Vue normale

Reçu — 4 avril 2026 Actualités numériques

America's CIA Recruited Iran's Nuclear Scientists - By Threatening To Kill Them

4 avril 2026 à 22:34
A former U.S. spy spoke to The New Yorker about "years of clandestine work for the C.I.A. — which, he said, had 'prevented Iran from getting a nuke'." [Kevin] Chalker told me that, as he understood it, the Pentagon had suggested running commando operations to kill key Iranian scientists, as Israel subsequently did. But the C.I.A. proposed recruiting those scientists to defect, as U.S. spies had once courted Soviet physicists. Chalker paraphrased the agency's pitch: "We can debrief them and learn so much more — and, if they say no, then you can kill them." (A more senior agency official confirmed the broad strokes of his account.) The White House liked the agency's idea, and [president George W.] Bush authorized the C.I.A. to conduct clandestine operations to stop Iran from building a bomb. The C.I.A. program that Chalker described to me became publicly known in 2007, when the Los Angeles Times reported on the existence of an agency project called Brain Drain. But the details of the "invitations" to Iranian scientists have not previously been reported... Chalker typically had about ten minutes to explain, as gently as possible, that he was from the C.I.A., that he had the power to secure the scientist and his family a comfortable new life in the U.S. — and that, if the offer was rejected, the scientist, regrettably, would be assassinated. (Chalker tried to emphasize the happier potential outcome.) Killing a civilian scientist would violate international law. The American government has denied ever doing it, and I found no evidence that the U.S. has carried out any such murders. A former senior agency official familiar with the Brain Drain project told me all that mattered was that Iranian scientists had believed they would be killed, regardless of whether the U.S. actually made good on the threat. And Israel had been conducting a campaign to assassinate Iranian scientists, which made the prospect of lethal reprisal highly plausible. Other former officials with knowledge of the project told me that the C.I.A. sometimes shared intelligence with Mossad which enabled its operatives to locate and kill a scientist. Such information exchanges were kept vague enough to preserve deniability if a more legalistic U.S. Administration later took office... [Chalker] is confident that those who rebuffed him were, in fact, killed — one way or another... One of Chalker's colleagues told me that, against the backdrop of so many Israeli assassinations, Chalker's interactions with Iranian scientists could almost be considered humanitarian — he had been "throwing them a lifeline." Of the many scientists he approached, three-quarters ultimately agreed to coöperate. Their 10,000-word article suggests Chalker may now be resentful the CIA didn't help him in a later unrelated lawsuit, noting it's "nearly unheard of for ex-spies to divulge their past activities." But Chalker also says he "helped obtain pivotal information that laid the groundwork for more than a decade of American efforts to disrupt the Iranian nuclear-weapons program, from the Stuxnet cyberattacks, which occurred around 2010 [destroying 1,000 uranium-enriching centrifuges], to the Obama Administration's nuclear deal, in 2015, to the U.S. air strikes on Iranian atomic-energy facilities in the summer of 2025."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Before Webcomics: Selling Political Cartoons On BBSes In 1992

4 avril 2026 à 21:34
Slashdot reader Kirkman14 writes: A year before the Web opened to the public, Texas entrepreneur Don Lokke was trying to syndicate weekly political cartoons to bulletin board systems. His "telecomics," as he called them, represent an overlooked early experiment in online comics. Lokke launched his main series, "Mack the Mouse" at the height of the 1992 Clinton-Bush-Perot presidential race. His mouse protagonist voiced the frustrations felt by everyday Americans about rising taxes and the recession. Lokke gave away "Mack" for free, but sold subscriptions to his other telecomics, betting sysops would pay for exclusive content. The timing wasn't crazy: enthusiasm for BBSes as an industry was surging, with conferences like ONE BBSCON promoting "BBSing for profit." But the Web soon deflated those hopes, and Lokke left BBSes behind in 1995. Decades later, about half of his nearly 300 telecomics were recovered and preserved on 16colors.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Are Employers Using Your Data To Figure Out the Lowest Salary You'll Accept?

