How far we've come: can the latest mid-range cameras compete with recent pro-grade models?
|
Playing 'Top Trumps' with camera specs doesn't give the full picture, but it can still reveal something interesting. Composite image: Richard Butler |
It occurred to me, recently, that the latest enthusiast cameras can often shoot faster than the pro cameras of just a few years ago. So I decided to do some quick comparisons to get a sense of how far cameras have come, in a series of regards, since the last generation of pro-level sports cameras.
The biggest change, of course, is the move from DSLRs to mirrorless. The previous gen pro sports models from both Canon and Nikon were DSLRs, whereas Sony's launched its pro tier cameras in earnest with the mirrorless a9, back in 2017.
Speed
| Max frame rate (Mechnical / Electronic) | |
|---|---|
| Canon EOS-1D X Mark III (2020) | Canon EOS R6 Mark III (2025) |
| 16 fps / 20 fps | 12 fps / 40 fps |
| Nikon D6 (2020) | Nikon Z6 III (2024) |
| 14 fps / 10.5 fps | 14fps / 20 fps |
| Sony a9 II (2019) | Sony a7 V (2025) |
| 10 fps / 20 fps | 10 fps / 30 fps |
The most obvious spec comparison is shooting speed, as that's historically been the main area in which pro models stand out from more mainstream offerings.
The enthusiast models are all faster than the pro models in their e-shutter modes, but this does come with some rolling shutter distortion. It's worth highlighting that, despite its maximum shooting rate being lower, the Sony a9 II, with its Stacked CMOS sensor, still reads out faster than any of the newer cameras.
But in many of these instances, the enthusiast models are just as quick in their mechanical shutter modes as the previous generation sports camera was. The enthusiast models don’t always have such deep buffers as their pro forebears, but they increasingly have at least one CFexpress slot to help clear those buffers quickly.
Autofocus
Of course shooting speed means nothing if your images aren’t in focus, but the modern cameras will do remarkably well in this regard. The pro DSLRs had AF systems honed by decades of development, and could be adjusted to suit a wide range of sports and subjects.
| Subject recognition (Number of subjects recognized) | |
|---|---|
| Canon EOS-1D X Mark III | Canon EOS R6 Mark III |
| Eye detection (LV), Face / head (OVF) | 9 subjects + Auto |
| Nikon D6 | Nikon Z6 III |
| Face detection | 9 subjects + Auto |
| Sony a9 II | Sony a7 V |
| 2 subjects | 6 subjects + Auto |
However, we’d expect the enthusiast models to be competitive, as they all have AF systems that directly derive from their respective company’s most recent pro cameras. They also have subject recognition AF systems and much wider AF coverage that makes them much easier to get the best out of, for those of us who aren’t full-time professionals.
As a rough generalization, modern lenses perform better and the number of pin-sharp images delivered by mirrorless camera focus systems tends to be higher.
All three of the modern enthusiast models also offer some degree of pre-burst capture, again helping to boost the success rate of photographers who can't perfectly anticipate when the key moment is going to occur.
Viewfinders
The biggest difference we see is the move from optical viewfinders in the DSLRs to electronic viewfinders in the mirrorless cameras. Whether in terms of response time or just preference, there will be some photographers who simply prefer an optical finder, regardless of the spec of an EVF.
However, it's worth noting that each of the mirrorless cameras has a viewfinder that's at least as large as the largest optical viewfinder in play here. The 0.8x magnification, high brightness finder in the Nikon Z6 III is going to feel appreciably larger than the 0.76x finder in the EOS-1D Mark III, and even more spacious in comparison with the D6's 0.72x OVF.
Image stabilization
Another big difference is that the two most popular DSLRs didn't have in-body image stabilization, instead making use of in-lens stablization. This tends to be more effective for the long focal lengths used for sports, but less effective than in-body stabilization for the wide-to-normal focal lengths used in a lot of photojournalism and general photography.
| Image stabilization (Max correction posisble, per tesing using the CIPA standard) |
|
|---|---|
| Canon EOS-1D X Mark III | Canon EOS R6 Mark III |
| In-lens only | Up to 8.0EV |
| Nikon D6 | Nikon Z6 III |
| In-lens only | Up to 8.5EV |
| Sony a9 II | Sony a7 V |
| Up to 5.5EV | Up to 7.5EV |
As well as the shift to in-body stabilization, Canon, Nikon and Sony have subsequently developed systems that can combine the effect of in-body and in-lens stabilization to boost the overall amount of correction that's possible and to play to the strengths of both systems.
Video
| Max frame rate (Mechnical / Electronic) | |
|---|---|
| Canon EOS-1D X Mark III | Canon EOS R6 Mark III |
|
|
| Nikon D6 | Nikon Z6 III |
|
|
| Sony a9 II | Sony a7 V |
|
|
Unsurprisingly, perhaps, video is an area in which the modern cameras show the greatest advantage, not just in the resolutions and frame rates listed here, but in terms of the support tools and capabilities. It’s increasingly common to have false colour displays or waveforms to aid with exposure, as well as 10-bit Log or Raw capabilities, that still weren’t commonplace, just one generation of pro camera ago.
Battery life
One difference not captured here is battery life. We haven’t quoted the CIPA figures, as they aren’t especially comparable between DSLRs and mirrorless cameras, but the pro DSLRs will have vastly better endurance, as much from not having to power a screen to show a preview as from their significantly larger batteries. The Sonys are the outliers, in that the a9 II and a7 V use the same battery, and the newer camera is rated as giving more shots per charge.
The 'pro' differences
There are differences beyond specs and capabilities, though. In all three instances, the pro models have a level of build quality and environmental sealing that are essential for high-priced tools that need to keep working, day in, day out, regardless of the rigors of the job. All three also have features such as Ethernet connections that are essential for some professional applications but irrelevant for the majority of enthusiasts.
| Weight (with battery & card) | |
|---|---|
| Canon EOS-1D X Mark III | Canon EOS R6 Mark III |
| 1440g | 699g |
| Nikon D6 | Nikon Z6 III |
| 1450g | 760g |
| Sony a9 II | Sony a7 V |
| 678g | 695g |
Price
Even with the high levels of inflation over the past few years, the enthusiast models are significantly less expensive than the pro models were. Even without taking inflation into account, the professional DSLRs here cost at least twice as much as the latest enthusiast cameras. Factor inflation in and the new cameras come in at as little as 1/3rd the original list prices of the pro models.
| MSRP at launch (Money terms / Real terms) |
|
|---|---|
| Canon EOS-1D X Mark III | Canon EOS R6 Mark III |
| $6500 / $8170* | $2800 |
| Nikon D6 | Nikon Z6 III |
| $6500 / $7890* | $2500 |
| Sony a9 II | Sony a7 V |
| $4500 / $5670* | $2900 |
*Price adjusted using the consumer price index inflation figures, adjusted to the launch date of the newer camera
And, while we’re not saying enthusiast cameras are in every way a match for the pro cameras of the last generation, it’s striking at how close they are. And at how far we’ve come, during a period where you could easily make the mistake of thinking things haven't particularly changed.