développeurs et développeuses en Amérique du Nord et de partout à travers le monde.

Nous sommes présentement à la recherche de conférenciers et de conférencières avides de partager leur expertise et leur savoir dans une multitude de domaines des hautes technologies ; PHP, Ruby, Java, DotNet, JavaScript, Intelligence Artificielle, et plus encore !

Offertes en français ou en anglais, nos présentations sont généralement d’un format de 45 minutes, incluant un 10 minutes de questions des participants. Nos conférenciers et conférencières invitées profitent d’un traitement privilégié ; avec notamment la couverture de leurs frais de déplacement et d’hébergement, en plus de l’accès à l’expérience complète de l’événement (présentations, repas, etc.).

Vous avez jusqu’au 22 septembre prochain pour soumettre votre projet de présentations !

Si vous souhaitez simplement vous inscrire en tant que participant, profitez dès maintenant d’un rabais de 300$ en réservant votre inscription d'ici au 18 octobre !

Faites partie de l’aventure avec nous et découvrez comment l’intelligence humaine façonne le milieu des hautes technologies !

Commentaires : voir le flux Atom ouvrir dans le navigateur

Chemist Explains the Chemistry Behind Decaf Coffee

Par : BeauHD
26 juillet 2024 à 03:30
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Conversation, written by Michael W. Crowder, Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Dean of the Graduate School at Miami University: For many people, the aroma of freshly brewed coffee is the start of a great day. But caffeine can cause headaches and jitters in others. That's why many people reach for a decaffeinated cup instead. I'm a chemistry professor who has taught lectures on why chemicals dissolve in some liquids but not in others. The processes of decaffeination offer great real-life examples of these chemistry concepts. Even the best decaffeination method, however, does not remove all of the caffeine -- about 7 milligrams of caffeine usually remain in an 8-ounce cup. Producers decaffeinating their coffee want to remove the caffeine while retaining all -- or at least most -- of the other chemical aroma and flavor compounds. Decaffeination has a rich history, and now almost all coffee producers use one of three common methods. All these methods, which are also used to make decaffeinated tea, start with green, or unroasted, coffee beans that have been premoistened. Using roasted coffee beans would result in a coffee with a very different aroma and taste because the decaffeination steps would remove some flavor and odor compounds produced during roasting. Here's a summary of each method discussed by Dr. Crowder: The Carbon Dioxide Method: Developed in the early 1970s, the carbon dioxide method uses high-pressure CO2 to extract caffeine from moistened coffee beans, resulting in coffee that retains most of its flavor. The caffeine-laden CO2 is then filtered out using water or activated carbon, removing 96% to 98% of the caffeine with minimal CO2 residue. The Swiss Water Process: First used commercially in the early 1980s, the Swiss water method uses hot water and activated charcoal filters to decaffeinate coffee, preserving most of its natural flavor. This chemical-free approach removes 94% to 96% of the caffeine by soaking the beans repeatedly until the desired caffeine level is achieved. Solvent-Based Methods: Originating in the early 1900s, solvent-based methods use organic solvents like ethyl acetate and methylene chloride to extract caffeine from green coffee beans. These methods remove 96% to 97% of the caffeine through either direct soaking in solvent or indirect treatment of water containing caffeine, followed by steaming and roasting to ensure safety and flavor retention. "It's chemically impossible to dissolve out only the caffeine without also dissolving out other chemical compounds in the beans, so decaffeination inevitably removes some other compounds that contribute to the aroma and flavor of your cup of coffee," writes Dr. Crowder in closing. "But some techniques, like the Swiss water process and the indirect solvent method, have steps that may reintroduce some of these extracted compounds. These approaches probably can't return all the extra compounds back to the beans, but they may add some of the flavor compounds back."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Oracle's Java Pricing Brews Bitter Taste, Subscribers Spill Over To OpenJDK

Par : BeauHD
25 juillet 2024 à 23:20
Lindsay Clark reports via The Register: Only 14 percent of Oracle Java subscribers plan to stay on Big Red's runtime environment, according to a study following the introduction of an employee-based subscription model. At the same time, 36 percent of the 663 Java users questioned said they had already moved to the employee-based pricing model introduced in January 2023. Shortly after the new model was implemented, experts warned that it would create a significant price hike for users adopting it. By July, global tech research company Gartner was forecasting that those on the new subscription package would face between two and five times the costs compared with the previous usage-based model. As such, among the 86 percent of respondents using Oracle Java SE who are currently moving or plan to move all or some of their Java applications off Oracle environments, 53 percent said the Oracle environment was too expensive, according to the study carried out by independent market research firm Dimensional Research. Forty-seven percent said the reason for moving was a preference for open source, and 38 percent said it was because of uncertainty created by ongoing changes in pricing, licensing, and support. [...] To support OpenJDK applications in production, 46 percent chose a paid-for platform such as Belsoft Liberica, IBM Semeru, or Azul Platform Core; 45 percent chose a free supported platform such as Amazon Corretto or Microsoft Build of OpenJDK; and 37 percent chose a free, unsupported platform. Of the users who have already moved to OpenJDK, 25 percent said Oracle had been significantly more expensive, while 41 percent said Big Red's licensing had made it somewhat more expensive than the alternative. The survey found three-quarters of Java migrations were completed within a year, 23 percent within three months.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

❌
❌