4 avril 2026 à 20:34
MarketWatch looks at "surveillance wages," pay rates "based not on an employee's performance or seniority, but on formulas that use their personal data, often collected without employees' knowledge." According to Nina DiSalvo, policy director at labor advocacy group Towards Justice, some systems use signals associated with financial vulnerability — including data on whether a prospective employee has taken out a payday loan or has a high credit-card balance — to infer the lowest pay a candidate might accept. Companies can also scrape candidates' public personal social-media pages, she said... A first-of-its-kind audit of 500 labor-management artificial-intelligence companies by Veena Dubal, a law professor at University of California, Irvine, and Wilneida Negrón, a tech strategist, found that employers in the healthcare, customer service, logistics and retail industries are customers of vendors whose tools are designed to enable this practice. Published by the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, a progressive economic think tank, the August 2025 report... does not claim that all employers using these systems engage in algorithmic wage surveillance. Instead, it warns that the growing use of algorithmic tools to analyze workers' personal data can enable pay practices that prioritize cost-cutting over transparency or fairness... Surveillance wages don't stop at the hiring stage — they follow workers onto the job, too. The vendors that provide such services also offer tools that are built to set bonus or incentive compensation, according to the report. These tools track their productivity, customer interactions and real-time behavior — including, in some cases, audio and video surveillance on the job. Nearly 70% of companies with more than 500 employees were already using employee-monitoring systems in 2022, such as software that monitors computer activity, according to a survey from the International Data Corporation. "The data that they have about you may allow an algorithmic decision system to make assumptions about how much, how big of an incentive, they need to give to a particular worker to generate the behavioral response they seek," DiSalvo said. The article notes that Colorado introduced the "Prohibit Surveillance Data to Set Prices and Wages Act" to ban companies from setting pay rates with algorithms that use payday-loan history, location data or Google search behavior for algorithmically set. Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader sinij for sharing the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Anthropic Announces Claude Subscribers Must Now Pay Extra to Use OpenClaw

4 avril 2026 à 19:34
Anthropic's making a big and sudden change — and connecting its Claude AI to third-party agentic tools "is about to get a lot more expensive," writes the Verge: Beginning April 4th at 3PM ET, users will "no longer be able to use your Claude subscription limits for third-party harnesses including OpenClaw," according to an email sent to users on Friday evening. Instead, if users want to use OpenClaw with Claude, they'll have to use a "pay-as-you-go option" that will be billed separate from their Claude subscription. Anthropic's announcement added these extra usage bundles are "now available at a discount." Users can also try Anthropic's API, notes VentureBeat, "which charges for every token of usage rather than allowing for open-ended usage up to certain limits, as the Pro and Max plans have allowed so far. " The technical reality, according to Anthropic, is that its first-party tools like Claude Code, its AI vibe coding harness, and Claude Cowork, its business app interfacing and control tool, are built to maximize "prompt cache hit rates" — reusing previously processed text to save on compute. Third-party harnesses like OpenClaw often bypass these efficiencies... [Claude Code creator Boris Cherny explained on X that "I did put up a few PRs to improve prompt cache hit rate for OpenClaw in particular, which should help for folks using it with Claude via API/overages."] Growth marketer Aakash Gupta observed on X that the "all-you-can-eat buffet just closed," noting that a single OpenClaw agent running for one day could burn $1,000 to $5,000 in API costs. "Anthropic was eating that difference on every user who routed through a third-party harness," Gupta wrote. "That's the pace of a company watching its margin evaporate in real time." However, Peter Steinberger, the creator of OpenClaw who was recently hired by OpenAI, took a more skeptical view of the "capacity" argument."Funny how timings match up," Steinberger posted on X. "First they copy some popular features into their closed harness, then they lock out open source." Indeed, Anthropic recently added some of the same capabilities that helped OpenClaw catch-on — such as the ability to message agents through external services like Discord and Telegram — to Claude Code... User @ashen_one, founder of Telaga Charity, voiced a concern likely shared by other small-scale builders: "If I switch both [OpenClaw instances] to an API key or the extra usage you're recommending here, it's going to be far too expensive to make it worth using. I'll probably have to switch over to a different model at this point." "I know it sucks," Cherny replied. "Fundamentally engineering is about tradeoffs, and one of the things we do to serve a lot of customers is optimize the way subscriptions work to serve as many people as possible with the best mode..." OpenAI appears to be positioning itself as a more "harness-friendly" alternative, potentially using this moment as a customer acquisition channel for disgruntled Claude power users. By restricting subscription limits to their own "closed harness," Anthropic is asserting control over the UI/UX layer. This allows them to collect telemetry and manage rate limits more granularly, but it risks alienating the power-user community that built the "agentic" ecosystem in the first place. Anthropic's decision is a cold calculation of margins versus growth. As Cherny noted, "Capacity is a resource we manage thoughtfully." In the 2026 AI landscape, the era of subsidized, unlimited compute for third-party automation is over. For the average user on Claude.ai, the experience remains unchanged; for the power users running autonomous offices, the bell has tolled.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Debian Is Figuring Out How Age Verification Laws Will Impact It

