Vue normale

Les 6 raisons pour lesquelles Wikipédia rejette l’écriture d’articles avec IA, sauf dans deux cas particuliers

27 mars 2026 à 14:43

L'encyclopédie en ligne Wikipédia n'ignore pas l'explosion des textes produits par les systèmes d'IA générative. Pour l'essentiel, leur usage pour écrire des articles est prohibé. Mais à la marge, il y a quelques exceptions tolérées.

Écrire sur Wikipédia avec l’IA, c’est non, sauf dans deux cas de figure très spécifiques

27 mars 2026 à 12:43

L'encyclopédie en ligne Wikipédia n'ignore pas l'explosion des textes produits par les systèmes d'IA générative. Pour l'essentiel, leur usage pour écrire des articles est prohibé. Mais à la marge, il y a quelques exceptions tolérées.

Should Banksy Remain Anonymous?

15 mars 2026 à 16:34
He's "the most famous anonymous man in the world," suggests Reuters. But investigating Banksy's artworks in a bombed Ukrainian village (and other clues in the U.K. and Manhattan) have led them to "a hand-written confession by the artist to a long-ago misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct — a document that revealed, beyond dispute, Banksy's true identity." But Banksy's long-time lawyer "urged us not to publish this report, saying doing so would violate the artist's privacy, interfere with his art and put him in danger" and "would harm the public, too." Working "anonymously or under a pseudonym serves vital societal interests," he wrote. "It protects freedom of expression by allowing creators to speak truth to power without fear of retaliation, censorship or persecution — particularly when addressing sensitive issues such as politics, religion or social justice." Reuters took into account Banksy's privacy claims — and the fact that many of his fans wish for him to remain anonymous. Yet we concluded that the public has a deep interest in understanding the identity and career of a figure with his profound and enduring influence on culture, the art industry and international political discourse... As for the risk he might face of retaliation or censorship, Britain's legal and political establishments seem comfortable with Banksy's messages and how he delivers them... His mastery of disguise began as a way of shaking the police, says former manager [Steve] Lazarides. In an interview, Lazarides said anonymity served a practical purpose in Bristol, where authorities enforced "draconian" policies against graffiti... Eventually, keeping the secret became a burden. By the end of their partnership, Lazarides estimates he spent half or more of his time managing and maintaining the artist's mystique. "I think it became a good gag, and then, if you want my honest, honest opinion, I think it then became a disease," he said. Lazarides wrote a two-volume book about managing Banksy from the late 1990s to 2008, including a story about Banksy's arrest in 2000 for this defacing of a billboard. Reuters geolocated that building, then found police documents and a court file including the hand-written confession. This investigation spawned a 7,000-word article with everything from a comic strip Banksy drew when he was 11 to his connections with Robert Del Naja of the trip hop band Massive Attack — and a 2017 podcast interview where a music producer apparently revealed Banksy's real first name. But the article also reveals how protective the art community is of Banksy's secret. Reuters investigated that Banksy auctioned in 2018 for $1.4 million — and then immediately started shredding itself with a device Banksy embedded in its frame: That piece, renamed "Love is in the Bin," sold three years later for about $25 million. Art dealer [Robert] Casterline was at the auction and remembers when the shredder began to beep. He pulled out his phone to take pictures. "Unfortunately, there was one person standing in front of me," blocking the view, he said. It was an eccentric-looking man with a broad neck scarf and thick eyewear. Oddly, the man wasn't watching the painting get shredded. He was looking in the other direction, observing the crowd's reaction. Only later, reviewing what he shot, did Casterline notice that the man's glasses appeared to have a small camera built into the bridge. (Banksy later posted a video of the stunt, including shots of the astonished audience.) Having seen a photo of the man suspected of being Banksy, Casterline confirmed to Reuters that he was "pretty sure" it was the same man. But "I don't want to be the guy who exposes Banksy."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Le jour où Wikipédia s’est « auto-piratée » et a causé la paralysie de l’encyclopédie pendant des heures

6 mars 2026 à 14:58

Wikipédia a clairement connu de meilleurs jeudis. Le 5 mars 2026, le projet encyclopédique a été soudainement figé en mode « lecture seule » pendant quelques heures. Derrière cette paralysie ne se cache pas un redoutable groupe de pirates informatiques, mais une équipe de Wikimédia réalisant un test de sécurité.

Le jour où Wikipédia s’est « auto-piratée » et a causé la paralysie de l’encyclopédie pendant des heures

6 mars 2026 à 12:31

Wikipédia a clairement connu de meilleurs jeudis. Le 5 mars 2026, le projet encyclopédique a été soudainement figé en mode « lecture seule » pendant quelques heures. Derrière cette paralysie ne se cache pas un redoutable groupe de pirates informatiques, mais une équipe de Wikimédia réalisant un test de sécurité.

Le jour où Wikipédia s’est « auto-piratée » et a causé la paralysie de l’encyclopédie pendant des heures

6 mars 2026 à 09:52

Wikipédia a clairement connu de meilleurs jeudis. Le 5 mars 2026, le projet encyclopédique a été soudainement figé en mode « lecture seule » pendant quelques heures. Derrière cette paralysie ne se cache pas un redoutable groupe de pirates informatiques, mais une équipe de Wikimédia réalisant un test de sécurité.

❌