4 avril 2026 à 19:05
With age verification/attestation laws down to the OS level enacted by California and being decided upon by other US states, it's been a hot topic of discussion in the open-source world. For the Debian project that is strictly volunteer/community-driven unlike various commercial Linux platforms, they are figuring out how such laws will impact them...

No, AMD Is Not Buying Intel

4 avril 2026 à 18:34
"The April 1st timing should have been your first clue," writes Gadget Review. TechSpot's false story was just an April Fool's prank — although Gadget Review thinks it's still funny how "something about this particular piece of satire felt uncomfortably plausible." Maybe it's because AMD stock sits around $196 while Intel hovers near $41, or perhaps it's the poetic justice of the underdog finally eating the giant. The semiconductor world has witnessed stranger reversals, but none quite this dramatic. Your gaming rig's CPU battle represents decades of corporate warfare, legal grudges, and technological leapfrogging that makes Game of Thrones look like a friendly board game. Picture this: In 1975, AMD reverse-engineered Intel's 8080 processor, creating the Am9080 clone. The audacity was breathtaking — AMD spent 50 cents per chip to manufacture something they sold for $700. That's a 1,400% markup on borrowed technology, making today's GPU prices look reasonable. This relationship evolved from copying to partnership to bitter rivalry. The companies signed second-sourcing deals in the late 1970s, with AMD becoming Intel's official backup supplier. Then came the lawsuits. AMD sued Intel for antitrust violations in 2005, eventually settling for $1.25 billion in 2009. That settlement money helped fund the Ryzen revolution that's currently eating Intel's lunch. The historical irony runs deeper than your typical tech rivalry. AMD literally started as Intel's shadow, creating chips by studying Intel's designs under microscopes. Today, Intel engineers probably study AMD's Zen architecture the same way... This April Fool's joke works because it captures something true about power shifts in technology. The site TipRanks notes that both companies saw their stock price rise Wednesday, though that might not be related to the false article. "Positive analyst coverage from Wells Fargo could be acting as a catalyst for AMD stock today. Intel also announced plans to buy back its 49% equity interest in a joint venture with Apollo Global Management APO."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Windows Server 2025 vs Ubuntu Server 24/04 LTS : qui est le meilleur en NVMe ?

Depuis décembre 2025, Microsoft met à disposition des utilisateurs de Windows Server 2025 des pilotes NVMe natifs, plus performants que les pilotes traditionnels. L'équipe de StorageReview a publié début mars 2026 un test opposant les performances de l'OS de Microsoft avec l'ancien et le nouveau pil...

Amazon Must Negotiate With First Warehouse Workers Union, US Labor Board Rules

4 avril 2026 à 17:34
Amazon "must negotiate with a labor union representing some 5,000 workers at a company warehouse on Staten Island," reports Reuters, citing a ruling Wednesday from America's National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The union formed in 2022, according to the article, and "has been seeking to negotiate with Amazon over pay, working conditions and other matters." The NLRB said in its ruling that Amazon "has engaged in unfair labor practices" by refusing to bargain with the labor group or to recognize its legitimacy... Amazon said on Thursday it disagreed with the NLRB's ruling. "Representatives of the NLRB improperly influenced this election," the company said in a statement, suggesting it planned to appeal. "We're confident an unbiased court will overturn the original certification, and we look forward to the opportunity for our team to fairly voice their opinions." An appeal would likely preclude Amazon from having to comply with the NLRB's order while it makes its way through the courts... Related to the Staten Island case, Amazon has argued that the NLRB itself is unconstitutional and sued to block the agency from ruling on it. The matter is still pending. After forming independently, that union "has since aligned with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters," the article points out. The Teamsters represent 1.3 million American workers, according to a statement they issued this week, which also includes this quote from the president of Amazon Labor Union-e Local 1. "We are making history at Amazon, and we are doing it through undiluted worker power..." Their statement adds that the ruling "came only one day after the union announced another historic victory that upheld Amazon Teamsters' right to strike."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

The Document Foundation Removes Dozens of Collabora Developers

4 avril 2026 à 16:34
Long-time GNOME/OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice contributor Michael Meeks is now general manager of Collabora Productivity. And earlier this month he complained when LibreOffice decided to bring back its LibreOffice Online project, as reported by Neowin, which had been inactive since 2022. After the original project went dormant — to which Collabora was a major contributor — they forked the code and created their own product, Collabora Online. But this week Meeks blogged about even more changes, writing that the Document Foundation (the nonprofit behind LibreOffice) "has decided to eject from membership all Collabora staff and partners. That includes over thirty people who have contributed faithfully to LibreOffice for many years." Meeks argues the ejections were "based on unproven legal concerns and guilt by association." This includes seven of the top ten core committers of all time (excluding release engineers) currently working for Collabora Productivity. The move is the culmination of TDF losing a large number of founders from membership over the last few years with: Thorsten Behrens, Jan 'Kendy' Holesovsky, Rene Engelhard, Caolan McNamara, Michael Meeks, Cor Nouws and Italo Vignoli no longer members. Of the remaining active founders, three of the last four are paid TDF staff (of whom none are programming on the core code). The blog It's FOSS calls it "LibreOffice Drama." They've confirmed the removals happened, also noting recently adopted Community Bylaws requiring members to step down if they're affiliated with a company in an active legal dispute with the Foundation. But The Documentation Foundation "also makes clear that a membership revocation is not a ban from contributing, with the project remaining open to anyone, and expects Collabora to keep contributing 'when the time comes.'" Collabora's Meeks adds in his blog post that there's "bold and ongoing plans to create an entirely new, cut-down, differentiated Collabora Office for users that is smoother, more user friendly, and less feature dense than our Classic product (which will continue to be supported for years for our partners). This gives a chance to innovate faster in a separate place on a smaller, more focused code-base with fewer build configurations, much less legacy, no Java, no database, web-based toolkit and more. We are excited to get executing on that. To make this process easier, and to put to bed complaints about having our distro branches in TDF gerrit [for code review], and to move to self-hosted FOSS tooling we are launching our own gerrit to host our existing branch of core... We will continue to make contributions to LibreOffice where that makes sense (if we are welcome to), but it clearly no longer makes much sense to continue investing heavily in building what remains of TDF's community and product for them — while being excluded from its governance. In this regard, we seem to be back where we were fifteen years ago.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Envie d'en savoir plus sur le Neural Rendering ? NVIDIA expose sa vision du sujet dans cette vidéo de 38 minutes

Certains d'entre vous sont sans doute déjà quasi incollables au sujet du Neural Rendering, mais, si ce n'est pas (encore ?) votre cas, voici une vidéo qui pourrait peut-être vous intéresser. NVIDIA l'intitule lui-même "Introduction au Neural Rendering", tout un programme, donc ! Elle a été publiée s...

Ecran IIYAMA Black Hawk G-Master 27″ IPS FHD à 89.99€ ?

4 avril 2026 à 14:37

Black Hawk

Proposé à 89.99€ sur Amazon, cet écran Black Hawk habituellement vendu 129.99€ est parfait pour un poste de travail classique comme pour devenir un écran secondaire. Avec 27″ de diagonale, un affichage 1920 x 1080 pixels, un rafraîchissement 144 Hz et une réactivité de 1 ms, il conviendra aussi bien au jeu qu’au travail et au multimédia. Il est monté sur un pied ergonomique avec réglage en hauteur et pivot portrait/paysage, un support VESA 100×100, des entrées HDMI et DisplayPort, un hub USB 2.0 double, un port casque jack audio 3.5 mm et même des enceintes stéréo. Sa couverture colorimétrique à 100% de la zone sRGB lui offrira également des possibilités d’usage créatif.

Voir l’offre sur Amazon

Ecran IIYAMA Black Hawk G-Master 27″ IPS FHD à 89.99€ 🍮 © MiniMachines.net. 2026

Un bench CPU-Z déjà très musclé pour le Ryzen 9 9950X3D2

4 avril 2026 à 13:45

Un de nos lecteur, Gamester, en fouinant un peu sur le web, est tombé sur un score CPU-Z particulièrement violent pour le tout nouveau Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition d'AMD. Le résultat provient d'une validation accessible en ligne et met en avant des performances très élevées en multi-thread, avec un test réalisé sur 16 threads. Le score affiché grimpe à 16832 points, ce qui représente tout simplement une hausse d'environ +54 % face à certains modèles actuels dans des conditions comparables. Clairement, sur le papier, ça commence à devenir très sérieux. Bien sûr, comme toujours avec ce type de bench isolé, il faut rester prudent. Les conditions exactes du test, les fréquences appliquées, la mémoire utilisée ou encore la gestion du boost peuvent fortement influencer le résultat. Mais malgré ces réserves, la tendance semble claire : le nouveau processeur d'AMD pourrait bien frapper très fort, notamment sur les charges lourdes exploitant efficacement plusieurs threads et le cache de niveau L3. Un processeur officialisé récemment par AMD Pour rappel, AMD vient tout juste d'officialiser son Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition, un modèle qui traînait dans les rumeurs depuis un moment. L'annonce a été faite via une vidéo publiée par la marque, confirmant enfin l'existence de cette puce attendue. Le processeur est prévu pour le Q2 2026, mais toutes les spécifications détaillées ne sont pas encore officiellement listées dans une fiche produit complète. […]

Lire la suite

'Cognitive Surrender' Leads AI Users To Abandon Logical Thinking, Research Finds

Par : BeauHD
4 avril 2026 à 14:00
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: When it comes to large language model-powered tools, there are generally two broad categories of users. On one side are those who treat AI as a powerful but sometimes faulty service that needs careful human oversight and review to detect reasoning or factual flaws in responses. On the other side are those who routinely outsource their critical thinking to what they see as an all-knowing machine. Recent research goes a long way to forming a new psychological framework for that second group, which regularly engages in "cognitive surrender" to AI's seemingly authoritative answers. That research also provides some experimental examination of when and why people are willing to outsource their critical thinking to AI, and how factors like time pressure and external incentives can affect that decision. Overall, across 1,372 participants and over 9,500 individual trials, the researchers found subjects were willing to accept faulty AI reasoning a whopping 73.2 percent of the time, while only overruling it 19.7 percent of the time. The researchers say this "demonstrate[s] that people readily incorporate AI-generated outputs into their decision-making processes, often with minimal friction or skepticism." In general, "fluent, confident outputs [are treated] as epistemically authoritative, lowering the threshold for scrutiny and attenuating the meta-cognitive signals that would ordinarily route a response to deliberation," they write. These kinds of effects weren't uniform across all test subjects, though. Those who scored highly on separate measures of so-called fluid IQ were less likely to rely on the AI for help and were more likely to overrule a faulty AI when it was consulted. Those predisposed to see AI as authoritative in a survey, on the other hand, were much more likely to be led astray by faulty AI-provided answers. Despite the results, though, the researchers point out that "cognitive surrender is not inherently irrational." While relying on an LLM that's wrong half the time (as in these experiments) has obvious downsides, a "statistically superior system" could plausibly give better-than-human results in domains such as "probabilistic settings, risk assessment, or extensive data," the researchers suggest. "As reliance increases, performance tracks AI quality," the researchers write, "rising when accurate and falling when faulty, illustrating the promises of superintelligence and exposing a structural vulnerability of cognitive surrender." In other words, letting an AI do your reasoning means your reasoning is only ever going to be as good as that AI system. As always, let the prompter beware.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Les prix des cartes graphiques semaine 14-2026 : des ajustements ciblés, NVIDIA baisse légèrement, AMD contrasté

4 avril 2026 à 13:32

Cette semaine, entre le 27/03/2026 et le 03/04/2026, les prix des cartes graphiques évoluent assez peu dans l'ensemble. La majorité des références restent stables, mais nous notons tout de même quelques ajustements intéressants, principalement chez AMD et NVIDIA. Les cartes d'entrée de gamme ne bougent quasiment pas, tandis que le milieu et le haut de gamme enregistrent quelques variations. AMD : des hausses sur plusieurs références Chez AMD, la RX 7600 reste stable à 269,90 U+20AC, tout comme la RX 7600 XT à 529,90 U+20AC. En revanche, la RX 9060 XT 16 Go passe de 399,90 U+20AC à 429,90 U+20AC, soit une hausse notable. La RX 7700 XT reste stable à 429,90 U+20AC, mais la RX 7800 XT grimpe de 729,90 U+20AC à 749,90 U+20AC. La RX 7900 XT et la RX 7900 XTX ne bougent pas, respectivement à 699,90 U+20AC et 899,90 U+20AC. […]

Lire la suite

Trois nouvelles vidéos hardware cette semaine avec 2 écrans et un watercooling plein d'écrans

4 avril 2026 à 13:18

Cette semaine, nous vous proposons un nouveau récap de nos vidéos avec trois produits qui n'ont absolument pas le même objectif, mais qui ont tous un vrai truc à raconter. Thermaltake MineCube 360 : le watercooling qui ne passe pas inaperçu On commence avec le très original Thermaltake MineCube 360, un kit watercooling AIO qui mise avant tout sur son design. Ici, le bloc CPU prend la forme d'un cube équipé d'écrans sur plusieurs faces, permettant d'afficher des informations système, des animations ou encore des éléments personnalisés. Le radiateur 360 mm est accompagné de trois ventilateurs ARGB, tandis que l'ensemble mise sur une intégration visuelle très poussée. Clairement, ce modèle s'adresse à ceux qui veulent une configuration qui sorte du lot, avec une vraie identité visuelle. ASUS ProArt PA27USD : la création en mode premium Deuxième vidéo de la semaine, changement complet d'ambiance avec le ASUS ProArt PA27USD, un écran clairement taillé pour les créateurs exigeants. Ce modèle embarque une dalle QD-OLED de 26.5 pouces en 3840 x 2160, avec un contraste annoncé à 1 500 000:1 et un taux de rafraîchissement qui grimpe jusqu'à 240 Hz. Sur le papier, c'est tout simplement une vitrine technologique, avec une approche qui mélange précision d'affichage, définition 4K et grande fluidité. Un écran qui ne vise pas uniquement les joueurs, mais aussi tous ceux qui veulent travailler l'image avec une base très haut de gamme. […]

Lire la suite

Ubuntu 26.04 LTS : la configuration "requise" dévoilée, et elle demande 50 % de plus de RAM !

Canonical a récemment publié les Release Notes d'Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. L'occasion d'en apprendre davantage sur cette distribution Linux, qui sortira officiellement le 23 avril 2026. On y découvre notamment la configuration requise, rédigée sous la forme d'une simple phrase pour la version "Desktop" : U...

#Flock : Ils sont parmi nous

Par : Flock
4 avril 2026 à 11:37
I don’t want to live on this planet anymore
#Flock : Ils sont parmi nous

En mars, le nom de domaine aliens.gov est enregistré par l’administration américaine. JD Vance dit vouloir se pencher sur la question. La lune est de nouveau pointée du doigt. Je ne dis pas qu’il y a un alignement des planètes, mais je pense qu’on ne nous dit pas tout : pas besoin ceci dit, puisque ça crève les yeux…

Ma rubrique se fera enlever par des aliens la semaine prochaine, mais elle devrait voyager paranormalement jusqu’à la suivante. Gros doigt lumineux bienveillant sur vous, à très vite !


Il reste 75% de l'article à découvrir.
Vous devez être abonné•e pour lire la suite de cet article.
Déjà abonné•e ? Générez une clé RSS dans votre profil.

AWS Engineer Reports PostgreSQL Performance Halved By Linux 7.0, But A Fix May Not Be Easy

4 avril 2026 à 11:36
An Amazon/AWS engineer raised the alarms on Friday over the current Linux 7.0 development kernel leading to the throughput for the PostgreSQL database server being around half that of prior kernel versions. The culprit halving the PostgreSQL performance is known but a revert looks like it may not happen and currently suggesting that PostgreSQL may need to be adapted...
❌